其真实含义是：钱会再来、政策会松、成本会降，市场提前一年把"好日子"都算进价格里了。 真正的风险不是坏消息，而是市场已经把2026年的好日子提前透支了。 来源：华尔街情报圈 虽然嘴上说"跑热经济"，但Hartnett并没有去追最热的风险资产。他的真实仓位逻辑是：押低通胀，不 是押高增长。他买的是零息债（赌利率下行）、中盘股（性价比）、新兴市场股票、大宗商品——不追 烟花，而是提前站在"降温会发生"的那一侧。因为——钱，已经嗨过头了。根据美国银行的数据，股票 单周流入982亿美元，其中779亿流向美股（历史第二高），被动ETF流入1450亿美元（史无前例），现 金流出439亿美元（今年最大）——直接满仓上车。 号称华尔街最准分析师的Michael Hartnett本周发布报告说出了一句时代名言：市场已经提前在交易2026 年那种"通胀不怕、经济跑热、政策全开"的环境了。即QE、英伟达芯片重新卖给中国、2000美元补 贴、油价跌回3美元以下。 Hartnett现在开始警惕，他的牛熊指标直接冲到了8.5。该指标">8=情绪过热=反向卖出信号"。以史为 鉴，过去16次触发后，全球股市平均会回撤2–3%，极端情况下1– ...

Group 1: Company Overview - Neuberger Berman, founded in 1939, has assets under management totaling $558 billion, approximately 3.97 trillion RMB, operating in 26 countries and 39 cities globally [2] - The company has a strong presence in both public and private markets, with $358 billion in public market assets and $150 billion in private market assets as of the end of 2024 [2] - Neuberger Berman leads in the Qualified Domestic Limited Partner (QDLP) business in mainland China [2] Group 2: Investment Strategy and Market Outlook - The company has been overweight in China compared to benchmarks, but significant increases in foreign investment in Chinese assets will take time [10] - Global economic growth is expected to be below expectations, and the macro environment remains complex, emphasizing the importance of diversified investment strategies [1][12] - The valuation of U.S. tech stocks is considered high, with the focus shifting from whether to invest to how to invest, similar to historical investments in railroads [11] Group 3: ETF and Active Management Trends - The rise of global active managers entering the active ETF space is noted, with Neuberger Berman's active ETF business growing to approximately $2.5 billion [5][7] - Active ETFs are experiencing growth at a rate surpassing passive ETFs, indicating significant potential for future development [7] - The popularity of Separately Managed Accounts (SMA) is increasing due to their tax efficiency, which may compete with active ETFs [6] Group 4: Risk Management and Client Focus - The company emphasizes the importance of decision-making prior to a crisis, focusing on risk awareness and maintaining robust operational structures [4] - Neuberger Berman aligns its compensation structure with client interests, ensuring that deferred compensation is tied to client performance rather than company stock prices [8] - The firm aims to help clients navigate market volatility by encouraging disciplined, long-term investment strategies [12]

Group 1: Company Overview - Neuberger Berman, founded in 1939, has assets under management totaling $558 billion, approximately 3.97 trillion RMB, operating in 26 countries and 39 cities globally [2] - The company has a strong presence in both public and private markets, with $358 billion in public market assets and $150 billion in private market assets as of the end of 2024 [2] - Neuberger Berman leads in the Qualified Domestic Limited Partner (QDLP) business in mainland China [2] Group 2: Investment Strategy and Market Outlook - The company has consistently overweighted its investment in China compared to benchmarks, although significant increases in foreign investment in China will take time [1][12] - The global economic growth is expected to be below expectations, and the macro environment remains complex, emphasizing the importance of diversified investment strategies [1] - The valuation of U.S. tech stocks is considered expensive, and the focus should be on "how to invest" rather than "whether to invest" [1][13] Group 3: ETF and Active Management - The rise of ETFs is driven by various factors, including tax efficiency, with active ETFs growing at a rate that outpaces passive ETFs [6][8] - Neuberger Berman's active ETF business has grown to approximately $2.5 billion, with a positive trend in fund inflows primarily from new clients [6] - The popularity of Separately Managed Accounts (SMA) is increasing, as they can enhance tax efficiency and may compete with active ETFs in the future [7][8] Group 4: Risk Management and Client Focus - The company emphasizes the importance of risk management and maintaining a disciplined investment approach, especially during market downturns [14] - Neuberger Berman aligns its compensation structure with client interests, ensuring that deferred compensation is tied to client performance rather than company stock prices [9] - The firm aims to help clients navigate market challenges and maintain long-term investment strategies, avoiding the pitfalls of market timing [14]

