Group 1 - The article highlights the unexpected strong responses from China and India against the U.S. tariff strategy aimed at pressuring them to stop importing Russian oil, indicating a shift in international order dynamics [1][2][4] - China's firm stance, articulated by its foreign ministry, emphasizes that "there are no winners in a tariff war," while India initially paused its oil purchases but later reaffirmed its commitment to Russian energy cooperation [2][4] - The strategic decisions of China and India reflect their economic interests, particularly the cost advantages from discounted Russian oil and the establishment of direct currency settlement systems, undermining Western sanctions [2][4][7] Group 2 - The article discusses the broader implications of the U.S. tariff strategy, which has proven ineffective, as Russia's oil revenues have increased despite sanctions, and its military capabilities remain robust [4][6] - The planned maritime operations by the UK and NATO against Russian oil tankers represent a significant escalation, potentially disrupting international shipping norms and reflecting desperation in Western strategies [4][6] - The actions of China and India are reshaping the development rules for Global South countries, showcasing their strategic autonomy in the face of U.S. hegemony and leading to a potential shift towards de-dollarization in global energy trade [6][7][8] Group 3 - The article suggests that the next three months will be critical in determining the outcome of this global energy conflict, with uncertainties surrounding NATO's maritime plans and the security of Russian oil shipments [8] - The potential for a new type of warfare, extending beyond traditional military confrontations to include energy supply chains and financial systems, is emphasized as a defining characteristic of 21st-century conflicts [8]

Core Viewpoint - The situation in the Middle East is escalating, with military actions and threats between Iran and Israel, supported by the U.S. military presence in the region [1][2][10]. Group 1: Military Actions - The U.S. military, including the "Patriot" and "THAAD" missile defense systems, is actively involved in Israel's defense against Iranian missile attacks [1][4]. - Iran's Revolutionary Guard has claimed to have hit over 150 Israeli targets in a retaliatory operation named "Real Commitment 3" [6]. - Reports indicate that Iran plans to increase the number of missiles used in future attacks on Israel by "20 times" [6]. Group 2: U.S. Involvement - U.S. officials confirmed that American naval forces assisted Israel in intercepting Iranian ballistic missiles [3][4]. - President Trump warned Iran that the next wave of U.S. strikes would be "more brutal" if a nuclear agreement is not reached [2][10]. - The U.S. has been coordinating with allies in the region, notifying them prior to Israeli strikes on Iran [14]. Group 3: Casualties and Damage - The Iranian missile attacks have resulted in at least 3 deaths and over 100 injuries in Israel [7]. - Israeli military actions have reportedly killed high-ranking Iranian military officials [12].

相比去年美方在伊朗两次报复性袭击中出动空中和海上力量协助拦截导弹的广泛介入，此次行 动的规模明显较小。 （来源：央视新闻） 当地时间6月13日，总台记者获悉，匿名美国国防官员发布消息称，由美军人员操作、最早在 拜登政府时期部署的"爱国者"和"萨德"导弹防御系统，参与了以色列的防空行动。 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the historical transition of power from gold to oil, emphasizing the establishment of the petrodollar system as a means to maintain U.S. dollar hegemony [1][2][11] - The strategic value of oil, which constitutes 31.2% of global energy consumption, is highlighted as a key factor in the U.S. dollar's role as a pricing anchor [2][3] - The 1974 U.S.-Saudi agreement is described as a pivotal moment that solidified the dollar's status in global oil transactions, with 80% of oil trade being dollar-denominated by 1975 [11][14] Group 2 - The article outlines the military and financial power dynamics involved in the U.S.-Saudi negotiations, where military support was exchanged for oil pricing rights [3][4] - The impact of the oil crisis on the global economy is noted, with oil prices soaring by 400% and Western GDPs declining by 6% within three months [2][3] - The emergence of financial instruments like oil futures in the 1980s is discussed as a means for the U.S. to exert influence over global economic cycles [3][14] Group 3 - The article addresses the challenges to the petrodollar system, including attempts by countries like Iraq and Libya to shift away from dollar-denominated oil transactions, which were met with military intervention [4][12] - The rise of alternative payment systems and digital currencies is noted as a potential threat to the dollar's dominance, with the dollar's share in global reserves dropping below 58% [7][12] - The shift towards multi-currency settlements by countries like Saudi Arabia signifies a growing skepticism towards U.S. military protection and dollar reliance [8][12]