证券代码：601111 证券简称：中国国航 公告编号：2025-058 中国国际航空股份有限公司 关于召开2025年第三次临时股东会的通知 网络投票起止时间：自2025 年 12 月 16 日 1 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性 陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 一、 召开会议的基本情况 （一） 股东会类型和届次 2025年第三次临时股东会 召开的日期时间：2025 年 12 月 16 日 11 点 00 分 召开地点：中国北京市顺义区天柱路 30 号国航总部大楼 C713 会议室 （五） 网络投票的系统、起止日期和投票时间。 网络投票系统：上海证券交易所股东会网络投票系统 股东会召开日期：2025年12月16日 本次股东会采用的网络投票系统：上海证券交易所股东会网络投票系统 （二） 股东会召集人：董事会 （三） 投票方式：本次股东会所采用的表决方式是现场投票和网络投票相结合 的方式 （四） 现场会议召开的日期、时间和地点 至2025 年 12 月 16 日 采用上海证券交易所网络投票系统，通过交易系统投票平台的投票时间为股 东 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the top and bottom AH premium rates for various stocks as of November 27, with Northeast Electric (00042) leading with a premium rate of 864.29% [1] - The article also lists the stocks with the highest and lowest deviation values, indicating significant discrepancies between A-shares and H-shares [1] AH Premium Rate Rankings - The top three stocks with the highest AH premium rates are: - Northeast Electric (00042): 864.29% - Hongye Futures (03678): 269.82% - Sinopec Oilfield Service (01033): 264.86% [1] - The bottom three stocks with the lowest AH premium rates are: - Ningde Times (03750): -5.40% - China Merchants Bank (03968): -1.65% - Heng Rui Medicine (01276): -0.38% [1] Deviation Value Rankings - The stocks with the highest deviation values are: - Vanke Enterprises (02202): 30.48% - Dazhong Public Utilities (01635): 24.57% - Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical (00719): 22.88% [1] - The stocks with the lowest deviation values are: - Sairis (09927): -17.06% - China National Airlines (00753): -13.21% - China Life (02628): -13.18% [1] Additional Insights - The article provides detailed tables showing the premium rates and deviation values for the top and bottom AH stocks, indicating market trends and potential investment opportunities [2]

每经AI快讯，港股航空股再度走低，截至发稿，东方航空(00670.HK)跌4.56%，报4.4港元；南方航空 (01055.HK)跌2.33%，报5.02港元；中国国航(00753.HK)跌2.33%，报6.3港元。 ...

汇丰发布研报称，近日多部门提醒中国公民近期谨慎赴日，另据报中国航空公司收到要求，削减日本航 班的措施将维持至明年3月底。汇丰认为这将对航空公司的盈利构成直接风险。自疫情以来，中国至日 本航线一直是航空公司的高利润航线，而延长航班削减的措施涵盖了最具利润的农历新年假期。 消息面上，11月24日，航班管家DAST数据显示，截至11月24日10点，已有12条中日航线取消所有航 班，涉及名古屋、福冈、札幌、大阪等地。监测数据显示，未来一周赴日计划航班取消率将在11月27日 达到21.6%，为1个月以来最高值。11月26日，中国驻日本大使馆发文，再次提醒中国公民注意人身安 全。 航空股再度走低，截至发稿，东方航空(00670)跌4.56%，报4.4港元；南方航空（600029）(01055)跌 2.33%，报5.02港元；中国国航（601111）(00753)跌2.33%，报6.3港元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Airline stocks have declined significantly due to the cancellation of flights to Japan, with major airlines facing direct risks to profitability as travel restrictions are extended [1] Group 1: Airline Stock Performance - Eastern Airlines (00670) dropped by 4.56%, trading at 4.4 HKD [1] - Southern Airlines (01055) fell by 2.33%, trading at 5.02 HKD [1] - Air China (00753) decreased by 2.33%, trading at 6.3 HKD [1] Group 2: Flight Cancellations and Impact - As of November 24, 12 routes between China and Japan have canceled all flights, affecting cities like Nagoya, Fukuoka, Sapporo, and Osaka [1] - The cancellation rate for planned flights to Japan is expected to reach 21.6% by November 27, the highest in a month [1] - The Chinese Embassy in Japan has issued warnings to citizens regarding personal safety [1] Group 3: Analyst Insights - HSBC's report indicates that multiple departments have advised Chinese citizens to exercise caution when traveling to Japan [1] - Chinese airlines have received requests to reduce flights to Japan, with measures expected to last until the end of March next year [1] - The extension of flight reductions includes the profitable Lunar New Year holiday period, posing a direct risk to airline profitability [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent practice of airlines locking seats and charging for seat selection has raised consumer concerns, as it is perceived as a means for airlines to increase revenue at the expense of consumer rights [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - A special investigation by Jiangsu Consumer Council focused on 10 domestic airlines, revealing that seat locking is prevalent, with the proportion of locked seats in economy class ranging from 19.9% to 62.1%, averaging 38.7% [1][2]. - The locked seats are primarily desirable ones, such as those in the front row, window, and aisle, limiting consumer choice to less favorable options [1][2]. - The investigation identified four main