Report Industry Investment Rating No information regarding the industry investment rating is provided in the given content. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the volatile market, credit bonds outperformed interest - rate bonds. Interest - rate bond yields slightly declined, while credit bond yields dropped more significantly. Credit spreads mostly decreased slightly, with the 3Y variety showing a relatively larger decline [2][5]. - Urban investment bond spreads generally compressed slightly. Spreads of external ratings AAA, AA +, and AA platforms decreased by 1BP respectively. Spreads also declined when classified by administrative levels [2][9][15]. - Most industrial bond spreads decreased. Central and state - owned enterprise real - estate bond spreads declined, mixed - ownership real - estate bond spreads decreased, and private - enterprise real - estate bond spreads increased. Spreads of coal, steel, and chemical bonds also decreased [2][18]. - The yields of secondary and perpetual bonds followed the decline of certificates of deposit, with the short - to - medium - term performing relatively strongly [2][21]. - The excess spreads of 5Y industrial bonds and 3Y urban investment bonds slightly decreased [2][24]. Summary by Directory 1. Credit Bonds Outperformed Interest - Rate Bonds in the Volatile Market - Interest - rate bond yields slightly declined. The yields of 1Y, 5Y, and 7Y China Development Bank bonds decreased by 2BP, 1BP, and 1BP respectively, while the 3Y and 10Y remained flat [2][5]. - Credit bond yields dropped more significantly. The yields of 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, 7Y, and 10Y credit bonds decreased to varying degrees [2][5]. - Credit spreads mostly decreased slightly, with the 3Y variety showing a relatively larger decline. Rating spreads and term spreads showed obvious differentiation [5]. 2. Urban Investment Bond Spreads Slightly Compressed - By external ratings, the spreads of AAA, AA +, and AA platforms decreased by 1BP respectively, with different changes in different regions [9]. - By administrative levels, the spreads of provincial, municipal, and district - level platforms decreased by 2BP, 1BP, and 1BP respectively, with different changes in different regions [15]. 3. Most Industrial Bond Spreads Decreased - Real - estate bonds: Central and state - owned enterprise real - estate bond spreads decreased by 2 - 4BP, mixed - ownership real - estate bond spreads decreased by 1BP, and private - enterprise real - estate bond spreads increased by 7BP [2][18]. - Other industrial bonds: The spreads of AAA, AA +, and AA coal bonds decreased by 2BP, 2BP, and 1BP respectively; the spreads of AAA and AA + steel bonds decreased by 2BP and 4BP respectively; and the spreads of all levels of chemical bonds decreased by 3BP [2][18]. 4. The Yields of Secondary and Perpetual Bonds Followed the Decline of Certificates of Deposit, with the Short - to - Medium - Term Performing Relatively Strongly - 1Y secondary and perpetual bonds: Yields decreased by 2 - 3BP, and spreads compressed by 1 - 2BP [21]. - 3Y secondary and perpetual bonds: The yields of secondary capital bonds decreased by 2BP, and spreads decreased by 2 - 3BP; the yields of perpetual bonds decreased by 3 - 4BP, and spreads decreased by 3 - 4BP [21]. - 5Y secondary and perpetual bonds: The yields of secondary capital bonds decreased by 1 - 2BP, and spreads compressed by 0 - 1BP; the yields of AA + and above perpetual bonds decreased by 1BP, and spreads increased by 1BP, while the yields of AA perpetual bonds decreased by 4BP, and spreads decreased by 2BP [21]. 5. The Excess Spreads of 5Y Industrial Bonds and 3Y Urban Investment Bonds Slightly Decreased - AAA 3Y industrial perpetual bond excess spreads remained at 3.82BP, at the 1.32% quantile since 2015; 5Y industrial perpetual bond excess spreads decreased by 0.86BP to 7.65BP, at the 4.18% quantile since 2015 [24]. - Urban investment AAA 3Y perpetual bond excess spreads decreased by 0.65BP to 3.75BP, at the 0.29% quantile; urban investment AAA 5Y perpetual bond excess spreads increased by 0.09BP to 10.21BP, at the 10.93% quantile [24]. 6. Credit Spread Database Compilation Instructions - Market - wide credit spreads, commercial bank secondary and perpetual spreads, and industrial/urban investment perpetual bond credit spreads are calculated based on ChinaBond medium - and short - term notes and ChinaBond perpetual bond data. Historical quantiles are since the beginning of 2015 [28]. - Industrial and urban investment bond credit spreads are compiled and statistically analyzed by Cinda Securities R & D Center, with historical quantiles since the beginning of 2015 [28]. - Specific calculation methods and sample selection criteria are provided, including how to calculate spreads, which samples to select, and which samples to exclude [31].

