USDT(泰达币)

Search documents
虚拟货币异常交易涉嫌犯罪,北京一男子因协助转移赃款获刑
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-08-26 12:45
法院审理发现,刘某分多次接单后赴外地交易,行踪遍布多地且停留时间极短,交易时佩戴口罩遮挡面 部,事后立即删除通讯记录,这些异常行为成为认定其"明知系犯罪所得"的关键证据。 新京报讯(记者吴梦真)新京报记者获悉,近日,北京市第二中级人民法院审结一起利用虚拟货币交 易,掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得的案件。被告人刘某因通过USDT(泰达币)交易协助转移诈骗资金20万元, 被判处有期徒刑三年六个月,并处罚金人民币四万元。 2024年8月,被告人刘某在明知何某持有的现金系犯罪所得的情况下,仍向何某贩卖USDT(俗称U 币),并收取现金20万元,现已无法查明涉案钱款去向。经查,被告人刘某转移的20万元系他人被诈骗 钱款。 法官表示,此类犯罪具有明显的逐利性和侥幸心理特征。犯罪分子往往经不起短期高额收益的诱惑,自 认为可以逃避法律追究。实际上,虚拟货币交易并非法外之地,任何协助转移、套现犯罪所得的行为, 均可能构成刑事犯罪。 法官提醒社会公众,应警惕明显偏离市场价格、要求快速大额交易、采取隐蔽操作等异常虚拟货币交易 行为,切勿因贪图手续费或差价而参与来源不明的资金交易。明知是他人犯罪所得,却仍协助进行转 换、转移、套现等行为,均可能 ...
《稳定币条例》生效在即 街边“找换店”还能兑换加密货币吗?
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-07-31 00:09
Core Viewpoint - The "Stablecoin Regulation" in Hong Kong will take effect on August 1, prohibiting unlicensed stablecoin operations, raising questions about the future of stablecoins like USDT and USDC in the region [1][4]. Group 1: Current Operations of Crypto Exchange Shops - Crypto exchange shops in Hong Kong, such as "One Bitcoin" and "Fangbei," continue to operate normally ahead of the regulation's implementation [2][3]. - These shops offer services for exchanging fiat currency and stablecoins, with varying transaction fees based on the method of purchase [3]. - Staff at these shops expressed uncertainty about the impact of the new regulation on their operations post-August 1, indicating they have not received official notifications [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Environment and Future Implications - The Hong Kong government welcomes virtual asset trading institutions to apply for licenses, emphasizing that unlicensed platforms selling USDT and USDC will be illegal after the regulation takes effect [4][6]. - Current OTC (over-the-counter) operations are not yet under specific licensing requirements, but the government is considering regulatory measures for these services [6][7]. - The government has observed around 200 physical virtual asset OTC shops and 250 digital platforms operating in Hong Kong, indicating a significant market presence [5]. Group 3: Stakeholder Engagement and Future Licensing - The Hong Kong government has conducted consultations regarding the licensing of virtual asset service providers, receiving approximately 70 submissions from various stakeholders [7]. - A proposal to establish a licensing regime for OTC services is under consideration, which would involve regulatory oversight by the Hong Kong Customs [6][7].
多地警示虚拟币非法集资风险!
第一财经· 2025-07-20 11:22
Core Viewpoint - The recent collapse of the "Xin Kang Jia" Ponzi scheme, which promised a daily interest rate of 2%, has heightened societal awareness and vigilance against new forms of online fraud [1] Regulatory Warnings - Financial regulatory bodies across multiple regions, including Guangdong, Yunnan, Hunan, and others, have issued warnings regarding illegal fundraising risks associated with virtual currencies and new online scams [1][2] - These warnings highlight that many fraudulent schemes utilize exaggerated claims and false promises, often featuring phrases like "guaranteed returns" and "high fixed income" [1][3] Common Characteristics of Scams - New online scams, often referred to as "funding plates," share common traits such as high promised returns, often exceeding 300% annualized, and recruitment mechanisms that incentivize users to promote projects [1][12] - Legal experts categorize these scams as "pyramid-style fundraising fraud," which involves collecting funds through pyramid schemes [1][2] Types of Fraud - Various types of online scams have emerged, including investment fraud, false project schemes, and fake loan schemes, all characterized by their deceptive nature and strong concealment [10] - Investment fraud often masquerades as legitimate institutions, using fake financial apps and platforms to lure consumers with promises of high returns [10][11] Virtual Currency Scams - Scams involving virtual currencies often claim to be decentralized and utilize fictitious technology backgrounds to issue tokens with no real value, exploiting investors' lack of understanding of blockchain technology [7][8] - Regulatory bodies have clarified that activities related to virtual currencies lack legal protection, and participation in such schemes can lead to significant financial losses and legal repercussions [7][8] Participant Profiles - Participants in these scams can be categorized into three groups: "operators" who aim to defraud, "smart investors" seeking quick profits, and "innocent victims" who suffer the most significant losses [13][14] - The return rates in these schemes are inversely related to their credibility, with higher promised returns indicating a higher risk of fraud [13][14]
