| 23 珠海市斗门区井岸镇刘文祥麻辣烫店 | 56 | 2 | 1 | 珠海市斗门区井岸镇港霞东路128-156号汇星商业城1楼A2 | 4月22 | 餐饮服 | 限期 | （个体工商户) | 务 | 日 | 整改 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 4月22 | 24 珠海市斗门区井岸镇安民麻辣烫店 | 餐饮服 | 限期 | 珠海市斗门区井岸镇何家村二巷十八号一楼1号 | 56 | 1 | 4 | （个体工商户) | 务 | 日 | 整改 | | 4月22 | 餐饮服 | 限期 | 珠海市斗门区井岸镇北澳西路7号 | 25 珠海市斗门区井岸镇志允烧腊快餐店 | 61 | 0 | 2 | 务 | 日 | 整改 | | | 4月22 | 餐饮服 | 限期 | 珠海市斗门区井岸镇北澳西路9号 | 26 珠海市斗门区井岸镇自信烧腊店 | 61 | 0 | 2 | 务 | 日 | 整改 | | | 4月22 | 餐饮服 | 限期 | 斗门区井岸新民路179号 | 27 斗门区井岸老赵甜品店 | 5 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses a comparative test conducted by the Hangzhou Consumer Rights Protection Committee on swimming goggles to help consumers make informed choices [1][2] - The test combined questionnaire surveys and objective testing based on industry standards QB/T 4734-2023, focusing on various performance indicators [1][3] Group 2 - A total of 22 swimming goggles were purchased, including 5 from physical stores and 17 from online platforms, covering popular brands such as Li Ning, 361°, and Decathlon [1][2] - The testing included assessments of appearance quality, optical performance, physical performance, and functionality [1][4][13][14] Group 3 - The optical performance tests included key indicators such as transmittance uniformity, spherical power, cylindrical power, and minimum optical aperture, with results indicating varying performance among brands [5][7][10][12] - The physical performance tests showed that all 22 products met the industry standards, with specific brands like YOTTOY and Arena performing particularly well [13][18] Group 4 - The functionality test focused on anti-fog performance, with several brands exceeding the industry standard requirements [14][18] - Recommendations for consumers include selecting compliant products, ensuring a comfortable fit, and prioritizing anti-fog features [22][23][24]

Core Points - Ningbo Municipal Market Supervision Administration conducted food safety inspections and found 6 batches of non-compliant food products [1][2] - The non-compliant products included items such as licorice olives, onion-flavored pastries, and eggplants, with specific violations related to sulfur dioxide residue, peroxide value, and pesticide residues [1][2] Group 1: Non-compliant Products - Licorice olives from Ningbo Yinzhou Zhonghe Ruyue Food Business had sulfur dioxide residue at 0.675 g/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.35 g/kg [2] - Onion-flavored pastries from Sanjiang Shopping Club had a peroxide value of 3.0 g/100g, surpassing the acceptable limit of 0.25 g/100g [2] - Wood beans from Ningbo Fenghua Yuan Yifang Food Store had an acid value of 5.5 mg/g, exceeding the standard of 3 mg/g [2] Group 2: Regulatory Actions - Local market supervision departments have been instructed to investigate the non-compliant food products and their producers, with findings recorded in the food safety credit archives [2] - Consumers are encouraged to report any non-compliant products found in the market by calling the complaint hotline 12345 or visiting local market supervision departments [2]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint The recent food safety inspection conducted by the Taizhou Market Supervision Administration revealed that out of 312 food samples tested, 307 passed while 5 were found to be non-compliant with national food safety standards. The non-compliance primarily involved excessive food additives and pesticide residues. Group 1: Food Safety Inspection Results - A total of 312 food samples from 23 categories, including grain products, edible oils, and dairy products, were tested [3][4] - 307 samples were compliant, while 5 samples failed the inspection [3][4] - The non-compliant samples were related to excessive food additives and pesticide residues [3][4] Group 2: Specific Non-Compliant Products - Non-compliant products included: - Shrimp from a vendor in Wenling with sulfur dioxide residue exceeding the standard [3] - Green rice cakes from a vendor in Taizhou containing prohibited colorants [3] - Green rice cakes from a vendor in Sanmen with excessive sorbic acid [3] - Green rice cakes from another vendor in Linhai also with excessive sorbic acid [3] - Celery from a vendor in Wenling with pesticide residue exceeding the standard [4] Group 3: Regulatory Actions - The Taizhou Market Supervision Administration has mandated local market regulatory bodies to take immediate actions such as recalling and removing the non-compliant products from shelves [4] - Local authorities are required to report the rectification measures and results to the Taizhou Market Supervision Administration within three months [4]

