崇左市市场监督管理局针对抽检发现的问题，对不合格样品涉及的生产经营单位，已要求属地市场监管部门依法处理，督促查清不合格产品的批次、数量、 流向，召回不合格产品，采取下架等措施控制风险，分析原因进行整改，并依法予以查处。 食品安全消费提示：消费者应当在正规可靠渠道购买所需食品并保存相应购物凭证，购买时要看清外包装上的相关标识，如生产日期、保质期、生产者名称 和地址、成分或配料表、食品生产许可证编号等标识是否齐全并符合法律法规的规定。不要购买无厂名、厂址、生产日期和保质期的产品，不要购买超过保 质期的产品。如在购物时遇到未能及时召回的通告内的不合格产品，请广大群众不要购买，并及时向市场监管部门反映。欢迎广大消费者积极参与食品安全 监督，关注食品安全抽检信息公布，如发现食品安全相关问题，请及时拨打当地投诉举报电话12315/12345。 特此通告。 崇左市市场监督管理局食品安全"你点我检"专项抽检信息通告（2025年第2期） 崇左市市场监督管理局组织抽检食用农产品共390批次。根据食品安全国家标准进行检验和判定，个别项目不合格，其产品即判定为不合格产品。具体情况 通告如下： 一、抽检总体情况 所有抽检样品遵循随机抽 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Huizhou Daya Bay Economic and Technological Development Zone Management Committee's Market Supervision Administration has conducted food safety supervision and sampling inspections, revealing that out of 150 batches tested, 3 batches were found to be non-compliant with safety standards [3]. Summary by Category Food Safety Inspection Results - A total of 150 batches of food were inspected as part of the 2025 food sampling plan, with 3 batches failing to meet safety standards [3]. - The results are being publicly disclosed in accordance with government information disclosure regulations [3]. Specific Findings - The inspection covered various food categories, including dining utensils, condiments, and processed meat products, among others [4][5][6]. - Specific products that failed included items such as flavored condiments and processed meat products, indicating potential issues in food safety compliance [4][5][6]. Regulatory Compliance - The public disclosure of inspection results aligns with the government's commitment to transparency and consumer safety in food products [3].

Core Points - The article presents the results of the first batch of food safety inspections for edible agricultural products in Honghuagang District, Zunyi City, revealing various non-compliance issues with specific products [3][4][5] Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 239 batches of edible agricultural products were inspected, with several batches found to contain pesticide residues exceeding the standard limits [3] - Specific products such as "折耳根" (a type of herb) and "桑葚" (mulberry) were reported to have pesticide residues like "乐果" and "甲拌磷" that exceeded permissible levels [4][5] - The inspection results indicate a need for stricter monitoring and compliance measures in the agricultural sector to ensure food safety [3][4] Group 2: Non-compliance Details - Non-compliance items included pesticide residues such as "氧乐果" and "氟虫腈," which were detected in various products, raising concerns about consumer safety [4][5] - The report highlights specific instances where the detected pesticide levels were significantly above the standard values, necessitating immediate action from regulatory authorities [3][4] - The findings emphasize the importance of regular inspections and the need for producers to adhere to safety standards to protect public health [3][5]

Core Points - The Chongqing Jiangbei District Market Supervision Administration conducted a sampling inspection of 168 batches of edible agricultural products, with 160 passing and 8 failing the safety standards [3]. Group 1: Inspection Results - Out of 168 samples tested, 160 were found to be compliant with food safety standards, while 8 samples were deemed non-compliant [3]. - The non-compliant products were identified based on specific items that did not meet the national food safety standards [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The local market supervision authority has initiated legal actions against the non-compliant products as per the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China [3]. - Risk control measures have been implemented to trace the distribution of the non-compliant products, including recalls and removal from shelves [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the enforcement actions taken by various market regulatory authorities across China to combat food waste, emphasizing the importance of compliance with the Anti-Food Waste Law and the measures taken against businesses that induce excessive ordering or fail to provide necessary information to consumers [1]. Group 1: Enforcement Actions - Beijing Yichuanxiang Catering Management Co., Ltd. was found to induce consumers to order excessively by setting a minimum purchase price for self-pickup, leading to food waste. The company was not penalized due to the minor consequences and prompt corrective actions [2][3]. - Shanghai Jutong Catering Co., Ltd. was penalized for not taking measures to prevent food waste, as they set minimum order quantities and failed to display anti-food waste signs. They were warned and required to rectify their practices [4]. - Zhangjiagang Yishe Milk Tea Shop was found to mislead consumers into ordering more than needed through a "buy two get one half price" promotion without proper waste prevention prompts. They were ordered to rectify their practices and received a warning [5]. - Taizhou Huangyan Boxin Restaurant was penalized for not providing information on food portions or recommended serving sizes on their delivery platform, leading to potential food waste. They were ordered to correct this and received a warning [6][7]. - Mengji Earth Cuisine Restaurant was fined for setting a minimum consumption requirement for private dining rooms, violating local anti-food waste regulations [8]. - Panjiang Roast Duck Shop was found to mislead consumers into excessive ordering, resulting in food waste. They were fined and required to implement corrective measures [9]. - Bama Jinyuan After-School Care Service Company was penalized for not providing adequate food portions based on the number of diners, leading to food waste. They were fined and required to improve their practices [10]. - Xinxin Hotel was found not to display anti-food waste signs or guide consumers on appropriate ordering, resulting in a warning and requirement to rectify their practices [11][12]. - Yuncheng Yongxing Lichai Wonton Shop was penalized for not displaying anti-food waste signs and failing to guide consumers on appropriate ordering. They were required to correct their practices and received a warning [13].

