能源化工期权 2025-08-26 能源化工期权策略早报 | 卢品先 | 投研经理 | 从业资格号：F3047321 | 交易咨询号：Z0015541 | 邮箱：lupx@wkqh.cn | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 黄柯涵 | 期权研究员 | 从业资格号：F03138607 | 电话：0755-23375252 | 邮箱：huangkh@wkqh.cn | | 李仁君 | 产业服务 | 从业资格号：F03090207 | 交易咨询号：Z0016947 | 邮箱：lirj@wkqh.cn | 能源化工期权策略早报概要：能源类：原油、LPG；聚烯烃类期权：聚丙烯、聚氯乙烯、塑料、苯乙烯；聚酯类期 权：对二甲苯、PTA、短纤、瓶片；碱化工类：烧碱、纯碱；其他能源化工类：橡胶等。 策略上：构建卖方为主的期权组合策略以及现货套保或备兑策略增强收益。 表1：标的期货市场概况 | 期权品种 | 标的合约 | 最新价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 | 成交量 | 量变化 | 持仓量 | 仓变化 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -- ...

金属期权 2025-08-22 金属期权策略早报 | 卢品先 | 投研经理 | 从业资格号：F3047321 | 交易咨询号：Z0015541 | 邮箱：lupx@wkqh.cn | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 黄柯涵 | 期权研究员 | 从业资格号：F03138607 | 电话：0755-23375252 | 邮箱：huangkh@wkqh.cn | | 李仁君 | 产业服务 | 从业资格号：F03090207 | 交易咨询号：Z0016947 | 邮箱：lirj@wkqh.cn | 表2：期权因子—量仓PCR | 期权品种 | 成交量 | 量变化 | 持仓量 | 仓变化 | 成交量 | 量PCR | 持仓量 | 仓PCR | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | PCR | 变化 | PCR | 变化 | | 铜 | 78,247 | -4,389 | 118,896 | -300 | 0.77 | -0.16 | 0.87 | -0.01 | | 铝 | 48,439 ...

General Information - The report date is August 11, 2025 [1] - The core view is that for stock index options, with the upward movement and decreasing volatility, a covered call strategy can be considered [1] Market Data Statistics Underlying Market Statistics - The closing price of the Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 Index was 2789.90, up 0.72, with a trading volume of 43.48 billion hands, an increase of 4.56 billion hands. The current - month synthetic futures price was 2790.47, with a basis of 0.57, and the next - month synthetic futures price was 2793.13, with a basis of 3.24 [2] - The closing price of the CSI 300 Index was 4122.51, up 17.54, with a trading volume of 190.44 billion hands, an increase of 17.27 billion hands. The current - month synthetic futures price was 4119.40, with a basis of - 3.11, and the next - month synthetic futures price was 4109.87, with a basis of - 12.64 [2] - The closing price of the CSI 1000 Index was 6943.94, up 105.81, with a trading volume of 260.97 billion hands, an increase of 9.50 billion hands. The current - month synthetic futures price was 6926.33, with a basis of - 17.60, and the next - month synthetic futures price was 6860.13, with a basis of - 83.80 [2] Option Market Statistics - For the Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 Index Option, the trading volume was 44922, an increase of 15604, the open interest was 78144, an increase of 3462, VL - PCR was 59.91%, OI - PCR was 53.47%, the C - maximum open interest (near - month) was 2800, and the P - maximum open interest (near - month) was 2750 [2] - For the CSI 300 Index Option, the trading volume was 116426, an increase of 37090, the open interest was 211865, an increase of 2426, VL - PCR was 55.35%, OI - PCR was 75.11%, the C - maximum open interest (near - month) was 4150, and the P - maximum open interest (near - month) was 4100 [2] - For the CSI 1000 Index Option, the trading volume was 321756, an increase of 105966, the open interest was 294708, an increase of 1052, VL - PCR was 77.77%, OI - PCR was 115.94%, the C - maximum open interest (near - month) was 7000, and the P - maximum open interest (near - month) was 6500 [2] Option Volatility Statistics Near - Month - The ATM - IV of the Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 Index Option was 11.76%, with an IV change of 0.07%, the same - term HV was 3.67%, with an HV change of - 3.47%, Skew was 3.19%, with a Skew change of 4.83%, and VIX was 17.79, with a VIX change of 0.750 [5] - The ATM - IV of the CSI 300 Index Option was 11.12%, with an IV change of - 0.13%, the same - term HV was 4.46%, with an HV change of - 2.43%, Skew was 3.96%, with a Skew change of 15.32%, and VIX was 17.71, with a VIX change of 0.081 [5] - The ATM - IV of the CSI 1000 Index Option was 16.44%, with an IV change of - 0.36%, the same - term HV was 13.83%, with an HV change of 3.68%, Skew was 0.27%, with a Skew change of 6.94%, and VIX was 22.28, with a VIX change of 0.321 [5] Next - Month - The ATM - IV of the Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 Index Option was 14.13%, with an IV change of 0.11%, the same - term HV was 8.00%, with an HV change of - 0.01%, and Skew was 9.40%, with a Skew change of 5.12% [5] - The ATM - IV of the CSI 300 Index Option was 