11 月下旬，网上曝出某度大规模裁员的消息，有些部门的比例甚至达到 30% 。不过裁员补偿还不错， 最高的有 N+3.5。 前几天刷到一个帖子， 有位做后端开发的网友发帖称"在某度滥竽充数 10 年"，在最近这波裁员中又是毫 发无损。 一、"滥竽充数"的潜台词：不是没能力，是没热情了 原贴底下评论直接炸出了大厂人的"职场生存学"。 网上有网友替发帖者辩解："他的滥竽充数，大概只是没热情了，不是没能力。" 这话戳中不少人：谁刚进大厂时不是揣着代码改变世界的劲儿？ 但后来呢？有人熬到项目上线，功劳归了汇报的 leader；有人改了八版需求，最后用回第一版；连调个接 口都要走三页流程、填五个审批单。 就像另一位网友说的："没热情不是倦怠，是烦琐流程和条条框框磨没了激情。" 帖子下的吐槽，藏着大厂裁员的"潜规则"："平庸的能躲，裁的是有能力的"。 基层 leader 攥着名单，既能借裁员清掉"不好拿捏"的能者，又能把项目延期甩锅给"裁员影响"。而那 些"按流程走"的人，反而因为"不出错"成了"稳定资产"。 就像留言区有位某度认证员工说的："搞懂规则，某度真的好混" —— 当"合规"比"创造"更重要，"混"就 成了职场 ...

Core Viewpoint - ByteDance has reported significant financial growth, with a projected profit of $50 billion for the year, leading to a company-wide salary increase and a restructuring of its job level system to attract and retain talent in a competitive AI landscape [5][7][15]. Financial Performance - ByteDance's profit for the first three quarters has exceeded $40 billion, with an average daily profit of approximately $9.64 million [5]. - The company's revenue is expected to reach $186 billion this year, marking a 20% increase from the previous year, resulting in a net profit margin of 26.9% [7]. - The company's valuation has risen, with reports indicating a valuation of $330 billion in September, later increasing to $480 billion following stock buybacks and investment interest [8]. Salary Increase and Job Level Restructuring - ByteDance announced a salary increase of 1.5 times the previous cycle's adjustment, with a focus on increasing cash compensation and modifying the distribution of stock options [10][20]. - The new compensation structure will see a higher cash component and a reduction in the proportion of stock options, with performance incentives also increasing by 35% [10][20]. - The job level system will transition from a 10-tier structure to a new L1-L10 system, effective January 2026, allowing for greater salary flexibility and potential for salary increases [12][23]. Strategic Rationale - The company aims to enhance its talent acquisition and retention strategies in response to emerging opportunities and challenges in the AI sector, indicating a shift in focus from top-tier talent to a broader employee base [15][16]. - The restructuring of salary and job levels is designed to provide employees with more significant salary growth potential and to ensure competitive compensation across various markets [19][23].

Core Viewpoint - Tencent's AI product "Yuanbao" has been integrated across various platforms, allowing users to interact with it in a human-like manner, raising questions about whether real human editors are involved in the responses [1][3]. Group 1: AI Interaction and Public Perception - Users have expressed surprise at the human-like responses generated by Yuanbao, leading to speculation that real human editors might be behind the replies [3]. - Examples of AI responses include thoughtful advice on social situations, which further fueled the belief that a human touch was involved [3]. Group 2: Official Clarification - Tencent officially clarified that all responses marked with "Content generated by AI" are indeed generated by Yuanbao's AI, with no human involvement or editorial teams [4][7]. - The company emphasized that the volume and frequency of responses across multiple platforms could not be managed by human teams, even with round-the-clock shifts [7]. Group 3: AI Content Identification - Tencent established an AI content identification system in August, allowing users to distinguish between AI-generated content and human responses based on specific markings [8][9]. - This system aims to comply with regulatory requirements and help users avoid confusion regarding the source of responses [9].

