Workflow
不锈钢钢坯及热轧板/卷
icon
Search documents
2国交锋升级,白兰地和钢铁全中招!欧盟诬陷援俄,中方果断还击
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-06 01:29
Group 1 - The recent tensions in China-EU relations are primarily due to issues surrounding rare earths and trade policies, highlighting a discrepancy between the EU's proclaimed "strategic autonomy" and its actions [1][3] - China has imposed anti-dumping duties of 27.7% to 34.9% on imported brandy from the EU for five years, signaling a response to the EU's stance on tariffs and accusations regarding China's support for Russia [3][5] - The EU's previous statements about the impracticality of decoupling from China contrast sharply with its current criticisms of China's export controls, indicating a shift in strategy influenced by its relationship with the US [3][6] Group 2 - German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock criticized China's export controls on key materials, claiming they harm Sino-German trade relations and China's image as a reliable partner [5][6] - China's position emphasizes a commitment to peace and non-provision of lethal weapons, countering accusations of military support to Russia, which reflects a strategic concern about potential shifts in US focus post-conflict [6][7] - The EU's aggressive stance towards China may backfire, as evidenced by China's previous imposition of anti-dumping duties on EU steel products, suggesting that continued provocations could undermine the EU's strategic interests [7]
稀土没等到,5年加税先来了!欧盟双标玩脱如意算盘彻底落空了
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-03 23:58
Group 1 - China's response to the EU's pressure has been to impose a five-year anti-dumping tax on imports of stainless steel billets and hot-rolled sheets/rolls from the EU, UK, South Korea, and Indonesia, effective July 1 [2] - This action effectively blocks these countries' steel companies from capturing the Chinese market with low-priced products, signaling that China is the dominant player in China-EU trade [2] - Historical context shows that previous attempts by the Trump administration to pressure China on rare earth controls led to a shift in strategy towards dialogue and compromise, highlighting the effectiveness of China's strong countermeasures in the rare earth sector [2] Group 2 - The EU's recent actions regarding rare earths reflect a mix of arrogance and dependency, as they have attempted to pressure China while simultaneously relying on its resources [3] - EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen accused China of "weaponizing" rare earths and creating a global shortage, which appears to be an unfounded attempt to apply pressure through public opinion [5] - The EU's envoy to China expressed anxiety over the rare earth issue, indicating a stark contrast to their previous hardline stance, revealing their vulnerability in this matter [5] Group 3 - The EU's dual approach of criticizing China while seeking its rare earth resources demonstrates a lack of awareness regarding their own dependency [7] - The EU's previous actions, such as dumping stainless steel billets below cost in the Chinese market, violate fair competition principles and have provoked China's countermeasures [7] - To secure rare earth resources from China, the EU must adopt a more sincere and conciliatory approach rather than maintaining a stance of arrogance and pressure [7]
欧盟又狮子大开口,要中方一个月内,解决稀土问题,却先收到加税通知
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-02 16:23
Core Viewpoint - The ongoing trade tensions between China and the EU are highlighted by China's recent decision to impose anti-dumping duties on imports of stainless steel products from the EU, UK, South Korea, and Indonesia, reflecting the complex interdependence and friction in their trade relationship [1][5][8] Group 1: Trade Relations and Policies - The EU is facing a crisis regarding rare earth magnets, with a significant drop in exports from China, which has heightened the urgency for a resolution to the supply chain issues affecting the automotive and high-tech industries [3][6] - China's announcement of continued anti-dumping duties for five years is a response to perceived damage to its domestic industry and reflects a broader pattern of trade friction that has existed between China and the EU, particularly in the steel sector [5][6] - The EU's recent imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles contrasts with the growth of China's trade surplus with the EU, which increased by nearly 23% to $117 billion in the first five months of the year, indicating a complex and contradictory trade dynamic [5][6] Group 2: Economic Impact and Strategic Responses - The EU's reliance on Chinese rare earth materials is underscored by the comments from EU officials, who express concerns about the severe impact of supply shortages on European businesses [3][6] - The EU's attempts to pressure China into resolving the rare earth supply issue are met with China's firm stance against unilateral protectionist measures, suggesting a cycle of pressure and countermeasures that complicates the trade relationship [6][8] - Upcoming high-level dialogues between EU leaders and Chinese officials are seen as a potential turning point for easing trade tensions, but the effectiveness of these discussions will depend on mutual respect for international trade rules and a shift from confrontational to cooperative approaches [8]
只给中国30天,欧盟要求解决稀土问题,却收到了商务部的加税通知
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-02 03:57
Group 1 - European companies are facing a "very, very serious" shortage of rare earth magnets, prompting the EU ambassador to call for urgent resolution from China [1] - The shortage stems from China's export controls on key minerals, including rare earth magnets, implemented in response to U.S. tariffs [1] - China's rare earth magnet exports have significantly declined, disrupting global automotive and high-tech supply chains, with European firms expressing the most concern [1] Group 2 - The EU's contradictory stance towards China is evident, as it attempts to engage in trade while simultaneously portraying China as a common threat with the U.S. [2] - In 2024, the EU plans to impose tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, highlighting the ongoing tensions despite the need for cooperation [2] - The EU's actions, such as excluding Chinese products from public procurement, reflect a protectionist approach that undermines economic dialogue [5] Group 3 - The trade dynamics reveal a significant trade surplus for China with the EU, which increased by nearly 23% in the first five months of the year, reaching a record $117 billion [7] - The EU's current predicament is a result of its strategic double standards, seeking concessions from China while maintaining pressure [7] - A genuine "fair competition environment" requires mutual respect and equal rules, rather than unilateral demands from the EU [7]