14.25%, with an IV change of - 0.14%, the same - term HV was 8.70%, with an HV change of 0.04%, and Skew was 7.35%, with a Skew change of 3.52% [5] - The ATM - IV of the CSI 1000 Index Option was 18.15%, with an IV change of 0.13%, the same - term HV was 10.81%, with an HV change of 0.66%, and Skew was 0.20%, with a Skew change of 1.21% [5] Option Types and Related Charts Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 Index Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [9] CSI 300 Index Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [13] CSI 1000 Index Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [17] Shanghai Stock Exchange 50ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [21] Huatai - Peregrine 300ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [28] Southern CSI 500ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [38] ChinaAMC STAR 50ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [43] E Fund STAR 50ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [53] Harvest 300ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [57] Harvest CSI 500ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [59] ChiNext ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [66] Shenzhen 100ETF Option - There are charts of the full - contract PCR, the main - contract skew trend, the volatility cone, and the volatility term structure [68]

【金融期权早报：股市震荡，期权策略有建议】股市方面，上证综指、大盘蓝筹股、中小盘股和创业板 股呈现高位震荡行情。 金融期权波动性上，隐含波动率渐降至均值较低水平波动。 策略建议为，ETF 期权适合构建备兑策略、偏中性双卖策略及垂直价差组合策略；股指期权适合构建偏中性双卖策略，以 及期权合成期货多头或空头与期货空头或多头的套利策略。 本文由 AI 算法生成，仅作参考，不涉投资建议，使用风险自担 ...

【金融期权策略早报概要：股市震荡，期权策略有建议】股市方面，上证综指数、大盘蓝筹股、中小盘 股和创业板股呈现高位震荡行情。 金融期权波动性上，隐含波动率逐渐下降，在均值较低水平波动。 策略与建议方面，ETF期权适合构建备兑策略、偏中性的双卖策略以及垂直价差组合策略；股指期权适 合构建偏中性的双卖策略，还可进行期权合成期货多头或空头与期货空头或多头的套利策略。 本文由 AI 算法生成，仅作参考，不涉投资建议，使用风险自担 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not mentioned in the provided content 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The agricultural product sector is divided into beans, oils, agricultural by - products, soft commodities, grains, and others. For each sector, options strategies and suggestions are provided for selected varieties. The overall market shows different trends for each product type, such as the oil - bearing and oil - related agricultural products showing a strong - side shock, while grains like corn and starch are in a weak and narrow - range consolidation [2][8] 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 Futures Market Overview - The latest prices, price changes, price change rates, trading volumes, volume changes, open interests, and open interest changes of various agricultural product futures contracts are presented. For example, the latest price of bean one (A2509) is 4,133, with a price increase of 7 and a price change rate of 0.17% [3] 3.2 Option Factors - Volume and Open Interest PCR - Volume PCR and open interest PCR are used to describe the strength of the option underlying market and the turning point of the underlying market respectively. For instance, the volume PCR of bean one is 0.41, with a change of - 0.14, and the open interest PCR is 0.38, with a change of - 0.01 [4] 3.3 Option Factors - Pressure and Support Levels - The pressure and support levels of each option variety are analyzed from the perspective of the strike prices with the largest open interests of call and put options. For example, the pressure level of bean one is 4300, and the support level is 4100 [5] 3.4 Option Factors - Implied Volatility - The implied volatility of each option variety is presented, including at - the - money implied volatility, weighted implied volatility, and its change, annual average implied volatility, call and put implied volatility, historical volatility, and the difference between implied and historical volatility. For example, the at - the - money implied volatility of bean one is 8.295, and the weighted implied volatility is 13.57, with a change of 1.53 [6] 3.5 Option Strategies and Suggestions 3.5.1 Oil - Bearing and Oil Options - **Beans (Bean One, Bean Two)**: For bean one, the implied volatility is at a relatively high level compared to the historical average. The open interest PCR is below 0.60, indicating a weak - side shock. Directional strategy: None; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - neutral call + put option combination strategy; Spot long - hedging strategy: Construct a long