Group 1 - The issuer, Hebei Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., has approved the profit distribution plan for the year 2024, which will be executed on July 16, 2025, for all shareholders registered by the close of trading on that date [1] - The profit distribution to shareholders is a normal profit allocation and will not have a significant adverse impact on the issuer's daily management, production operations, or debt repayment capacity [2] - Huatai United Securities, as the trustee manager for the bond "23HBIS01," will continue to monitor the issuer's repayment of principal and interest, as well as other significant matters affecting bondholders [2]

光大证券股份有限公司关于 河钢股份有限公司分配股利的 临时受托管理事务报告 债券简称：20HBIS02 债券代码：149181.SZ 债券简称：23HBIS02 债券代码：148477.SZ 债券受托管理人 （住所：上海市静安区新闸路 1508 号） 2025 年 7 月 契约锁 声明 本报告依据《公司债券发行与交易管理办法》、其它相关信息披露文件以及 河钢股份有限公司（以下简称"发行人"、"公司"）出具的相关说明文件和提供的 相关资料等，由债券受托管理人光大证券股份有限公司（以下简称"光大证券"） 编制。光大证券编制本报告的内容及信息均来源于河钢股份有限公司提供的资料 或说明。 本报告不构成对投资者进行或不进行某项行为的推荐意见，投资者应对相关 事宜做出独立判断，而不应将本报告中的任何内容据以作为光大证券所作的承诺 或声明。 1 契约锁 一、发行人概况 （一）公司名称：河钢股份有限公司 （二）公司注册地址：河北省石家庄市体育南大街 385 号 （三）公司法定代表人：王兰玉 （四）信息披露事务负责人：王文多 （五）联系电话：0311-66770709 （六）联系传真：0311-66778711 （1）债券简称 ...

债券简称：24 河钢 Y1 债券代码：148794.SZ 债券简称：24 河钢 Y2 债券代码：148795.SZ 债券简称：25 河钢 Y1 债券代码：524154.SZ 债券简称：25 河钢 Y2 债券代码：524208.SZ 光大证券股份有限公司关于 河钢股份有限公司分配股利及触发强制付息事件的 临时受托管理事务报告 债券受托管理人 （住所：上海市静安区新闸路 1508 号） 2025 年 7 月 契约锁 声明 1 契约锁 一、发行人概况 （一）"24 河钢 Y1"、"24 河钢 Y2"债券概况 本报告依据《公司债券发行与交易管理办法》、其它相关信息披露文件以及 河钢股份有限公司（以下简称"发行人"、"公司"）出具的相关说明文件和提供的 相关资料等，由债券受托管理人光大证券股份有限公司（以下简称"光大证券"） 编制。光大证券编制本报告的内容及信息均来源于河钢股份有限公司提供的资料 或说明。 本报告不构成对投资者进行或不进行某项行为的推荐意见，投资者应对相关 事宜做出独立判断，而不应将本报告中的任何内容据以作为光大证券所作的承诺 或声明。 （二）"25 河钢 Y1"债券概况 （六）联系传真：0311-66 ...

（住所：深圳市前海深港合作区南山街道桂湾五路 128 号前海深港基金小镇 B7 栋 401） 2025 年 7 月 | 债券代码： | 148862.SZ | 债券简称： | 24 | 河钢 | Y3 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 债券代码： | 148922.SZ | 债券简称： | 24 | 河钢 | Y4 | 华泰联合证券有限责任公司关于 河钢股份有限公司分配股利及触发强制付息事件的 受托管理事务临时报告 债券受托管理人 声明 华泰联合证券有限责任公司（以下简称"华泰联合证券"）编制本报告的内 容及信息均来源于河钢股份有限公司（以下简称"发行人""公司"）对外披露的 文件。 本报告不构成对投资者进行或不进行某项行为的推荐意见，投资者应对相关 事宜做出独立判断，而不应将本报告中的任何内容据以作为华泰联合证券所作的 承诺或声明。 1 华泰联合证券作为"河钢股份有限公司2024年面向专业投资者公开发行可续 期公司债券（第三期）"和"河钢股份有限公司2024年面向专业投资者公开发行 可续期公司债券（第四期）"的受托管理人，根据《公司债券发行与交易管理办 法》 ...

债券代码： 148301.SZ 债券简称： 23HBIS01 华泰联合证券有限责任公司关于 河钢股份有限公司分配股利的 受托管理事务临时报告 债券受托管理人 1 一、 重大事项 华泰联合证券作为"河钢股份有限公司2023年面向专业投资者公开发行公司 债券（第一期）"的受托管理人，根据《公司债券发行与交易管理办法》《公司债 券受托管理人执业行为准则》等相关规则，与发行人《河钢股份有限公司信息披 露管理制度（2022年04月修订）》、《河钢股份有限公司2024年度股东大会决议公 告》、《河钢股份有限公司2024年度分红派息实施公告》，现就公司债券重大事项 报告如下： （住所：深圳市前海深港合作区南山街道桂湾五路 128 号前海深港基金小镇 B7 栋 401） 2025 年 7 月 声明 华泰联合证券有限责任公司（以下简称"华泰联合证券"）编制本报告的内 容及信息均来源于河钢股份有限公司（以下简称"发行人""公司"）对外披露的 文件。 本报告不构成对投资者进行或不进行某项行为的推荐意见，投资者应对相关 事宜做出独立判断，而不应将本报告中的任何内容据以作为华泰联合证券所作的 承诺或声明。 无。 特此公告。 （以下无正 ...