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the "Private Economy Promotion Law" aims to provide a clear direction for the development of the private economy in China, with Chengdu focusing on quality-driven growth through collaborative efforts between government and enterprises [1] Group 1: Industry Support and Development - Chengdu's market regulatory bureau has prioritized quality enhancement as a core driver for industrial development, implementing tailored quality improvement plans for 723 enterprises across key industries, addressing over 2020 quality issues [3] - The establishment of a "one-stop" service platform integrates various quality infrastructure resources, significantly reducing time and communication costs for enterprises [5] - Chengdu has built 8 service stations and 40 offline service platforms, providing services to over 109,000 enterprises and resolving more than 10,000 quality issues [6] Group 2: Case Studies of Successful Enterprises - Sichuan Teweining Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. faced challenges in market recognition but improved its technology and market position through government support and collaboration with research institutions, leading to industry-leading technology recognition by the end of 2024 [2] - Sichuan Jianshan Technology Co., Ltd. transformed from a small startup to a leading enterprise with over 400 employees, achieving significant revenue growth to 160 million yuan through tailored support from the "one-stop" service platform [4] Group 3: Brand Development and Recognition - Chengdu's market regulatory bureau has successfully nurtured brands like XGIMI Technology, which has become a benchmark in the smart projection industry, receiving multiple awards for quality excellence [7][8] - The city has recognized 8 organizations and 2 individuals with the China Quality Award and has established 125 geographical indication products, showcasing the effectiveness of its brand cultivation efforts [8] Group 4: Vision for Future Development - Chengdu is on a path to becoming a "world quality highland," reflecting its commitment to enhancing the private economy and quality standards in the region [9]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The recent food safety inspection in Shaoxing City revealed that out of 178 food samples tested, 169 passed while 9 were found to be non-compliant, primarily due to excessive food additives and pesticide residues [3][4]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 178 food samples were tested across 19 categories including beverages, frozen foods, and dairy products [3]. - 169 samples were deemed compliant with national food safety standards, while 9 samples failed the inspection [3][4]. Group 2: Non-compliance Issues - The non-compliant samples were primarily related to two issues: 1. Exceeding limits for food additives 2. Excessive pesticide and veterinary drug residues [3][4]. - Specific instances of non-compliance included: - Chili from a vegetable store with a pesticide residue of 1.96 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 1 mg/kg [5]. - Longan from multiple fruit stores with sulfur dioxide residue levels significantly above the permissible limit of 0.05 g/kg [5][6]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions - The Shaoxing Market Supervision Administration has mandated local regulatory bodies to take immediate action, including product recalls and risk control measures [4]. - Local authorities are required to report back on the handling of non-compliant products within three months [4].

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint The Xiangshan Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, revealing that out of 188 batches tested, 175 were compliant while 13 were found to be non-compliant, indicating a need for improved food safety standards in the region [1]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 188 batches were inspected, with 175 passing and 13 failing the safety standards [1]. - Specific non-compliant products included small台芒 from Xiangshan Alei Fruit Store, which contained 0.12 mg/kg of the pesticide 戊唑醇, exceeding the allowable limit of 0.05 mg/kg [2][3]. - Other non-compliant items included 铁棍山药 and 尖椒 from Xiangshan Jiafuli Fresh Supermarket, which had levels of 咪鲜胺 and 吡虫啉 that exceeded safety limits [2][3]. Group 2: Non-Compliant Products - Non-compliant products were identified from various vendors, including: - 小葱 from multiple vendors with 戊唑醇 levels of 1.61 mg/kg and 1.54 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 0.5 mg/kg [3]. - 山药 from Xiangshan Xizhou Rongxin Supermarket with 咪鲜胺 levels of 3.32 mg/kg, surpassing the 0.3 mg/kg limit [3]. - 龙眼 from two vendors with 二氧化硫 levels of 0.196 g/kg and 0.170 g/kg, both exceeding the 0.05 g/kg limit [3]. Group 3: Compliance Actions - The Xiangshan Market Supervision Administration has mandated local market supervision branches to take legal action against the vendors of the non-compliant products [2][3]. - The administration's proactive measures aim to enhance food safety and compliance among local food vendors [1].