collar strategy [7] - **Bean Meal, Rapeseed Meal**: For bean meal, the daily average提货量 of major oil mills increased week - on - week, and the basis also increased. The implied volatility is at a relatively high level compared to the historical average. Directional strategy: None; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - neutral call + put option combination strategy; Spot long - hedging strategy: Construct a long collar strategy [9] - **Palm Oil, Soybean Oil, Rapeseed Oil**: For palm oil, the yield increased in July, but the export volume decreased. The implied volatility is at a relatively low level compared to the historical average. Directional strategy: None; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - bullish call + put option combination strategy; Spot long - hedging strategy: Construct a long collar strategy [10] - **Peanut**: The peanut market is in the off - season, with low downstream demand. The implied volatility is at a relatively low level. Directional strategy: Construct a bearish put spread strategy; Volatility strategy: None; Spot long - hedging strategy: Hold spot long + buy put option + sell out - of - the - money call option [11] 3.5.2 Agricultural By - product Options - **Pig**: The average weight of pig slaughter increased last week, and the cold - storage capacity rate increased. The implied volatility is at a relatively high level compared to the historical average. Directional strategy: None; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - bearish call + put option combination strategy; Spot long - covered call strategy: Hold spot long + sell out - of - the - money call option [11] - **Egg**: The inventory of laying hens increased at the end of July. The implied volatility is at a relatively high level. Directional strategy: Construct a bearish put spread strategy; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - bearish call + put option combination strategy; Spot hedging strategy: None [12] - **Apple**: The estimated apple production increased. The implied volatility is at a relatively high level compared to the historical average. Directional strategy: None; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - neutral call + put option combination strategy; Spot hedging strategy: None [12] - **Jujube**: The inventory of jujube decreased week - on - week. The implied volatility is at a relatively high level compared to the historical average. Directional strategy: None; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - bearish strangle option combination strategy; Spot covered - hedging strategy: Hold spot long + sell out - of - the - money call option [13] 3.5.3 Soft Commodity Options - **Sugar**: The number of ships waiting to load sugar in Brazilian ports increased, and the estimated sugar production in the 2025/26 season decreased slightly. The implied volatility is at a relatively low level. Directional strategy: None; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - neutral call + put option combination strategy; Spot long - hedging strategy: Construct a long collar strategy [13] - **Cotton**: The operating rates of spinning and weaving mills decreased, and the commercial inventory decreased. The implied volatility is at a relatively low level. Directional strategy: None; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - bullish call + put option combination strategy; Spot covered strategy: Hold spot long + buy put option + sell out - of - the - money call option [14] 3.5.4 Grain Options - **Corn, Starch**: The new corn is in the centralized listing period, and the futures price is weak. The implied volatility is at a relatively low level. Directional strategy: Construct a bearish put spread strategy; Volatility strategy: Construct a short - bearish call + put option combination strategy; Spot long - hedging strategy: None [14]

金融期权 2025/08/01 金融期权策略早报 | 卢品先 | 投研经理 | 从业资格号：F3047321 | 交易咨询号：Z0015541 | 邮箱：lupx@wkqh.cn | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 黄柯涵 | 期权研究员 | 从业资格号：F03138607 | 电话：0755-23375252 | 邮箱：huangkh@wkqh.cn | 金融期权策略早报概要： （1）股市短评：上证综指数、大盘蓝筹股、中小盘股和创业板股表现为高位震荡回落的市场行情。 （2）金融期权波动性分析：金融期权隐含波动率逐渐下降至均值较低水平平波动。 （3）金融期权策略与建议：对于ETF期权来说，适合构建备兑策略和偏中性的双卖策略，垂直价差组合策略；对于 股指期权来说，适合构建偏中性的双卖策略和期权合成期货多头或空头与期货空头或多头做套利策略。 表1：金融市场重要指数概况 | 重要指数 | 指数代码 | 收盘价 | 涨跌 | 涨跌幅 | 成交额 | 额变化 | PE | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | ...

