+ CCS3763 EBBH + NAME(S) AND ADDRESS OF REGISTERED SHAREHOLDER(S) 登記股東之姓名及地址 (A joint stock company incorporated in the People's Republic of China with limited liability) （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） (Stock code 股份代號：6818) DIVIDEND CURRENCY ELECTION FORM FOR 2025 INTERIM DIVIDEND OF RMB 0.105 PER SHARE ("2025 INTERIM DIVIDEND") 二零二五年度中期股息每股人民幣 0.105 元（「二零二五年度中期股息」） 股息貨幣選擇表格 Registered shareholders will automatically receive their cash dividends in Hong Kong dollars unless they elect to receive them in Renminbi. No ...

历经多年，一桩涉及多家银行的3.5亿诈骗案迎来最新进展！ 近日，锦龙股份披露，其子公司中山证券收到一份《应诉通知书》，其中显示，光大银行长 春分行作为原告，向中山证券、招商银行无锡分行、平安银行深圳分行、深圳国民基金等五 名被告要求连带赔偿3.5亿元本金，以及1.394亿元资金占用费，涉案金额高达4.89亿元。 5月30日，光大银行长春分行以同业存款形式向招商银行无锡分行存入3.5亿元。招商银行无 锡分行根据与光大银行长春分行签订的《委托定向投资协议》及《投资指令》、与中山证券 事实上，上述案件已历经多次开庭审理，甚至已达最高人民法院，至今仍未尘埃落定。而此 案的背后，是一名公司法人与银行职员"里应外合"，通过虚假材料等制造的一场刑事案件。 公司法人"精心策划"3.5亿诈骗案，行长助理擅自修改财报数据 回溯过往，上述案件的开端，始于柳河聚鑫源米业有限公司（以下简称 "聚鑫源公司"）及 其法定代表人刘某某。相关判决书显示，2013年下半年，刘某某通过他人介绍，认识了时任 光大银行长春分行汽车厂支行行长助理的张某。 而后，刘某某以聚鑫源公司需购粮资金等为由，隐瞒该公司具有巨额债务需要偿还及其本人 炒作期货的事实， ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal dispute involving Jinlong Co., Ltd. and Zhongshan Securities, stemming from a channel business transaction that occurred a decade ago, highlighting the ongoing risks and responsibilities associated with such financial arrangements [2][3][4]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The dispute originated from a 3.5 billion yuan transaction where Everbright Bank's Changchun branch claims its funds were misappropriated through fraudulent activities involving employees and the actual controller of the financing party [2][4]. - The lawsuit seeks a total of 489 million yuan, including damages for the occupied funds, as Everbright Bank alleges that the involved parties should bear joint liability for the losses incurred [4][11]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings and Historical Context - This is not the first lawsuit; Everbright Bank previously sued the Wuxi branch of China Merchants Bank in 2015 over the same issue but lost the case [6][8]. - The Supreme Court ruled that the agreements involved were fraudulent and did not reflect the true intentions of Everbright Bank, leading to a dismissal of their claims [8][9]. Group 3: Implications for Channel Business - The article emphasizes the ongoing scrutiny of channel business practices, particularly after the introduction of asset management regulations aimed at curbing such activities [11][12]. - Judicial precedents indicate that channel providers may be held liable for losses, as seen in cases where trust companies were required to compensate investors for negligence in managing channel business [10][12].

Core Viewpoint - China Everbright Bank (601818) has shown a slight increase in stock price, closing at 3.37 yuan, reflecting a 0.6% rise from the previous week, with a total market capitalization of 199.12 billion yuan [1]. Trading Information Summary - On January 19, China Everbright Bank executed a block trade with a transaction amount of 6.04 million yuan [2]. Company Announcement Summary - China Everbright Bank plans to redeem 3.5 billion shares of preferred stock on February 11, 2026, with an issuance scale of 35 billion yuan. The redemption price will include the face value plus accrued dividends up to the day before redemption [1][2].

