本次高等检察署通过对8月被起诉的前员工及相关在职人员的调查，认定Tokyo Electron存在 监管责任。检方指出，未发现该公司采取过具体的商业机密保护措施，认为其"在防范机密泄 露方面未尽到最大努力，应承担相应刑事责任"。 Tokyo Electron于2日回应称"正在核实台湾当局公告的详细内容"。今年8月台积电前员工被 起诉后，该公司曾表示"未发现有组织的涉案行为"。 版权声明：日本经济新闻社版权所有，未经授权不得转载或部分复制，违者必究。 就台积电商业机密遭窃一案，台湾的监察部门起诉了日本Tokyo Electron的台湾子公司。检 方认为其需为今年8月被起诉的台积电前员工相关行为承担监管责任，要求判处1.2亿新台币 罚金…… 台湾的检察部门12月2日发布公告，就半导体行业巨头台积电（TSMC）商业机密遭非法窃取 一案，起诉Tokyo Electron的台湾子公司。起诉罪名是违反国家安全法等，要求判处1.2亿新 台币罚金。检方认为其需为今年8月被起诉的台积电前员工相关行为承担监管责任。 据台湾的高等检察署智慧财产检察分署透露，Tokyo Electron涉嫌违反营业秘密法、国家安 全法等4项法律条款。 ...

据台湾FTNN新闻网12月2日报道，台积电在今年7月惊传机密技术外泄案。一名已离职工程师陈力铭勾 结台积电竹科厂2名工程师戈一平、吴秉骏涉嫌窃取2纳米制程机密技术，并泄漏给竞争对手，在职2名 员工前者案发后离职，后者遭解雇，3人均移送法办。台湾"高等检察署"2日侦查终结，依"安全 法"、"营业秘密法"等4罪，追加起诉日企东京电子公司，求处共1.2亿元新台币（1元新台币约合0.23元 人民币）罚金。 据报道，陈力铭曾任职于日本半导体大厂东京电子公司在台湾的子公司。 据报道，涉嫌窃取2纳米制程机密技术的3名工程师皆毕业于同一所大学，为学长学弟关系。陈力铭在台 积电资历8年，并曾担任需与研发、晶圆生产与采购部门等合作的量测相关业务，也参与过5纳米、3纳 米等先进制程的缺陷改善职务。2022年年底，陈力铭被日企延揽，担任高级营销专员，并负责台积电相 关蚀刻设备服务。随后陈力铭疑似为解决工作上所碰到的问题，找上台积电在职的戈一平和吴秉骏，要 求他们利用远程办公模式，登入台积电内部系统，再以手机拍摄计算机屏幕方式传送2纳米制程机密给 陈力铭。 台积电今年7月发现上述违法行径，主动向台"高等检察署"提告；"高等检察署智财分 ...

Taiwan prosecutors said on Tuesday they had charged Tokyo Electron's Taiwan unit with violating the National Security Act and the Trade Secrets Act after a former employee was indicted for stealing tr... ...

Core Viewpoint - The case involving TSMC's former senior vice president, Luo Wei-ren, who allegedly took confidential information related to advanced semiconductor processes before joining Intel, has raised significant concerns and led to legal actions by TSMC against him [2][4]. Group 1: Allegations and Legal Actions - TSMC has filed a lawsuit against Luo Wei-ren for violating a non-compete agreement and potentially leaking trade secrets after he joined Intel [2][4]. - Taiwanese prosecutors have initiated an investigation into Luo, conducting searches at his residences and seizing computers and USB drives [2][5]. - The prosecutors have also obtained approval to freeze Luo's TSMC stocks and real estate assets [2]. Group 2: Background of Luo Wei-ren - Luo Wei-ren, who retired from TSMC in July 2023, was a key figure in the company's advancement towards 2nm technology and had previously worked at Intel for 18 years [4][5]. - He was recognized for his contributions to TSMC, including the implementation of the "Night Hawk Plan" to enhance 10nm process development [5]. Group 3: Intel's Response - Intel's CEO, Pat Gelsinger, stated that the company adheres to strict policies regarding the use of third-party confidential information and expressed confidence in Luo's return to the team [5][6]. - Gelsinger emphasized that talent mobility is essential for innovation in the semiconductor industry and that Intel is focused on strengthening its engineering culture and advancing its technology strategies [5][6]. Group 4: Industry Implications - Analysts suggest that Luo's expertise could be crucial for Intel's transformation, especially as the company seeks to recover from its manufacturing setbacks [6][7]. - The ongoing investigation and legal proceedings may have broader implications for the semiconductor industry, particularly regarding the protection of trade secrets and competitive dynamics between TSMC and Intel [7].