Report Date - The report is dated July 30, 2025 [1] Core Viewpoint - Stock index options: Implied volatility has declined, and there is still a significant implied volatility premium. A covered call strategy can be considered [2] Market Data Summary Underlying Market Statistics - **Indices**: The Shanghai Composite 50 Index closed at 2819.35, up 10.76; the CSI 300 Index closed at 4151.24, down 0.79; the CSI 1000 Index closed at 6718.48, down 55.40 [3] - **ETFs**: The Shanghai Composite 50 ETF closed at 2.943, up 0.009; the Huatai-PineBridge CSI 300 ETF closed at 4.232, down 0.003; etc [3] Option Market Statistics - **Volume and Open Interest**: For example, the trading volume of Shanghai Composite 50 index options was 56,146, an increase of 29,906; the open interest was 68,176, a decrease of 2,286 [3] - **PCR**: The VL-PCR and OI-PCR of different options vary, such as the VL-PCR of Shanghai Composite 50 index options was 51.35%, and the OI-PCR was 58.89% [3] Option Volatility Statistics - **ATM-IV and HV**: The ATM-IV of Shanghai Composite 50 index options (near - month) was 14.82%, down 1.32%; the same - term HV was 6.37%, up 0.05% [6] - **Skew and VIX**: The Skew of Shanghai Composite 50 index options was 9.62%, down 3.24%; the VIX was 18.64, down 0.976 [6]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The Shanghai Composite Index and large-cap blue-chip stocks are consolidating and fluctuating at high levels, while small and medium-cap stocks and ChiNext stocks are showing an upward trend [2]. - The implied volatility of financial options is fluctuating at a relatively high average level [2]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct covered strategies, neutral double-selling strategies, and vertical spread combination strategies; for index options, it is suitable to construct neutral double-selling strategies and arbitrage strategies between synthetic long or short options and long or short futures [2]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Financial Market Index Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,457.75, up 13.32 points or 0.39%, with a trading volume of 553.6 billion yuan, a decrease of 13.6 billion yuan [3]. - The Shenzhen Component Index closed at 10,476.29, up 11.17 points or 0.11%, with a trading volume of 912.5 billion yuan, a decrease of 7.3 billion yuan [3]. - The SSE 50 Index closed at 2,717.71, up 5.73 points or 0.21%, with a trading volume of 66.1 billion yuan, a decrease of 10.3 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 300 Index closed at 3,942.76, up 6.68 points or 0.17%, with a trading volume of 236.1 billion yuan, a decrease of 52.8 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 500 Index closed at 5,934.67, up 19.28 points or 0.33%, with a trading volume of 213.6 billion yuan, a decrease of 12.9 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 1000 Index closed at 6,373.77, up 17.59 points or 0.28%, with a trading volume of 334.3 billion yuan, a decrease of 1.9 billion yuan [3]. 3.2 Option Underlying ETF Market Overview - The SSE 50 ETF closed at 2.810, up 0.003 or 0.11%, with a trading volume of 4.3882 million lots, an increase of 4.3092 million lots, and a turnover of 1.232 billion yuan, a decrease of 978 million yuan [4]. - The SSE 300 ETF closed at 3.988, up 0.006 or 0.15%, with a trading volume of 6.4069 million lots, an increase of 6.2987 million lots, and a turnover of 2.551 billion yuan, a decrease of 1.749 billion yuan [4]. - The SSE 500 ETF closed at 5.982, up 0.019 or 0.32%, with a trading volume of 1.3824 million lots, an