Core Viewpoint - The AI Fund Ping An Hong Kong Stock Connect Dividend Select Mixed Fund A (021046) reported a profit of 11.96 million yuan for Q4 2025, with a net asset value growth rate of 3.5% during the period [3]. Fund Performance - As of January 22, the fund's unit net value was 1.286 yuan, with a fund size of 389 million yuan [3][17]. - The fund's performance over the past three months showed a return of -0.63%, ranking 588 out of 621 comparable funds; over the past six months, it returned -0.69%, ranking 607 out of 621; and over the past year, it achieved a return of 19.68%, ranking 525 out of 613 [4]. Investment Strategy - The fund manager indicated that in the context of declining cash yields, high-dividend assets have shown a "quasi-fixed income" characteristic, becoming a dominant investment style in Q4. In contrast, growth sectors faced increased volatility and pressure due to market sentiment and fluctuating fundamental expectations [3]. - The fund will continue to focus on stable high-dividend stocks, particularly in the financial, telecommunications, energy, and public utility sectors, which are expected to provide visibility and stable profits during the economic recovery [3]. Risk Metrics - The fund's Sharpe ratio since inception is 1.3198, indicating a favorable risk-adjusted return [9]. - The maximum drawdown since inception is 10.87%, with the largest quarterly drawdown occurring in Q2 2025 at 9.1% [12]. Portfolio Composition - The average stock position since inception is 85.49%, with a peak of 89.53% at the end of H1 2024 and a low of 71.51% at the end of Q3 2024 [15]. - The fund has a high concentration of holdings, with the top ten stocks including China National Offshore Oil, China Mobile, CITIC Bank, Bank of China, and others [20].

中国经济网北京1月24日讯 国家金融监督管理总局23日发布焦作监管分局行政处罚信息公示表 （焦金罚决字〔2026〕1、2、3号）。 中国光大银行股份有限公司（简称"光大银行"，601818.SH）焦作分行存在以下违法违规事实：贷 后管理不到位，信贷资金回流至借款人；以贷转存，虚增存贷款规模。焦作金融监管分局决定对其处以 罚款60万元。 毋志鹏（光大银行解放路支行公司业务部原经理）存在以下违法违规事实：贷后管理不到位，信贷 资金回流至借款人。焦作金融监管分局决定对其处以警告。 任丽萍（光大银行焦作分行原副行长）存在以下违法违规事实：以贷转存，虚增存贷款规模。焦作 金融监管分局决定对其处以警告。 以下为原文： | 序 | 当事人 | 行政处罚 决定书文 | 主要违法违规行 | 行政处 | 作出决 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 름 | 名称 | 를 | 为 | 罚内容 | 定机关 | | | 中国光 大银行 | 焦金罚决 | 贷后管理不到 | | | | | 股份有 | 字 | 位,信贷资金回 | 明 款 | 焦作金 | | 1 | | | | 60 万 | 融 ...

公告显示，2014年5月，招商银行无锡分行委托中山证券设立定向资产管理计划，并向作为管理人的中山证券发出《投资指令》，要求投资以下资产：投资 内容——平安银行深圳分行作为受托人的委托贷款，投资金额为3.5亿元，投资期限为2014年5月30日至2015年5月29日；授权委托中山证券代表招商银行无 锡分行与平安银行深圳分行、柳河聚鑫源米业有限公司（下称"柳河米业"）签订《委托贷款合同》；明确该投资系由招商银行无锡分行决策，投资安全及任 1月20日，锦龙股份发布公告称，控股子公司中山证券近日收到吉林省长春市中级人民法院《应诉通知书》（〔2026〕吉01民初7号），光大银行长春分行作 为原告，以招商银行无锡分行、中山证券、平安银行深圳分行、国民基金及朱东卫作为被告，就侵权责任纠纷向吉林省长春市中级人民法院提起诉讼。 何风险收益均由招商银行无锡分行负责。随后，中山证券根据相关约定，代表资产管理计划及其委托人通知平安银行深圳分行将委托贷款资金3.5亿元转入 借款人柳河米业账户。投资期限届满后，该笔委托贷款未能按约收回。 光大银行长春汽车厂支行员工张磊与柳河米业实控人刘孝义冒用光大银行长春分行名义于2014年5月与招商银行 ...