多地警示虚拟币非法集资风险,八大类“资金盘”套路曝光
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-07-20 09:43
Core Viewpoint - The recent collapse of the "Xin Kang Jia" Ponzi scheme, which promised a daily interest rate of 2%, has heightened societal awareness and vigilance against new forms of online fraud [1] Regulatory Warnings - Multiple financial regulatory bodies across various provinces, including Guangdong, Yunnan, and Hunan, have issued warnings about illegal fundraising risks associated with virtual currencies since July [2][3] - Shenzhen and Guangzhou have specifically highlighted that illegal institutions are using terms like "financial innovation" and "digital assets" to mislead the public and engage in illegal fundraising activities [2] Characteristics of Online Scams - New online scams often share common traits such as exaggerated claims, false promises, and high returns, with phrases like "guaranteed profits" and "fixed high returns" frequently used [1] - These scams typically promise unrealistically high returns, such as a daily yield of 1% or 2%, leading to annualized returns exceeding 300% [1] Legal Implications - Legal experts categorize these scams as "pyramid-style fundraising fraud," which can lead to severe criminal charges, including life imprisonment for the organizers and key participants [1] - The involvement in such scams can result in criminal liability for all parties involved, including promoters and core members [1] Types of Scams - Various types of scams have emerged, including investment fraud, consumer rebate schemes, and fictitious project scams, all characterized by their deceptive nature and complexity [9][10] - Investment scams often impersonate legitimate institutions and utilize fake financial products to lure investors, while consumer rebate scams disguise themselves as community-oriented initiatives [10] Mechanisms of Fraud - Many scams employ a "referral" mechanism to encourage users to promote projects, promising tiered rewards for recruitment [11] - The structure of these scams often includes both "static" and "dynamic" returns, where static returns are fixed and dynamic returns depend on recruiting new participants [12] Risk Awareness - Regulatory bodies emphasize the importance of understanding the complexities and volatility of digital currencies and encourage the public to avoid any form of virtual currency speculation [8] - Participants in virtual currency transactions face significant legal risks, as these activities are deemed illegal under current regulations [7]
京东蚂蚁跑步入局稳定币 为何专家建议普通人不要急于试水?
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-16 08:20
Core Viewpoint - The concept of stablecoins has gained significant attention recently, with major players like JD.com and Ant Group entering the market, and Hong Kong implementing a regulatory framework for stablecoins starting August 1 [1][5]. Group 1: Definition and Historical Context - Stablecoins are likened to the "jiaozi," the earliest form of paper currency in China during the Song Dynasty, which served as a receipt to facilitate trade and was not a legal tender [2]. - The first stablecoins emerged in 2014, with Tether's USDT being a prominent example, pegged at a 1:1 ratio to the US dollar, addressing the volatility of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin [4]. Group 2: Mechanism and Types - Stablecoins are designed to maintain a stable value by being pegged to sovereign currencies or liquid assets, allowing for 1:1 exchange [5]. - The stability mechanisms of stablecoins can be categorized into three types: reserve-backed stablecoins, algorithmic stablecoins, and hybrid models, with reserve-backed being the most discussed [5]. Group 3: Applications and Advantages - Stablecoins facilitate instant cross-border payments, significantly reducing transaction times and costs compared to traditional banking systems, which can take days and incur fees of 3%-5% [7][8]. - Major Chinese e-commerce companies are leveraging stablecoins to enhance their cross-border payment capabilities, potentially transforming the payment landscape [8]. Group 4: Regulatory Developments - The U.S. Senate has passed the Stablecoin Uniform Standards Act, integrating stablecoins into the regulatory framework, while Hong Kong has also enacted a stablecoin regulation [5]. - The regulatory environment is crucial as it will shape the future of stablecoins and their integration into mainstream financial systems [10]. Group 5: Risks and Considerations - Experts caution against overestimating the stability and benefits of stablecoins, highlighting potential risks related to their value stability and regulatory scrutiny [9]. - The need for regulatory oversight is emphasized, as the history of currency development shows that private innovations often lead to eventual government regulation [10].