increase of 1.3579 million lots, and a turnover of 824 million yuan, a decrease of 631 million yuan [4]. - The Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.048, down 0.008 or 0.76%, with a trading volume of 21.6808 million lots, an increase of 21.4046 million lots, and a turnover of 2.272 billion yuan, a decrease of 634 million yuan [4]. - The E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.021, down 0.008 or 0.78%, with a trading volume of 4.1744 million lots, an increase of 4.1036 million lots, and a turnover of 426 million yuan, a decrease of 300 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 300 ETF closed at 4.116, up 0.006 or 0.15%, with a trading volume of 1.2236 million lots, an increase of 1.2034 million lots, and a turnover of 503 million yuan, a decrease of 326 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 500 ETF closed at 2.390, up 0.006 or 0.25%, with a trading volume of 1.1027 million lots, an increase of 1.0897 million lots, and a turnover of 263 million yuan, a decrease of 45 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 100 ETF closed at 2.731, down 0.003 or 0.11%, with a trading volume of 262,000 lots, an increase of 258,100 lots, and a turnover of 71 million yuan, a decrease of 35 million yuan [4]. - The ChiNext ETF closed at 2.126, down 0.007 or 0.33%, with a trading volume of 6.758 million lots, an increase of 6.6517 million lots, and a turnover of 1.434 billion yuan, a decrease of 822 million yuan [4]. 3.3 Option Factor - Volume and Position PCR - The volume PCR and position PCR of various options are provided, which are used to describe the strength of the option underlying market and the turning point of the underlying market [5][6]. 3.4 Option Factor - Pressure and Support Points - The pressure and support points of various options are analyzed from the exercise prices of the maximum open interest of call and put options [7][8]. 3.5 Option Factor - Implied Volatility - The implied volatility of various options is presented, including the at-the-money implied volatility and the weighted implied volatility [9][10]. 3.6 Strategy and Recommendations - The financial option sector is divided into large-cap blue-chip stocks, small and medium-cap stocks, and ChiNext stocks. Different strategies are recommended for each sector [11]. - For the financial stock sector (SSE 50 ETF and SSE 50), it is recommended to construct a bull spread combination strategy for directional trading, a neutral selling strategy for volatility trading, and a covered call strategy for spot trading [12]. - For the large-cap blue-chip stock sector (SSE 300 ETF, Shenzhen 300 ETF, and CSI 300), it is recommended to construct a selling call and put option combination strategy for volatility trading and a covered call strategy for spot trading [12]. - For the medium-cap stock sector (Shenzhen 100 ETF), it is recommended to construct a selling call and put option combination strategy for volatility trading and a covered call strategy for spot trading [13]. - For the small and medium-cap stock sector (SSE 500 ETF, Shenzhen 500 ETF, and CSI 1000), it is recommended to construct a selling call and put option combination strategy for volatility trading and a covered call strategy for spot trading [13][14]. - For the ChiNext sector (ChiNext ETF, Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF, and E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF), it is recommended to construct a selling call and put option combination strategy for volatility trading and a covered call strategy for spot trading [14].