关于 河钢股份有限公司 分配股利的 临时受托管理事务报告 债券简称：24HBIS01 债券代码：148581.SZ 债券受托管理人 2025 年 7 月 重要声明 本报告依据《公司债券发行与交易管理办法》《公司债券受托管理人执业行 为准则》、河钢股份有限公司（以下简称"发行人"或"公司"）就存续公司债 券与受托管理人签署的受托管理协议（以下简称"《受托管理协议》"）及其它 相关信息披露文件以及发行人出具的相关说明文件和提供的相关资料等，由受托 管理人中信建投证券股份有限公司（以下简称"中信建投证券"或"受托管理人"） 编制。中信建投证券编制本报告的内容及信息均来源发行人提供的资料或说明。 中信建投证券作为上述存续债券的受托管理人，为充分保障债券投资人的利 益，履行债券受托管理人职责，在获悉相关事项后，及时与发行人进行了沟通， 根据《公司债券受托管理人执业行为准则》的有关规定出具本临时受托管理事务 报告。 中信建投证券后续将密切关注发行人关于上述存续债券本息偿付及其他对 债券持有人有重大影响的事项，并严格按照《公司债券受托管理人执业行为准则》 《受托管理协议》等规定或约定履行债券受托管理人的职责。 特此提请投资 ...

Overview - The metallurgical industry in China is focusing on energy conservation and emission reduction, aiming to minimize energy consumption and pollutant emissions while ensuring product quality and output [1][9][21] - In 2024, total investment in energy conservation and emission reduction by metallurgical enterprises is projected to decrease to 42 billion yuan, with energy-saving benefits dropping to 13 billion yuan [11] Market Policies - The Chinese government has implemented a series of policies to promote energy conservation and carbon reduction in the metallurgical industry, including action plans and guidelines aimed at reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions [4][6] - Specific targets for comprehensive energy consumption and carbon emission intensity in the steel industry have been established to guide the development of energy conservation and emission reduction efforts [4][6] Industry Chain - The energy conservation and emission reduction industry in metallurgy includes manufacturers of energy-saving equipment, technology providers, and software service providers [7] - The upstream supply chain consists of raw material suppliers, component manufacturers, and research institutions, while the downstream market primarily targets the steel and non-ferrous metal industries [7] Current Development - In 2023, the metallurgical industry consumed 680 million tons of standard coal and emitted 1.98 billion tons of CO2, with significant reductions expected in 2024 due to policy support [9][11] - The environmental cost per ton of steel is approximately 138 yuan, with carbon trading revenues estimated at 3.5 billion yuan [11] Competitive Landscape - Major players in the industry include large metallurgical groups like Baowu Steel and Hebei Iron and Steel, which are leading the development of energy-saving technologies [13][16] - Specialized energy-saving technology companies, such as China Metallurgical Group, focus on specific areas like waste heat recovery and flue gas purification [13][18] Future Trends - The dual carbon goals and related policies will continue to drive the metallurgical industry towards stricter energy consumption and emission standards [21] - The adoption of electric furnace short-process steelmaking technology is expected to increase, gradually shifting the industry away from traditional long-process methods [21]

Group 1 - The A-share steel sector experienced an initial surge, with Liugang Co., Ltd. hitting the daily limit up [1] - Other companies such as Shengde Xintai, Hebei Steel, Vanadium Titanium Co., Ltd., Zhongnan Co., Ltd., and Shagang Co., Ltd. also saw increases [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent news about a potential 30% production cut in Tangshan's steel industry has stirred the market, but the immediate impact on steel prices and stocks appears to be stabilizing, with a long-term downward trend in steel prices expected [2][6]. Group 1: Production Cuts and Market Impact - Tangshan's steel production cut is expected to reduce iron water capacity by approximately 50,000 tons per day, which may alleviate supply pressure in the region and stabilize the market [5][6]. - The production cut rumors primarily target sintering processes, and companies like Hebei Steel, which have high environmental performance ratings, are expected to be less affected [5][6]. - Despite initial market optimism following the production cut news, steel prices have begun to decline again, with rebar prices averaging 3,182 yuan per ton as of July 8, down 5 yuan from the previous trading day [6]. Group 2: Historical Context and Financial Performance - In 2017, Hebei Steel's production was reduced due to environmental restrictions, with iron, crude steel, and steel product outputs decreasing by 6.66%, 7.04%, and 5.31% respectively [3]. - The steel industry saw a significant profit increase in 2021, with major steel enterprises achieving a total profit of 352.4 billion yuan, a 59.7% year-on-year increase [4]. - Hebei Steel's revenue in 2021 was 149.63 billion yuan, a 38.98% increase, while its net profit grew by 58.32% to 2.688 billion yuan, indicating a recovery in profitability [4]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The steel market is expected to face continued pressure in the second half of the year, with average steel prices projected to decline compared to the first half [7][8]. - However, there is a potential for a short-term rebound in steel prices as seasonal demand increases, contingent on production control measures and supply-demand dynamics [8].