Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for long-term investors to deeply interpret the reshaping of the global order and assess the cost-effectiveness of various assets, particularly in light of the increasing risks associated with U.S. recession and the implications of new investment paradigms [3][10]. Group 1: Introduction - The article discusses two key variables at the beginning of the year: Deepseek and equivalent tariffs, which reinforce the underlying logic of a new investment paradigm characterized by increasing de-globalization, trends in AI industries, and debt cycles [3][10]. - It suggests that the global risk premium has risen, potentially amplifying asymmetric pricing risks, particularly regarding the underpricing of recession risks in major asset classes [3][10]. Group 2: U.S. Recession Trading - Historical data indicates that U.S. recession trading often begins 1-6 months before the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) officially declares a recession [4][47]. - Typical characteristics during U.S. recession trading include declines in U.S. stocks and industrial metals, falling 10-year Treasury yields, widening credit spreads, and defensive stocks outperforming cyclical stocks [4][47]. Group 3: Volatility During Recession Trading - The article notes that during past U.S. recession trading phases, asset volatility has generally increased, with risk assets experiencing greater volatility than safe-haven assets [5][65]. - Specific examples include the Nasdaq and Hang Seng Index showing higher volatility compared to gold and U.S. Treasuries during recession periods [5][65]. Group 4: All-Weather Strategy Model - The article proposes an all-weather strategy model to adjust for the underestimation of U.S. recession risks, focusing on the asymmetric pricing risks present in current asset allocations [6][73]. - It ranks various assets based on their volatility amplification factors during past recession trading periods, with Nasdaq, Indian SENSEX30, and Hang Seng Technology leading the list [6][73]. - The model suggests adjusting asset weights based on these factors, increasing allocations to underweighted assets like Chinese convertible bonds and A-share dividends while reducing exposure to overvalued assets like Nasdaq and Indian SENSEX30 [6][73].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for long-term investors to deeply interpret the reshaping of the global order and assess the cost-effectiveness of various assets, particularly in light of the underestimation of U.S. recession risks in global asset pricing [3][20][46]. Group 1: Introduction - The beginning of the year has seen two key variables (Deepseek and equivalent tariffs) that reinforce the underlying logic of a new investment paradigm, characterized by increasing de-globalization, trends in AI industries, and debt cycles [3][10]. - The global risk premium has risen, potentially amplifying asymmetric pricing risks, with current global risk assets having largely recovered to levels prior to the imposition of equivalent tariffs [3][20]. Group 2: U.S. Recession Trading - Historical data shows that U.S. recession trading often begins 1-6 months before the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) officially declares a recession [4][47]. - Typical characteristics during U.S. recession trading include declines in U.S. stocks and industrial metals, falling 10-year Treasury yields, widening U.S. credit spreads, and defensive stocks outperforming cyclical stocks [4][47]. Group 3: Volatility During Recession Trading - During past U.S. recession trading phases, asset volatility has increased, with risk assets experiencing greater volatility than safe-haven assets [5][65]. - The volatility amplification factors for risk assets (e.g., Nasdaq, Hang Seng Index) are higher than those for safe-haven assets (e.g., gold, U.S. Treasuries) [5][65]. Group 4: All-Weather Strategy Model - The article discusses how to adjust the all-weather strategy model to correct the underestimation of U.S. recession risks in asset pricing [6][73]. - The model suggests that the risk parity principle should be applied based on the adjusted volatility of various assets, leading to changes in asset allocation [6][73]. - The revised model indicates an increase in allocation for Chinese convertible bonds and A-share dividends, while reducing allocations for Nasdaq and Indian SENSEX30 [6][73]. Group 5: Asymmetric Pricing Risks - The current global investment landscape shows a significant underpricing of U.S. recession risks, which presents an opportunity for asymmetric trading strategies [20][46]. - The article highlights the importance of adjusting asset allocations to account for the potential impact of U.S. recession risks on various asset classes [20][46].