数字货币攻防战:警惕骗局披上“稳定币”马甲
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-15 08:21
Core Viewpoint - The rise of stablecoins as a new digital financial tool is leading to a trend of regulatory development, but it also brings significant risks of fraud and illegal activities, necessitating a balance between supporting innovation and enforcing regulation [1][2][10]. Group 1: Regulatory Responses - Various regions in China, including Shanghai and Wuxi, are conducting research to explore the regulatory application of stablecoins, while cities like Beijing and Shenzhen have issued warnings about potential fraud risks [1][2]. - The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has issued global alerts regarding the illegal use of stablecoins, indicating a persistent battle between regulatory bodies and criminal activities [2][9]. Group 2: Criminal Activities - Criminals are increasingly using stablecoins to facilitate fraud, money laundering, and other illegal activities, leveraging their characteristics such as price stability and cross-border transferability [3][4]. - Reports indicate that in 2024, the amount of on-chain illegal activities related to fraud could reach approximately $51 billion, with stablecoin transaction volumes exceeding $30 trillion during the same period [3][9]. Group 3: Case Studies - The "DGCX Xin Kang Jia" platform exemplifies a Ponzi scheme that promised unrealistic returns, using USDT as a medium for transactions, ultimately leading to significant financial losses for investors [4][5]. - The "WO Token" case involved a similar fraudulent structure, attracting over 715,000 members and accumulating approximately 286 million USDT, valued at over 7.769 billion yuan at the time of the incident [6][7]. Group 4: Warning Signals - Regulatory bodies have raised alarms about the use of stablecoins in illegal fundraising activities, highlighting the lack of legitimate qualifications among many entities promoting high-return investment schemes [7][8]. - The prevalence of scams utilizing stablecoins is prompting calls for increased public awareness and caution regarding high-return promises and the legitimacy of investment opportunities [8][9]. Group 5: Future Trends - The evolution of stablecoin-related crimes is expected to become more sophisticated, with trends indicating a shift towards integrated fraud and money laundering schemes, as well as the use of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols [13][15]. - Regulatory agencies are urged to enhance international cooperation and develop comprehensive frameworks to address the challenges posed by stablecoin-related criminal activities [15].
鑫慷嘉爆雷疑云:黄先生是谁?
经济观察报· 2025-07-11 14:12
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversial situation surrounding the "DGCX Xin Kang Jia Data" trading platform, highlighting the alleged fraudulent activities and the mysterious figure known as "Mr. Huang" who is believed to be the founder, Huang Xin [2][4][5]. Group 1: Company Background - Xin Kang Jia was established on March 1, 2021, with Huang Xin, Shao Xin Kang, and Wang Yan Jia as shareholders, holding 35%, 35%, and 30% respectively [4]. - Huang Xin has never held a specific management position in Guizhou Xin Kang Jia, raising questions about his role and identity as "Mr. Huang" [5][6]. - The company has been linked to a series of operational irregularities, including being listed in the business anomaly directory due to uncontactable registered addresses [4][17]. Group 2: Operational Model - Xin Kang Jia employed a strategy of leveraging a "state-owned enterprise identity" and utilized digital currency for transactions, which attracted a large number of members quickly [7][10]. - The platform operated on a pyramid scheme model, categorizing members into nine levels with increasing rewards based on the number of recruits [9][10]. - Members were encouraged to recruit others, with the organization divided into "four major battle zones" for promotional activities [8][9]. Group 3: Current Situation - As of June 26, 2023, the platform faced severe operational issues, including withdrawal suspensions, leading to widespread panic among its 1.8 million members and potential financial losses exceeding 10 billion yuan [2][11][17]. - Huang Xin's alleged departure with funds has led to a split among members, with some still believing in the platform's recovery while others seek legal recourse [13][14]. - Regulatory bodies have issued warnings about Xin Kang Jia, labeling it a typical pyramid scheme and indicating that it lacks legal operational status in China [18][19].
