JAHEN(300955)

Search documents
化妆品板块9月25日跌0.34%,嘉亨家化领跌,主力资金净流出4989.87万元
Zheng Xing Xing Ye Ri Bao· 2025-09-25 08:44
Market Overview - On September 25, the cosmetics sector declined by 0.34%, with Jiaheng Jiahua leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3853.3, down 0.01%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13445.9, up 0.67% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Notable gainers included: - Jinsheng New Material (300849) with a closing price of 13.42, up 1.82% [1] - Tiancaiya (603605) with a closing price of 80.50, up 1.31% [1] - Major decliners included: - Jiaheng Jiahua (300955) with a closing price of 27.90, down 2.04% [2] - Wanmei Biological (603983) with a closing price of 39.81, down 1.87% [2] Trading Volume and Capital Flow - The cosmetics sector experienced a net outflow of 49.89 million yuan from main funds, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 29.38 million yuan [2] - The trading volume for key stocks included: - Shanghai Jahwa (600315) with a trading volume of 37,100 shares and a turnover of approximately 96.45 million yuan [1] - Qingdao Kingway (002094) with a trading volume of 167,200 shares and a turnover of approximately 130 million yuan [2] Fund Flow Analysis - Main fund inflows and outflows for selected stocks: - Shanghai Jahwa had a main fund net inflow of 3.17 million yuan, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 3.43 million yuan [3] - Jiaheng Jiahua saw a main fund net outflow of 393,800 yuan, with retail investors contributing a net outflow of 387,720 yuan [3]
嘉亨家化连亏一年半 2021年上市即巅峰国投证券保荐
Zhong Guo Jing Ji Wang· 2025-09-24 03:20
Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, the company reported operating revenue of 514 million yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 21.72% [1][2] - The net profit attributable to shareholders was -32.14 million yuan, representing a decline of 489.78% compared to the previous year [2] - The net profit attributable to shareholders after deducting non-recurring gains and losses was -32.69 million yuan, a decrease of 432.52% year-on-year [2] - The net cash flow from operating activities was 14.99 million yuan, down 31.13% from the previous year [2] Previous Year Comparison - In 2024, the company achieved operating revenue of 923 million yuan, a decline of 9.13% year-on-year [2] - The net profit attributable to shareholders for 2024 was -23.70 million yuan, compared to a profit of 40.16 million yuan in the previous year [2] - The net cash flow from operating activities in 2024 was 38.43 million yuan, a significant drop of 77.78% year-on-year [2] Initial Public Offering (IPO) Details - The company was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's ChiNext on March 24, 2021, with an issuance of 25.2 million shares at a price of 16.53 yuan per share [3] - The total amount raised from the IPO was 417 million yuan, with a net amount of 373 million yuan after deducting issuance costs [3] - The final net amount raised was 64.95 million yuan less than the original plan of 438 million yuan [3] Issuance Costs - The total issuance costs for the IPO were 43.51 million yuan, including underwriting fees of 31.24 million yuan [4]
化妆品板块9月16日涨0.03%,水羊股份领涨,主力资金净流出4320.22万元
Zheng Xing Xing Ye Ri Bao· 2025-09-16 08:52
Market Overview - On September 16, the cosmetics sector rose by 0.03% compared to the previous trading day, with Shuiyang Co., Ltd. leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3861.87, up 0.04%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13063.97, up 0.45% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Shuiyang Co., Ltd. (300740) closed at 22.48, with a gain of 1.63% and a trading volume of 208,500 shares, amounting to a transaction value of 469 million yuan [1] - Qingdao Kingway (002094) closed at 8.47, up 1.44%, with a trading volume of 326,600 shares and a transaction value of 277 million yuan [1] - Other notable performers include: - Kezhou Co., Ltd. (300856) at 14.23, up 0.57% [1] - Beitaini (300957) at 49.13, up 0.41% [1] - Furuida (600223) at 7.91, up 0.38% [1] Fund Flow Analysis - The cosmetics sector experienced a net outflow of 43.2 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net outflow of 23.0 million yuan [2] - Conversely, speculative funds recorded a net inflow of 66.2 million yuan [2] Detailed Fund Flow for Key Stocks - Shuiyang Co., Ltd. (300740) had a net inflow of 41.1 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors faced a net outflow of 71.8 million yuan [3] - Qingdao Kingway (002094) saw a net inflow of 15.3 million yuan from institutional investors, but a net outflow of 7.2 million yuan from retail investors [3] - Other stocks with significant fund flow include: - Beitaini (300957) with a net inflow of 5.7 million yuan from institutional investors and a net outflow of 13.2 million yuan from retail investors [3] - Furuida (600223) faced a net outflow of 10.2 million yuan from institutional investors but a net inflow of 8.9 million yuan from retail investors [3]