Core Insights - The chairman and CEO of Neuberger Berman, George H. Walker, emphasizes that the firm has been overweighting China in its investment strategy compared to benchmarks, indicating a long-term commitment to the Chinese market [1][10] - Walker notes that while the valuation of U.S. tech stocks is becoming expensive, the critical question for investors is not whether to invest, but how to invest effectively [1][11] - The global asset management industry is witnessing a significant rise in actively managed ETFs, with Neuberger Berman's active ETF business growing to approximately $2.5 billion [4][6] Company Overview - Neuberger Berman, founded in 1939, manages assets totaling $558 billion, equivalent to approximately 3.97 trillion RMB, and operates in 26 countries and 39 cities [2] - The firm has a strong presence in both public and private markets, with $358 billion in public market assets and $150 billion in private market assets [2] Investment Strategy - The firm has been focusing on diversifying investments and maintaining a robust risk management framework, especially in light of past financial crises [3] - Walker highlights the importance of transparency and tax efficiency in investment products, noting that actively managed ETFs are gaining traction due to these factors [5][6] Market Trends - The growth of actively managed ETFs is outpacing that of passive ETFs, indicating a shift in investor preferences towards more actively managed strategies [6] - The firm anticipates that the global AUM (Assets Under Management) for active ETFs will grow from $1.4 trillion in June 2025 to $4.2 trillion by 2030 [6] Client Focus - Neuberger Berman aims to align its compensation structure with client interests, ensuring that deferred compensation is tied to client performance rather than the firm's stock price [7] - The firm recognizes the increasing interest from Chinese insurance companies in global asset allocation strategies, particularly in a low-interest-rate environment [8] Geopolitical Considerations - Walker suggests that foreign investors will require time to increase their allocation to Chinese assets, despite recent positive developments in U.S.-China trade relations [10]

Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the given text. Core Viewpoints - **Macro**: The US tariff exemption extension is entering its final week, and negotiations with countries like the EU, India, and Mexico are in a tense phase, with uncertainties regarding potential tariff counter - measures. Overseas is in a week of intensive macro - events, including the Fed's interest - rate meeting and key economic data releases. China will hold a Politburo meeting, and attention should be paid to economic work guidance and PMI data to confirm economic recovery. The real estate sales remain at a low level, the service industry is structurally differentiated and has declined due to summer heat, and the manufacturing's rush - to - export phase is ending, posing potential downward pressure on the Q3 economy. However, anti - involution policies are expected to gradually reverse deflation [4]. - **Funds**: Domestic liquidity is generally loose but marginally tightening. Bond market redemptions are flowing into the stock market, providing incremental funds. Overseas financial conditions have improved, with a decline in the real interest rate of US bonds, leading to foreign capital inflows into the domestic stock market. Passive ETF shares are being re - increased, equity financing such as IPOs has cooled, margin trading funds are continuously flowing in, and the pressure of restricted - share unlocks has increased, overall favoring liquidity [4]. - **Valuation**: After a short - term rebound, the valuations of various indices are still at a historically neutral - to - high level. The stock - bond yield spreads at home and abroad have further declined, making the attractiveness of allocation funds average [4]. - **Strategy**: The current valuations of broad - based indices are not cheap, and the foreign - capital risk