智通财经1月27日讯（记者 吴雨其）2025年这一轮行情反复之中，百亿主动权益基金经理的版图已经悄然换了一拨 人。Wind数据显示，按照产品合计管理规模（含共管）统计，截至2025年末，百亿主动权益基金经理数量增至109 位，比2024年末的71位明显增多。（注：本次统计仅纳入各基金经理管理的主动权益类产品，如同时管理其他非主 动权益基金，其对应规模未计入，下同。） 从名单结构看，呈现出两大特点，一方面，老牌顶流仍占据榜首，但规模回撤已经成为不少明星管理人的共同特 征；另一方面，一批此前规模尚在百亿线下基金经理，在一年时间里迅速站上百亿乃至数百亿台阶，成为新一轮资 金追逐的焦点。 | 52 | 李竟 | 154. 73 | 121.25 | 33. 48 | 上海东方 证券资产 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | 管理 | | 53 | 胡宜斌 | 153.26 | 181. 09 | -27.83 | 华安基金 | | 54 | 薛怡然 | 153. 14 | 0. 00 | 153. 14 | 兴证全球 | | | | | | | 基金 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the launch of the 2026 TOP50 fixed income fund manager ranking, highlighting the growth and stability of fixed income products, particularly in the "fixed income +" category, which is expected to see significant expansion in 2025 [1]. Summary by Sections Performance Metrics - The average performance of various fund categories for 2025 shows that the "Point Pick & Zero City" funds outperformed their respective benchmarks across different categories, with notable figures such as: - Money Market Average: 1.61% vs. 1.30% benchmark [2] - Short-Debt Average: 1.29% vs. 1.40% benchmark [2] - Conservative Income Average: 1.86% vs. 0.83% benchmark [2] - Steady "Fixed Income +" Average: 4.75% vs. 4.58% benchmark [2] - Active "Fixed Income +" Average: 7.78% vs. 6.53% benchmark [2] - Equity-Debt Balanced Average: 20.41% vs. 16.77% benchmark [2] Fund Manager Selection Criteria - The selection of fund managers for the ranking is based on multiple factors including: - Performance since inception, five-year performance, excess return stability, maximum drawdown, Sharpe ratio, Calmar ratio, volatility, and qualitative analysis [3]. - Consideration of fund manager's management scale, holder structure, strategy capacity, management fees, number of funds managed, position, and influence [3]. Fund Classification Methodology - A unique classification method for fixed income funds is introduced, categorizing them into: 1. Cash Alternative 2. Conservative Income 3. Steady "Fixed Income +" 4. Active "Fixed Income +" 5. Equity-Debt Balanced [5]. Ranking Characteristics - The ranking focuses on experienced fund managers, excluding those with less than five years of tenure, emphasizing risk control over aggressive yield chasing [7]. - The average management tenure of selected fund managers is 10.43 years, with an average management scale of 32.38 billion [7]. - Only 50 fund managers are selected to avoid excessive homogeneity, with rankings not indicating preference [7]. Fund Manager Diversity - The ranking includes multi-manager configurations to leverage diverse asset classes, recognizing that single managers may not excel across all areas [7]. - The list excludes dollar-denominated bond funds and money market funds, while including mixed-asset FOFs due to the increasing importance of asset allocation [8]. Conclusion - The article acknowledges the dynamic nature of the fund management industry, inviting feedback and suggestions for potential fund managers to consider for future rankings [19].