特此公告 贵阳市市场监督管理局 2025年5月21日 | | | 食品监督抽检不合格信息2025年第4期 | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 序 | 标称 生产 | 标称生产企业 | 被抽样单位 | | 食品 | 规格 | 商 | 生产 | | 分 | 任务来源/项 | 检验 | 备 | | | | | | 被抽样单位地址 | | | | 日期/ | 不合格项目 | | | | | | 号 | 企业 | 地址 | 名称 | | 名称 | 型号 | 标 | 批号 | | 类 | 目名称 | 机构 | 注 | | 名称 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 食 | 贵阳市市场 监督管理 | | | | | | | | 贵州省贵阳市南明区花果园街道 | 线椒 | | | | | 用 | 局/2025年贵 | 成都 | | | 1 / | | / | 南明区郭光 | 花果 ...

渭南市市场监督管理局关于15批次食品不合格的通告（2025年第6期） 近期，渭南市市场监督管理局组织开展食品安全监督抽检，重点对粮食加工品、酒类、食用油、油脂及其制品、食用农产品、淀粉及淀粉制品、调味品、水 果制品、餐饮食品、肉制品、速冻食品、蜂产品等共11类食品145批次样品进行了监督抽检，其中15批次样品不合格，发现农药残留物超标、超范围超限量 使用食品添加剂、化学洗涤剂残留超标、微生物污染等问题。 现将监督抽检不合格食品具体情况通告如下： 1.澄城县韦庄镇福海佳绿源自选超市销售的芹菜，其中噻虫胺检验值不符合食品安全国家标准规定。检验机构为西安中检科测试认证技术有限公司。 2.蒲城县阳光生活购物广场有限公司销售的生姜，其中噻虫胺检验值不符合食品安全国家标准规定。检验机构为华研检测集团有限责任公司。 3.蒲城县赞多多超市销售的芒果，其中吡唑醚菌酯检验值不符合食品安全国家标准规定。检验机构为华研检测集团有限责任公司。 4.蒲城县赞多多超市销售的香蕉，其中噻虫嗪检验值不符合食品安全国家标准规定。检验机构为华研检测集团有限责任公司。 5.富平县杨改涛菜店销售的豆芽，其中4-氯苯氧乙酸钠(以4-氯苯氧乙酸计)检验值 ...

4月29日—5月5日 武汉小龙虾消费季来了！ 4月27日， 在武汉市政府新闻办召开的新闻发布会上， 武汉市商务局负责人表示， 将借助五一、端午假日消费契机， 以"夏日荟聚·来武汉凑热闹"为主题， 突出武汉小龙虾美食文化IP， 举办系列促消费活动。 即日起到8月，我市将推出"乐购武汉""烟火武汉""活力武汉"三大板块600余场特色活动。 于4月29日至5月5日，全市重点举办2025武汉"夏日荟聚"促消费活动暨武汉小龙虾消费季。 届时，肥肥虾庄、靓靓蒸虾、巴厘龙虾、一棠龙虾、虾皇等品牌虾企将推出诚意满满的美食盛宴和特色 龙虾节、嘉年华活动，助力市民、游客朋友们实现"吃虾自由"。 面向广大市民和海内外朋友们，武汉市商务局负责人诚挚邀请："来武汉嘬虾子、喝啤酒、听音乐、赏 美景、凑热闹，共赏人间烟火气，共叙江城夏日情！" 墙前打卡拍照。 江汉路肥肥虾庄内，游客正在黄鹤楼装饰前打卡。肖僖 摄 走进武汉天地的一棠龙虾，仿佛闯入小龙虾的赛博朋克世界。全味虾球、牛蛙虾球、咸蛋黄焗虾球、锅 巴蛋黄龙虾......创意吃虾的方式让新老顾客都流连忘返，已悄然写入最美好的回忆。 或油焖、或清蒸、或麻辣腌制，"喷香"的小龙虾是武汉夏天 ...