Core Points - TSMC has filed a lawsuit against former senior vice president Luo Wei-ren for allegedly taking confidential 2nm technology to Intel after leaving the company [1] - Luo Wei-ren had signed non-disclosure and non-compete agreements during his tenure at TSMC, promising not to work for competitors after leaving [1] - Intel's CEO Pat Gelsinger has publicly supported Luo, claiming the accusations are baseless and emphasizing Luo's previous contributions to wafer process technology development at Intel [2] Group 1 - TSMC's lawsuit is based on concerns that Luo may use or disclose trade secrets to Intel [1] - Luo Wei-ren's background includes a PhD from UC Berkeley and a long career in semiconductor technology, including roles at both TSMC and Intel [1] - The legal action reflects TSMC's commitment to protecting its intellectual property and competitive advantage in advanced semiconductor manufacturing [1] Group 2 - Intel's response highlights the company's support for Luo and its stance on the allegations, indicating a potential conflict between the two companies [2] - Gelsinger's internal communication to employees reinforces Intel's position on the matter and aims to maintain morale amid the controversy [2] - The situation underscores the competitive dynamics in the semiconductor industry, particularly regarding talent movement and intellectual property [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the investigation of former TSMC senior vice president Luo Wei-ren for allegedly leaking sensitive technology information to Intel, marking an escalation in a significant commercial dispute [3]. Group 1: Investigation Details - Taiwanese authorities conducted searches at Luo Wei-ren's residences in Taipei and Hsinchu due to suspicions of violating security laws [3]. - The investigation is focused on allegations that Luo may have leaked TSMC's 2nm process technology to Intel, which Intel has denied [3]. - The Taiwanese Intellectual Property Office stated that the court has approved the freezing of Luo's stocks and real estate [3]. Group 2: Company Responses - TSMC has accused Luo of potentially leaking sensitive information, while Intel has firmly rejected these allegations, stating there is no substantial basis for the claims [3]. - Intel emphasized its strict policies against the use or transfer of third-party confidential information and highlighted Luo's respected status in the semiconductor industry [3]. - The company noted that talent movement between firms is common and healthy in the industry, suggesting that the situation is not unusual [3].

Core Viewpoint - Intel denies allegations from TSMC regarding the leakage of trade secrets by former executive Wei Chen Luo, who recently joined Intel as Executive Vice President [2]. Group 1: Company Actions - Intel emphasizes its strict policies and controls against the use or transfer of third-party confidential information or intellectual property [2]. - The company asserts that it has no reason to believe the allegations against Wei Chen Luo are valid based on current information [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - TSMC has filed a lawsuit against Wei Chen Luo in Taiwan's Intellectual Property and Commercial Court, claiming he violated confidentiality and non-compete agreements [2]. - TSMC alleges that Luo took advanced process-related trade secrets below 2 nanometers when he transitioned to Intel [2].

