（来源：内蒙古日报） 转自：内蒙古日报 □本报记者 高敏娜 通讯员 韩雨格 "对企业来说，节约的时间就是经济效益！"日前，兴安盟扎赉特旗天润新能源有限公司负责人在快速拿 到风电项目用地预审与选址意见书后感慨道。这份关键审批的办理时间从5个工作日压减至2个，为项目 开工抢出宝贵窗口期——这背后，是兴安盟自2025年11月启动的重大项目联审联批工作机制在发力。 该机制聚焦投资额度大、带动作用强的重大项目，组建跨部门专项工作组，通过"集中办公+专业保 障"，推动前期手续"一站式"办理。机制运行以来，已对全盟128个2026年计划新建项目开展摸排调度， 多项审批明显提速，有效破解项目落地的"最先一公里"难题。从盟级层面的机制创新到县级层面的帮办 代办服务落地，兴安盟层层递进，织就了一张覆盖政策落地到细节服务的全流程保障网。 眼下在兴安盟，一股以机制创新为牵引、多方服务协同发力的"暖流"正持续涌动：审批做"减法"，打通 项目落地堵点；融资做"加法"，引金融活水精准滴灌；法治做"乘法"，筑牢企业发展"安全护盾"；信用 做"除法"，解锁经营"信用枷锁"，全方位化解企业经营痛点，激活区域发展内生动力。 融资难、融资贵是企业发 ...

中国—上海合作组织产业园区联盟扩容 中国两园区加入 中新网青岛12月17日电(王禹)中国(山东)—上合组织国家特殊经济区域合作会议17日在中国—上海合作 组织地方经贸合作示范区(简称"上合示范区")举行。会上，中国—上海合作组织绿色产业发展合作区(天 津子牙经开区)等3家上合组织国家园区加入中国—上海合作组织产业园区联盟(筹)。 据介绍，特殊经济区是推动国际区域合作与全球经济治理的重要载体。《上海合作组织成员国元首理事 会天津宣言》提到，成员国将根据各自国内法律法规和自愿原则开展特殊经济区合作，包括有关国家发 挥青岛"中国-上合组织地方经贸合作示范区"潜力。 2023年，上合示范区与40个国内外园区共建中国—上海合作组织产业园区联盟(筹)。该联盟致力于整合 中国与上合组织各成员国的产业园区资源，通过加强园区间协同联动，打破地域壁垒，充分挖掘各方在 资源禀赋和特色产业领域的合作潜力。 近年来，围绕粮油大宗贸易、物流运输、农业机械等重点合作领域，上合示范区常态化举办"走进上 合"经贸产业对接活动，组织来自中国14个省(市、自治区)的470余家企业，与100余家上合组织国家企 业洽谈600余项合作需求，有效推动人流 ...

泰兴的科创公司为扩大产能愁眉不展 兴化的批发零售企业因资金不足而犯难 这些曾困扰无数中小微企业的发展难题 如今正被一个平台破解 01 02 能为企业做什么？ 生成专属信用信息报告：平台基于企业授权提供的账户资金流水，动态生成反映经营状况与偿债能力的资金流信用信息报告，帮助企业告别"信用白户"。 两类产品：提供资金流信用信息报告与资金流信用信息明细汇总产品，供企业在融资时一键授权金融机构查询使用。 自主可控、安全便捷：企业可自主选择共享某一或多个账户信息，无授权不调用。 03 平台是什么？ "全国中小微企业资金流信用信息共享平台"由中国人民银行征信中心负责建设、运行及维护，可在全国范围内统一共享企业资金流信用信息，全生命周期 的动态反映企业的经营状况、收支状况、偿债能力、履约行为等，能丰富企业信用图景、助力中小微企业融资。 3188家 如何使用平台？ 登录官网https://www.cfcii.org.cn/，完成企业身份验证。或登录"全国中小微企业资金流信用信息共享平台"微信小程序进行操作。 资金账号绑定：企业通过平台操作绑定资金账号，委托银行等信息提供机构按照其要求对外提供资金流信用信息。 查询授权管理：企 ...

