Core Viewpoint - The dispute over the ingredients in medical beauty products is escalating, particularly between Huaxi Biological and Juzhi Biological, with accusations of misleading information and legal threats being exchanged [1][5][6]. Group 1: Company Statements - Huaxi Biological issued a statement supporting Dr. Hao Yu, indicating that they had confirmed the authenticity of the testing reports and would cooperate with regulatory bodies if needed [2][3]. - Huaxi Biological accused Juzhi Biological of using online marketing tactics to undermine competition and suggested that they are prepared for a "real business war" [1][4]. - Juzhi Biological responded by stating that they would pursue legal action against those spreading false information and emphasized their commitment to consumer interests [1][5]. Group 2: Product Controversy - Dr. Hao Yu claimed that the product "Kefumei" from Juzhi Biological contained only 0.0177% of recombinant collagen, which does not meet regulatory standards for labeling as a non-trace component [3]. - Huaxi Biological highlighted that their products have the highest number of medical device certifications in the industry, asserting that there is no evidence to support the safety of recombinant collagen over hyaluronic acid [4]. Group 3: Financial Performance - Juzhi Biological reported significant revenue growth from 2022 to 2024, with revenues of 2.364 billion, 3.524 billion, and 5.539 billion yuan, and net profits of 1.002 billion, 1.452 billion, and 2.062 billion yuan respectively [6]. - In contrast, Huaxi Biological experienced a decline in both revenue and net profit for 2024, with revenues of approximately 5.371 billion yuan (down 11.61%) and net profits of about 174 million yuan (down 70.59%), marking their worst performance since going public [7]. Group 4: Market Reaction - Following the controversy, Juzhi Biological's stock price fell by 18.07% from its peak on May 20, closing at 68.25 HKD per share on June 2, reflecting market concerns over the ongoing disputes [6].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Hyaluronic Acid and recombinant collagen has gained significant attention, particularly involving major players in the medical aesthetics industry, Huaxi Biological and Juzhi Biological, leading to market volatility and investor caution [1][8]. Company Responses - Huaxi Biological expressed support for Dr. Hao Yu, emphasizing the importance of consumer rights and the integrity of product testing, while also indicating that they have conducted thorough evaluations of the claims made by Dr. Hao [2][5]. - Juzhi Biological issued a statement condemning Huaxi Biological's accusations as malicious and unfounded, highlighting their commitment to consumer trust and the integrity of their products [2][3]. Market Reaction - Following the controversy, Juzhi Biological's stock price fell over 5.6% on June 2, closing at 68.25 HKD per share, with a market capitalization of 731 billion HKD, reflecting investor concerns about the ongoing dispute [1][8]. Testing and Standards - The testing report that Dr. Hao Yu referenced was clarified by the testing agency, stating it was not legally valid for public proof and lacked comprehensive methodology, which raised questions about the reliability of the results [3][7]. - The lack of unified testing standards in the recombinant collagen industry has been highlighted as a significant issue, contributing to consumer distrust and regulatory challenges [7][9]. Industry Implications - The incident has exposed vulnerabilities in the regulatory framework and testing standards for the recombinant collagen sector, prompting discussions about the need for clearer guidelines and industry standards [7][9]. - The National Medical Products Administration has initiated the development of industry standards for recombinant collagen testing, indicating a move towards greater regulatory oversight [7].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collagen content in the product "Collagen Stick" from the brand Kefu Mei, owned by Giant Biological (02367.HK), has intensified due to allegations of misleading advertising and low actual collagen levels compared to what is claimed [1][4]. Group 1: Controversy and Responses - Beauty blogger "Big Mouth Doctor" (Hao Yu) claims that the actual collagen content in Kefu Mei's product is only 0.0177%, significantly lower than the advertised "≥0.1%" [4][5]. - Giant Biological issued a statement acknowledging an apology from the testing agency used by "Big Mouth Doctor" and stated that they are pursuing legal action against those spreading false information [3][6]. - The company has sent products to multiple testing agencies for verification, but results are still pending due to the complexity of the testing process [3][6]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Market Impact - Giant Biological has shown steady revenue growth from 2020 to 2024, with revenues increasing from 1.19 billion to 5.54 billion yuan, and net profits rising from 826 million to 2.06 billion yuan [6]. - The Kefu Mei brand accounted for 82% of Giant Biological's total revenue in 2024, with its revenue reaching 4.54 billion yuan [6]. - The ongoing controversy coincides with the 618 e-commerce promotion period, raising concerns among industry experts about potential impacts on Giant Biological's performance [6]. Group 3: Industry Context and Competitor Actions - Competitors like Huaxi Biological (688363.SH) and Jinbo Biological (832982.BJ) have higher R&D expenditure ratios at 8.68% and 4.94%, respectively, compared to Giant Biological's 1.9% [7]. - Huaxi Biological publicly supported "Big Mouth Doctor" and has conducted its own testing on the allegations, emphasizing the importance of product integrity and transparency [10][11]. - Huaxi Biological has criticized the overhyped claims surrounding recombinant collagen, suggesting that such narratives lack scientific backing and may mislead consumers [11].