Core Points - ByteDance's Seed researcher Ren Zeyu was dismissed for multiple leaks of confidential information [1][11] - The Seed team focuses on cutting-edge research areas including large language models, speech technology, and robotics [8][10] Group 1: Company Background - Ren Zeyu had a strong background in robotics, having worked at companies like Xiaomi and Lattice Robotics before joining ByteDance [6] - The Seed department was established in 2023 and is considered a strategic asset within ByteDance, contributing to various applications in AI and robotics [8][10] Group 2: Implications of the Dismissal - ByteDance's strict internal discipline and information security management led to the dismissal, reflecting the company's emphasis on confidentiality [11] - Leaks can undermine product competitiveness and damage brand reputation, particularly in high-stakes fields like AI and robotics [12]

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI has responded strongly to the lawsuit filed by xAI, denying all allegations of corporate espionage and asserting that the lawsuit is an attempt to intimidate its employees [2][3][10]. Group 1: Allegations by xAI - xAI has made three main allegations against OpenAI: violation of federal trade secret laws, intentional interference with xAI's economic relationships with its employees, and violation of California's unfair competition laws [11]. - Specific incidents cited include the alleged theft of proprietary information by former xAI engineers Xuechen Li and Jimmy Fraiture, who are accused of transferring sensitive data to OpenAI [12][14][15]. - xAI also claims that a former senior finance executive left without signing a confidentiality agreement and took critical strategic information to OpenAI [19][20]. Group 2: OpenAI's Defense - OpenAI has categorically denied the allegations, stating that Xuechen Li never officially joined the company and did not transfer any proprietary information [27][29]. - Regarding Jimmy Fraiture, OpenAI asserts that any actions taken during his "garden leave" were personal and not directed by OpenAI, and that no confidential information was received [31][32]. - OpenAI emphasizes that the unnamed finance executive's departure was unrelated to any alleged poaching and was due to refusing to engage in improper financial practices at xAI [33][34]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - OpenAI has filed a motion to dismiss xAI's lawsuit, arguing that the claims lack merit and that the inclusion of names of former employees not accused of wrongdoing is an act of intimidation [37]. - A hearing for this motion is scheduled for November 18, 2025, which will address procedural matters rather than the substantive issues of the case [38].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal battle between Musk's xAI and OpenAI has escalated, with xAI accusing OpenAI of systematically poaching employees and stealing trade secrets, marking the sixth lawsuit in a year and a half [1][12]. Summary by Relevant Sections Allegations and Lawsuits - xAI has filed a lawsuit in federal court, claiming that OpenAI has engaged in a "disturbing pattern" of actions that violate confidentiality agreements, attempting to gain unfair advantages in AI development by luring away key employees [3][11]. - Musk expressed his frustration on his platform, stating that after multiple warnings, legal action was the only option left [3][12]. - The lawsuit details accusations against OpenAI for deliberately recruiting xAI's core staff, including engineers who have access to critical technology and strategic plans [4][5]. Employee Cases - The lawsuit specifically names two engineers, including Xuechen Li, who allegedly downloaded xAI's entire codebase before leaving for OpenAI, and another engineer, Jimmy Fraiture, who also copied technical documents [4][7]. - xAI has successfully obtained a temporary restraining order against Li, preventing him from working at OpenAI or any AI company and requiring him to surrender personal devices for investigation [6][12]. Competitive Landscape - The legal conflict highlights the intense competition in the AI sector, with xAI accusing OpenAI of stealing information to maintain its market dominance, particularly as xAI's Grok model is reported to rival OpenAI's offerings [10][11]. - Musk's xAI has quickly risen in the AI industry, raising significant funds and attracting talent from major tech companies, positioning itself as a formidable competitor to OpenAI [17][20]. Historical Context - The lawsuits represent a significant shift in the relationship between Musk and OpenAI, which he co-founded. Disagreements over the company's direction and its transition to a profit-driven model have fueled Musk's legal actions [18][22]. - Musk's previous lawsuits against OpenAI and its partners, including Microsoft and Apple, reflect ongoing concerns about monopolistic practices in the AI industry [19][21].