1. Report's Industry Investment Rating - No information provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The Shanghai Composite Index, large-cap blue-chip stocks, small and medium-cap stocks, and ChiNext stocks all closed higher, with the ChiNext having the largest increase of 2.3% [2]. - The implied volatility of financial options fluctuates at a historically low level [2]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct covered strategies, neutral double-selling strategies, and vertical spread combination strategies; for index options, it is suitable to construct neutral double-selling strategies and arbitrage strategies between synthetic long or short options and long or short futures [2]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Financial Market Important Index Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,420.57, up 38.98 points or 1.15%, with a trading volume of 544.9 billion yuan and an increase of 102.1 billion yuan [3]. - The Shenzhen Component Index closed at 10,217.63, up 169.24 points or 1.68%, with a trading volume of 869.7 billion yuan and an increase of 189.9 billion yuan [3]. - The SSE 50 Index closed at 2,715.92, up 31.15 points or 1.16%, with a trading volume of 89.1 billion yuan and an increase of 17 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 300 Index closed at 3,904.03, up 46.13 points or 1.20%, with a trading volume of 294.2 billion yuan and an increase of 61.7 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 500 Index closed at 5,765.84, up 91.67 points or 1.62%, with a trading volume of 191.9 billion yuan and an increase of 45.9 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 1000 Index closed at 6,194.67, up 116.44 points or 1.92%, with a trading volume of 303.7 billion yuan and an increase of 63.7 billion yuan [3]. 3.2 Option Underlying ETF Market Overview - The SSE 50 ETF closed at 2.792, up 0.030 or 1.09%, with a trading volume of 9.5885 million shares and an increase of 9.513 million shares, and a trading value of 2.676 billion yuan and an increase of 600 million yuan [4]. - The SSE 300 ETF closed at 3.936, up 0.045 or 1.16%, with a trading volume of 12.2455 million shares and an increase of 12.1706 million shares, and a trading value of 4.815 billion yuan and an increase of 1.907 billion yuan [4]. - The SSE 500 ETF closed at 5.804, up 0.092 or 1.61%, with a trading volume of 3.8429 million shares and an increase of 3.8237 million shares, and a trading value of 2.225 billion yuan and an increase of 1.132 billion yuan [4]. - The Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.029, up 0.017 or 1.68%, with a trading volume of 33.0888 million shares and an increase of 32.8645 million shares, and a trading value of 3.393 billion yuan and an increase of 1.126 billion yuan [4]. - The E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.003, up 0.017 or 1.72%, with a trading volume of 7.5166 million shares and an increase of 7.4729 million shares, and a trading value of 751 million yuan and an increase of 321 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 300 ETF closed at 4.059, up 0.041 or 1.02%, with a trading volume of 3.3225 million shares and an increase of 3.3131 million shares, and a trading value of 1.348 billion yuan and an increase of 971 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 500 ETF closed at 2.320, up 0.034 or 1.49%, with a trading volume of 591,700 shares and an increase of 585,900 shares, and a trading value of 137 million yuan and an increase of 5 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 100 ETF closed at 2.680, up 0.036 or 1.36%, with a trading volume of 438,200 shares and an increase of 436,000 shares, and a trading value of 117 million yuan and an increase of 59 million yuan [4]. - The ChiNext ETF closed at 2.044, up 0.046 or 2.30%, with a trading volume of 12.3884 million shares and an increase of 12.3277 million shares, and a trading value of 2.518 billion yuan and an increase of 1.311 billion yuan [4]. 3.3 Option Factor - Volume and Open Interest PCR - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.6182 million contracts, an increase of 268,800 contracts; the open interest was 1.4507 million contracts, a decrease of 145,800 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.83, a decrease of 0.33; the open interest PCR was 1.09, an increase of 0.08 [5]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.3402 million contracts, an increase of 330,400 contracts; the open interest was 1.2484 million contracts, a decrease of 129,100 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.78, a decrease of 0.26; the open interest PCR was 0.90, an increase of 0.02 [5]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.7774 million contracts, an increase of 247,200 contracts; the open interest was 1.2693 million contracts, a decrease of 165,600 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.83, a decrease of 0.30; the open interest PCR was 1.13, an increase of 0.04 [5]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 793,300 contracts, an increase of 221,800 contracts; the open interest was 1.6652 million contracts, a decrease of 104,200 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.55, a decrease of 0.32; the open interest PCR was 0.67, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 204,300 contracts, an increase of 89,300 contracts; the open interest was 517,600 contracts, a decrease of 22,500 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.61, a decrease of 0.14; the open interest PCR was 0.70, no change [5]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 137,900 contracts, an increase of 12,800 contracts; the open interest was 251,900 contracts, a decrease of 2,800 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.82, a decrease of 0.30; the open interest PCR was 1.05, a decrease of 0.02 [5]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 163,800 contracts, an increase of 22,800 contracts; the open interest was 323,100 contracts, a decrease of 8,900 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.94, a