Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Games Workshop's (GW) strong stance against the use of AI in content creation and design processes, contrasting it with the industry's trend of embracing AI as a core business element [1][4]. Group 1: Company Policy on AI - GW has implemented a strict internal policy prohibiting employees from using AI to generate any official content or participate in design processes, including concept setting, illustrations, writing, and sculpture [5]. - Only a few executives are allowed to research AI out of curiosity, and none of them are particularly excited about it [6]. Group 2: Investment in Human Creators - Contrary to industry trends of layoffs, GW is increasing its investment in human creators by hiring more concept designers, illustrators, writers, and sculptors, emphasizing the importance of human creativity and intellectual property protection [6][7]. - The CEO stated that passionate and talented individuals are essential for creating the rich and engaging IP that is Warhammer [7]. Group 3: Community Sentiment and Brand Integrity - GW's zero-tolerance policy towards AI reflects a keen understanding of the community's sentiments, as even minor AI-like elements can trigger trust issues among fans [9][10]. - The company is aware that any association of its artwork with AI could lead to significant backlash, especially given the high value of its products like the Warhammer 40K Codex, which contains premium illustrations and lore [11][12]. Group 4: Legal and Ethical Considerations - GW's cautious approach is rooted in concerns over the copyright and data source issues associated with generative AI, as the current legal framework does not guarantee the transparency of training data or the non-infringement of output content [13]. - The company prioritizes maintaining the integrity of its IP over adopting potentially faster but riskier AI solutions, indicating a preference for a slower, more deliberate approach to innovation [14][15].

Core Viewpoint - The traditional IDEs may become obsolete by 2026, as engineers who do not adapt to new AI development methods will fall behind in productivity and competitiveness [1][5]. Group 1: Future of Development Tools - The transition from traditional IDEs to new AI-driven development tools is likened to moving from handheld tools to CNC machines, emphasizing the need for precision and automation in coding [2][11]. - Current AI models are inefficient, akin to sending a single diver into a vast codebase, suggesting a need for multiple specialized roles to enhance productivity [3][19]. - The future of software development will involve task decomposition, gradual refinement, and collaboration among multiple intelligent agents rather than relying on a single AI model [22][24]. Group 2: Productivity Disparities - There is a significant productivity gap among engineers, with those using AI tools like Codex potentially being ten times more productive than their peers who do not [5][27]. - Management is concerned about the implications of this productivity divide, fearing that they may need to reduce their workforce by up to 50% if engineers do not adapt [5][27]. - The situation mirrors the decline of the Swiss watch industry, where traditional craftsmanship was rapidly overtaken by quartz technology [8]. Group 3: New Development Paradigms - The concept of "Vibe coding" is introduced, where coding is driven by dialogue and AI-generated outputs, moving away from traditional manual coding practices [29][35]. - The economic implications of Vibe coding are significant, allowing for more modular and experimental approaches to development, thus increasing the value of options available to teams [38]. - Examples from companies like Travelopia and Capital One illustrate how AI-driven development can drastically reduce the time and resources needed for project completion [41][49]. Group 4: Organizational Transformation - The integration of AI tools is reshaping technical organizations, enabling non-developers to contribute to coding and deployment processes, thus democratizing software development [44][47]. - Trust in AI increases with usage, suggesting that engineers need to practice and engage with these tools to fully leverage their capabilities [42]. - The rapid pace of code submission and the ability to resolve legacy system issues with AI-generated solutions indicate a transformative shift in how teams operate [49].

很多朋友也都跑来问，如果真是这样，他们能提前做哪些准备？ 有一位在大厂做程序员的朋友老张，之前联系过一段时间，然后现在他做的这条业务线已经开始不赚钱，说他们 团队被集体裁员了 。 从去年开始，身边这种情况越来越多，互联网上也是呜呼哀哉一片，大批人哭诉降薪、失业、裁员，生活质量难以保障。 真的，不知道哪一天，失业就是一夜间的事。 可能你不相信，其实更多的，是你不愿意相信。2008年的时候，也没人会相信诺基亚会消失。 悲剧在有些人身上重复上演，就是因为他们不愿意相信。 所以劝大家，这个时候一定要给自己提前谋出路，多一手准备。 之所以跑来问，是因为他们的这个情况，几年前走过一遭，而且当时的情况比现在还要难，毕竟现在还有时间。 好在后来找到了解法。所以这几年，其实不论外面怎么变，虽说不是稳如泰山，但起码每次都是有对策的。 有对策，心里就不慌。不慌，事情就会慢慢有起色。 这是那一遭之后，我最大的体会。 那一遭，真的，痛得我这辈子也忘不了，不过也成了我这辈子最大的财富。 你说人生好玩吧。 01 早些年啊，我在阿里，每天工作十几个小时，有时候每周 6 天，各种难题到了我这儿，我都能想办法解决。 玩得好的几个同事都说我"活好 ...

