Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the results of a recent driving assistance system test conducted by Dongche Di, highlighting the performance of various popular models, particularly Tesla's, while raising concerns about consumer perceptions and safety standards in the autonomous driving industry [3][4][5]. Summary by Sections Test Results and Methodology - The test involved 36 models equipped with driving assistance systems, with Tesla's Model 3 and Model X achieving an 83.3% success rate in high-speed scenarios, outperforming other brands [3][4]. - The testing scenarios were based on data from three years of national traffic accident statistics, ensuring realistic conditions [3][7]. - The test included high-risk situations such as sudden obstacles and blind spots, with vehicles required to react within 1.5 seconds at speeds of 100 km/h [7]. Industry Reactions and Concerns - While Tesla's performance was highlighted, industry analysts cautioned that a single test cannot define overall safety and effectiveness [4][5]. - The increase in complaints related to driving assistance accidents, which reached 327 in 2024 (up 47% from 2023), indicates a growing consumer misunderstanding of these technologies [5]. - The article emphasizes that many automakers use "safety redundancy" as a marketing tool, potentially misleading consumers about the actual safety of these systems [5]. Testing Standards and Future Directions - The need for standardized testing in the industry is underscored, as current tests often lack comparability and transparency [8][9]. - Critics argue that the extreme scenarios used in testing do not accurately reflect real-world conditions, which could mislead consumers [8][9]. - The article notes that the China Automotive Industry Association is working on establishing a standardized testing scenario library, expected to be released by 2025 [8]. Safety and Redundancy Issues - The article discusses the "safety redundancy paradox," where the presence of multiple sensors may create a false sense of security among users, leading to dangerous behaviors such as distracted driving [10]. - It highlights that 47% of drivers become distracted when using driving assistance features, with 87% of accidents involving these systems attributed to driver inattention [10]. Regulatory Developments - There is a growing consensus on the need for quantifiable safety redundancy standards, with the EU and China moving towards regulations that require manufacturers to disclose specific performance metrics under various conditions [16][17]. - The article suggests that the focus of competition in the industry will shift from hardware quantity to the effectiveness of safety measures, emphasizing the importance of algorithm optimization over mere sensor count [19].

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of a new national standard by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology in China will phase out the "one-pedal driving" mode, which was previously seen as a hallmark of electric vehicle (EV) intelligence, marking a significant milestone in EV braking safety [2][4][19]. Group 1: New Regulations and Industry Impact - The new regulation will take effect on January 1, 2027, with a two-year grace period for car manufacturers [4]. - The regulation aims to ensure that vehicles do not come to a complete stop solely through the release of the accelerator pedal, addressing safety concerns associated with the one-pedal mode [3][19]. - The introduction of this standard has sparked intense discussions within the industry regarding the safety and practicality of the one-pedal mode [5]. Group 2: Safety Concerns and User Experience - Critics argue that many users have not fully experienced the benefits of the one-pedal mode, leading to a lack of understanding and adaptation [6]. - Research indicates that 32% of drivers have mistakenly pressed the accelerator instead of the brake in emergencies, with 15% resulting in accidents [13]. - A study from Tsinghua University shows that drivers accustomed to the one-pedal mode may experience a 0.3-second delay in emergency braking, equating to an additional stopping distance of 8.3 meters at 100 km/h [14]. Group 3: Historical Context and Technological Evolution - The one-pedal driving concept originated with the first-generation BMW i3 and gained popularity through Tesla's aggressive promotion [8][10]. - Tesla's implementation of the one-pedal mode aimed to maximize energy recovery, reportedly increasing urban range by 15%-20%, equivalent to an additional 80 kilometers for the Model 3 [11]. - The decline of the one-pedal mode reflects a broader trend in the automotive industry, moving away from minimalist designs towards a renewed focus on user control and safety [25][26]. Group 4: Design Trends and Future Directions - The shift away from the one-pedal mode is part of a larger reconsideration of minimalist design principles in the automotive sector, as evidenced by the resurgence of physical buttons and controls [33][35]. - The European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) has introduced new regulations requiring physical controls for safety functions to achieve high safety ratings, further influencing design trends [34]. - The automotive industry is now seeking a balance between innovative design and essential safety features, moving towards a more user-centric approach [44][45].