号称日息2厘的平台被曝崩盘,操盘手称“我已在国外”!此前多地早已发出预警
第一财经· 2025-07-09 13:30
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the fraudulent activities of the "Xinkangjia" investment platform, which has been identified as a Ponzi scheme combined with a multi-level marketing structure, leading to significant financial losses for investors [3][4][29]. Group 1: Overview of "Xinkangjia" - "Xinkangjia" platform was established in 2021, initially claiming to engage in oil spot trading and later shifting to derivatives trading, falsely associating itself with the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX) [6][19]. - The platform attracted around 2 million investors with claims of high returns, reportedly involving approximately 13 billion yuan in total investments [3][4]. - DGCX has publicly denied any affiliation with "Xinkangjia," warning that the platform is unauthorized and operates without any legitimate partnership [8][9]. Group 2: Investment Structure and Operations - "Xinkangjia" employed a nine-level hierarchical structure to incentivize recruitment, with participants earning rewards for bringing in new members, creating a classic Ponzi scheme dynamic [13][19]. - The platform promised daily returns of 0.2% and used various promotional tactics, including offering luxury cars as incentives for high investments [20][19]. - Investors were required to purchase USDT (Tether) for transactions, complicating the process and leading many to transfer funds to higher-level members for conversion [22][30]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment and Risks - The Chinese government has previously banned virtual currency investments, and multiple warnings have been issued regarding the risks associated with platforms like "Xinkangjia" [23][24]. - Local authorities have identified "Xinkangjia" as a significant illegal fundraising risk, highlighting its use of high-return promises and multi-level marketing tactics [28][24]. - The article emphasizes the growing trend of such schemes leveraging stablecoins to bypass financial regulations, posing a threat to investors and the broader financial system [30][33].
鑫慷嘉平台被曝崩盘:当资金盘与稳定币挂钩,资金被快速跨境转移
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-07-09 12:28
Core Viewpoint - The "Xin Kang Jia" platform is suspected to be a Ponzi scheme combined with a multi-level marketing structure, leading to significant financial losses for investors, with estimates of around 13 billion yuan involved and approximately 2 million investors affected [3][19][24]. Group 1: Platform Structure and Operations - "Xin Kang Jia" was initially presented as a platform for oil and commodity trading, later claiming to engage in futures trading linked to the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX), promising high returns of up to 0.2% daily [4][10]. - The platform utilized a nine-level hierarchical structure to incentivize recruitment, with varying rewards based on the number of direct referrals, creating a system that heavily relied on new investor contributions to pay returns to earlier investors [10][11]. - The platform's operations involved the use of stablecoins like USDT for transactions, complicating the process for new investors who often transferred funds to higher-level members for conversion, thus bypassing direct investment [15][16]. Group 2: Regulatory Warnings and Risks - Regulatory bodies had issued multiple warnings regarding the risks associated with "Xin Kang Jia," highlighting its illegal fundraising activities and the lack of legitimate investment projects [17][18][24]. - The DGCX publicly denied any affiliation with "Xin Kang Jia," emphasizing that the platform had no authorization to operate under its name, further indicating the fraudulent nature of the claims made by the platform [6][19]. - The rise of stablecoins has led to a resurgence of similar schemes, with many platforms adopting these digital currencies to evade financial regulations, posing significant risks to investors [20][24]. Group 3: Investor Experiences and Consequences - Many investors were lured into the scheme by promises of high returns and the belief that the investment was legitimate, often encouraged by friends or acquaintances [14][23]. - Once the platform collapsed, investors found themselves unable to withdraw their funds, leading to widespread panic and the dissolution of investor groups [14][22]. - The investigation revealed that the platform's associated company had a registered capital of 30 million yuan but had not actually contributed any capital, raising further red flags about its legitimacy [14].
“迪拜黄金交易所”暴雷前48小时:18亿稳定币被转移
阿尔法工场研究院· 2025-07-07 15:04
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the collapse of DGCX Xin Kang Jia, a financial platform that was involved in a Ponzi scheme, highlighting the fraudulent activities and the significant financial losses incurred by investors [1][2][28]. Group 1: Company Overview - DGCX Xin Kang Jia falsely presented itself as a branch of the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX) [4][6]. - The platform had a membership base of approximately 2 million individuals [8][33]. - The company was registered in Guizhou, China, and underwent a change in legal representation, with the new owner having no actual capital contribution [10][11]. Group 2: Financial Misconduct - Prior to its collapse, DGCX Xin Kang Jia transferred approximately 1.8 billion USDT (around 12.9 billion RMB) to a shell company in the Cayman Islands within 48 hours [28][30]. - The platform's operations were characterized by deceptive practices, including fake data and manipulated investment returns [16][35]. - The platform's leadership reportedly took high commissions, with up to 50% of the funds being siphoned off, leaving little for actual returns to investors [35]. Group 3: Investor Impact - The collapse of DGCX Xin Kang Jia resulted in significant financial losses for investors, reminiscent of previous financial fraud cases in China [2][21]. - Many investors were drawn in by promises of high returns and were encouraged to recruit others, resembling a multi-level marketing scheme [25][24]. - The article notes that despite warnings and previous incidents of financial fraud, new scams continue to emerge, indicating a persistent vulnerability among investors [37][38].