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between Huaxi Biological (688363.SH) and Juzhi Biological (02367.HK) is escalating from subtle accusations to open confrontation, with both companies making public statements regarding the controversy surrounding the "Kefumei" product and its alleged lack of added recombinant collagen [2][3][8]. Group 1: Huaxi Biological's Position - Huaxi Biological publicly supports Dr. Hao Yu, stating that his company, Shanghai Liuyue Medical Technology Service Co., is an important member of the Huaxi ecosystem, and they will provide legal protection [2][4]. - The company claims to have conducted thorough evaluations and multiple tests on the materials provided by Dr. Hao, and has obtained results from third-party institutions [4][7]. - Huaxi Biological accuses Juzhi Biological of engaging in malicious competition and using online tactics to undermine its reputation, asserting that they are prepared for a transparent business battle [7][8]. Group 2: Juzhi Biological's Response - Juzhi Biological asserts that it received an apology from the testing agency used by Dr. Hao, which clarified that it never authorized the use of the test report and demanded that Dr. Hao cease using it to avoid public misinformation [2][8]. - The company emphasizes that the testing report's results are influenced by various factors and should only be considered as reference values, indicating that the methodology used was flawed [8][12]. - Juzhi Biological expresses shock and disappointment at Huaxi Biological's accusations, labeling them as malicious and harmful to consumer trust in domestic brands [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing controversy regarding the authenticity of collagen content in the "可复美胶原棒" product has sparked significant industry attention, with both 华熙生物 and 巨子生物 responding to the allegations made by 郝宇 and the testing institution involved [1][2]. Group 1: Company Responses - 华熙生物 issued a statement supporting 郝宇, indicating that they have conducted thorough evaluations and testing of the claims made against their products, and are willing to cooperate with regulatory bodies regarding the testing results [1]. - 巨子生物's 可复美 brand acknowledged the apology from the testing institution used by 郝宇 but stated their intention to pursue legal action against those spreading false information [2][3]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The dispute highlights the growing scrutiny within the medical aesthetics industry regarding product integrity and consumer trust, as both companies emphasize their commitment to transparency and consumer rights [2].

Core Viewpoint - The public dispute regarding the content of recombinant collagen in the product "Collagen Stick" from the brand Kefu Mei, owned by Giant Biological (02367.HK), has intensified, with accusations of misleading information about the actual collagen content [1][3]. Group 1: Company Response and Actions - Giant Biological received an apology from the testing agency used by the beauty blogger "Big Mouth Doctor" (Hao Yu) on May 30, and the company has sent products to multiple testing institutions for compliance checks [2][4]. - The company claims that multiple tests have shown collagen content greater than 0.1%, adhering to the standards set by the Chinese Pharmacopoeia [4]. - Giant Biological clarified that the rumors about the product "Collagen Stick 1.0" being taken off the shelves are false, stating it was a normal product iteration that began in April [6]. Group 2: Industry Context and Competitor Involvement - The controversy has drawn attention from competitors, notably Huaxi Biological, which publicly supported the claims made by "Big Mouth Doctor" and offered to assist in testing and regulatory communication [10]. - Huaxi Biological has criticized the overhyped claims surrounding recombinant collagen, suggesting that the industry is experiencing inflated expectations without sufficient scientific backing [13]. - The financial performance of Huaxi Biological has been declining, with a reported revenue of 5.371 billion in 2024, down 11.61% year-on-year, and a significant drop in net profit [13]. Group 3: Financial Performance of Giant Biological - Giant Biological has shown steady revenue growth from 1.19 billion in 2020 to 5.539 billion in 2024, with net profit increasing from 826 million to 2.062 billion during the same period [7]. - The Kefu Mei brand is a significant contributor to Giant Biological's revenue, accounting for 82% of total income in 2024, with a reported revenue of 4.542 billion [7]. - Concerns have been raised about the potential impact of the ongoing controversy on the company's performance during the critical 618 e-commerce promotion period [7].

