"电影关税"的真正荒谬之处在于，娱乐产业是美国最持久的影响力来源，软实力的影响力远比军事力量更深远，好莱坞在传播美国价值观方面所 做的贡献比任何一艘航空母舰都要大。如今，两大不可逆转的趋势当下正在瓦解好莱坞的垄断地位：互联网的普及打破了发行壁垒，全球观众可 以通过流媒体直接观看韩剧、日本动漫和宝莱坞电影等。与此同时，人口结构的变化催生了对多元化故事的需求，观众不再满足于在美国叙事中 永远扮演次要角色。 美政府征收电影关税的提议，或许会加速美国在全球娱乐领域中主角地位的终结，亚洲国家正乘胜追击。11部韩剧入围网飞2025年全球百佳剧 目。防弹少年团等韩流明星在美国体育场馆的门票销售一空。电影旅游业推动日本入境游客数量创历史新高。韩语和日语已成为美国青少年的流 行语言。韩国电影《寄生虫》荣获2020年奥斯卡最佳影片奖，展现了亚洲故事在全球的接受度不断提高，但这仅仅是亚洲叙事崛起的一部分。美 国信誉的崩盘为其他国家提供了战略空间。好莱坞因不确定性而陷入停滞时，亚洲的新晋力量完全可以大胆行动，洽谈更有利的流媒体合作协 议，吸引优秀人才并加大产业投入。（作者道格拉斯·蒙哥马利，任伊然译） 就连角色也体现了这一点。在不少 ...

Core Viewpoint - The statement by Lee Jae-myung, "South Korea can no longer rely on the U.S. for security and China for the economy," signifies a potential shift in South Korea's long-standing foreign policy, raising questions about its future alliances and economic dependencies [3][5][7]. Group 1: U.S.-South Korea Relations - Lee Jae-myung's visit to the U.S. was marked by a cold reception from Trump, indicating a lack of diplomatic warmth and setting a challenging tone for discussions [5]. - Trump’s demands for the ownership of U.S. military bases in South Korea were seen as a direct affront to South Korean sovereignty, complicating the diplomatic landscape [5][15]. - The pressure from the U.S. has forced Lee to express a willingness to adjust South Korea's strategic approach, moving away from the previous reliance on the U.S. for security [7][13]. Group 2: Economic Dependency on China - Historically, China has been a crucial economic partner for South Korea, with significant trade surpluses and cultural influence, particularly in sectors like technology and entertainment [7][9]. - Recent shifts in trade dynamics have seen South Korea's trade with China turn from a surplus to a deficit, with South Korean products losing market share in China [9][11]. - The rise of Chinese companies in key industries has intensified competition, making it increasingly difficult for South Korea to maintain its economic reliance on China [9][11]. Group 3: Future Economic Strategies - Lee's statement reflects a recognition of the changing economic landscape, where South Korea can no longer depend on China as it once did [11][13]. - Potential alternatives for economic partnerships, such as Southeast Asia and India, are limited by their smaller market sizes and the competitive presence of Chinese products [15]. - The lack of a clear economic strategy moving forward highlights South Korea's precarious position between the U.S. and China, with no immediate solutions in sight [13][15].

Group 1 - The article discusses the gradual easing of the "Korean Wave Ban" in China, with recent events indicating a potential thaw in cultural exchanges between China and South Korea [1][49][50] - There have been multiple K-POP idol meet-and-greets and promotional events in Chinese cities, signaling a resurgence of interest in Korean entertainment [1][47] - The "Korean Wave Ban" has had a long-lasting impact on both countries' entertainment industries, creating a protective environment for China's domestic entertainment while pushing K-POP to expand globally [1][2][4] Group 2 - The article highlights the historical context of the "Korean Wave Ban," which began in 2016 due to geopolitical tensions, leading to significant restrictions on Korean cultural exports to China [3][4][8] - The ban resulted in a drastic decline in the presence of Korean stars in Chinese media, with many shows and collaborations being canceled or altered to avoid association with Korean content [6][7][10] - The shift in consumer preferences in China has led to a growing demand for domestic idols and content, reflecting a change in cultural consumption patterns [20][27][56] Group 3 - The article notes that despite the easing of restrictions, there remains a cultural gap and skepticism among Chinese consumers towards Korean entertainment, influenced by past political tensions [2][52] - The Korean entertainment industry has also adapted by seeking new markets and diversifying its talent pool, including members from various countries to appeal to a broader audience [32][33] - The financial performance of major K-POP companies has been affected by the changing dynamics, with significant revenue declines reported in 2024 [43][44] Group 4 - The article emphasizes the ongoing cultural exchange efforts, including collaborations between Chinese and Korean media companies, which have resumed in recent years [45][46] - The rise of social media platforms has allowed Korean idols to engage directly with Chinese fans, further bridging the gap between the two cultures [48][49] - The future of the K-POP industry in China remains uncertain, as consumer sentiment continues to evolve and the market landscape changes [52][61]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's cultural output lacks a strategic approach, hindering its ability to leverage its rich cultural assets for global influence, unlike South Korea which has successfully positioned culture as a core strategic asset [1][2][3] Group 1: Comparison with South Korea - South Korea has transformed from a niche cultural exporter to a cultural superpower over the past 20 years, excelling in music, film, and fashion [1][2] - The South Korean government supports cultural industries through coordinated investment, talent development, and marketing, fostering a culture of risk-taking and long-term planning [2] - Korean dramas contributed $8 billion in streaming revenue to Netflix from 2020 to 2024, showcasing the economic impact of cultural exports [2] Group 2: Japan's Cultural Strategy - Japan possesses significant cultural capital, with globally recognized anime, games, fashion, and cuisine, yet fails to translate this into global influence due to a lack of cohesive strategy [1][2] - The Japanese cultural strategy is fragmented, with media and content policies dispersed across various institutions and dominated by traditional interest groups [2] - Young Japanese creatives face challenges such as low income, long working hours, and limited career advancement, which discourages talent retention in the creative sector [2] Group 3: Recommendations for Japan - Japan should integrate soft power with economic development, improve labor conditions in the creative sector, and modernize export and copyright infrastructure [3] - Learning from successful neighboring countries can empower Japan to enhance its cultural strategy and global presence [3] - A strategic approach that aligns with Japan's cultural assets is essential for future growth and influence [3]