此外，造纸标委会还通过持续优化和完善标准体系，推动国际国内标准协同发展，国际标准化工作取得 了显著突破，增强了国际影响力和话语权。作为国际标准化组织纸、纸板和纸浆技术委员会（ISO/TC 6）及其分技术委员会（ISO/TC 6/SC 2），以及国际标准化组织女性卫生用品技术委员会（ISO/TC 338）的国内技术对口单位，造纸标委会积极参与国际标准制定，主导制修订了多项具有国际影响力的 标准。其中，由我国主导制修订的《纸、纸板和纸浆 试样温湿处理和试验的标准大气及控制程序》 （ISO 187:2022）、《纸、纸板和纸浆 纤维分析 第1部分：通用方法》（ISO 9184—1:2023）等国际标 准的相继发布实施，为中国造纸企业、中国设备、中国标准走向世界、参与国际竞争提供了有力的技术 支撑。 展望未来，造纸标委会表示，将继续秉承创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享的新发展理念，持续完善标准 体系，强化标准实施与监督，提升国际标准化水平；不断发挥行业内的领导作用，助推中国造纸行业在 保障消费品质量安全、推动绿色评价及国际标准化等方面取得更加辉煌的成就，为其可持续发展作出更 大贡献。 记者了解到，造纸标委会下设7个分技术 ...

Core Points - The U.S. has significantly reduced tariffs on small packages from China, dropping from 120% to 30%, which is expected to ease trade tensions between the two countries and provide relief for Chinese e-commerce platforms like Temu and Shein [1][9] - Following recent high-level trade talks, both nations agreed to lower tariffs by 115% within 90 days, marking a potential thaw in the ongoing trade standoff [1][9] - The number of small packages entering the U.S. has surged from approximately 140 million a decade ago to over 1 billion last year, with the value of Chinese exports to the U.S. projected to rise from $5.3 billion in 2018 to $66 billion in 2023 [4][9] Tariff Changes - The new tariff structure includes a 54% tax on small packages, while maintaining a $100 de minimis threshold for duty-free items, and reversing plans to increase this threshold to $200 [1][4] - Despite the reduction, experts indicate that a 54% tariff remains high, causing delays in package deliveries and impacting consumer purchasing behavior [1][4] Consumer Impact - U.S. consumers have increasingly turned to Temu and Shein for affordable products, but recent price hikes on these platforms, including a 377% increase on kitchen paper towels, have made these goods less accessible [5][6][9] - Approximately 48% of small packages are sent to the poorest regions in the U.S., indicating a reliance on affordable imports among lower-income consumers [8] Political Context - The trade war initiated by the Trump administration has disrupted decades of international trade norms, leading to concerns about a potential recession in the U.S. economy [9] - Young Americans, who have become accustomed to affordable fast fashion and online shopping, are expressing frustration over the impact of tariffs on their purchasing power [9][10]

Group 1 - The trade war initiated by the Trump administration has resulted in significant economic repercussions for young Americans, who are now facing increased living costs and reduced consumer choices due to tariffs [3][4] - Data indicates that the poorest American households spend three times more of their income on clothing compared to wealthier families, highlighting the disproportionate impact of tariffs on low-income groups [3] - A notable shift in public opinion has occurred, with disapproval of Trump among the 18 to 29 age group rising by 14 percentage points within four months, reflecting the adverse effects of trade policies on this demographic [3][5] Group 2 - China has responded to U.S. tariffs with strategic measures, including rare earth export controls and expanding free trade agreements, demonstrating its commitment to maintaining economic stability and countering protectionism [4][6] - Chinese e-commerce platforms like Temu and Shein are effectively meeting global consumer demands, showcasing the resilience and competitiveness of China's digital economy in the face of geopolitical tensions [4][5] - The global economic contribution of China remains significant, with over 30% of global growth attributed to the country in 2023, emphasizing its role in promoting an open world economy [5][6] Group 3 - The backlash from young Americans against trade policies reflects a broader discontent with the manipulation of globalization benefits for political gain, indicating a potential shift in consumer behavior and political support [6] - The ongoing challenges in the global economy, such as climate change and technological advancements, necessitate international cooperation, particularly between major economies like the U.S. and China [6] - The narrative suggests that closing off markets will not yield future benefits, reinforcing the idea that collaboration and mutual benefit are essential for navigating economic uncertainties [6]