（参考：微博、央视新闻，本文经由 AI 优化） 各位，你们是不是也被涨价打乱了换机、攒机计划呢？你觉得这场涨价潮会持续多久？国产存储能不能扛起替 代大旗？快来评论区聊聊你的看法。 有任何疑问，还可以直接 @元宝 来问哦！ 1 月 18 日，"内存条价格暴涨"的词条又又又又冲上微博热搜榜，这场从 2025 年下半年开始的涨价潮愈演愈 烈。 成本压力已全面传导至终端。联想、戴尔等 PC 厂商多款机型涨价 500~1500 元，小米、vivo 等国产手机新 品涨价 300~600 元，魅族甚至因成本过高取消了新款机型上市计划。存储成本占手机 BOM 比超 35%，商家 直言"下午报价晚上就作废"，不少消费者的攒机、换机计划被迫搁浅。 业内人士表示，这不是短期周期反弹，而是 AI 时代的产业重构，新产能释放至少需要两年，2026 年一季度 存储价格可能再涨 40%-50%。目前国产存储企业正加速扩产，但高端领域仍需时间突破，这场涨价潮或将倒 逼行业加速国产替代。 DDR5 内存半年涨幅超 300%，256G 服务器级内存条单价逼近 6 万元，一盒 100 根的价格堪比上海小户型住 宅，网友直呼"内存比黄金还疯狂"。 ...

2006 年诞生的 jQuery，在 2026 年迎来了它的 20 岁生日，同时也等来了近 10 年的首个大版本更新 —— jQuery 4.0.0 正式上线。 作为曾经统治前端界的"神器"，jQuery 4.0.0 这次彻底甩掉历史包袱，不仅精简了大量遗留代码，移除了 jQuery.isArray 、 jQuery.trim 等一批已弃用的 API，还砍掉了对 IE10 及更旧浏览器的支持。 旧的不去，新的不来，轻装上阵的 jQuery 才配得上现代前端的节奏 。 我去！我去！前端上古神器 jQuery 居然更新了！ 20 年沉淀，一朝焕新，jQuery 从未退场，只是换了种方式陪开发者前行 。 https://blog.jquery.com/2026/01/17/jquery-4-0-0/ 你上一次用 jq 还是啥时候呢？欢迎在评论区留言。有任何问题都可以@元宝 来问咯~ 源码全面迁移到 ES 模块，适配现代构建工具； 新增可信类型与 CSP 支持，让网页更安全； 焦点事件顺序遵循 W3C 规范，结束浏览器兼容乱象； 精简版体积再瘦身，压缩后仅 19.5k 字节，轻便度拉满。 本次更新还有几个核心亮点： ...

2、所谓的"擅离岗位"，不过是培训期没活的时候去茶水间、接个电话，每次都不到 30 分钟，根本不算违规。 上海有个程序员，就因为上班时吃了个外卖、累了趴在桌上眯了会儿，居然被公司以"严重违纪"开除了！ 在微博看到这个新闻时把小蒜都给整无语了，好在最后法院判公司违法，赔了 11 万多。 事情是这样的： 程序员小陈在上海一家外包公司干了 4 年，本来好好的，结果项目一撤，他就被公司发配到了一个宝山区办 公点。 说是培训，其实就是没活干，人事专门盯着监控抓小辫子 。 三个月后，公司突然发难：先是给了他一份书面警告，说他"5 次上班睡觉超过半小时"，紧接着一天内又追加 了"擅离岗位"、"吃外卖"、"用个人电脑"三连口头警告，然后直接把这三个口头警告合并成第二份书面警告， 以"一个月内两次书面警告"为由，把他开除了。 二 小陈不服，先仲裁败诉，又起诉到法院。法院一查监控，直接戳穿了公司的把戏： 1、 监控是用来保安全的，不是用来秋后算账的！ 小陈睡觉的同时，其他同事也在摸鱼小憩，公司之前不 管，现在却只罚他，典型的"选择性执法"。 3、公司倒查几个月的监控，把零散的小事硬凑成"严重违纪"，甚至把同一天的口头警告合并成书 ...

1 月 18 日，小程程在网上多次刷到，腾讯向 GitHub 发函要求下架一批与微信相关的开源工具。 说白了，这就是是一场大厂维权和开发者、用户需求之间的冲突。 到底是怎么回事呢？ 简单说，就是一批程序员在 GitHub 上公开的免费工具，核心功能大多是帮用户导出、查看自己手机里的微信 聊天记录，有的还能清理微信缓存、整理聊天数据。 早在 2025 年 7 月，腾讯就发现了这些工具，当时就给 GitHub 发过通知，说这些项目有问题，但 GitHub 那 会回复说"没看出违反我们的规定"，没把工具下架。 2、" 被投诉的开源项目，违反并诱导他人违反微信服务条款，非法干涉腾讯的合同" 这事就拖到了最近，在 1 月 8 日左右，腾讯直接走了更正式的法律流程：发 DMCA 投诉函 ，要求平台下 架。 腾讯的投诉理由 在发给 GitHub 平台的函件中，腾讯提出了 2 项指控： 1、" 被投诉的开源项目，违反 DMCA 法案第 1201 条 。" 这些非法代码仓库提供的软件代码和文档，允许未经授权提取和解密微信用户的完整聊天记录。这些记录存储在 微信的本地数据库中，腾讯通过使用专有加密算法、独特加密密钥和专有数据库协 ...