premium index has dropped to a low level. The pressure of US tariff policies may resurface. Considering that the stock market has prematurely priced in macro - expectations, the market is expected to oscillate, reach a peak, and then correct in the next 1 - 2 weeks when positive factors are realized or fall short of expectations. It is recommended to reduce long positions in stock indices after sharp rallies this week or use out - of - the - money put options to protect against black - swan risks. In terms of style, hold long positions in IC and IM, or conduct an arbitrage strategy of going long on IM and short on IF [4]. Summary by Directory 1. Market Review - **Stock Indices**: In the past week, the Science and Technology Innovation 50 Index led the gains, while the German stock market led the losses. The week - on - week changes of major indices are as follows: the Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.67%, the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose 1.83%, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 2.33%, and the ChiNext Index rose 2.76%, among others [8][9]. - **Sectors**: Coal led the gains, and banks led the losses. Coal > Steel > Non - ferrous metals > Building materials... > Electric power and public utilities > Communications > Comprehensive finance > Banks [12]. - **Futures**: The basis rates of the four major stock index futures (IH, IF, IC, and IM) changed by 0.21%, 0.09%, - 0.39%, and - 0.31% respectively, with IH reaching par and the discounts of IC and IM slightly widening. The inter - period spread rates (current and next month) of the four major stock index futures changed by - 0.3%, - 0.25%, - 0.19%, and - 0.25% respectively, and the inter - period discounts of the four major futures began to widen. The inter - period spread rates (next quarter and current month) changed by - 0.21%, - 0.61%, - 1.32%, and - 1.81% respectively, with the long - term discounts of the four major futures widening significantly [19]. 2. Fund Flows - **Margin Trading and Market - Stabilizing Funds**: Last week, margin trading funds flowed in 39.65 billion yuan, reaching a total of 1.94 trillion yuan. The proportion of margin trading balance to the circulating market value of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets remained unchanged at 2.26%. The scale of passive stock ETF funds was 3.17358 trillion yuan, an increase of 74.43 billion yuan from the previous week, and the share was 198.619 billion shares, with a net subscription of 290 million shares from the previous week [22]. - **Industrial Capital**: In July, the cumulative equity financing was 45.49 billion yuan, with 6 cases. Among them, IPO financing was 20.92 billion yuan, private placement was 24.58 billion yuan, and convertible bond financing was 8.79 billion yuan. The market value of stock market unlocks last week was 86.84 billion yuan, a significant increase of 58.38 billion yuan from the previous week [26]. 3. Liquidity - **Monetary Injection**: Last week, the central bank's OMO reverse - repurchase matured at 1.7268 trillion yuan, with a reverse - repurchase injection of 1.6563 trillion yuan, resulting in a net monetary withdrawal of 7.05 billion yuan. The MLF was injected with 400 billion yuan in July and matured at 300 billion yuan, with continuous monthly net injections for 5 months. Overall, the liquidity supply was neutral but marginally tightening [28]. - **Fund Prices**: The DR007, R001, and SHIBOR overnight rates changed by 14.5bp, 6.4bp, and 5.8bp respectively, reaching 1.65%, 1.55%, and 1.52%. The issuance rate of inter - bank certificates of deposit rebounded by 2.1bp, and the CD rate issued by joint - stock banks rebounded by 4.1bp to 1.67%. The fund supply tightened marginally, debt financing demand declined, but the real - economy financing demand recovered, and the fund prices generally rebounded slightly [34]. - **Term Structure**: Last week, the yields of 10 - year, 5 - year, and 2 - year Treasury bonds changed by 6.7bp, 6bp, and 5.2bp respectively; the yields of 10 - year, 5 - year, and 2 - year China Development Bank bonds changed by 8.9bp, 9.5bp, and 6.6bp respectively. The yield term structure continued to steepen, and the credit spreads between Treasury bonds and China Development Bank bonds widened at both the long and short ends, indicating a return of broad - credit expectations [38]. - **Sino - US Interest Rate Spread**: As of July 25, the US 10 - year Treasury yield changed by - 4.0bp to 4.40%, the inflation expectation changed by 3.0bp to 2.44%, and the real interest rate changed by - 7.00bp to 1.96%. The Sino - US interest rate spread inversion narrowed by 10.79bp to - 266.61bp, and the offshore RMB appreciated by 0.19% [41]. 