12月26日开盘后，过去两个交易日接连大涨的多只LOF产品集体跌停。 12月24日至12月25日，有色LOF、国投瑞盛LOF、有色金属LOF、资源LOF等累计涨幅都在19%以上，昨日溢价率均超7%，今日开盘后直接跌停。 昨日已经跌停的国泰商品LOF、国投瑞盈LOF今日继续跌停，两只LOF的溢价率已从12月24日的30%左右降至10%以下。 今日开市后停牌一小时的国投白银LOF、国投瑞泰LOF、国投新丝路LOF、国投资源LOF、中信保诚双盈LOF在10:30复牌后直接跌停。其中，国投白银LOF 的溢价率已从高点60%以上回落至30%以内。 | ( W | 全部 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 全部 | 上证基金 | | 深证艺 | | 名称 | | 现价 | 涨 | | 国泰商品LOF | | 0.707 | -7 | | 160216.SZ | | | | | 国投资源LOF | | 2.282 | 7 | | 161217.SZ | | | | | 中信保诚双盈LOF | | 1.212 | T | | 165517.SZ | | | | | 有色LOF | | 3.00 ...

红星资本局12月24日消息，A股全天走强，三大指数集体上扬。不过，今天市场最大亮点是LOF（上市型开放式基金）出现了涨停潮。 市场人士分析，这是由国投白银LOF高溢价涨停，基民的"狂欢"套利带来的资金溢出效应。 白银LOF实现三连板 有人晒套利教程，称"500元很快就能赚350" 红星资本局注意到，加上今日，国投白银LOF已连续斩获三次涨停，实现三连板。拉长时间来看，该基金在短短21个交易日内便实现了超100%的涨幅。 截至目前，该基金溢价率已飙升至68.16%。 | | LOF | | O | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 名称代码 | 最新 ◆ | 涨幅 ◆ | 涨跌 = ▶ | | 国投资源LOF | | 2.305 +10.02% | 0.210 | | 161217 | | | | | 嘉实黄金LOF | 2.427 | +10.02% | 0.221 | | 160719 T+0 | | | | | 港股小盘LOF | | 1.241 +10.02% | 0.113 | | 161124 T+0 | | | | | 黄金主题LOF | 2.054 | +10.02% | ...

经济观察网近期，国际黄金、白银价格接连创下新高。12月24日，场内多只商品LOF产品涨停，包括黄 金主题LOF、嘉实黄金LOF、黄金LOF、有色LOF、有色金属LOF、国投白银LOF等诸多产品。此外， 国投瑞银基金旗下的国投资源LOF、国投瑞泰LOF、国投瑞盈LOF、国投新丝路LOF等多只LOF产品也 集体涨停。国投瑞银基金12月24日发布公告称，国投白银LOF的场内申购进一步限额，该基金A份额的 申购限额仍为500元，C份额的申购限额由500元降至100元。 ...

格隆汇12月24日｜近期，国际黄金、白银价格接连创下新高。今日，场内多只商品LOF产品涨停，包括 黄金主题LOF、嘉实黄金LOF、黄金LOF、有色LOF、有色金属LOF、国投白银LOF等诸多产品。此 外，国投瑞银基金旗下的国投资源LOF、国投瑞泰LOF、国投瑞盈LOF、国投新丝路LOF等多只LOF产 品也集体涨停。 （责任编辑：宋政 HN002） 国投瑞银基金12月24日发布公告称，国投白银LOF的场内申购进一步限额，该基金A份额的申购限额仍 为500元，C份额的申购限额由500元降至100元。 【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点，与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立，不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考，并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱： news_center@staff.hexun.com ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the gold-silver ratio, which reflects the relative price relationship between gold and silver, indicating whether silver is undervalued or overvalued. A higher ratio suggests silver is cheaper relative to gold, while a lower ratio indicates the opposite [3][7]. - Historical data shows that the gold-silver ratio reached a peak of 104 in April 2025, but has since declined to 94.14 as of June 20, 2025, with gold priced at $3384.4 per ounce and silver at $35.95 per ounce [3][8]. - The article notes that the gold-silver ratio typically fluctuates within a range, with 80-100 being a top and around 40 being a bottom. The current ratio of 94.14 is above the historical average of approximately 58, suggesting potential for silver price recovery [7][8]. Group 2 - The demand for silver is increasing due to its industrial applications, such as in photovoltaics and electronics, while supply growth is limited, creating a supply-demand gap that supports silver prices [9]. - The article highlights that silver is known for its high volatility, with a volatility rate 1.5 times that of gold [10]. - The recovery of the gold-silver ratio is influenced by multiple factors, including macroeconomic conditions, geopolitical events, and changes in Federal Reserve policies [11]. Group 3 - Some analysts express skepticism about the recovery of the gold-silver ratio, suggesting it may continue to rise due to the significant increase in silver production compared to gold since 1994, with silver production up by 79.9% and gold by only 43.5% [13]. - The article mentions that when the market shifts focus from gold to silver, it often indicates that prices have already reflected speculative themes, prompting investors to reassess reasonable pricing [13]. Group 4 - Currently, there is only one commodity fund investing in silver, the Guotai Silver LOF (161226), which tracks the performance of the Shanghai Futures Exchange silver futures [14]. - The fund has underperformed significantly since its inception, which is noted as a drawback for potential investors [14][19]. Group 5 - The article compares the performance of resource-related funds over the past five years, highlighting several funds that have performed relatively well, including Qianhai Kaiyuan Hong Kong-Shenzhen Core Resource Mixed A and Jiashi Resource Selection Stock A [20][23]. - The performance of the Shanghai Natural Resources Index and the CSI Upstream Resource Industry Index is discussed, with both indices showing similar performance trends over the past decade [25][27]. Group 6 - The article provides valuation metrics for the Shanghai Resource Index and the CSI Upstream Resource Index, noting their respective P/E ratios of 11.74 and 12.09, as well as P/B ratios of 1.39 and 1.41 [32][33]. - The dividend yield for the Shanghai Resource Index is reported at 4.80%, indicating a relatively attractive yield compared to the CSI Upstream Index's 4.63% [34].