Workflow
皮革加工
icon
Search documents
美国对印度输美产品开征50%关税,印度多个行业遭严重冲击
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-27 09:52
Group 1 - The United States has officially imposed a 50% tariff on products imported from India, severely impacting industries such as leather and diamond processing [1][3] - Many American clients have begun canceling orders, leading to factory shutdowns in Kanpur, a major leather processing center in India, which heavily relies on the U.S. market [3][9] - The diamond processing industry is also affected, with the U.S. accounting for one-third of India's annual gem and jewelry exports, amounting to approximately $9 billion [5][7] Group 2 - Over 80% of raw diamonds are cut and polished in Surat, Gujarat, India, and the new tariffs exacerbate an already sluggish diamond export business, prompting factories to reduce raw diamond purchases and cut inventory [7][9] - The Indian Export Organization has indicated that the higher tariffs will put about 55% of products exported to the U.S. at a "price disadvantage," particularly affecting labor-intensive sectors like leather, chemicals, and handicrafts, leading to significant job losses [9]
50%关税,正式生效!印度部分工厂“停工”
证券时报· 2025-08-27 07:47
Core Viewpoint - The United States has officially imposed a 50% tariff on products imported from India, significantly impacting industries such as leather and diamond processing, leading to order cancellations and operational difficulties for many factories [1][3][11]. Group 1: Impact on Leather Industry - Kanpur, a major leather processing center in India, has seen numerous American clients cancel orders, resulting in factory shutdowns and a shift towards local sales or exports to other countries [3][5]. - Exporters in Kanpur report that all orders with American clients have been rendered void, with one exporter stating that a client has halted supply until the tariff issue is resolved [5]. Group 2: Impact on Diamond Industry - The diamond processing sector is also severely affected, with the U.S. accounting for one-third of India's annual gem and jewelry exports, approximately $9 billion [7]. - The new tariff policy exacerbates an already sluggish diamond export business, prompting some factories to reduce raw diamond purchases, cut inventory, and lower working hours to maintain cash flow [9]. Group 3: Broader Economic Implications - The Federation of Indian Export Organizations has indicated that the increased tariffs will put about 55% of goods exported to the U.S. at a "price disadvantage," particularly affecting labor-intensive sectors like leather, chemicals, and handicrafts, leading to significant job losses [11].
印度炸锅了!特朗普对中国签下总统令,莫迪两头碰壁,里外不是人
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-21 08:34
Group 1 - Trump signed a document extending the tariff suspension on China for 90 days, originally set to expire on August 12 [1] - The extension is seen as a strategic move to ease tensions with China while simultaneously applying pressure on India by imposing tariffs of up to 50% on Indian goods [3][5] - The tariffs affect approximately 55% of India's exports to the U.S., targeting key industries such as jewelry, pharmaceuticals, and leather [5][13] Group 2 - India's economy faces significant challenges due to the tariffs, with the jewelry sector at risk of losing 700,000 jobs and pharmaceutical costs rising by 50% [13] - The U.S. tariffs disrupt India's profitable model of purchasing and refining Russian oil, which has helped maintain economic stability [7] - India's response includes a strategy of negotiation to seek policy adjustments and potential increases in LNG and defense purchases from the U.S. [11] Group 3 - The tariffs have broader implications for U.S.-India relations, with a notable decline in visa approval rates for Indian students and restrictions on Bollywood stars [15] - India has retaliated by increasing tariffs on bourbon whiskey to 150% and halting defense procurement negotiations, indicating a willingness to push back against U.S. pressure [17] - The current geopolitical landscape is shifting towards a multipolar balance, with India seeking to strengthen ties with China and Russia as a counterbalance to U.S. influence [19]