4. Macroeconomic Fundamentals - **Real Estate Demand**: As of July 24, the weekly trading area of commercial housing in 30 large - and medium - sized cities was 1.531 million square meters, showing a seasonal improvement from the previous week's 1.372 million square meters but still at a relatively low level compared to the same period. Second - hand housing sales declined seasonally, reaching the lowest level in nearly seven years. The real estate market sales generally returned to a low level, and attention should be paid to whether the Politburo meeting will propose signals to boost the real estate market [44]. - **Service Industry Activities**: As of July 25, the daily average subway passenger volume in 28 large - and medium - sized cities dropped significantly to 81.84 million person - times, a 1.2% decrease from the same period last year but a 21.8% increase from 2021. The Baidu congestion delay index of 100 cities decreased slightly from the previous week, indicating that the service industry's economic activities were cooling down [48]. - **Manufacturing Tracking**: Due to the anti - involution policy, the overall capacity utilization rate of the manufacturing industry declined. The capacity utilization rates of steel mills, asphalt, cement clinker enterprises, and coking enterprises changed by - 0.08%, - 4%, - 0.26%, and 0.44% respectively. The average operating rate of the chemical industry chain related to external demand changed by 0.01% from the previous week. Overall, the domestic and foreign demand trends of the manufacturing industry improved marginally, and it has entered the seasonal peak season [52]. - **Goods Flow**: The goods and people flow remained at a relatively high level. The postal express and civil aviation sectors showed a significant weekly decline, while railway transportation rebounded slightly, which may be related to the rush - to - export. There is a risk of a second seasonal decline from August to September [56]. - **Exports**: As the rush - to - export after the Sino - US trade talks is nearing its end, the port cargo throughput and container throughput have increased significantly. There is a risk of a second decline from August to September when the 90 - day tariff exemption period ends [61]. - **Overseas**: With the US Markit manufacturing PMI preliminary value in July falling back into the contraction range and the US durable goods orders data dropping more than expected, the financial market has revised its expectations for the Fed's interest - rate path. The market expects 2 interest rate cuts in 2025, with a reduction of 25 - 50bp, and the probability of a September rate cut has increased to 61.9% [63]. 5. Other Analyses - **Valuation**: The stock - bond risk premium was 3.07%, a 0.15% decrease from the previous week, at the 58.5% quantile. The foreign - capital risk premium index was 3.99%, a 0.05% decrease from the previous week, at the 21.2% quantile. The valuations of the Shanghai 50, CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 indices were at the 81.1%, 76.8%, 87.3%, and 71.4% quantiles of the past 5 years respectively, and their relative valuation levels were not low [66][71]. - **Quantitative Diagnosis**: According to seasonal laws, the stock market is in a period of seasonal shock - driven growth and structural differentiation in July. The growth style is relatively dominant, and the cyclical style first rises and then falls. There are opportunities to go long on IC and IM on pullbacks and short on IF and IH on sharp rallies [74]. - **Financial Calendar**: China will release July's manufacturing and service industry PMI and industrial enterprise profits, which will help confirm economic recovery. Overseas, attention should be paid to the US non - farm payroll report, job vacancies, manufacturing PMI, PCE inflation data, and the Fed's interest - rate meeting [76].