这个周末，罗永浩又又又贡献了一个瓜！ 一、吐槽导火索："千兆宽带缩水" 12 月 18 日，老罗在朋友圈吐槽电信宽带："再解决不了网速，我就要在网上发疯了！" 他说自己迁居上海后，办了上海电信的 "独享千兆宽带"，结果半年多来实测速率大多不到 100 兆，连承诺的十分之一都达不到。 更闹心的是，每次找客服维修，都只管用三五天就打回原形，反复折腾让他忍无可忍。 这番吐槽戳中了无数网友的痛处，不少上海电信用户跟风晒 "同款遭遇"，有人说 200 兆宽带实测不足 100 兆，还有人吐槽上行带宽被偷偷限速。 12 月 19 日晚，上海电信官方回应，称网速不达标可能和户型、路由器、信号干扰等多种因素有关，承诺提供免费检测维修服务。 他先是猜测，罗永浩会不会是混淆了 "MB" 和 "Mbps" 的单位？毕竟如果是 90MB/s，换算下来差不多 720Mbps，其实不算差太多。 接着他又抛出疑问：家庭用的 "独享千兆宽带" 每月费用得 3 万左右，这事靠谱吗？还直言网速问题大概率出在路由器上。 在项立刚看来，自己是基于行业常识做分析，但在罗永浩眼里，这就是 "站着说话不腰疼"。 罗永浩直接转发项立刚的言论，怒怼 "一直怀疑 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the major updates to Microsoft's VS Code, focusing on the introduction of AI-assisted programming features, the controversial discontinuation of IntelliCode, and the preview of TypeScript 7, highlighting both opportunities and risks in the evolving landscape of programming tools [5][10][13]. Group 1: AI-Assisted Programming Features - The core highlight of the update is the introduction of the Agent HQ, which serves as a management center for multiple AI agents, enhancing programming efficiency [5]. - Ten new features related to AI agents have been introduced, including the ability to keep agents active when the chat window is closed and the option to run custom sub-agents [6]. - The update has sparked debate over the Agent HQ concept, as it is described as a long-term direction rather than a specific feature [5]. Group 2: Security Concerns - The introduction of AI agents raises significant security risks, including the threat of prompt injection attacks that could lead to sensitive information leaks [7]. - A controversial feature called YOLO mode has been introduced, which removes manual approval processes for all tools in the workspace, significantly increasing the risk of device compromise [9]. Group 3: TypeScript 7 Preview - TypeScript 7 has been introduced in a preview version, featuring a new compiler and language service written in Go, aimed at achieving high-performance capabilities [10]. - The update promises to reduce loading times and memory usage, enhancing the overall responsiveness of the editor [12]. Group 4: Discontinuation of IntelliCode - The discontinuation of IntelliCode, a free AI code completion tool with over 60 million users, has drawn criticism from developers [13]. - Developers will now need to subscribe to GitHub Copilot for AI-assisted code completion, which offers limited free usage before requiring payment [14]. - This shift reflects Microsoft's broader commercial goals, despite VS Code being an open-source product [15].

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI has launched its new flagship image model, GPT Image 1.5, which claims to outperform Google's Nano Banana Pro in various benchmarks, but initial user feedback has been largely negative, suggesting it may be a case of "high scores but low capability" [1][12][26]. Group 1: Model Features and Performance - GPT Image 1.5 has significantly improved capabilities, including enhanced instruction comprehension, detailed image retention, and a generation speed that is four times faster than its predecessor [4][6]. - In benchmark tests, GPT Image 1.5 achieved a score of 1264, ranking first in Text-to-Image generation, while Google's Nano Banana Pro scored 1235, placing second [10][15]. - The model's editing capabilities allow for precise modifications while maintaining consistency in lighting, composition, and character appearance across multiple edits [28][30][67]. Group 2: User Feedback and Comparisons - Despite its high ranking, user tests revealed that GPT Image 1.5 struggles with certain tasks, such as interpreting handwritten notes, leading to criticism that it does not live up to expectations [12][14][21]. - Users have expressed disappointment, with some stating that Google's Nano Banana Pro remains superior, and others labeling OpenAI's release as "meaningless" [21][26]. - Comparisons between images generated by GPT Image 1.5 and those from Nano Banana Pro show that the latter often produces more realistic results, raising concerns about OpenAI's competitive edge [183][189]. Group 3: Market Context and Competitive Landscape - OpenAI's rapid response to Google's advancements, including the recent release of GPT-5.2 and now GPT Image 1.5, indicates a competitive urgency in the AI image generation market [163][164]. - The AI image model competition is intensifying, with other players like Qwen-Image and Black Forest Labs also making strides in the field [167]. - OpenAI aims to capture the enterprise market by enhancing its image generation capabilities, which are now 20% cheaper for API users compared to the previous version [152][153].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the changing dynamics in the tech industry, particularly in AI, where companies like Tencent and Meta are prioritizing talent with proven technical skills over traditional experience, leading to workplace anxiety among long-term employees [1][5][7]. Group 1: Talent Acquisition Strategies - Tencent's recent hiring of top talent like Yao Shunyu, a Princeton PhD and former OpenAI contributor, reflects a strategy focused on acquiring key technical skills to enhance their AI capabilities [2][5]. - Meta has also engaged in aggressive talent acquisition, hiring Alexander Wang at a young age and granting him a high position, showcasing a trend where companies are willing to overlook traditional hierarchies in favor of immediate expertise [3][5]. Group 2: Changing Workplace Dynamics - The traditional workplace norm of valuing years of experience is being challenged, as companies now emphasize the importance of technical barriers and immediate contributions over tenure [7][8]. - Long-term employees express feelings of unfairness as their accumulated experience may not hold the same value in the rapidly evolving AI landscape, indicating a shift in what constitutes career capital [6][8].

