Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the backlash from Rob Pike, a legendary programmer, against AI-generated template emails that he perceives as disrespectful and indicative of broader issues within the AI industry [4][10]. Group 1: Incident Overview - During Christmas 2025, Rob Pike received an AI-generated email that superficially praised his contributions to programming but was ultimately recognized as insincere and automated [4]. - The email included a hidden clause stating that all conversations with the system would be publicly shared, which further angered Pike [4]. Group 2: Reaction and Public Response - Rob Pike expressed his outrage on social media, criticizing the AI industry for its environmental impact and lack of respect for human contributions [5][6]. - His post garnered over 7,000 likes and 1,800 shares, indicating significant public support for his stance [6]. Group 3: Broader Implications - Pike's anger reflects a deeper frustration with the AI industry's practices, particularly regarding the generation of redundant code and the exploitation of human data without proper acknowledgment or compensation [10][13]. - The incident sparked a wider conversation about the ethical boundaries of AI experimentation and the need for respect in technological advancements [11].

Core Viewpoint - Linus Torvalds emphasizes the importance of maintaining stability and backward compatibility in the Linux kernel, asserting that there are no shortcuts in the development process and that AI should be viewed as a tool rather than a revolutionary change in programming [2][4][25]. Group 1: Linux Kernel Development Process - The Linux kernel codebase has surpassed 40 million lines, with a release cycle of approximately 9 weeks, during which around 12,000 submissions are processed [2][14]. - During the merge window, Torvalds typically spends two weeks merging code and the following seven weeks identifying and fixing bugs, ensuring the kernel is in optimal condition before release [16][17]. - The principle of "no regressions" is strictly enforced, meaning that new code must not introduce bugs or break backward compatibility [3][23]. Group 2: Role of AI in Development - Torvalds expresses skepticism towards the hype surrounding AI, stating that while he dislikes the term, he recognizes the potential of AI as a valuable tool in code maintenance and review processes [25][26]. - AI tools are being explored to assist in code reviews and to prevent problematic code from being submitted, which could streamline the development workflow [26][27]. - The comparison is made between AI and the advent of compilers, suggesting that while AI may enhance efficiency, it is ultimately just another tool in the developer's toolkit [28][29]. Group 3: Challenges in Kernel Development - The difficulty of maintaining the "no regressions" rule is highlighted, as changes may not be immediately apparent and can lead to issues for users who upgrade to newer kernel versions [31][32]. - Developers often face the temptation to introduce new features that may disrupt existing functionality, complicating the maintenance of stability [33][34]. - Torvalds emphasizes the need for a careful balance between innovation and maintaining a reliable codebase, advocating for the use of new interfaces for new features while keeping old ones functional [34][35].

2025 年 12 月 21 日，华为通过心声社区公布了鸿蒙生态的一些数据： PS2：开源鸿蒙是在 2020 年开源，据报道最初代码量是在 700 万行。 开源鸿蒙代码量超 1.3 亿行，代码贡献者接近 1 万人； 目前搭载 HarmonyOS 5 和 6 的终端设备超 3200 万台； 鸿蒙系统已进行超过 100 次系统版本更新，开发者人数突破 1000 万，用户日均下载、更新应用超过 8800 万次； 鸿蒙生态内应用及元服务超 35 万个，适配度超 95%，用户日均应用下载更新量达 8800 万次。 PS1："(开源)鸿蒙代码量 1.3 亿行" 这个数据，其实 余承东早在 8 月 16 日的央视财经访谈上就提到过 ，最早应该是在 5 月 24 日公布的。 ...