Group 1: Fund Size Changes - The total size of fixed income + funds reached approximately 2.18 trillion, marking a historical high in Q4 2025 [6][10][14] - The increase in fund size was primarily driven by medium-position fixed income + funds, while the scale of primary bond funds slightly declined [8][10] - The top products with the largest size increase included Invesco Great Wall Jing Sheng Shuang Xi, Yongying Stable Enhancement, and Huaxia Stable Enjoyment [12][19] Group 2: Investment Characteristics - In Q4 2025, fixed income + products generally reduced their equity and convertible bond positions due to high volatility in the equity market, while increasing allocations to financial and cyclical sectors [26][27] - There was a notable divergence in the allocation to the TMT sector, with high-elasticity funds continuing to increase their positions, while other product types showed no significant upward or downward trends [26][27] Group 3: Performance Review - In Q4 2025, the median return for fixed income + funds was 0.43%, with the highest returns observed in medium-position funds [6][10] - The top-performing funds included Invesco Great Wall Jing Sheng Shuang Xi and Yongying Stable Enhancement, with absolute returns also being high for Invesco Great Wall Jing Yi Feng Li [6][10][21] Group 4: New Product Dynamics - A total of 43 fixed income + funds were launched in Q4 2025, with a total initial scale of 457 billion, the highest monthly issuance in nearly two years occurring in December 2025 [14][19] - The majority of newly launched funds were positioned as medium to low allocation products [8][14] Group 5: Fund Company Insights - The top 20 fund companies saw an increase in managed scale, with Invesco Great Wall, Huitianfu, and China Merchants Fund experiencing significant growth [17][19] - Invesco Great Wall Fund's managed scale surpassed 200 billion, ranking first in the market [17][19]

Core Insights - The article discusses the launch of the 2026 TOP50 fixed income fund manager ranking, highlighting the significant growth of "fixed income +" products in 2025 and the positive reputation of the ranking list [1][2]. Performance Summary - The average performance of various fund categories for 2025 shows that: - The average return for cash equivalent funds is 1.61%, compared to 1.30% for the Wind Money Market Fund Index [2]. - The short-term bond fund average return is 1.29%, slightly lower than the Wind Short-term Pure Bond Fund Index at 1.40% [2]. - The stable "fixed income +" average return is 4.75%, outperforming the non-pure bond index at 4.58% [2]. - The active "fixed income +" average return is 7.78%, exceeding the Wind Mixed Bond Fund Index at 6.53% [2]. - The balanced equity and bond fund average return is 20.41%, significantly higher than the Wind Balanced Mixed Fund Index at 16.77% [2]. Ranking Methodology - The ranking considers factors such as historical performance, excess return stability, maximum drawdown, Sharpe ratio, Calmar ratio, volatility, and qualitative analysis [3]. - The average management tenure of the selected fund managers is 10.43 years, with an average management scale of 32.38 billion [6]. - The list includes only 50 fund managers to avoid excessive homogeneity, with rankings not being prioritized [6]. Fund Classification - A unique classification method categorizes fixed income funds into five types based on risk exposure and return characteristics: 1. Cash alternative 2. Conservative income 3. Stable "fixed income +" 4. Active "fixed income +" 5. Balanced equity and bond [5]. Fund Manager Selection - The selection process excludes managers with less than five years of experience to ensure stability and risk control [6]. - Multi-manager configurations are considered due to the diverse asset classes involved in fixed income funds [6]. - The list excludes dollar-denominated bonds and money market funds, while including mixed bond fund of funds (FOF) due to the importance of asset allocation [7].

强化产品进攻性、走赛道化布局路线，已成为基金保障合同存续、实现规模扩容的关键路径。 在赛道化策略验证业绩与规模双赢后，同类产品的逆袭经验已在行业内成为教科书，吸引不少小微基金主动摒 弃均衡打法，聚焦单一高景气赛道提升净值弹性，开启业绩突围与规模跃升双主线，刚刚披露完毕的公募四季 报显示，一批小微基金在较短时间内从千万元规模飙升到10亿元甚至100亿元，数百倍的规模崛起背后正是产 品风格的进攻性特征。 小微基金舍均衡做减法重进攻 公募正推动小微产品的基金经理做减法、深耕紧盯一两个赛道，而不是广泛涉足多个行业。 随着基金赛道化布局的业绩红利持续释放，正推动更多产品主动调整持仓逻辑，在见证产品赛道化喜迎业绩与 规模双赢局面后，越来越多的小微产品放弃均衡打法，转而布局行业打法提升产品风格的高弹性。例如，根据 最新披露的2025年四季报持仓，融通明锐混合基金就在去年末大幅增加净值风格的进攻性，该产品此前以个股 精选为主，重仓股曾涵盖各类行业，整体收益弹性表现平淡。2025年12月末起，该基金启动全面风格调整，前 十大重仓股全数聚焦AI+应用产业链，顺利完成从个股策略到赛道化策略的切换，产品进攻性显著提升，2026 年开 ...