Core Viewpoint - TikTok's parent company ByteDance has signed an agreement with three leading investors to establish a new joint venture, TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC, to sell over 80% of its U.S. assets and comply with U.S. regulations, marking a significant development in the ongoing business challenges faced by TikTok [5][6]. Group 1 - The new entity will be jointly owned by Oracle, Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi's MGX, which will collectively hold 45% of the shares, aligning with previous reports [5][6]. - The new entity will be responsible for data protection, algorithm security, content moderation, and software assurance for TikTok in the U.S., while ByteDance will retain ownership of TikTok's algorithm and charge licensing fees [5][6]. - A seven-member board, predominantly composed of U.S. citizens, will oversee the new entity, ensuring compliance and governance [7]. Group 2 - The new investor alliance will hold a total of 50% of the shares, with Oracle, Silver Lake, and MGX each owning 15%, while ByteDance's existing investors will hold 30.1%, and ByteDance itself will retain 19.9% [6]. - The transaction is expected to be completed by January 22, 2026, allowing TikTok's 170 million U.S. users to continue using the platform without interruption [7].

Core Viewpoint - Tencent's QQ has reintroduced a classic mode in its latest update, aiming to attract and retain users from the 80s and 90s generations by evoking nostalgia while also enhancing practical functionalities [2][3][5]. User Experience and Features - The update allows users to switch between a simplified efficiency mode and a classic mode that resembles the early 2000s QQ interface, which has been dubbed a "moyu tool" by users [3][4]. - New features include free access to a color palette for customization, the ability to batch import emoji packs, and migration of historical chat records, addressing previous user pain points [4][5]. User Engagement and Market Data - As of Q3 2025, QQ's mobile active user accounts have declined to 517 million, a drop of 8% year-on-year, while WeChat's combined active accounts reached 1.414 billion, marking a 2% increase [5][6]. - Historical data shows a steady decline in QQ's mobile active users from 800 million in 2018 to 517 million in 2025, indicating a need for strategic changes to retain users [6]. Strategic Implications - The reintroduction of the classic mode is seen as a defensive strategy to retain older users and attract them back to the platform through nostalgia and enhanced features [5][6].

这种情况，在等级观念重、岗位分工界限清晰的公司里特别常见。 有一个从鹅厂"跳槽到某里的 网友 ，他在向一位平级的 P7 同事索要数据 时，因对方在休假，便回复"不着急，辛苦了 "。 该对话被对方转发给发帖者的直属领导，领导随后指出"辛苦"一词的使用存在"越界"问题，认为这句 话只能 上级对下级 或 产品对研发 （甲方对乙方）使用，而平级或下级对上级说"辛 苦"可能显得冒犯，因为"他人是否辛苦不由平级定义"。 「 庙小妖风大，池小王八多，但是池大王八更多 」 「建议发 X 里内网让大家看看」 「我讨厌别人对我说"辛苦了"，任何人 说都讨厌，我对别人只说"谢谢你"不说"辛苦了"。 」 「 话说得是没错，辛苦了就是上级对下级用语，平级或跨部门应该说有劳了。如果对平级或跨部门同事 用辛苦这个词，也应该是"辛苦老哥/老弟/领导了"。虽然领导专门把这小事说一句不值当，但职场就是职 场，你可以不care，但将来有一天因为今天不care而丢掉机会/无人帮忙，也怨不得别人 」 有些企业特别在意说话方式里藏着的 "权力信号"。一句看似普通的感谢，都可能被当成是对同事工作的 "定性 评价"，一不小心就踩了不成文的权力规矩。 此贴一 ...