嘉亨家化:截至9月10日股东人数约为7千户
Zheng Quan Ri Bao Wang· 2025-09-15 11:18
Core Viewpoint - The company Jiaheng Jiahua (300955) reported that as of September 10, 2025, the number of shareholders is expected to be approximately 7,000 households [1] Summary by Relevant Categories - Company Information - Jiaheng Jiahua anticipates having around 7,000 shareholders by September 10, 2025 [1]
化妆品板块9月15日跌0.18%,华业香料领跌,主力资金净流出8338.08万元
Zheng Xing Xing Ye Ri Bao· 2025-09-15 08:49
Market Overview - On September 15, the cosmetics sector declined by 0.18%, with Huaye Fragrance leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3860.5, down 0.26%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13005.77, up 0.63% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Notable gainers included: - Jinsong New Material (300849) with a closing price of 14.48, up 3.72% and a trading volume of 121,800 shares, totaling 179 million yuan [1] - Lafang Home (603630) closed at 28.58, up 2.11% with a trading volume of 71,300 shares, totaling 200 million yuan [1] - Notable decliners included: - Huaye Fragrance (300886) closed at 29.66, down 1.79% with a trading volume of 18,400 shares, totaling 55.05 million yuan [2] - Marubi Biological (603983) closed at 39.95, down 1.36% with a trading volume of 13,900 shares, totaling 55.49 million yuan [2] Capital Flow Analysis - The cosmetics sector experienced a net outflow of 83.38 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 76.42 million yuan [2] - The overall capital flow for individual stocks showed: - Jinsong New Material had a net inflow of 18.50 million yuan from institutional investors, accounting for 10.31% of its total [3] - Huaye Fragrance had a net outflow of 4.23 million yuan from institutional investors, accounting for 6.58% of its total [3]
净利暴跌1664%,美妆包材业洗牌加速
3 6 Ke· 2025-09-15 02:50
Core Insights - The beauty packaging industry is facing significant challenges in 2025, impacting both upstream and downstream companies [1] - Among 12 listed beauty packaging companies, half reported revenue and profit growth, while others experienced declines, highlighting a widening gap between companies [1][10] - The competitive landscape is fragmented, with revenue disparities exceeding 50 times between the largest and smallest companies [1] Revenue Performance - The top tier companies (revenue over 5 billion) include Yutong Technology, Zijiang Enterprise, and Hexing Packaging, with Yutong and Zijiang achieving revenue growth, while Hexing saw a decline of 9.52% [5][10] - The second tier (revenue between 1 billion and 5 billion) companies, including Yongxin Co., Zhongrong Co., and Lihua Technology, all reported revenue growth, with Zhongrong achieving double-digit growth [5][10] - The third tier (revenue between 500 million and 1 billion) companies, such as Shanghai Ailu, Xianggang Technology, and Jiahen Household, also showed revenue increases, with Xianggang achieving a notable growth rate of 43.76% [6][8] - The fourth tier (revenue between 100 million and 500 million) companies, including Longlide, Baixinglong, and Jinsong New Materials, displayed significant revenue differences, with Longlide growing by 20.71% while Baixinglong and Jinsong experienced declines [8][10] Profitability Analysis - Among the 12 companies, only Jinsong New Materials and Jiahen Household reported net losses, while the rest remained profitable [10] - Jinsong's net profit plummeted by 1664%, attributed to declines in both domestic and international sales, alongside rising fixed costs [14][19] - In contrast, Xianggang Technology's net profit surged by 432%, driven by market expansion and operational efficiency improvements [14][15] - Half of the companies experienced a decline in gross profit margins, with Jiahen Household's margin dropping nearly 24 percentage points [3][16] Cost and Margin