decrease of 0.16; the open interest PCR was 1.00, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the trading volume was 65,600 contracts, an increase of 2,700 contracts; the open interest was 115,900 contracts, a decrease of 6,600 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.02, a decrease of 0.16; the open interest PCR was 1.01, an increase of 0.05 [5]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the trading volume was 1.6269 million contracts, an increase of 520,900 contracts; the open interest was 1.4497 million contracts, an increase of 13,000 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.73, a decrease of 0.20; the open interest PCR was 0.87, an increase of 0.06 [5]. - For the SSE 50 index option, the trading volume was 45,800 contracts, an increase of 19,900 contracts; the open interest was 48,200 contracts, an increase of 4,500 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.50, a decrease of 0.15; the open interest PCR was 0.66, a decrease of 0.05 [5]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the trading volume was 89,000 contracts, an increase of 31,600 contracts; the open interest was 134,700 contracts, an increase of 6,700 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.51, a decrease of 0.28; the open interest PCR was 0.65, an increase of 0.01 [5]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the trading volume was 202,000 contracts, an increase of 60,200 contracts; the open interest was 204,900 contracts, an increase of 15,000 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.77, a decrease of 0.19; the open interest PCR was 0.92, an increase of 0.05 [5]. 3.4 Option Factor - Pressure and Support Points - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.792, the at-the-money strike price was 2.80, the pressure point was 2.75, the support point was 2.75, the maximum open interest for calls was 59,310 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 76,308 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 3.936, the at-the-money strike price was 3.90, the pressure point was 3.90, the support point was 3.90, the maximum open interest for calls was 43,474 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 45,172 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 5.804, the at-the-money strike price was 5.75, the pressure point was 6.00, the support point was 5.75, the maximum open interest for calls was 64,711 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 65,312 contracts [7]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.029, the at-the-money strike price was 1.05, the pressure point was 1.05, the support point was 1.00, the maximum open interest for calls was 64,485 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 60,194 contracts [7]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.003, the at-the-money strike price was 1.00, the pressure point was 1.05, the support point was 1.00, the maximum open interest for calls was 17,966 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 12,670 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 4.059, the at-the-money strike price was 4.10, the pressure point was 4.10, the support point was 4.00, the maximum open interest for calls was 8,218 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 7,063 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.320, the at-the-money strike price was 2.30, the pressure point was 2.30, the support point was 2.25, the maximum open interest for calls was 6,719 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 9,208 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.680, the at-the-money strike price was 2.70, the pressure point was 2.70, the support point was 2.45, the maximum open interest for calls was 3,135 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 5,593 contracts [7]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.044, the at-the-money strike price was 2.05, the pressure point was 2.05, the support point was 2.00, the maximum open interest for calls was 45,814 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 60,845 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 50 index option, the underlying closing price was 2,715.92, the at-the-money strike price was 2,700, the pressure point was 2,700, the support point was 2,650, the maximum open interest for calls was 4,320 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 1,711 contracts [7]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the underlying closing price was 3,904.03, the at-the-money strike price was 3,900, the pressure point was 3,900, the support point was 3,850, the maximum open interest for calls was 6,156 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 4,793 contracts [7]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the underlying closing price was 6,194.67, the at-the-money strike price was 6,200, the pressure point was 6,200, the support point was 6,000, the maximum open interest for calls was 7,454 contracts, and the maximum open interest for puts was 7,050 contracts [7]. 3.5 Option Factor - Implied Volatility - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 11.94%, the weighted implied volatility was 12.94%, an increase of 0.34%, the annual average was 8.95%, the call implied volatility was 13.04%, the put implied volatility was 12.82%, the 20-day historical volatility was 12.55%, and the difference between implied and historical volatility was 0.40% [9]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 11.96%, the weighted implied volatility was 13.20%, an increase of 0.66%, the annual average was 9.35%, the call implied volatility was 13.32%, the put implied volatility was 13.03%, the 20-day historical volatility was 13.00%, and the difference between implied and historical volatility was 0.20% [9]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 13.64%, the weighted implied volatility was 16.48%, an increase of 1.26%, the annual average was 11.82%, the call implied volatility was 16.54%, the put implied volatility was 16.41%, the