issues: widespread seat locking, disguised payment mechanisms, lack of transparency, and unfair contractual terms [2]. Group 2: Consumer Rights and Responsibilities - Airlines are legally responsible for protecting consumer rights and must ensure transparency in seat distribution and pricing policies [3]. - Airlines should provide equal seat selection opportunities for all passengers at the same fare and respect consumer autonomy in choosing seats [3]. Group 3: Required Actions from Airlines - Jiangsu Consumer Council has mandated airlines to conduct self-assessments and rectify their seat selection rules, particularly addressing excessive locking and disguised payment models [4]. - Airlines must revise unfair contractual terms that limit consumer rights and ensure that their policies are clear and transparent [4]. Group 4: Industry Response - Representatives from Southern Airlines and Lucky Air acknowledged the situation and stated they are evaluating the requirements set by Jiangsu Consumer Council [5]. - Experts have pointed out that while some seat locking for safety or special needs is acceptable, excessive locking for profit could violate consumer rights [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Consumer Rights Protection Committee has released a report highlighting issues related to seat locking practices by airlines, including widespread locking behavior, excessive locking of premium seats, disguised fees for unlocking, and infringement on consumer rights [1][4]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - The average seat locking rate among the 10 surveyed airlines is 38.7%, with rates ranging from 19.9% to 62.1% [3][4]. - Spring Airlines and Shenzhen Airlines have particularly high locking rates, exceeding 60% and 50% respectively, while Juneyao Airlines has a relatively low rate of under 20% [3][4]. - The investigation focused on the locking ratio, locking range, redemption methods, and customer service explanations [3]. Group 2: Identified Issues - Widespread seat locking practices are prevalent, with premium seats being excessively locked, limiting consumer choices to less desirable seats [4][5]. - The unlocking mechanism often requires payment or points redemption, which disadvantages non-members or infrequent travelers, effectively increasing travel costs [4][5]. - There is a lack of transparency in information provided to consumers, with unclear seat selection rules and inadequate customer service responses [4][5]. Group 3: Recommendations and Actions - The Jiangsu Consumer Rights Protection Committee has urged airlines to conduct self-examinations and rectify unfair terms in their agreements regarding seat locking [1][6]. - Airlines are recommended to ensure a reasonable and balanced distribution of free seat options, limiting paid options to only those necessary for special circumstances [7]. - Continuous monitoring of airlines' compliance with these recommendations will be conducted, with potential follow-up measures if necessary [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Protection Committee has raised concerns regarding the long-standing issues of seat locking and paid seat selection services among major Chinese airlines, highlighting the need for reform in these practices to protect consumer rights [1][2][3]. Group 1: Issues Identified - The practice of seat locking is widespread among the ten airlines, with the proportion of locked seats in the economy class ranging from 19.9% to 62.1%, averaging 38.7%, primarily affecting preferred seating areas [1][2]. - Airlines are increasingly using a mechanism that effectively charges consumers for seat selection, particularly disadvantaging non-members or infrequent travelers who lack the means to accumulate points for free seat selection [2]. - There is a lack of transparency in the information provided to consumers regarding seat locking rules and associated fees, with airlines often providing vague explanations that do not align with the high rates of seat locking [2]. Group 2: Required Reforms - The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Protection Committee has mandated airlines to conduct self-assessments and rectify their seat selection rules within 15 working days, specifically addressing the excessive locking of seats and eliminating disguised paid seat selection models [3][4]. - Airlines are required to ensure a reasonable and balanced