Challenges - The majority of companies reported gross margins between 10% and 30%, with Baixinglong achieving the highest at 36.5% [16] - Jiahen Household's gross margin decline was primarily due to increased fixed costs and a shift towards lower-margin products [20] - Shanghai Ailu faced similar challenges, with rising raw material costs and stagnant revenue growth leading to a significant drop in net profit [20] Strategic Insights - Companies are increasingly focusing on R&D investments, with most maintaining a sales-to-R&D expense ratio of less than 1, indicating a commitment to innovation [21] - The need for supply chain upgrades is critical as consumer demands evolve, and failure to meet these demands could result in customer loss [28][29] - The industry is experiencing pressure from raw material price fluctuations, competitive pricing, and environmental regulations, necessitating strategic adjustments for survival [29][30] - Long-term success in the packaging industry will favor companies with integrated service capabilities and technological barriers, while those relying on single product lines must adapt to avoid obsolescence [15][31]
日化护肤半年报|嘉亨家化盈利能力垫底:销售毛利率为14.98%垫底、销售净利率为-6.26%垫底
Xin Lang Zheng Quan· 2025-09-12 09:24
Core Insights - The skincare and daily chemical industry in A-shares has shown a high gross profit margin but low net profit margin, with over 80% of companies having a gross profit margin above 50% and more than half having a net profit margin below 10% [1][4] - The significant gap between gross and net profit margins is attributed to high sales expenses, which consume profits, with Marubi Biological's sales expense ratio reaching 56.5%, making it the highest in the industry [1][6] Financial Performance - The top three companies in terms of gross profit margin for the first half of 2025 are Jinbo Biological (90.68%), Fulejia (81.47%), and Beitaini (76.01%) [2] - Only four companies reported a gross profit margin below 50%, with figures of 49.26% for Lafang, 32.05% for Kesi, 17.51% for Qingsong, and 14.98% for Jiaheng [2] Marketing and R&D Expenditure - The industry is characterized by high marketing expenditures, with many companies spending over 40% of their revenue on marketing, leading to a focus on brand marketing over product development [6][9] - Marubi Biological's sales expense ratio is 56.5%, while its R&D expense ratio is only 2.3%, indicating a heavy reliance on marketing rather than innovation [8] Industry Challenges - The heavy emphasis on marketing has resulted in severe product homogeneity, limiting true innovation and hindering brand development [8] - The industry faces ongoing price wars and promotional activities that further erode profitability, creating a vicious cycle [9] - Companies must find a balance between marketing and R&D expenditures to transition from a marketing-driven approach to a product-driven strategy [9]
护肤日化半年报|华熙生物、贝泰妮、敷尔佳、福瑞达难扭业绩颓势2025年上半年业绩双降
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-09-12 09:14
Core Viewpoint - The skincare and daily chemical industry in A-share listed companies has shown significant performance divergence in the first half of 2025, with 14 representative companies analyzed for their financial results [1]. Group 1: Performance Analysis - Six companies experienced declines in both revenue and net profit: Lafang Jiahua, Furuida, Fulejia, Beitaini, Huaxi Biological, and Kesi Co. [1] - Lafang Jiahua reported revenue of 410 million yuan, a decrease of 4.27% year-on-year, and a net profit of 6 million yuan, down 82.89% compared to the previous year [1]. - Furuida achieved revenue of 1.79 billion yuan, a decline of 7.05% year-on-year, with a net profit of 108 million yuan [1]. - One company, Chuang'er Biological, saw revenue growth of 16.98% to 214 million yuan but a net profit decline of 55.99% to 13 million yuan [1]. - Jiaheng Jiahua reported revenue of 514 million yuan, an increase of 21.72% year-on-year, but a net loss of 32 million yuan, with losses widening compared to the previous year [1]. Group 2: Factors Influencing Performance - Jiaheng Jiahua's significant net loss is closely linked to its Huzhou base, with new business expansions impacting operational performance [2]. - Lafang Jiahua's dual decline in performance is attributed to changes in the domestic and international operating environment, compounded by intensified industry competition, despite increased market investment [2].