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. Core Views - The results of the second Sino-US meeting were not significant. The US initiated new home appliance tariff policies and restrictions on key chip equipment. With the 90-day exemption period for various countries ending soon, there is a risk of tariffs impacting the market again in the next two weeks. It's necessary to guard against Trump's potential extreme pressure, similar to the situation in 2018. The domestic economy is entering a seasonal recovery window, and potential macroeconomic positives from the Politburo meeting in late June - July should be watched [4]. - The real estate sales are seasonally recovering from a low level, but the peak season is not booming. The service industry shows structural differentiation and a slight decline from its high level. In May, production and investment in the real economy declined, while consumption took the lead with the boost of fiscal subsidies. The logic of manufacturing rush exports continues, the domestic supply - demand contradiction is marginally cooling, and prices are expected to oscillate upwards. Attention should be paid to whether fiscal policy will further support the economic center in the second half of the year [4]. - Domestic liquidity is generally loose, and overseas liquidity is also tending to be loose due to the Fed's dovish guidance and declining economic data. Financial conditions have significantly improved. Coupled with the expected rebound of the US dollar index, the domestic stock market will receive incremental funds, with inflows from passive ETFs and margin trading funds, while IPO and other equity financing and unlocking pressures remain [4]. - After a short - term rebound, the valuations of various indices are still at a relatively high level in the historical neutral range. The stock - bond risk premiums at home and abroad are low, and the attractiveness of allocation funds is average [4]. - The pressure on the macro and industrial fundamentals is facing a marginal reversal, financial conditions are generally loose, and the valuations of broad - based index markets are generally not cheap. Coupled with the expected return of US tariff policy pressure, the stock market's upward path in the third quarter may be characterized by frequent setbacks, with an overall oscillatory upward trend. Policy - level macro expectations, excessive domestic liquidity, and the support of stable funds will support the lower limit of the stock market adjustment. It is recommended to actively go long on stock index futures during sharp declines in July. In terms of style, first go long on IC and IM, then on IF and IH, or conduct an arbitrage strategy of going long on IM and short on IF [4]. Summary by Directory 1. Market Review - **Global Stock Market Performance**: In the past month, A - shares led the global stock market rally, while European stocks led the decline. The performance order is: ChiNext > Dow Jones > Nikkei 225 > FTSE Emerging Markets > Hang Seng Tech > CSI 300 > German stocks > FTSE Europe. Specific index increases include: Shanghai Composite Index 2.29%, Shenzhen Component Index 3.37%, ChiNext Index 6.58%, etc. [8][9] - **Industry Performance**: In the past month, the comprehensive finance sector led the rise, while the food and beverage sector led the decline [12]. - **Futures Performance**: The basis rates of the four major stock index futures (IH, IF, IC, and IM) changed by 0.48%, 0.53%, 0.91%, and 1.26% respectively, with significant narrowing of the discounts. The inter - period spread rates (current month and next month) of the four major stock index futures changed by - 0.16%, - 0.2%, 0.16%, and 0.16% respectively. The inter - period discount of IH increased slightly, while those of IF, IC, and IM narrowed slightly. The inter - period spread rates (next quarter and current month) of the four major stock index futures changed by - 0.08%, - 0.12%, 0.21%, and 0.35% respectively. The long - term discounts of IH and IF increased slightly, while those of IC and IM narrowed slightly [16][17] 2. Fund Flow - **Margin Trading and Market - Stabilizing Funds**: In June, margin trading funds flowed in 37.5 billion yuan, reaching 1.84 trillion yuan. The proportion of margin trading balance to the circulating market value of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets decreased by 0.02% to 2.27%. The scale of passive stock ETF funds reached 3.0185 trillion yuan, exceeding 3 trillion yuan for the first time, an increase of 68.35 billion yuan from the previous month. The share was 199.594 billion shares, with a redemption of 7.92 billion shares from the previous month [22]. - **Industrial Capital**: In June, equity financing was 541.96 billion yuan, with 6 companies involved. Among them, IPO financing was 8.73 billion yuan, private