12 月 31 日凌晨 2 点多，罗永浩在发布会后发文："趁着今晚突然很想说，就赶紧说了，因为 ADHD 的关系" （老罗微博没排版堆在一起，看着太难受了 ，重排如下） "1、我的发布会没有一场是彩排过的，全是没有彩排直接上去硬讲。 2、幻灯片从来没有提前做完过，都是做到开场前，还有百分之三十左右的页面需要再调整。有好几场甚至是 把全场的幻灯片切成前后两大段，交待同事后一半应如何处理后拿着前一半提心吊胆上台。 3、多年以来，看起来没出大问题的，全是靠体力、经验和时灵时不灵的药物支撑。 4、现在我体力已经不太行了，比如连撑两三天不睡觉心脏会明显不适，而且脑子不工作，吃了十几年的专注 达也已经吃最大剂量也不太管用了。 5、为我的发布会做幕后的同事，工作难度全程都是地狱级数的，每次结束后都需要疗伤。 6、如果 ADHD 换药失败，或是不能用锻炼彻底改善体能问题，我不会再举办这种大型活动了，会害人害己。 7、今晚除了愧疚，剩下的部分大都是幸福的 ❤️ 具体表现为：做事容易分心，比如看文档时总忍不住刷手机；做事情虎头蛇尾，计划好的事很难坚持到底；经 常丢三落四，忘事是常态；还爱冲动，说话爱插嘴，做决定不经过脑子，情绪也 ...

30 日， Meta 和 Manus 双方都宣布了收购/被收购这事 ，但很多细节没透露出来。 这次收购不会影响现有客户， Manus 之后还会在新加坡继续运营，通过原来的 App 和网站卖订阅服务。 31 日，外媒 Business Insider 发了一篇文章，透露出更多细节。 总结如下： Meta 发言人表示："收购 Manus AI 能让我们给用户用上最先进的技术，还会做好安全措施避免潜在风险。 交 易完成后，Manus AI 再也没有中国老板的股份了，在中国的服务和运营也会停掉 。" Manus 开发了一款智能体：能自己搞定市场调研、写代码、做数据分析这些复杂活，Meta 会把这些技术整合 到内部所有消费级和企业级产品里。 Meta 本身在中国没有业务，他们说这次收购会彻底切断 Manus 跟中国的所有剩余联系，包括中国所有者的 权益。 作为交易的一部分，Meta 会逐步关停 Manus 在中国的少量业务，比如关掉 AI 助手 Monica.cn，还会把相关 员工迁出中国。 Manus 员工加入 Meta 后，不能访问直接从客户那里收集的数据，Meta 也会继续对 AI 模型做地域访问限 制。 （参考 ...

Core Viewpoint - The dispute between Vizio and the Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) centers on Vizio's failure to comply with GPLv2 by not providing the source code for the open-source software used in its smart TVs, leading to a lawsuit by SFC [1][9]. Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - A recent court ruling mandated that Vizio must provide the source code but is not required to supply the signing keys for firmware upgrades [1]. - The case highlights the ongoing legal battle initiated by SFC in 2021, which accused Vizio of violating GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 by not providing the complete source code and build scripts to purchasers [16][18]. - The court has recognized that GPL serves as both a copyright license and a contract, allowing SFC's breach of contract claims to proceed [22]. Positions of the Parties - Vizio initially failed to provide the required source code, which is a clear violation of GPLv2 [9]. - SFC attempted to extend the GPLv2 requirements to include installation keys, a claim that Linus Torvalds criticized as lacking legal basis [4][9]. - Both parties exhibited poor conduct during the legal proceedings, with Vizio correcting its practices only under legal pressure [10]. Linus Torvalds' Commentary - Linus Torvalds emphasized that GPLv2 is focused on software freedom and does not impose obligations on hardware access [4][7]. - He criticized SFC for attempting to misinterpret the GPLv2 terms, asserting that the license does not extend to hardware control [11][15]. - Torvalds stated that the core requirement of GPLv2 is to provide source code, not to ensure that users can modify and reinstall software on their devices while maintaining full functionality [14]. Timeline of Events - The timeline of the case includes SFC's initial request for source code in 2018, the lawsuit filed in 2021, and ongoing legal developments expected to continue into 2026 [15][16].

老罗很刑啊，真敢说 上热搜后，网友都炸锅了。 有夸老罗"真性情的"： 也有批评他"故意引战，不可饶恕"： ...

七月初已经曝出从国内"跑路"了 ，还去探访？似乎没必要吧 ...