Core Viewpoint - The global asset allocation should focus on three core factors: de-globalization, debt cycles, and AI industry trends [1] Group 1: Investment Strategy - The current global economic uncertainty necessitates an investment strategy that adopts a "global barbell strategy," which includes both stable assets and high-yield, high-volatility assets [1] - The company maintains a positive outlook on investments in gold, short-duration U.S. Treasury bonds, Chinese interest rate bonds, and China's dividend assets combined with AI technology industries [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the underestimation of recession risks in the U.S. by global asset pricing, emphasizing the need for new asset allocation strategies in the context of the debt cycle [3][16]. Group 1: Economic Indicators - The current pricing levels of U.S. equities significantly deviate from the implied risks indicated by recent soft data, suggesting a potential mispricing in the market [4][8]. - The U.S. Soft CAI reflects subjective expectations of future economic conditions from businesses and consumers, which may not align with actual market performance [11][12]. Group 2: Market Sentiment - Recent market sentiment has been overly optimistic, as indicated by the VIX futures returning to a contango state, suggesting rising expectations of volatility and accumulated risks [12][14]. - The BNP global risk premium index has reached historical low levels, indicating high market sentiment towards U.S. equities [14]. Group 3: Investment Strategy - The article suggests a contrarian approach to U.S. equity allocation, focusing on defensive sectors in light of the current market conditions and potential risks [11][12]. - The analysis highlights the importance of monitoring economic policy uncertainty and its impact on equity risk premiums, which are currently misaligned with soft data indicators [9][10].

董事总经理（MD）、首席资产研究官 戴康 CFA 广发证券发展研究中心 邮箱：daikang@gf.com.cn 报告摘要 ● 引言： 部分投资者仍然对"新投资范式"认识不足。特朗普政府企图通过非常规手段化解当前全球供给与需求失 衡，世界秩序重塑的底层逻辑不可逆。新投资范式三大宏观交易背景：美债利率higher for longer+中债利率lower for longer+全球风险溢价中枢抬升。 ● 战略层面：全球资产定价显著低估了美国衰退风险。 中长期投资者需要深刻解读世界秩序重塑的方向和权衡各 类资产的性价比，并且关注组合中存在的非对称定价风险。当前全球投资者对于美国经济的判断存在巨大的分 歧，如果从美债利率倒挂的信号来看，当前市场显著低估了美国经济衰退的风险。我们认为当前全球大类资产的 非对称定价的风险主要在于美国资产对于衰退的风险定价严重不足。因此，美国"衰退交易"是非常好的非对称交 易——即赢多输少的交易策略。 ● 中长期而言，关税强化了新范式的三大底层逻辑（逆全球化加剧、债务周期错位、AI产业趋势），仍是基于全 天候策略调整的反脆弱的"全球杠铃策略"。 仍然建议在"全球杠铃策略"组合中下调↓美股 ...

Introduction - The article discusses the "new investment paradigm" and highlights the ongoing restructuring of the global order, driven by unconventional methods to address the current global supply-demand imbalance [3][9]. Strategic Level - Global asset pricing significantly underestimates the risk of a U.S. recession, with a notable divergence in investor sentiment regarding the U.S. economy [3][18]. - The current market is seen as having a substantial mispricing of recession risks, particularly in U.S. assets, suggesting that a "recession trade" could be a favorable asymmetric trading strategy [3][52]. - The article emphasizes the need for long-term investors to deeply understand the direction of the global order's restructuring and to assess the cost-effectiveness of various assets [22][51]. Tactical Level - Short-term sentiment in global risk assets, particularly U.S. equities, is perceived to be overstretched, following a significant rebound catalyzed by tariff easing [5][53]. - Indicators such as the VIX futures returning to a contango state and the BNP global risk premium index reaching historical lows suggest high market sentiment but also an accumulation of risk [5][56]. - The article advises a contrarian approach to U.S. equity allocation, focusing on defensive sectors in the short term while monitoring developments in negotiations with key global players [5][64]. Macro Trading Background - The new investment paradigm is framed by three macro trading backgrounds: U.S. Treasury yields expected to remain high for an extended period, Chinese bond yields expected to remain low, and an elevation in the global risk premium [3][13]. - The article outlines the implications of these macroeconomic factors on global asset correlations and volatility, indicating a potential long-term disruption to existing asset allocation frameworks [13][18].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that global major asset classes have shown significant recovery, particularly risk assets such as equities, commodities, and alternatives, following positive developments in US-China trade talks [4][10] - The "Global Barbell Strategy" is proposed as the optimal response for asset allocation in the context of a changing investment paradigm, focusing on three tactical opportunities for aggressive buying: improved win rates due to easing trade tensions, attractive valuations of Chinese assets, and liquidity issues leading to opportunities [5][13] - The article highlights that the strategic long-term view is influenced by three underlying logics: the intensification of de-globalization, misalignment of debt cycles, and trends in the AI industry, reinforcing the need for an all-weather strategy to balance risks and returns [5][13] Group 2 - Key financial indicators from May 5 to May 13 