不清楚背景的，可以参考之前推文：《 宽带缩水引骂战！罗永浩大骂项立刚"智障"，项："你除了做直播，其 他就是做不成，要认命" 》 在被老罗骂后，项立刚没骂回去。 12 月 21 日他发长文宣布要写 6 篇系列大作文，分析"老罗创业为什么不成功"。 于是从 22 日起，每天更新一篇。 很多篇的配图，都是老罗的黑历史截图。 第一篇说罗永浩 "缺少爱国情怀和民族大义"， 还放狠话："他除了直播啥也干不成，成功了就是对产业人的侮 辱" 第二篇指责他 "不懂感恩，把俞敏洪等恩人当仇人"，还吐槽 " 罗永浩是用着投资人的钱，把这些钱打了水 漂，却毫无感激之情。最后弄一个公司，给这些投资人留了 5% 的股份，这就算是回报。" 被骂后"大作文"连环轰 后续文章更嘲讽他 "没前瞻能力，创业全跟风"、"管理水平比雷军差十个等级"，甚至造谣挖苦老罗"50 多岁还 在旧小区租民宅创业"。 罗永浩的间接回应 不像之前直接开骂"智障"，这些大作文，老罗并没有直接回应。 大概率是最近忙着筹备 12 月 30 日的"科技春晚"，没太多精力应对其他。毕竟门票都卖完了，还高调宣布门票 收益都会捐给香港火灾做公益。 12 月 24 日被粉丝追问时 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a consumer's experience with a long-term membership subscription to iQIYI, highlighting the absurdity of a 25-year membership and the challenges faced in seeking a refund for unused services [1][4][6]. Group 1: Membership Duration and Consumer Reaction - A consumer discovered that their iQIYI membership, purchased in multiple transactions, extends to 2043, totaling 25 years, which they found unreasonable [1][3]. - The consumer expressed frustration over the long duration of the membership, comparing it to a 30-year mortgage, and noted that they would be over 50 years old when it expires [1]. Group 2: Refund Issues - The consumer faced difficulties in obtaining a refund, as the customer service stated that refunds could only be processed to the original payment method, which was no longer accessible [4][5]. - iQIYI's official response indicated that they would initiate a refund process while considering the consumer's situation regarding the original payment account [6]. Group 3: Public and Expert Opinions - Legal experts advised consumers in similar situations to utilize new regulations on prepaid consumption to protect their rights [7]. - Online discussions reflected a mix of humor and criticism regarding the consumer's decision to purchase such a long membership, with some commenters suggesting personal responsibility for the choice [9].

Core Insights - The article highlights the significant increase in salaries for AI-related internships and short-term research positions, with monthly salaries reaching approximately 14,000 RMB, which is comparable to full-time research roles [1][2]. Group 1: Salary Trends - AI internships and research positions now offer monthly salaries in the range of 7,000 to 18,000 USD, equivalent to about 49,000 to 126,000 RMB [1]. - OpenAI's six-month residency program offers a monthly salary of approximately 18,300 USD (about 128,000 RMB), with potential for participants to transition to full-time roles [8][9]. - Anthropic's AI Safety Fellow program provides a weekly stipend of 3,850 USD (around 27,000 RMB) and monthly access to computational resources valued at 15,000 USD (approximately 105,000 RMB) [14][15]. - Google's Student Researcher program offers annual salaries ranging from 113,000 to 150,000 USD (approximately 790,000 to 1,050,000 RMB), indicating a shift away from traditional internship compensation [17][18]. - Meta's Research Scientist Intern program has a monthly salary range of 7,650 to 12,000 USD, reflecting the overall trend of increasing compensation for AI internships [19]. Group 2: Industry Competition - Major tech companies are competing aggressively for AI talent, with significant investments in internship and research programs [3][4]. - The competition has extended to students and early-career researchers, indicating a shift in how companies view and recruit talent [3][4]. - Domestic companies like ByteDance, Tencent, and Alibaba are also increasing their investment in AI talent, with Tencent planning to add 28,000 internship positions over three years, focusing heavily on technical roles [29][30][33]. Group 3: Talent Acquisition Strategies - Companies are seeking candidates with verifiable research output capabilities, emphasizing the importance of published papers and innovative methodologies [36][37]. - The design of these short-term projects often mimics full-time roles, allowing companies to assess candidates' performance in a high-pressure environment [42][45]. - The trend indicates that internships are evolving into a method for companies to cultivate and secure top talent, rather than merely filling temporary roles [46][48].

