最近几天，钉钉连续上热搜。 " CEO凌晨巡岗 " " 优化不主张加班的高管 " 虽然官方都否认了… 但 21 号凌晨 00:03， 官方公号还在更新，说是加班 （当然也有可能是定时发的 ） 就当今天趣图了吧 ↓↓↓ 往期趣图 （点击下方图片可跳转阅读） 趣图: 解决 Bug 的创新方式 原标题的"加班"又踩中"热点"了 趣图: 当不做测试就直接上生产环境 的时候... ...

8 月 20 日，博主"网界"发文称，钉钉将对多位不主张加班高管进行优化。 其表示有可靠消息，目前钉钉 CEO 无招已经布置完任务，涉及 4 位 P10 以及 15 位 P8 级别以上员 工，三个月内会进行边缘或者优化。 针对这一新爆料，新浪科技向钉钉方面求证，对方表示"消息不实"。 - EOF - 推荐阅读 点击标题可跳转 1、 网传钉钉 CEO 凌晨巡查工位，质问员工为何提前下班 2、 偷 2396 部黄片，每部赔 15 万，Meta 盗版海量小视频训练 AI 3、 余承东回应"鸿蒙是安卓套壳"，透露鸿蒙代码 1.3 亿行 4、 Linus 怒喷谷歌工程师：代码垃圾又迟交，别想轻易混进 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the dynamics of relationships where one partner is a programmer, emphasizing the importance of mutual growth and understanding in a partnership [1] - It highlights the challenges faced by programmers, particularly the mental strain from their work, and suggests that partners should be considerate of their needs [1] - The conversation includes humorous and light-hearted comments about relationships and the responsibilities of each partner, reflecting a community perspective on work-life balance [1]

Group 1 - The CEO of DingTalk conducted a surprise inspection of the office area and found very few employees at their desks during the early hours of the morning [1] - Following the inspection, the CEO criticized all departments for leaving work early and questioned the reasons behind it [1] Group 2 - A DingTalk staff member denied the claims made about the CEO's inspection and subsequent criticism [3]

Group 1 - The U.S. government is negotiating to acquire approximately 10% of Intel's shares, potentially making it the largest shareholder if the deal goes through [1] - Intel has been approved for $10.9 billion in funding under the CHIPS Act, which may be converted into equity as part of the acquisition [1] - The estimated value of Intel's 10% stake is around $10.5 billion, which is comparable to the funding amount [1] Group 2 - SoftBank has signed a final securities purchase agreement to invest $2 billion in Intel, making it the fifth-largest shareholder [3] - SoftBank will pay $23 per share for the investment, reflecting confidence in Intel's future [3] - Intel's CEO expressed gratitude for SoftBank's investment, highlighting a long-standing collaboration with Masayoshi Son [3]