Core Viewpoint - Windows 11 has been criticized for high resource usage, strict hardware requirements, and poor performance compared to older versions, with a recent test showing it ranked last in multiple performance metrics [1][35]. Performance Comparison - A YouTuber conducted a comparison test using six generations of Windows on outdated hardware, revealing that Windows 11 consistently performed poorly, even compared to Windows XP and 8.1 [1][35]. - The test utilized a Lenovo ThinkPad X220 from 2012, featuring an Intel Core i5-2520M processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB mechanical hard drive, which inherently favored older systems [3][5]. Boot Speed - Windows 8.1 had the fastest boot time, while Windows 11 was significantly slower, suffering from prolonged loading times even after booting [6][8]. Storage Usage - Windows XP had the lowest storage usage at 18.9GB, while Windows 11 consumed 37.3GB, indicating its bulkiness. Interestingly, Windows 7 and Vista had even higher storage requirements [9]. Memory Management - Windows XP excelled in memory management, using only 0.8GB of RAM when idle, whereas Windows 11 averaged 3.3GB, attributed to numerous background services [11][13]. Browser Performance - In a test of how many browser tabs could be opened, Windows 11 managed only 49 tabs, while Windows 8.1 opened 252 tabs, showcasing a significant performance gap [14][16]. Battery Life and Media Processing - Windows 11 was the first to shut down in battery life tests, while Windows XP had the longest battery life. The differences were minimal, around two minutes [17]. - In audio export tests, Windows 11 ranked fifth, and in video rendering, it again placed last, with Windows 10 taking the top spot [19]. Application Launch Speed - Windows 11 performed poorly in application launch speed tests, ranking last in all five tested applications [21]. Web Browsing and File Transfer - Windows 11 ranked third in web image loading tests but fell to last place in switching to Google images and Microsoft account login pages [24]. - It achieved second place in file transfer tests, only behind Windows 10 [26]. Benchmark Performance - In CPU-Z tests, Windows XP had the best single-core performance, while Windows 7 excelled in multi-core performance. Windows 11 had slightly better single-core results but was underwhelming in multi-core tests [27]. - Windows 11 ranked third in CrystalDiskMark tests, while Windows XP was the top performer [29]. - In Cinebench R10 tests, Windows 8.1 secured second place in single-core performance, while Windows 11 ranked fourth [31]. Overall Summary - Windows 11 did not win any tests and was described as having a "disastrous performance." Windows 8.1 was declared the overall winner, praised for its speed and stability despite previous criticisms [35]. - The testing hardware was outdated, which may not accurately reflect Windows 11's performance on modern systems, particularly with the absence of SSDs, which significantly enhance system performance [35].

1 月 15 日晚间，一张追觅科技内部飞书工作群的截图在网上疯传。一位即将离职业务负责人杨柳，对 CEO 俞浩和同事陈龙冬发出了一连串灵魂拷问，直接把公司内部矛盾摆上了台面。 " 药磕多了？一年超过英伟达，一年超过中国所有车企 30 年未达成的成果？ " 这些辛辣的金句瞬间点燃了全 网。 CEO 的回应：赶超是长期目标 面对这场突如其来的"内部爆破"，俞浩在 1 月 17 日通过微博回应。他解释"百万亿美金市值"是 20 年的长期目 标，并非短期口号。 他不仅嘲讽公司"一年超英伟达"的目标是天方夜谭，还痛骂同事只会"无条件舔老板"、"无条件翘单"，甚至直接 放话："老板到时被美国政府罚得倾家荡产的时候，是不是原因就是你强行搞了几台车去美国卖？" 为什么会被吐槽？ 据悉， 俞浩此前发朋友圈表示， "目前全球市值最高的公司是英伟达，约 4.5 万亿美元，预计黄仁勋、马斯克 这代企业家有望将最高市值推至 8-10 万亿美元，但他们已老了，作为更年轻一代，他的目标是把追觅生态做 到一百万亿美金量级。" 同时透露该员工早已提交离职申请，是赶在当天权限失效前故意截屏扩散。还表示"根本不会在意这些，这点 肚量还是有的"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Bilibili experienced significant server issues during a live event due to high traffic, highlighting the platform's ongoing challenges with scalability and infrastructure [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On January 18, around 3 PM, Bilibili's live stream for the "Top 100 UP Master Awards" faced severe lag and loading failures [1]. - Users reported needing to refresh multiple times to watch the stream, leading to the topic "Bilibili crashed" trending on Weibo [3]. - The peak number of bullet comments during the live stream reached 9.019 million, which overwhelmed the servers [4]. Group 2: Historical Context - This incident marks the second time in the year that Bilibili has faced such issues due to high traffic; the previous occurrence was during the New Year's Eve gala, which had 346 million concurrent users [5]. - The recurring nature of these server crashes suggests a pattern in Bilibili's operational challenges [6].