Core Viewpoint - BYD has confirmed the rumors regarding salary increases for its R&D personnel, indicating a strategic move to retain talent and enhance its competitive edge in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle industry [3]. Group 1: Salary Increase Details - The salary increase for BYD's R&D staff ranges from 500 to 4500 yuan, with most employees receiving an increase of 500 to 1000 yuan, while high-performing individuals can earn between 2000 to 3000 yuan [4]. - Key focus areas for the salary increases include engineers in battery materials, autonomous driving algorithms, and electric drive systems, as well as employees who have recently been promoted or have not changed jobs for a long time [4]. Group 2: Reasons for Salary Increase - The salary adjustments are driven by intense competition for talent in the new energy sector, as competitors have raised starting salaries for algorithm engineers, making it crucial for BYD to retain its workforce [6]. - Additionally, BYD is focusing on overcoming key technological challenges, such as solid-state batteries and automotive-grade chips, which necessitates a strong and motivated engineering team [6][7]. Group 3: Financial Backing for Salary Increase - BYD's substantial investment in R&D, amounting to 437.48 billion yuan in the first three quarters of 2025, reflects a year-on-year increase of 31.3%, with total R&D expenditures exceeding 2200 billion yuan [8]. - This long-term commitment to R&D not only supports technological advancements but also provides a solid financial foundation for the salary increases, ensuring they are sustainable rather than superficial [9].

Group 1 - The article discusses the importance of identifying bugs in code for Java development, emphasizing the need for developers to be vigilant and proactive in debugging processes [1][2] - It highlights common pitfalls and challenges faced by Java developers, suggesting that understanding these issues can lead to more efficient coding practices [4] - The content aims to engage readers by presenting relatable scenarios that resonate with the experiences of Java developers, fostering a sense of community and shared learning [5]

Core Viewpoint - Cursor, an AI-assisted development tool by Anysphere, has launched its v2.2 version with significant new features, including an upgraded debugging mode and a visual web editor, but faces criticism over cost transparency and user experience issues [4][6][7]. Group 1: New Features - The upgraded debugging mode allows developers to describe bugs to the AI, which then inserts log statements to identify issues and suggests fixes, aiming for more precise repairs without generating excessive "guesswork code" [4]. - The visual web editor enables developers to adjust page elements easily through a sidebar, with real-time updates to the code and a hot reload feature for immediate visual feedback [4]. Group 2: Cost Concerns - Developers express concerns over the cost implications of using the AI for even minor adjustments, questioning the necessity of AI involvement for small design changes [6]. - Cursor's pricing model is based on usage, with different packages offering varying free quotas, but the specific costs for operations remain opaque, leading to dissatisfaction among users [6]. - Some developers feel that using Cursor to access third-party models is significantly more expensive than direct subscriptions to those models [6]. Group 3: User Experience Issues - Frequent changes to the user interface have frustrated developers, who find the constant need to reconfigure settings tedious [7]. - The lack of clear product management and a defined product roadmap has been highlighted as a contributing factor to the poor user experience, with developers calling for better oversight and management [9]. - Core bugs reported by users have been largely ignored, leading some teams to cancel their subscriptions due to the focus on new features over fixing existing issues [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Luo Yonghao's ongoing interest in the smartphone industry despite past failures and current market challenges, highlighting his cautious approach towards potential future projects in this sector [2][4][5]. Group 1: Luo Yonghao's Perspective on Smartphones - Luo Yonghao expresses a willingness to return to smartphone development, even if it means working for someone else, as long as he can create products that align with his ideals [2]. - Despite being approached by investors to restart his smartphone project, he refrains from accepting funding due to concerns about losing their money, reflecting a more cautious and mature outlook [2][4]. - The loyalty of over a million users still using old Smartisan phones indicates a lasting connection to his previous work, which he finds difficult to let go of [2]. Group 2: Challenges and Past Experiences - Luo's caution stems from his experience with Smartisan Technology, which faced significant challenges, including a complex production process and issues with manufacturing partners, leading to a debt of 600 million yuan [4]. - The smartphone market is now dominated by major players like Huawei, Xiaomi, OPPO, and Apple, making it extremely difficult for new entrants to succeed [4]. - Luo acknowledges a harsh reality where innovative products from startups are often copied by larger companies, leading to a high risk of failure for new ventures in the smartphone space [4]. Group 3: Future Aspirations - Despite his fears of financial loss, Luo has not completely closed the door on smartphone development and is considering a revival if his current venture, Xihongxian Technology, becomes successful [5][6]. - He is exploring potential partnerships with industry giants to ensure that any new products are well-positioned in the market, indicating a strategic shift in his approach [6]. - Luo's current focus on AIOS is seen as a preparatory step that could eventually lead back to smartphone development, especially as he recognizes the potential of AI in the industry [6].