宙斯盾作战系统
Search documents
特朗普:不给乌克兰钱了
第一财经· 2025-11-11 15:48
2025.11. 11 本文字数:778,阅读时长大约2分钟 据参考消息援引俄罗斯卫星社11日报道,美国总统特朗普 在白宫告诉记者: "我们不再向乌克兰付 钱,现在他们通过北约向我们付钱。" 特朗普今年8月在记者会上表态。图源:央视新闻 他当时还强调, 在乌克兰安全保障问题上,美国仅扮演辅助的角色,主导责任应由欧洲国家承担。 由于大量财政收入用于国防支出,乌克兰在社会和人道主义等方面的支出严重依赖外部援助,欧盟目 前是乌克兰最大财政支持方。 今年5月,乌克兰财政部长谢尔盖·马尔琴科公开说,乌克兰在未来30年内不打算向西方伙伴偿还债 务。他指出,这些债务的金额已接近乌一年的国内生产总值(GDP)。 近期,由于政府停摆,美国已暂停向北约盟国交付武器。据环球网援引美国Axios新闻网9日的报 道,价值超50亿美元、用于支持北约盟国和乌克兰的美国武器出口已被推迟。被冻结交付的武器包 括先进中程空空导弹、宙斯盾作战系统和海马斯多管火箭炮系统。 来源:长安街知事 报道称,特朗普在谈及乌克兰冲突时说:"如果当时我是总统,这场战争永远不会发生。如果不是我 当总统,这场战争可能会引发第三次世界大战,(但是)这不会发生。" 他还 ...
晨枫:欧洲好像醒了,又想要装睡
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-06-26 01:14
Core Points - The article discusses the shift in U.S. foreign policy under President Trump, indicating a long-term move away from Atlanticism and European alliances towards a focus on the Asia-Pacific region [1][2] - It highlights the challenges Europe faces in re-establishing its own defense capabilities amid a perceived abandonment by the U.S. and the need for increased military spending [4][7] - The article emphasizes the fragmentation of European military capabilities and the reliance on U.S. military technology, which complicates Europe's efforts to independently rearm [12][13] Group 1: U.S. Policy Shift - The U.S. is moving away from Europe, prioritizing the Asia-Pacific region and sacrificing Atlanticism as a result of strategic contraction [1][2] - This shift is not merely a temporary phenomenon tied to Trump's presidency but reflects a long-term trend that will persist regardless of which party is in power [1] Group 2: European Defense Challenges - Europe is attempting to bolster its own defense capabilities, with NATO countries aiming to increase defense spending from 2% to 3% of GDP and enhance military equipment by 30% over the next 5-10 years [7][10] - The European Union has proposed an €800 billion "rearmament plan," with €650 billion coming from member states and €150 billion from a new EU fund [10] Group 3: Military Capability Fragmentation - European NATO countries have a total military strength of around 1.5 million personnel, but much of this is non-combat support, leading to concerns about actual combat readiness [4][6] - The reliance on U.S. military equipment is increasing, with European NATO countries' arms imports rising by 105% from five years ago, 64% of which come from the U.S. [6][12] - European military industries are struggling to meet the demand for advanced military technology, particularly in areas like combat aircraft and naval systems, which are heavily reliant on U.S. technology [12][13]