Group 1: Hong Kong Stock Market Highlights - Mixue Group (02097) rose over 7%, reaching a new high, with Daiwa raising its target price to HKD 608, optimistic about same-store sales growth and store opening speed [1] - Lianlian Digital (02598) increased nearly 10% following the official enactment of the "Stablecoin Regulation" in Hong Kong [1] - Automotive stocks collectively declined, with Li Auto-W, Great Wall Motors, and GAC Group all dropping over 2%, as the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers opposed "involution-style" price wars [1] - CSPC Pharmaceutical Group (02005) fell over 7% after reporting a 36.9% year-on-year decline in revenue and a 59.5% drop in net profit attributable to shareholders for Q1, with expectations of a 45%-60% decline in profit for the first half of the year due to demand drop and intensified competition [1] - Solar energy stocks dropped across the board, with New Special Energy, Xinyi Energy, Fuyao Glass, and Xinyi Solar all declining over 4%, as the anticipated "531" rush in May did not materialize following the April rush [1] - Chinese property stocks fell collectively in early trading, with R&F Properties, Sunac China, New City Development, and Agile Group all dropping over 4%, as data showed a 10.8% year-on-year decline in sales for the top 100 real estate companies from January to May, with a 17.3% drop in May alone [1] Group 2: Other Notable Stocks - Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank (03618) rose nearly 5% after being included in the CSI 300 Index, becoming the first local financial institution from Chongqing to be included, with a 6.25% year-on-year increase in net profit attributable to shareholders for Q1 [2] - Baker Hughes (02149) increased over 8%, reaching a new high after completing a placement of 3 million new H-shares, raising approximately HKD 117 million [2] - Giant Bio (02367) fell over 4% amid ongoing controversies regarding its product components, with the company stating it received an apology from the relevant testing agency and will pursue accountability for the rumors [2] - Chip stocks declined across the board, with Hua Hong Semiconductor, Jingmen Semiconductor, SMIC, and Shanghai Fudan all dropping over 2%, influenced by fluctuating U.S. policies and a decline in the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index [2] - Beike-W (02423) dropped nearly 6% as Huaxi Securities reported a significant slowdown in second-hand housing transaction growth, with a mere 8% year-on-year increase in 15 cities for the first 29 days of May, the lowest since October of the previous year [2] Group 3: U.S. Stock Market Highlights - AstraZeneca (AZN.US) rose over 2% after its cancer drug Imfinzi received EU approval for specific muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatments [3] - Trump Media & Technology Group (DJT.US) increased over 2.4% after announcing the completion of approximately USD 2.44 billion in financing, planning to use about USD 2.32 billion for Bitcoin reserves, potentially becoming one of the largest Bitcoin holders among U.S. public companies [3] - Nvidia (NVDA.US) fell over 2.92% after the CEO announced plans to sell up to 6 million shares by the end of 2025 [3] - Palantir (PLTR.US) rose over 7.73% as reports indicated the Trump administration relies on its technology for inter-agency data sharing, with over USD 113 million in government contracts since Trump took office [3] - Costco (COST.US) increased over 3.12% after reporting Q3 earnings that exceeded expectations, with revenue of USD 63.2 billion, an 8% year-on-year increase, and EPS of USD 4.28, demonstrating its scale advantage and member loyalty [3]

6月1日，巨子生物发布声明，表示接受"大嘴博士"（郝宇）所用检测机构道歉，但将追究造谣者法律责任。 声明介绍，有关"可复美"未添加重组胶原蛋白的争议，5月30日我司收到了来自"大嘴博士"（郝宇）所用检测机构的道 歉声明，该机构明确表示"我司对此做法不仅不予认同，更从未做出任何形式的授权"，并严令要求"大嘴博士"（郝 宇）"⽴即停⽌使⽤及转发该《测试报告》的⾏为，以避免对社会公众产⽣更严重的误导 "。 根据上海东谱检测技术服务有限公司的声明，近期，名为"大嘴博士"的网络博主在各大网络平台，针对"可复美"品牌 某款化妆品中"重组胶原蛋白"的成分含量提出质疑，并发布相关视频及博文，其中可能引用了我司出具的《测试报 告》作为依据，此举引发了广泛争议。针对该《测试报告》相关情况，我司特作如下澄清说明: 1.报告用途与授权说明:我司出具的该《测试报告》，其明确用途限定为科研、教学以及内部质量控制与研究的目的， 并不具备对社会公众进行证明的法律效力。在受托进行测试时，委托人并未向我司告知其真实用途是为利用该《测试 报告》向社会公众宣传并证明博主观点。我司对此做法不仅不予认同，更从未作出任何形式的授权。 2.测试结果的科学性 ...

