菜豆

Search documents
毕节城的叫卖声(我与一座城)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-04 21:56
在黔西北的毕节城,无论是踱步于湿漉漉的青石板路,抑或倚靠沧桑百年的古城墙,无论是细雨迷蒙之 际还是灯影阑珊之时,总会听见一些独具特色的叫卖声。久居此地的人,对于这刻入骨子里的"乡音"耳 熟能详,开口便能模仿一二。 提及毕节城的叫卖声,"酸汤苞(嗷)饭——菜豆腐饭——"为人所熟知。毕节人称"苞谷"为"苞",尾音 自带丝滑的"嗷"音。"麻辣卤豆腐卤鸡蛋……卤魔芋豆腐……卤虾丸……"这叫卖声毕节人也常听 见。"卤豆腐卤鸡蛋"一气呵成,中间不停顿,"豆腐"与"虾丸"后音调拖长,抑扬顿挫的调调,分明是在 勾人食欲。 在毕节城行走,带着"泥土味"的叫卖声冷不丁与你"撞个满怀"。在那些叫卖声中,有一种是"舀豆 喔……菜豆喔……",这是卖嫩豆腐和菜豆花的。毕节人叫嫩豆腐为豆花,加了蔬菜烹制的,就叫菜豆 花。叫卖时原本要发那个"花"声的,因为并没太使劲张大嘴巴喊,以至听起来便成了"喔"。 毕节气候潮湿,早些年,人们习惯烧煤取暖煮饭,卖蜂窝煤的叫卖声总在胡同小巷回荡。卖蜂窝煤的人 满面煤粉,他们却不在乎。"蜂窝煤——"的叫卖声从他们嘴里弹出来时,"蜂窝"被连读成"fō"。卖煤人 笑着说,节约喊一个字的力气,能多担一坨煤。 上高中 ...
黑龙江省集贤县市场监督管理局2025年第五期食品监督抽检信息公示
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-07-03 08:55
Summary of Key Points - The article reports on the food safety inspection results conducted by the Jixian County Market Supervision Administration for the year 2025, highlighting the number of samples tested and their compliance status [2][3] - A total of 40 batches of ordinary food were sampled, all of which passed the inspection, while 71 batches of agricultural products were tested, with 69 passing and 2 failing [2][3] - The report emphasizes the importance of these inspections in ensuring food safety and eliminating potential hazards in the food supply [2][3] Group 1: Inspection Results - 40 batches of ordinary food were tested, with a 100% pass rate [2][3] - 71 batches of agricultural products were tested, with 69 passing and 2 failing, indicating a compliance rate of approximately 97.2% [2][3] - The specific failures involved residues of agricultural chemicals exceeding the national safety standards [3] Group 2: Non-compliance Details - The two non-compliant agricultural products were found to have residues of chloramphenicol exceeding the maximum allowable limit of 0.3 mg/kg, with one sample showing 0.770 mg/kg and another showing 1.44 mg/kg [3] - The report provides detailed information about the non-compliant products, including the names of the producers and the specific locations where the samples were collected [3][4]
山东省德州市宁津县食品安全监督抽检信息公告(2024年第8期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-05-07 02:42
Core Points - The Ningjin County Market Supervision Administration conducted food safety supervision and sampling inspections in October 2024, with results publicly announced [2][3][4] Non-compliant Products Information - Several food products were found to be non-compliant with safety standards, including: - Yam containing 3.40 mg/kg of chloramphenicol, exceeding the limit of 0.3 mg/kg [2] - Sweet pepper with 0.18 mg/kg of imidacloprid, exceeding the limit of 0.05 mg/kg [3] - Jujube with 0.031 mg/kg of flufenoxuron, exceeding the limit of 0.02 mg/kg [3] - Green pepper with 3.3 mg/kg of imidacloprid, exceeding the limit of 1 mg/kg [4] - Various other products also reported exceeding permissible limits for different pesticides [5] Links to Official Announcements - The results and details of the inspections can be accessed through the official website of the Ningjin County Market Supervision Administration [2][3][4][5]
山西省临汾市市场监督管理局关于不合格食品核查处置情况的通告(2024年第4期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-04-16 07:56
Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint The report outlines the results of food safety inspections conducted in Linfen City, revealing multiple instances of non-compliance with national food safety standards across various food products sold by local supermarkets and restaurants. The findings indicate a need for improved regulatory oversight and compliance measures within the food industry. Group 1: Non-compliant Food Products - Shanxi Yonghui Supermarket's chili failed to meet pesticide residue limits, with a total of 10 kg sold, valued at 50 yuan [3][4] - Linfen Rongxing Supermarket's green beans also did not comply, with 76.5 kg sold, valued at 195.84 yuan [7][8] - Linfen Yao District's Gelin Restaurant's leeks were found non-compliant, with 7.7 kg sold, valued at 30.8 yuan [11][12] Group 2: Risk Control Measures - Investigations were conducted by the Linfen Market Supervision Administration for each non-compliant case, confirming that the respective businesses had performed due diligence in purchasing [4][9][13] - Follow-up inspections were organized to ensure compliance and corrective actions were reported [5][10][14] Group 3: Legal Actions and Penalties - Linfen Yonghui Supermarket was investigated but exempted from penalties due to compliance efforts [6] - Linfen Rongxing Supermarket was similarly exempted from penalties despite violations [10] - Linfen Yao District's Gelin Restaurant received a warning and a fine of 5000 yuan for non-compliance [15] Group 4: Additional Non-compliance Cases - Various other establishments, including fruit and vegetable stores, were found selling products with pesticide residues exceeding legal limits, with total sales figures documented [16][26][32] - The report highlights the need for ongoing monitoring and enforcement of food safety regulations to protect consumer health [44][52][60]