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by adult film giant Strike 3 Holdings against Meta highlights the issue of copyright infringement in the context of AI training, specifically focusing on the unauthorized use of adult film content for developing AI models [2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media accuse Meta of systematically pirating 2,396 adult films since 2018 for training its AI models, potentially leading to a compensation claim of $359 million (approximately 2.6 billion RMB) [2][3][16]. - The lawsuit marks a significant case as it is the first to address the use of adult film content in training video generation AI, differing from previous copyright disputes involving text and images [2][3]. Group 2: Impact on the Industry - The plaintiffs express concern that Meta's AI could replicate their unique production style at a fraction of the cost, threatening the viability of traditional adult film studios that invest in high-quality production [5][16]. - The lawsuit reveals that Meta allegedly utilized a "tit-for-tat" mechanism on the BT network to not only download but also distribute pirated content, which could significantly enhance download speeds [6][7][8]. Group 3: Evidence and Allegations - The lawsuit cites data from the plaintiffs' VXN Scan tracking system, which indicates that 47 Facebook-registered IPs were involved in illegal distribution, with over 100,000 instances of infringement verified [10][12]. - Meta is accused of constructing a piracy network using "shadow data centers" and non-human usage patterns, suggesting a deliberate strategy to collect training data for AI [11][12][14][15]. Group 4: Legal Proceedings and Reactions - The plaintiffs are seeking a jury trial, asserting that Meta's actions constitute both direct and indirect copyright infringement [16]. - Meta has publicly denied the allegations, but the evidence presented by the plaintiffs is considered substantial, leading to speculation about a potential out-of-court settlement [18].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the urgency for technology professionals to adapt to the rapid growth of AI applications, highlighting the need for skills in AI model development and application to avoid job displacement and to seize high-paying opportunities in the industry [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Trends - The demand for AI talent is surging, with major companies like Alibaba and ByteDance actively hiring AI model developers while simultaneously laying off traditional tech roles [1]. - There is a significant shift in hiring criteria, where companies are prioritizing candidates with AI application experience over traditional coding skills [1][2]. - The article notes that 80% of companies now require proficiency in AI tools to enhance work efficiency, indicating a fundamental change in job requirements across the industry [1]. Group 2: Training and Development Opportunities - A training program is being offered to help individuals gain skills in AI model application development, covering essential topics such as business scenarios, technical architecture, and core principles of AI technologies like RAG and Transformer [2][4]. - The program includes live sessions with industry experts, providing insights into job market trends, salary expectations, and career development paths from the perspective of hiring managers [6][8]. - Participants will receive practical experience through case studies and project simulations, which can be directly added to their resumes to enhance employability [8][13]. Group 3: Technical Insights - The article discusses specific AI technologies such as RAG, which is used for improving question-answer accuracy, and the importance of understanding these technologies for successful application in various business contexts [4][15]. - It highlights the role of Agents in transforming AI models for specific scenarios, particularly in enterprise applications like intelligent customer service [15]. - The training will also cover the integration of external tools and resources to enhance the capabilities of AI models, thereby improving their functionality and interactivity [15].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the serious issue of software piracy in the engineering construction sector, detailing a case involving the sale of counterfeit software licenses and the subsequent legal actions taken against the perpetrators [2][9]. Group 1: Software Piracy and Its Impact - The engineering construction software industry faces significant challenges due to high technical difficulty and research costs, making it a critical technology for national infrastructure development [2]. - The sale of counterfeit software licenses not only causes economic losses for legitimate companies but also poses risks to national infrastructure projects [2]. Group 2: Case Overview - A technology company, A Company, holds over 1,400 software copyrights and has transitioned to a subscription model for its software licenses due to high operational costs [3]. - In 2022, a report was made regarding the instability of a purchased software license, leading to an investigation that uncovered a large-scale piracy operation involving multiple individuals [3][4]. Group 3: Criminal Activities and Profits - The main perpetrator, Yan, initially sold low-quality counterfeit licenses but later shifted to high-quality versions and expired licenses, significantly increasing his profits [5][6]. - Yan and his accomplice Chen developed a complete criminal chain involving the illegal purchase, cracking, and sale of software licenses, generating sales of approximately 25 million yuan, with Yan earning over 3 million yuan [8][9]. Group 4: Legal Proceedings - The case was formally prosecuted in 2023, with the court determining the involvement of 11 individuals in various stages of the piracy operation, leading to sentences ranging from one to three years [9][10]. - The technology company also pursued civil litigation against the perpetrators, resulting in over 6 million yuan in compensation paid to the company [10].

Core Viewpoint - Huawei's HarmonyOS has undergone significant investment and development, with a focus on creating a unified operating system for various smart devices, emphasizing its independence from Android and the challenges of ecosystem development [2][3][4]. Group 1: Development and Investment - HarmonyOS has a codebase of 130 million lines, with annual investments exceeding 10,000 personnel and hundreds of billions in research and development over six years [2]. - The majority of the code is developed by Huawei, with some contributions from ecosystem partners after open-sourcing [2]. Group 2: Ecosystem and Application Development - The transition from Android to HarmonyOS involved a dual framework initially, but since HarmonyOS 5.0, applications have been redeveloped specifically for HarmonyOS [3]. - The development of the operating system and its ecosystem is likened to the chicken-and-egg dilemma, where initial user adoption is crucial for attracting developers, despite the challenges of ecosystem migration [4].

Core Viewpoint - Linus Torvalds criticized a recent RISC-V code submission from a Google engineer, labeling it as "garbage" and highlighting issues with its quality and timing, which sparked controversy in the tech community [1][4][18]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The incident involved Google Android engineer Palmer Dabbelt submitting RISC-V architecture updates to the Linux 6.17 merge window just before its closure [2][4]. - Linus Torvalds rejected the submission, stating it was submitted too late and criticized the quality of the code [4][5]. Group 2: Specific Code Issues - Torvalds pointed out that the submission included irrelevant code that was not specific to RISC-V, which he deemed inappropriate for the general header files [7][10]. - He provided examples of poor coding practices, such as the unnecessary use of a helper function that obscured code readability [9][10]. Group 3: Response and Community Reaction - Palmer Dabbelt acknowledged the criticism and expressed intent to improve submission practices to avoid late and low-quality contributions in the future [17]. - The incident reignited discussions in the community about Torvalds' direct communication style, with some defending his approach as efficient and necessary [18].