以下文章来源于算法爱好者 ，作者小蒜 算法爱好者 . 没想到吧！谷歌在 2025 年招聘的 AI 工程师中，五分之一都是"回头草" 一、人才回流：谷歌 AI 团队 20% "新员工"是"老熟人" 随着 OpenAI、Meta 和 Anthropic 等公司之间的 AI 人才争夺战愈演愈烈，谷歌的竞争策略之一就是积极召回 前员工。 算法是程序员的内功！「算法爱好者」专注分享算法相关文章、工具资源和算法题，帮程序员修炼内 功。 据 CNBC 获悉，2025 年谷歌招聘的人工智能领域软件工程师中，约 20% 是所谓的"回飞镖员工"（即离职后 重新入职的员工），这一比例较往年有所上升。谷歌发言人证实，截至 12 月这一数据依然准确，并表示与 2024 年相比，来自主要竞争对手的 AI 研究人员数量大幅增加。 谷歌发言人在声明中表示："我们对当前的发展势头、计算资源和人才储备充满信心 —— 工程师们愿意来这里 工作，继续开发具有突破性的产品。" 二、重金与算力：谷歌吸引人才的两大王牌 谷歌薪酬主管约翰·凯西（John Casey）最近在一次会议上向员工介绍了重新招聘的情况。凯西称，专注于 AI 领域的软件工程师被谷歌的 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by programmers when frequent changes in requirements occur, highlighting the impact on their productivity and mental well-being [1]. Group 1 - The article mentions a specific instance where 351 responses were received, raising the question of what happened to the remaining 14 responses [2]. - It includes a comic that illustrates how to explain to outsiders why frequent changes in requirements can drive programmers crazy [2]. - Additionally, there is a humorous graphic emphasizing the importance of not interrupting programmers, suggesting that such interruptions can be disruptive [2].

以下文章来源于算法爱好者 ，作者小蒜 北京时间 12 月 30 日早上 6:21，Manus 在推上宣布加入 Meta。 一、突发重磅：Meta 闪电收购，创史上第三大交易 Meta 公司的 AI 话事人亚历山大·王也同步宣布：我们很高兴地宣布 ManusAI 已加入 Meta，帮助我们打造出 色的 AI 产品！ 虽然双方暂未公布具体的交易细节，但已有国内媒体报道称收购金额是数十亿美元。 这笔交易仅次于 WhatsApp 和 Scale AI，成了 Meta 史上第三大收购案。 算法爱好者 . 算法是程序员的内功！「算法爱好者」专注分享算法相关文章、工具资源和算法题，帮程序员修炼内 功。 起猛了！ 19-199 美元的月费和 ChatGPT 持平，体验却差了一大截，网友吐槽 "花高价买了个半成品"。 更让人意外的是，谈判仅用了十余天就敲定，真格基金的合伙人都直言 "快到怀疑是假 offer" 收购后，Manus 母公司蝴蝶效应将保持独立运作，继续在新加坡办公，创始人肖弘还将出任 Meta 副总裁， 产品订阅服务也会照常运营，甚至计划接入 Meta 旗下数十亿用户的生态。 要知道，Manus 刚在 12 月中旬 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the backlash from Rob Pike, a legendary programmer, against AI-generated template emails that he perceives as disrespectful and indicative of broader issues within the AI industry [4][10]. Group 1: Incident Overview - During Christmas 2025, Rob Pike received an AI-generated email that superficially praised his contributions to programming but was ultimately recognized as insincere and automated [4]. - The email included a hidden clause stating that all conversations with the system would be publicly shared, which further angered Pike [4]. Group 2: Reaction and Public Response - Rob Pike expressed his outrage on social media, criticizing the AI industry for its environmental impact and lack of respect for human contributions [5][6]. - His post garnered over 7,000 likes and 1,800 shares, indicating significant public support for his stance [6]. Group 3: Broader Implications - Pike's anger reflects a deeper frustration with the AI industry's practices, particularly regarding the generation of redundant code and the exploitation of human data without proper acknowledgment or compensation [10][13]. - The incident sparked a wider conversation about the ethical boundaries of AI experimentation and the need for respect in technological advancements [11].

Core Viewpoint - Linus Torvalds emphasizes the importance of maintaining stability and backward compatibility in the Linux kernel, asserting that there are no shortcuts in the development process and that AI should be viewed as a tool rather than a revolutionary change in programming [2][4][25]. Group 1: Linux Kernel Development Process - The Linux kernel codebase has surpassed 40 million lines, with a release cycle of approximately 9 weeks, during which around 12,000 submissions are processed [2][14]. - During the merge window, Torvalds typically spends two weeks merging code and the following seven weeks identifying and fixing bugs, ensuring the kernel is in optimal condition before release [16][17]. - The principle of "no regressions" is strictly enforced, meaning that new code must not introduce bugs or break backward compatibility [3][23]. Group 2: Role of AI in Development - Torvalds expresses skepticism towards the hype surrounding AI, stating that while he dislikes the term, he recognizes the potential of AI as a valuable tool in code maintenance and review processes [25][26]. - AI tools are being explored to assist in code reviews and to prevent problematic code from being submitted, which could streamline the development workflow [26][27]. - The comparison is made between AI and the advent of compilers, suggesting that while AI may enhance efficiency, it is ultimately just another tool in the developer's toolkit [28][29]. Group 3: Challenges in Kernel Development - The difficulty of maintaining the "no regressions" rule is highlighted, as changes may not be immediately apparent and can lead to issues for users who upgrade to newer kernel versions [31][32]. - Developers often face the temptation to introduce new features that may disrupt existing functionality, complicating the maintenance of stability [33][34]. - Torvalds emphasizes the need for a careful balance between innovation and maintaining a reliable codebase, advocating for the use of new interfaces for new features while keeping old ones functional [34][35].