Group 1 - The total scale of fixed income + funds reached approximately 2.18 trillion, marking a historical high in Q4 2025, despite a slower growth rate compared to Q3 2025 [8][12][21] - The increase in scale was primarily driven by medium-position fixed income + funds, while the scale of primary bond funds slightly declined [10][12][14] - The top products contributing to the scale increase included Invesco Great Wall Jing Sheng Shuang Xi, Yongying Stable Enhancement, and Huaxia Stable Enjoyment Incremental 6-Month Rolling [10][14] Group 2 - In Q4 2025, fixed income + funds generally reduced equity positions due to high volatility in the equity market, while increasing allocations to financial and cyclical sectors, and decreasing allocations to pharmaceuticals, consumer goods, and cash-generating sectors [30][31] - There was a notable divergence in the allocation strategy towards the TMT sector, with high-elasticity funds continuing to increase their positions, while other product types showed no significant adjustment tendencies [30][31] Group 3 - In Q4 2025, the average return and maximum drawdown for fixed income + funds were 0.43% and -1.30% respectively, with median returns for low, medium, and high-position funds at 0.48%, 0.34%, and 0.17% [10][12] - The top-performing fund companies in terms of average returns were Invesco Great Wall and Huashang, with representative products being Invesco Great Wall Jing Yi Zhao Li 6-Month Holding and Huashang Credit Enhancement [10][12][21]

Core Viewpoint - The recent strong performance of the non-ferrous metal sector in A-shares is attributed to the resonance of global macroeconomic and industrial trends, with a focus on long-term benefits rather than short-term price fluctuations [1][2]. Group 1: Market Performance - The non-ferrous metal sector has become one of the most prominent sectors in A-shares since 2026, with related ETFs recording significant gains, most exceeding 25% [2]. - On January 26, 2026, several ETFs, including the China Securities Non-ferrous Metal Mining Theme ETF, saw increases of over 6% [2]. - Despite some fluctuations on January 27, the sector did not experience significant declines that would erase previous gains [2]. Group 2: Driving Factors - Two main factors are driving the strength of the non-ferrous sector: a recovery in manufacturing and a long-term demand reshaping due to green and technological trends [2][3]. - The recovery in manufacturing, particularly in the U.S. and emerging economies, has led to increased demand for traditional industrial metals, while low inventory levels have amplified price elasticity [2]. - The demand for metals like copper and aluminum is being supported by stable needs from sectors such as electric vehicles, photovoltaics, and wind power, alongside new growth opportunities from AI infrastructure [3]. Group 3: Investment Strategy - Investors are advised to view industrial non-ferrous metals as strategic resource assets benefiting from global liquidity easing and future electrification and digitalization, rather than merely as cyclical commodities [4]. - Fund managers have identified key metals for 2026, including copper, aluminum, lithium carbonate, gold, and minor metals like tungsten, while also considering opportunities in sectors like chemicals and steel [4]. - Adjustments in portfolio allocations are being made based on industry conditions, with a focus on maintaining high positions in precious metals and copper while reducing exposure to overvalued sectors [4]. Group 4: Supply and Demand Dynamics - The current tight supply-demand balance in the non-ferrous sector necessitates close attention to the supply-demand balance sheet and macroeconomic influences on metal prices, including monetary policy and geopolitical factors [5].