distribution of free seat options, retaining only necessary seat locks for special passengers or emergency purposes, while prohibiting the inclusion of standard economy seats in the paid category [3]. - The committee has called for a review and modification of unfair contractual terms related to seat locking, ensuring that consumer rights are not limited and that airlines' responsibilities are clearly defined within a transparent framework [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Consumer Rights Protection Committee has released a report highlighting issues related to seat locking practices by airlines, including widespread seat locking, excessive locking of premium seats, disguised fees for unlocking, and infringement on consumer rights [1][4]. Group 1: Survey Findings - The average seat locking rate among the 10 surveyed airlines is 38.7%, with rates ranging from 19.9% to 62.1% across different routes [2][4]. - Spring Airlines has the highest locking rate at over 60% for the Nanjing-Lanzhou route, while Juneyao Airlines has the lowest at under 20% [2][4]. - The survey included major airlines such as China Southern Airlines, China Eastern Airlines, and Hainan Airlines, focusing on their booking apps to assess seat locking practices [2][4]. Group 2: Identified Issues - The report identifies four main issues: the prevalence of seat locking, excessive locking of desirable seats, disguised fees for unlocking, and lack of transparency in information provided to consumers [4][5]. - Premium seats are predominantly locked, limiting consumer choice to less desirable options, which infringes on consumer rights [4][5]. - Airlines are increasingly charging for seat selection, which can significantly increase travel costs, especially for families seeking adjacent seating [6][8]. Group 3: Recommendations and Actions - The Jiangsu Consumer Rights Protection Committee has urged airlines to conduct self-inspections and rectify unfair terms in their agreements regarding seat locking [6][7]. - Airlines are recommended to ensure a reasonable distribution of free seat options and to eliminate disguised fees associated with seat selection [6][7]. - Continuous monitoring of airlines' compliance with these recommendations will be conducted by the Jiangsu Consumer Rights Protection Committee [8].

Core Viewpoint - The recent practice of airlines locking seats and charging for seat selection has raised consumer concerns, as it is seen as a way for airlines to increase revenue at the expense of consumer rights [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - A special investigation by Jiangsu Consumer Council targeted 10 domestic airlines, revealing that seat locking is prevalent, with the proportion of locked seats in economy class ranging from 19.9% to 62.1%, averaging 38.7% [1][2]. - The locked seats are primarily desirable ones, such as those in the front row, window, and aisle, limiting consumer choice to less favorable options [1][2]. Group 2: Consumer Rights Violations - The unlocking mechanism for preferred seats often requires payment through membership points or miles, disadvantaging non-members or occasional travelers who lack accumulation channels [2]. - Airlines have introduced additional paid options for unlocking seats, effectively splitting the basic seat selection rights into paid services, increasing travel costs for consumers [2]. - Information regarding seat locking rules and fees is often unclear, violating consumers' right to know, with customer service responses being inadequate and contradictory [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Airlines - Airlines are urged to ensure transparency by clearly informing consumers about seat distribution and pricing policies [3]. - Fairness in rules must be maintained, ensuring equal seat selection opportunities for all passengers at the same fare [3]. - Airlines should respect consumer autonomy by safeguarding their right to choose and preventing disguised compulsory consumption [3]. Group 4: Required Actions - Airlines must conduct self-assessments to address excessive seat locking and eliminate disguised paid seat selection models, ensuring a reasonable and balanced distribution of free seat options [3][4]. - Unfair clauses in agreements related to seat locking should be reviewed and amended to avoid limiting consumer rights or increasing consumer responsibilities unfairly [4].