placement was 533.23 billion yuan, and convertible bond financing was 4.35 billion yuan. The scale of equity financing rebounded significantly to a high level. The market value of restricted - share unlockings (including additional issuance, placement, rights issue, equity incentive, etc.) was 218.5 billion yuan, an increase of 109.98 billion yuan from the previous month, showing a continuous marginal increase and ranking second highest in the year [25] 3. Liquidity - **Money Supply**: In June, the central bank's OMO reverse repurchase matured at 5.298 trillion yuan, and reverse repurchase was issued at 6.3795 trillion yuan, with a net money injection of 1.0815 trillion yuan. The liquidity in the open - market business was marginally loose at the end of the quarter. The MLF was issued at 300 billion yuan and matured at 182 billion yuan in June, with net issuance for four consecutive months, and the overall liquidity supply was neutral and tending to be loose [27]. - **Money Demand**: In June, the issuance of national bonds was 1.5958 trillion yuan, and the maturity was 889.65 billion yuan, with a net money demand of 706.15 billion yuan; the issuance of local bonds was 1.34898 trillion yuan, and the maturity was 484.32 billion yuan, with a net money demand of 864.65 billion yuan; the issuance of other bonds was 7.22604 trillion yuan, and the maturity was 6.6366 trillion yuan, with a net money demand of 589.43 billion yuan. The total bond market issuance was 10.17082 trillion yuan, and the maturity was 8.01058 trillion yuan, with a net money demand of 2.16023 trillion yuan. The debt financing demand in the bond market remained high, driven by the joint efforts of national bonds, local government bonds, and corporate debt financing [30]. - **Fund Price**: Last month, DR007, R001, and SHIBOR overnight rates changed by 3.2bp, - 12.6bp, and - 10bp respectively, reaching 1.7%, 1.44%, and 1.37%. The issuance rate of inter - bank certificates of deposit rebounded by 0.7bp, and the CD rate issued by joint - stock banks dropped by 3bp to 1.67%. The fund rate was significantly lower than the 1 - year MLF rate of 2% and slightly lower than the policy rate DR007 of 1.7%. The fund supply was loose, the debt financing demand was strong, but the real - economy financing was weak, and the fund price generally oscillated at a low level [33]. - **Term Structure**: Last month, the yield of the 10 - year national bond changed by - 2.3bp, the yield of the 5 - year national bond changed by - 5.6bp, and the yield of the 2 - year national bond changed by - 10.3bp; the yield of the 10 - year policy - bank bond changed by - 2.1bp, the yield of the 5 - year policy - bank bond changed by - 5.2bp, and the yield of the 2 - year policy - bank bond changed by - 5.2bp. Overall, the yield term structure steepened significantly in June due to the central bank's liquidity injection in the open market, which led to a significant decline in the short - end. The credit spread between national bonds and policy - bank bonds widened at the short - end [37]. - **Sino - US Interest Rate Spread**: In June, the yield of the US 10 - year Treasury bond changed by - 14.0bp to 4.29%, the inflation expectation changed by - 3.0bp to 2.29%, and the real interest rate changed by - 11.0bp to 2.00%. Risk - asset prices rose due to the improvement of financial conditions. The 10 - 2Y spread of US Treasury bonds changed by 5.0bp to 56.0bp. The inversion of the Sino - US interest rate spread narrowed by 9.8bp to - 264.38bp, and the offshore RMB appreciated by 0.47%. The US dollar - RMB exchange rate oscillated around the central level of the past three - year range [40] 4. Macroeconomic Fundamentals - **Real Estate Demand**: As of June 26, the weekly trading area of commercial housing in 30 large - and medium - sized cities was 2.928 million square meters, a seasonal increase from 2.021 million square meters of the previous week, but at a relatively low level compared to the same period. Compared with the same period in 2019 before the pandemic, it decreased by 32.1%. Second - hand housing sales declined seasonally, with a slight month - on - month decrease, at a relatively low level in the past seven years. The high - frequency sales trends of new and second - hand housing in the real estate market diverged last month, with new housing recovering but second - hand housing falling back to a low level. Overall, the real estate market remained weak, and the pulse effect of the new real estate policies faded. The overall sales center of the real estate market returned to a low level, and more incremental policies were awaited for boosting [43] - **Service Industry Activity**: As of June 27, the weekly average daily passenger volume of the subway in 28 large - and medium - sized cities remained at a high level, reaching 