show a convergence in the SOFR-OIS spread, indicating a slight easing of US dollar liquidity, and an increase in the US financial conditions index, reflecting improved overall financial conditions [6][10] - The article provides a calendar of important global economic data releases and events from May 19 to June 1, including China's fixed asset investment and retail sales, as well as US initial jobless claims and GDP estimates [16] - The focus charts track global major asset dynamics, showing significant movements in various asset classes and their correlations, which are essential for understanding market trends and making informed investment decisions [17]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the irreversible logic behind the restructuring of the global order and the new investment paradigm, driven by unconventional policies from the Trump administration to address global supply and demand imbalances [3][4][14]. Group 1: Globalization and G2 Imbalances - The globalization process has intensified the trade, production, and debt imbalances between the G2 nations, with the U.S. positioned as the largest consumer and China as the largest producer [9][13]. - Since China's accession to the WTO in 2001, the U.S. has increasingly relied on debt expansion to create demand, leading to continuous trade deficits and external debt accumulation, while China has maintained a trade surplus through its manufacturing capabilities [9][13]. - As major economies move away from high growth, the importance of "efficiency" is yielding to "distribution," indicating a long-term trend towards increased de-globalization [9][13]. Group 2: Restructuring Global Order - The "Mar-a-Lago Agreement" aims to reshape global trade and monetary order through tariffs and the restructuring of U.S. debt, addressing long-standing trade and fiscal deficits while enhancing U.S. export competitiveness [4][11][23]. - Although the full implementation of the Mar-a-Lago Agreement faces significant challenges, understanding its implications is crucial for anticipating future policy directions from the Trump administration [4][11][23]. Group 3: New Investment Paradigm - The new investment paradigm is framed by three macro trading backgrounds: U.S. Treasury yields remaining "higher for longer," Chinese bond yields remaining "lower for longer," and an increase in global risk premium [5][12][25]. - The ongoing trend of de-globalization and isolationist policies under Trump will exacerbate uncertainties in global economic growth and inflation, reinforcing the underlying logic of the new investment paradigm [5][12][25]. - The elevation of the global risk premium will significantly affect the correlation between major asset classes and increase the volatility of global assets, fundamentally altering the existing global asset allocation framework [5][12][25][33].

Group 1 - The article emphasizes that the restructuring of the global order is an irreversible underlying logic, driven by unconventional methods to address the current global supply and demand imbalance [3][4][14] - It highlights the increasing imbalance in trade, production, and debt between the G2 countries, with the U.S. as the largest consumer and China as the largest producer [9][13] - The article discusses the "Mar-a-Lago Agreement," which aims to reshape global trade and monetary order to alleviate the U.S.'s long-standing current account and fiscal deficits [11][23] Group 2 - The new investment paradigm is framed by three macro trading backgrounds: U.S. Treasury rates being "higher for longer," Chinese bond rates being "lower for longer," and an increase in global risk premium [5][12][32] - The article suggests that the ongoing trend of de-globalization will significantly disrupt the existing global asset allocation framework [9][13][33] - It notes that the U.S. reliance on debt expansion has led to continuous current account deficits and manufacturing hollowing out, while China benefits from a persistent trade surplus [9][13]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamic nature of financial markets through the lens of human behavior and biases, as articulated in George Soros's "reflexivity theory" [4] - The article highlights that traditional economic models often overlook the interplay between participants' perceptions and objective reality, which can lead to market distortions that reinforce biases [4] - It discusses how Soros's insights have allowed him to successfully predict market movements and financial crises, suggesting that markets are influenced by human emotions and not merely mathematical calculations [4] Group 2 - The article presents a global perspective on China's development logic and diplomatic strategies, as analyzed in "China's Choice" by Singaporean author Ma Kai-shuo [6] - It notes that the book provides a thorough analysis of China's rise, focusing on its institutional resilience, cultural genes, and governance wisdom, while addressing Western misconceptions [6] - The text emphasizes the practical outcomes of China's strategies, such as the Belt and Road Initiative and the concept of a "community with a shared future for mankind," supported by economic data and case studies on improving livelihoods [6]