Core Viewpoint - A new company, Xuyuan Grain and Oil Trading Co., Ltd., has been established in Jishishan County with a registered capital of 100,000 RMB, focusing on various food and agricultural product sales and services [1] Company Summary - The legal representative of the newly established company is Lu Yuping [1] - The registered capital of the company is 100,000 RMB [1] - The company is involved in a wide range of activities including food sales, retail of tobacco products (subject to approval), grain sales, and sales of beans and tubers [1] Business Scope - The company’s business scope includes: - Licensed projects: Food sales; retail of tobacco products (subject to approval) [1] - General projects: Grain sales; sales of beans and tubers; retail of edible agricultural products; internet sales of food (only pre-packaged food); initial processing of edible agricultural products; sales of agricultural by-products; daily necessities sales; sales of health food (pre-packaged); wholesale of fresh fruits; acquisition of primary agricultural products; wholesale and retail of fresh vegetables and fruits; sales of fertilizers; oilseed planting; planting of traditional Chinese medicine (excluding rare and precious varieties) [1] - The company can independently operate other legal and regulatory non-prohibited or restricted projects [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent legal troubles faced by Golden Dragon Fish (金龙鱼) due to a contract fraud case involving its subsidiary, Guangzhou Yihai (广州益海), which has been accused of participating in a significant palm oil fraud scheme amounting to 5 billion yuan [3][9]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The fraud case involves a commercial collaboration between Guangzhou Yihai, Anhui Huawen International Trade Co., and Yunnan Huijia Import and Export Co., where Guangzhou Yihai acted as a storage intermediary for palm oil transactions [6]. - The fraudulent activities were facilitated by bribery, where Yunnan Huijia's representative bribed key personnel at Anhui Huawen to alter the terms of their trade agreement from "payment before delivery" to "delivery before payment" [6][7]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings and Financial Implications - The first-instance judgment by the Huai Bei Intermediate People's Court found Guangzhou Yihai guilty of contract fraud, imposing a fine of 1 million yuan and ordering it to jointly compensate Anhui Huawen for 1.881 billion yuan [9][10]. - The total direct economic loss to Anhui Huawen is reported to be 3.23 billion yuan, with indirect losses amounting to 2.015 billion yuan [7]. Group 3: Company’s Defense and Market Reactions - Guangzhou Yihai has publicly denied the allegations, claiming it acted in accordance with the agreements and conducted due diligence during the transactions [10][11]. - The management of Golden Dragon Fish highlighted inconsistencies in Anhui Huawen's claims, such as the impracticality of storing palm oil for over a decade without spoilage, which contradicts standard trading practices [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The company Jinlongyu (金龙鱼) claims innocence in a major fraud case involving 5 billion yuan related to palm oil transactions, following a first-instance court ruling that found its subsidiary guilty of contract fraud [1][4]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The fraud case involves a commercial collaboration between Guangzhou Yihai (广州益海), Anhui Huawen (安徽华文), and Yunnan Huijia (云南惠嘉) from 2008 to 2014, where Guangzhou Yihai acted as a storage intermediary for palm oil [2]. - The transactions between Anhui Huawen and Yunnan Huijia were characterized as financing trade, which is common in bulk commodities but carries risks of loss of rights and funding chain disruptions [2][3]. - Yunnan Huijia's representative, Zhang Lihua, allegedly bribed executives at Anhui Huawen to change the agreed payment terms from "payment before delivery" to "delivery before payment" [2][3]. Group 2: Details of the Fraud - From March 2012 to December 2014, Zhang Lihua used bribery and forged documents to misappropriate palm oil, leading to direct economic losses of 3.23 billion yuan and indirect losses of 2.015 billion yuan for Anhui Huawen [3]. - The court found Guangzhou Yihai complicit in the fraud, imposing a fine of 1 million yuan and ordering it to jointly repay 1.881 billion yuan alongside Yunnan Huijia [4]. Group 3: Company’s Defense - Guangzhou Yihai and its parent company Jinlongyu have appealed the court's decision, asserting that they acted in accordance with the storage agreement and conducted due diligence [5][6]. - The company claims that it did not participate in any fraudulent activities and that the losses should not be attributed to them, as they followed proper procedures in verifying inventory and transactions [5][6]. Group 4: Market Implications - The case has drawn significant attention due to the scale of the alleged fraud, with the total amount involved reaching 5 billion yuan, raising concerns about the integrity of trade practices in the palm oil sector [1][8]. - The financial health of Yunnan Huijia is in question, as it reportedly has numerous enforcement actions against it, indicating a lack of ability to repay the alleged debts [8].