Market Performance - On January 27, the A-share market saw all three major indices rise, with the Shanghai Composite Index increasing by 0.18% to 4139.9 points, the Shenzhen Component Index rising by 0.09% to 14329.91 points, and the ChiNext Index climbing by 0.71% to 3342.6 points [1] - The sectors that performed well included storage chips, automotive chips, and F5G concepts, while sectors such as pork, Helicobacter pylori, and organic silicon experienced declines [1] Fund Manager Changes - On January 27, a total of 19 fund managers experienced changes in their positions, which can significantly impact the future performance of the funds they manage [2] - In the past 30 days (December 28 to January 27), 507 fund managers have left their positions, with 30 fund products announcing departures on January 27 alone [3] - The reasons for these departures included personal reasons, the end of agency roles, and product expirations [3] New Fund Managers - On January 27, 50 fund products announced new fund manager appointments, involving 15 new managers [5] - Notably, Longjiang Wei from Hengsheng Qianhai Fund has a total asset scale of 629 million yuan, with a highest return of 72.22% on the Hengsheng Qianhai High-end Manufacturing Mixed A fund during his tenure [5] Fund Research Activity - In the past month, Bosera Fund conducted the most company research, engaging with 46 listed companies, followed by Huaxia Fund and Guotai Fund with 44 and 37 companies respectively [7] - The chemical products industry was the most researched sector, with 193 instances, followed by the automotive parts industry with 170 instances [7] - In the last week (January 20 to January 27), the most researched company was Dajin Heavy Industry, which received attention from 67 fund management companies [9]

Group 1 - This week, 44 new funds have started fundraising, representing a 10% increase compared to the previous week, marking the fourth consecutive week of new fund issuance remaining above 35 [1] - Public funds are showing a strong interest in new stock subscriptions, with 101 public institutions collectively acquiring 35.2871 million shares, accounting for 56.78% of the total offline allocation, with a total investment amount of 766 million yuan, also representing 56.61% of the total [2] - The Guotou Silver LOF announced the suspension of subscription services starting January 28 to protect the interests of fund shareholders [3] Group 2 - A well-known fund manager, Lan Xiaokang, has been joined by a new co-manager, Yue Xiaobo, for the China Europe Rongheng Balanced Mixed Fund, which has an asset management scale of 30.273 billion yuan and has achieved a return of 63.75% over more than two years [4] - The ETF market has seen a rebound, with all three major indices turning positive, particularly in the semiconductor and precious metals sectors, while coal and battery sectors experienced declines [4] - The semiconductor ETFs, particularly the China-Korea Semiconductor ETF, have shown significant gains, with some related ETFs rising over 4% [4][5] Group 3 - The ongoing geopolitical tensions between China and Japan have strengthened the domestic focus on the supply security and domestic substitution of key semiconductor materials, driven by the demand for AI computing power and data centers [7]

1月27日，百通能源跌5%，截至发稿，报19.95元/股，成交2.65亿元，换手率6.06%，总市值91.95亿元。 责任编辑：小浪快报 中欧量化动力混合A（015006）成立日期2022年3月2日，最新规模5965.66万。今年以来收益11.74%， 同类排名1151/8861；近一年收益48.54%，同类排名2114/8126；成立以来收益39.95%。 中欧量化动力混合A（015006）基金经理为曲径。 截至发稿，曲径累计任职时间10年258天，现任基金资产总规模36.58亿元，任职期间最佳基金回报 229.38%， 任职期间最差基金回报-24.21%。 声明：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。 本文基于第三方数据库自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但 不限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。受限于第三方数据库质量等问题，我们无法对数据的真实性及完整性进行分辨或核验，因此本文内 容可能出现不准确、不完整、误导性的内容或信息，具体以公司公告为准。如有疑问，请联系 biz@staff.sina.com.cn。 资料显示，江西百通能源股份有限公司位于北京市西城区 ...