6月1日晚间，A股玻尿酸巨头华熙生物（688363）在微信号发表了一份逾2700字的长文支"大嘴博士"。 声明称，"华熙生物已组织专家对郝宇博士提供的资料进行审慎评估和多方法的反复测试，同时， 华熙生物也已经得到了第三方机构的检测结 果。 但在相关企业的自我检测结论公布之前，华熙生物出于对商业文明的最后一丝维护，希望相关企业主动面对发展中的问题，诚实面对全社 会关切的产品诚信和价值承诺。如监管机构需要查阅相关检测报告，华熙生物将毫无保留地配合提供；如相关企业无法正视自身问题，华熙生 物也将向全社会公开相关检测结果。" 声明中，华熙生物提及与郝宇博士的关系时表示，"鉴于热心网络水军的提醒，经过华熙生物核实，由郝宇博士担任法定代表人的上海柳页医 创医疗科技服务有限公司由华熙生物参与的海南海熙私募股权投资基金与郝宇博士相关公司共同投资，设立于2024年10月，华熙生物在该基金 中占比32.4%。基于此，由郝宇博士担任法人的柳页医创属于华熙生态的重要成员，华熙生物理应予以坚定支持和依法保护。" 华熙生物官方告诫这家擅长网络水军运营的公司："汝求战，便得战!"如果你们想要一个"商战"，那一定会得一个真正的商战。 医美龙 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rise and challenges faced by Juzhi Biotechnology, highlighting its rapid growth in the beauty industry and the recent controversies surrounding its flagship product, the collagen stick. Group 1: Company Overview - Juzhi Biotechnology, founded by Yan Jianya and Fan Daidi, has become a significant player in the beauty industry, with a market value exceeding 450 billion yuan in May 2023, making them the richest couple in Shaanxi [1][2]. - The company specializes in recombinant collagen products, leveraging advanced biotechnology to create products that mimic human collagen [5][6]. Group 2: Recent Controversies - In May 2023, Juzhi Biotechnology faced backlash from competitors and influencers, particularly regarding the safety and authenticity of its collagen stick product [3][11]. - A beauty influencer claimed that the collagen stick contained only 0.0177% of the advertised recombinant collagen, significantly below the stated minimum of 0.1% [11][14]. - Juzhi Biotechnology responded by asserting that their products met industry standards and were undergoing third-party testing to verify their claims [14][16]. Group 3: Market Impact - Following the controversies, Juzhi Biotechnology's stock price dropped over 8%, reducing its market capitalization from 909 billion HKD to 735 billion HKD within ten days [3][19]. - The company has seen significant sales from its collagen stick, generating over 5.15 billion yuan in revenue since its launch, accounting for 82% of the company's total revenue in 2024 [16][19]. Group 4: Competitive Landscape - The article highlights the competitive tension between Juzhi Biotechnology and other industry players, particularly Huaxi Biological, which criticized Juzhi's marketing tactics and product claims [3][19]. - Both companies have invested heavily in marketing, with Juzhi's marketing expenses exceeding 2 billion yuan in 2024, while Huaxi's were around 24.64 billion yuan [19].