Core Viewpoint - The company Jinlongyu claims that Anhui Huawen is attempting to illegally transfer its massive losses after being defrauded in a significant palm oil scam involving 5 billion yuan [1][2]. Group 1: Background of the Case - From 2008 to 2014, Guangzhou Yihai acted as a storage intermediary for Anhui Huawen and Yunnan Huijia, responsible for storing palm oil imported by Anhui Huawen [2]. - The transaction between Anhui Huawen and Yunnan Huijia was essentially a financing trade, which is common in bulk commodities but carries risks such as loss of control over goods and funding chain disruptions [2][3]. - Yunnan Huijia's representative bribed Anhui Huawen's executives to change the agreed payment terms from "payment before delivery" to "delivery before payment" [2][3]. Group 2: Details of the Fraud - Yunnan Huijia's representative exceeded the agreed limits to obtain goods and used forged documents to conceal the fact that the palm oil stored at Guangzhou Yihai had already been sold [3]. - Between March 2012 and December 2014, Yunnan Huijia's representative bribed Anhui Huawen's employees to facilitate the acquisition of goods through fraudulent means [3]. - The direct economic loss to Anhui Huawen was reported at 3.23 billion yuan, with indirect losses amounting to 2.015 billion yuan [3]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Company Response - The court found Guangzhou Yihai guilty of contract fraud and imposed a fine of 1 million yuan, along with a compensation responsibility of 1.881 billion yuan [4][5]. - Guangzhou Yihai and its parent company, Yihai Kerry, have appealed the ruling, asserting that they did not participate in any fraudulent activities and that Anhui Huawen is attempting to shift its losses onto them [5][6]. - The chairman of Guangzhou Yihai stated that they followed due diligence as per the storage agreement and had no knowledge of any fraudulent actions [6]. Group 4: Market Implications and Observations - The case has drawn attention to the unusual storage claims made by Anhui Huawen, which allegedly stored over 1 million tons of palm oil for over a decade, raising questions about the feasibility and legality of such practices [7]. - Legal experts suggest that the current judgment may favor the victims, as Yunnan Huijia appears to lack the ability to repay the defrauded amounts [8].

Core Insights - State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are crucial for the national economy and actively engage in the futures market to manage risks and enhance industry integration [1][2] - The application of futures tools has evolved from simple hedging to a comprehensive integration across the entire supply chain, significantly benefiting the company's operations [5][9] Group 1: Futures Market Participation - Since its establishment in 2017, the company has focused on supporting national food security and has integrated futures and derivatives into its entire supply chain [2] - The company began using futures for hedging in 2018, initially focusing on soybean meal and corn, which has since expanded to over 1 million tons annually [3][4] Group 2: Risk Management and Operational Efficiency - The company transitioned from a reactive approach to a proactive risk management strategy, utilizing futures to stabilize pricing and reduce inventory devaluation risks [3][4] - A specific case in Q1 2025 demonstrated successful hedging, where the company locked in a profit of 180 yuan per ton by managing the basis effectively [4] Group 3: Value Creation Across the Supply Chain - The company has moved beyond simple hedging to include basis trading, secondary pricing, and futures delivery in its daily operations, enhancing collaboration with upstream and downstream partners [5][6] - The establishment of a designated delivery warehouse has improved operational standards and customer relationships, allowing for better risk management and financing options [7][8] Group 4: Strategic Integration and Compliance - The company adheres to strict internal controls and compliance measures, ensuring that all futures transactions are aimed at hedging rather than speculation [9] - The understanding of hedging has deepened, recognizing that successful hedging is linked to overall business performance rather than isolated futures gains or losses [9][10] Group 5: Future Outlook and National Strategy - The company is exploring innovative hedging models that extend risk management services to farmers and small enterprises, aligning with national agricultural service goals [8][11] - The futures market is seen as a key component in optimizing resource allocation and enhancing the company's competitive edge in the agricultural sector [10][11]

Group 1 - Company Guolian Co., Ltd. (SH 603613) announced its ninth board meeting on October 29, 2025, to review the third quarter report for 2025 [1] - For the first half of 2025, Guolian's revenue composition is as follows: Petrochemical accounts for 56.12%, Grain and Oil Trade 16.11%, Sanitary Products 13.36%, Fertilizer 7.1%, and Glass 5.6% [1] - As of the report date, Guolian's market capitalization is 20.5 billion yuan [1] Group 2 - The A-share market has surpassed 4000 points, marking a significant resurgence after ten years of stagnation, with technology leading the market's transformation [1] - A new "slow bull" market pattern is emerging, indicating a shift in market dynamics [1]

Group 1 - The Shanghai Stock Exchange criticized Guolian Shares for inaccurate financial disclosures and improper use of raised funds, violating multiple regulations [1] - The disciplinary actions included a public reprimand for the former chairman Liu Quan, former general manager Qian Xiaojun, and former CFO Tian Tao [1] - The company failed to respond to regulatory inquiries in a timely manner, which contributed to the severity of the violations [1] Group 2 - For the first half of 2025, Guolian Shares reported a revenue composition where the petrochemical sector accounted for 56.12%, grain and oil trade for 16.11%, sanitary products for 13.36%, fertilizers for 7.1%, and glass for 5.6% [2] - As of the report date, the market capitalization of Guolian Shares was 23.7 billion yuan [2]