中经记者 秦玉芳 广州报道 近日，黄金价格再创历史新高，站稳4800美元高位。 随着国际金价持续高位震荡，商业银行频频发布贵金属交易风险提示公告，并上调积存金业务起购金 额。自2025年年初至今，多家银行已连续多次上调该业务门槛，普通起购金额普遍升至千元以上。 这一连串调整背后，既是金价上涨带来的自然结果，也反映出银行在波动市况下强化风险管理、落实投 资者适当性管理的主动应对。业内人士认为，当前黄金积存业务正经历产品定位再校准，从低门槛储蓄 替代品转向中风险投资品。预期2026年黄金价格高位震荡趋势加剧，而投资者对黄金资产配置的刚需趋 势仍将延续。在此背景下，投资者更需要审慎制定投资策略。 起投门槛普遍进入千元阶段 自2026年1月以来，不少银行发布贵金属交易风险提示，并上调黄金积存业务门槛。例如，工商银行 （601398.SH）如意金积存业务最低投资额（即积存起点金额）由1000元上调至1100元，按克数积存的 积存起点仍为1克；光大银行（601818.SH）黄金积存个人业务定期投资按固定金额投资起购金额由 1000元调整为1100元，追加金额为100元整数倍；宁波银行（002142.SZ）将积存金起购金额 ...

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Buy" [2] Core Insights - The report provides a comprehensive analysis of 127 regional banks in Jiangsu Province, highlighting their asset and liability structures, profitability, and asset quality [6][18] - Jiangsu's regional banks have shown a significant increase in asset growth, with major city commercial banks growing at 19.4%, surpassing the growth of listed city commercial banks at 14.2% [24][26] - The report indicates that the loan-to-asset ratio for city commercial banks is projected to reach 48.4% in 2024, reflecting a gradual increase in lending activities [30] - Jiangsu's regional banks exhibit better return on assets (ROA) compared to listed banks, with city commercial banks outperforming by 16 basis points and rural commercial banks by 9 basis points [6][42] - The asset quality of Jiangsu's regional banks is superior to that of listed banks, with lower non-performing loan ratios and higher provision coverage ratios [6][42] Summary by Sections 1. Economic Structure of Jiangsu Province - Jiangsu Province is focusing on new industrialization and strategic emerging industries, with significant contributions from cities like Nanjing and Suzhou [13][14] 2. Overview of 127 Regional Banks in Jiangsu - The report categorizes the banks into city commercial banks, rural commercial banks, and others, with a total of 127 banks established between 2006 and 2015 [18][20] 3. Asset/Liability Structure - The asset growth of major city commercial banks is accelerating, while rural commercial banks are experiencing a decline in growth rates [24][26] - The loan-to-asset ratio for city commercial banks is expected to increase to 48.4% by 2024, indicating a shift towards more lending [30] 4. Profitability - Jiangsu's regional banks have a higher ROA compared to listed banks, with city commercial banks showing a 16 basis point advantage [6][42] 5. Asset Quality/Capital Levels - Jiangsu's regional banks maintain a lower non-performing loan ratio compared to listed banks, with city commercial banks having a 30 basis point lower ratio [6][42]

一审法院认为,被告某银行锦州分行系案涉"汇添富稳健添盈一年持有期混合型证券投资基金"的代销 机构，原告王某通过被告购买上述理财产品,双方构成金融服务法律关系。 中国经济网北京1月23日讯 信网/信号新闻21日报道《推销基金时未充分告知风险光大银行锦州分 行被判承担客户一半损失》显示，王女士在中国光大银行股份有限公司锦州分行（以下简称"光大银行 锦州分行"）理财经理的推荐下，投入600万元购买了一款中风险基金，后续分两次赎回，但第二次赎 回时本金部分产生了14万余元的亏损，于是将光大银行锦州分行告上法庭。 近日，信号新闻获悉，一审法院审理后认为，光大银行锦州分行在销售该理财产品过程中，未对客 户进行书面风险告知、未履行风险评估义务，对客户投资损失存在过错，需承担50%本金损失的赔偿 责任。光大银行锦州分行提起上诉，被二审法院驳回。 裁判文书网发布的《辽宁省锦州市中级人民法院民事判决书》（（2025）辽07民终1743号）显 示，一审法院查明事实如下： 原告王某多次在被告某银行锦州分行购买金融理财产品，被告为原告指定专属理财经理裴超。被告 某银行锦州分行于2020年4月7日对原告王某进行购买理财产品进行了风险评估 ...