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint The Guizhou Qiannan Market Supervision Administration has conducted a special food safety inspection as part of the "You Order, I Inspect" initiative for the 2025 "3.15" Food Safety Day, revealing that out of 100 food samples tested, 97 passed while 3 failed to meet safety standards. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 100 food samples were tested, with 97 passing and 3 failing [2][3] - The non-compliant items included marinated chicken feet and lemon yellow in cold noodles, which did not meet food safety requirements [2][3] - The inspection covered various food categories, including dairy products, edible oils, and school foods [2] Group 2: Specific Non-compliant Products - The first non-compliant product was marinated chicken feet from a vendor in Longli County, with a detected level of sunset yellow at 0.0102 g/kg, exceeding the permissible limit [2] - The second non-compliant product was cold noodles from a vendor in Dushan County, with a detected level of lemon yellow at 0.0193 g/kg, also exceeding safety standards [2] - The third non-compliant product was marinated chicken claws from a vendor in Fuquan City, with a detected level of sunset yellow at 0.0600 g/kg, surpassing the allowed limit [2] Group 3: Compliance and Public Health - The initiative aims to enhance public health and safety by ensuring food products meet regulatory standards [2][3] - The results of the inspections are publicly disclosed to promote transparency and consumer awareness [2][3] - The program reflects ongoing efforts by local authorities to monitor food safety and protect consumer interests [2][3]

汉阳区市场监督管理局食品安全监督抽检信息公告（2025年第1期） 为切实保障广大人民群众的食品安全，根据《中华人民共和国食品安全法》的规定，汉阳区市场监督管理局组织检测机构对本辖区生产经营企业开展了食品 安全抽检，现将近期抽检信息进行公示如下: 一、总体情况。本次公布包括食用农产品110批次、酒类1批次、调味品20批次、粮食加工品21批次、淀粉及淀粉制品2批次、蔬菜制品8批次、糕点2批次、 食用油、油脂及其制品3批次、豆制品4批次、水产制品2批次、水果制品1批次、薯类和膨化食品2批次、方便食品2批次、炒货食品及坚果制品1批次、罐头1 批次、肉制品2批次、餐饮食品35批次共17类合计217批次。本次抽检196批次合格，21批次不合格。 | 监 | 督 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- ...

源汽车试验 检测中心有 限公司股权 案 2025 | | 业有限公司 | | 2025 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 4 | 收购圣诺哥 | 胜科公用事业有限公司，丸红株式会社，圣诺哥能源公司 | 年5 月9 | | | 能源公司股 权案 | | 日 | | | 中国汽车工 | | | 5 收购南方 （韶关）智 能网联新能 中国汽车工程研究院股份有限公司，广州汽车集团股份有限公司 年5 月9 日 6 加拿大公共 部门养老金 加拿大公共部门养老金投资委员会，Cintra 4352238 Investments Inc.，加拿大养老金计划投资委员会，407 International Inc. 2025 年5 程研究院股 份有限公司 转自：市场监管总局网站 序 号 案件名称 参与集中的经营者 审结 时间 1 太盟（珠 海）管理咨 询合伙企业 （有限合 伙）与高和 丰德（北 京）企业管 理服务有限 公司等经营 者收购北京 银河万达企 业管理有限 公司等48家 公司股权案 太盟（珠海）管理咨询合伙企业（有限合伙） 高和丰德（北京）企业管理服务有限公司 腾讯控股有限公司 北京市潘达商业管理 ...