Core Viewpoint - Geely's Galaxy Starship 7 EM-i has successfully passed the industry's first simultaneous puncture test of the power battery and fuel tank, achieving a significant safety milestone for plug-in hybrid vehicles [1][2]. Group 1: Test Results and Safety Verification - The test demonstrated that under extreme destructive conditions, the battery pack of the Galaxy Starship 7 EM-i did not catch fire or explode, indicating a controllable thermal runaway risk and high safety [2]. - The battery safety system, known as the "Shen Dun" battery safety system, has surpassed national standards, alleviating user concerns regarding the safety of the battery and fuel systems in plug-in hybrid vehicles [2]. Group 2: Design and Structural Innovations - The Galaxy Starship 7 EM-i is built on Geely's GEA architecture, emphasizing the principle of "safety as the top priority" and achieving "physical separation" between the fuel and electric systems [3]. - The vehicle features a unique "6 horizontal and 4 vertical insurance compartment" design, providing 360-degree protection against collisions and effectively dispersing impact forces [3][4]. Group 3: Comprehensive Safety Standards - Geely aims for comprehensive "safety redundancy," requiring the battery to undergo 36 extreme safety tests, exceeding the new national standards by 12 tests, with 23 tests surpassing the new national requirements [6]. - The company has pioneered the establishment of the first group standard for bottom protection of new energy vehicles in China, addressing the critical issue of battery damage from bottom collisions [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of safety in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle (EV) market, highlighting that consumer focus is shifting from technical specifications to safety concerns as incidents of vehicle malfunctions and accidents increase [2][21]. Group 1: Safety Redundancy Concept - Safety redundancy is defined as the practice of duplicating critical components or functions to enhance system reliability and prevent potential risks [6]. - The article illustrates safety redundancy through everyday examples, such as carrying cash alongside mobile payment methods, emphasizing its necessity in automotive safety [6]. Group 2: Implementation in bZ5 Model - The bZ5 model from FAW Toyota incorporates multiple safety redundancies, including dual circuit boards, dual motors, and decoupled designs for braking redundancy, as well as dual chip and power supply systems for parking redundancy [8][10]. - The vehicle also features a five-layer battery protection system to ensure battery safety during collisions and prevent fire hazards [10]. Group 3: Industry Standards and Future Directions - As of 2025, consumer safety concerns are leading to an upgrade in industry technical standards, with new national regulations requiring electric vehicle batteries to pass additional safety tests [21]. - FAW Toyota's commitment to safety redundancy aligns with national goals for high-quality development in the EV sector, showcasing its leadership in the industry [19][21]. Group 4: Long-term Corporate Philosophy - FAW Toyota's long-standing philosophy of safety redundancy reflects its dedication to long-term corporate responsibility and societal value, aiming to provide a safer driving experience for consumers [18][19]. - The company has maintained a strong reputation for quality and reliability, evidenced by its extensive experience in electric vehicle development and a record of zero accidents among its electric vehicle users [19][21].

Core Insights - The Hongqi brand showcased multiple models at the 2025 Shanghai Auto Show, focusing on new energy and intelligent technology, including the H5 PHEV, the new 9 series flagship model, the first new energy off-road vehicle, and the flying car "Tianxian No. 1" [1] - In 2024, Hongqi's annual sales reached 400,000 units, marking a milestone in the brand's history, with a target of 500,000 units for 2025, aiming for new energy vehicle sales to double to 250,000 units, representing 50% of total sales [3] - Safety is a core focus for Hongqi, with new models featuring military-grade materials and advanced safety technologies, including L3-level intelligent driving and a fully controlled chassis [7] - The brand emphasizes a "human-machine co-driving" philosophy, ensuring that technology does not mislead consumers, and aims to maintain this approach even as it enters the industry's top tier [8] - Hongqi announced the launch of the "Hongqi Off-Road Ecosystem Co-Creation Plan" and the "Hongqi Off-Road Vehicle Naming Collection Plan," alongside the upcoming first flight of the flying car "Tianxian No. 1" [11] - The brand's commitment to safety and quality is evident, with statements highlighting that safety is the highest luxury, and the company aims to set industry standards rather than merely meet them [13]

小米SU7事件后，多数车企在智能辅助驾驶方面的宣传更为理性了。"之前物料宣传上有智驾二字， 车展前都改了。"一家自主车企品牌负责人对第一财经记者表示，公司内部对智能辅助驾驶的营销策 略进行了调整，现阶段更侧重用户实际体验优化，而非技术参数的激进宣传。 4月16日，工信部召开智能网联汽车产品准入及软件在线升级管理工作推进会，针对智能驾驶（智 驾）领域的宣传、功能使用和技术部署等问题提出一系列规范性要求。"组合辅助驾驶"正式成为官方 表述，智驾等相关字眼不再被提及。 2025.04. 24 本文字数：2120，阅读时长大约3分钟 作者 | 第一财经 武子晔 4月的上海车展，空气中依然弥漫着汽车工业变革的焦灼感。但与此前行业押注"智能辅助驾驶军备 竞赛"的喧嚣不同，"安全冗余"、渐进式路线等成为车企宣传的高频词。 新能源汽车下半场，智能化是竞争的焦点，智能辅助驾驶相关技术依然是本届车展上车企重点展现的 技术力量。智能汽车时代，华为和小米等新兴势力快速成长，成为汽车行业的焦点。而当华为在展馆 内以活跃的姿态铺开合作版图时，小米的低调则折射出行业对辅助驾驶技术激进路线的集体反思。 小米沉默，华为扩容 华为在本届车展上的 ...