护肤日化半年报|嘉亨家化净利润亏损同比扩大490% 湖州基地成负担、产能利用率极低拖累利润及资产配置效率
Xin Lang Zheng Quan· 2025-09-12 09:09
Core Insights - The skincare and daily chemical industry in A-share has shown significant performance divergence among 14 representative listed companies in the first half of 2025, with 6 companies experiencing both revenue and profit declines, 6 companies achieving double growth, 1 company increasing revenue but not profit, and 1 company reporting a loss [1][2]. Performance Summary - **Companies with Double Growth**: 6 companies achieved both revenue and profit growth, although specific names and figures are not provided in the documents. - **Companies with Double Decline**: - Lafang Cosmetics: Revenue of 410 million yuan, down 4.27%, net profit of 6 million yuan, down 82.89% [2]. - Furuida: Revenue of 1.79 billion yuan, down 7.05%, net profit of 108 million yuan, down 15.16% [2]. - Fulejia: Revenue of 863 million yuan, down 8.15%, net profit of 230 million yuan, down 32.54% [2]. - Beitaini: Revenue of 2.372 billion yuan, down 15.43%, net profit of 247 million yuan, down 49.01% [2]. - Huaxi Biological: Revenue of 2.261 billion yuan, down 19.57%, net profit of 221 million yuan, down 35.38% [2]. - Kesi Co.: Revenue of 721 million yuan, down 48.67%, net profit of 65 million yuan, down 84.51% [2]. - **Company with Increased Revenue but Decreased Profit**: Chuang'er Biological achieved revenue of 214 million yuan, up 16.98%, but net profit decreased to 13 million yuan, down 55.99% [3][4]. - **Company Reporting a Loss**: Jiaheng Cosmetics reported revenue of 514 million yuan, up 21.72%, but a net loss of 32 million yuan, with losses expanding significantly [5][6]. The loss is attributed to increased operational costs and fixed expenses related to its Huzhou base [5]. Industry Challenges - Lafang Cosmetics cited increased market pressures and intensified competition as reasons for its significant profit decline, despite higher sales and financial expenses [6].
化妆品板块9月10日涨0.22%,锦盛新材领涨,主力资金净流出1099.12万元
Zheng Xing Xing Ye Ri Bao· 2025-09-10 08:39
Group 1 - The cosmetics sector experienced a slight increase of 0.22% on September 10, with Jinsheng New Materials leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3812.22, up 0.13%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 12557.68, up 0.38% [1] - Jinsheng New Materials saw a significant rise in its closing price to 14.38, reflecting an increase of 11.73% with a trading volume of 139,700 shares and a transaction value of 198 million yuan [1] Group 2 - The cosmetics sector faced a net outflow of 10.99 million yuan from institutional investors and 78.76 million yuan from retail investors, while individual investors saw a net inflow of 89.75 million yuan [2] - The trading data indicates that Jinsheng New Materials had a net inflow of 24.75 million yuan from institutional investors, despite a net outflow from retail and speculative investors [3] - Qingdao Kingway and Beitaini also reported net inflows from retail investors, while other companies like Shanghai Jahwa and Marubi experienced net outflows from both institutional and speculative investors [3]