81.26 million person - times, an increase of 1.8% compared to the same period last year and 32.5% compared to the same period in 2021. The economic activity in the service industry declined seasonally from a high level. The Baidu congestion delay index of 100 cities rebounded compared to the previous week, at a neutral level in the past three years. Overall, the economic activity in the service industry tended to a natural and stable growth level, with insignificant monthly changes [47] - **Manufacturing Tracking**: In June, the capacity utilization rates of the manufacturing industry showed mixed trends. The capacity utilization rate of steel mills changed by 0.14%, that of asphalt by 3.8%, that of cement clinker enterprises by 2.06%, and that of coke enterprises by - 2.31%. The average operating rate of the chemical industry chain related to external demand changed by - 0.24% compared to the previous month. Overall, the domestic demand trend in the manufacturing industry rebounded, while the external demand was weak [51] - **Cargo Flow**: Both cargo and passenger flows remained at relatively high levels. The postal express industry dominated by e - commerce and the civil aviation flight guarantee sector dominated by tourism consumption showed strong growth, with continuous weekly increases. The highway and railway transportation were relatively weak, with limited growth rates. Attention should be paid to the potential seasonal decline risk from July to August [56] - **Import and Export**: In terms of exports, the logic of rush exports after the Sino - US trade talks continued to play out. The port cargo throughput and container throughput rebounded after a short - term decline. From July to August, the risk of a second decline after the end of the 90 - day exemption period and the resurgence of tariff frictions should be guarded against [59] - **Overseas Situation**: In May, the US PCE inflation rebounded slightly, with the core PCE reaching 2.68%, an increase of 0.1% from the previous month. Structurally, it was mainly due to the significant rebound in the food and commodity sectors, which began to be affected by tariffs. The service and market - based sub - items rebounded slightly, and the decline of the energy sub - item narrowed, with the month - on - month growth rate returning to 0.2%. Assuming the tariff impact continues for the next three months with a 0.2% month - on - month growth rate, the annualized month - on - month rate is expected to rebound to 2.43%, still below the 2.5% level, providing data support for the Fed's interest - rate cut. Fed Chairman Powell sent a dovish signal during the Senate and House hearings. Coupled with the significant downward revision of the US GDP in the first quarter and the significant decline in residents' PCE income and consumption in May, the financial market began to optimistically revise its expectations for the Fed's interest - rate path. According to the CME's FedWatch tool, the market expects the number of interest - rate cuts in 2025 to increase to 3 times, with a cut range of about 50 - 75bp. The expected interest - rate cut times are in September, October, and December. The probability of an interest - rate cut in July rebounded to 18%, and the probability in September increased significantly. The terminal interest rate after the interest - rate cuts within the year is expected to be in the range of 3.5% - 3.75% [61][65] 5. Other Analyses - **Valuation**: The stock - bond risk premium in the past month was 3.41%, a decrease of 0.18% from the previous month, at the 71.3% quantile. The foreign - capital risk premium index was 4.45%, a decrease of 0.32% from the previous month, at the 29.3% quantile. The attractiveness of foreign capital was at a relatively low neutral level. The valuations of the Shanghai 50, CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 indices were at the 77.4%, 68.4%, 75.8%, and 59.1% quantiles of the past five years respectively, with relatively high valuation levels. The valuation quantiles changed by 8.8%, 14.9%, - 0.7%, and - 4.6% respectively compared to the previous month, indicating a marginal slight increase in the attractiveness of small - cap stocks and a marginal significant decrease in the attractiveness of large - cap stocks [68][73] - **Quantitative Diagnosis**: According to the seasonal pattern analysis, the stock market is in a period of seasonal oscillatory rise and structural differentiation in July. Growth stocks are relatively dominant in style, and the cyclical style first rises and then falls. Generally, the stock market tends to rise in July. Attention should be paid to the opportunities of going long on IC and IM during corrections, short - term trading on IF and IH after sharp rises, and medium - term long - term trading on IF and IH after sharp declines [76]