法治思维
Search documents
以法治推动“事前预防型”公共安全建设
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-02 18:29
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of transitioning public safety governance from "post-event response" to "pre-event prevention" as a key strategy for building a "Safe China" [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative Developments - Recent legislative efforts have reinforced the "pre-event prevention" concept, integrating it into various laws such as the Production Safety Law, Food Safety Law, and Environmental Protection Law [2]. - The newly revised Emergency Response Law exemplifies this shift, introducing new provisions that prioritize enhancing the capacity for prevention and response to emergencies [2][3]. - The law establishes a dedicated chapter on "Prevention and Emergency Preparedness," emphasizing the need for proactive measures to manage risks and prevent emergencies [2]. Group 2: Risk Management Strategies - Effective public safety governance requires a dual approach of "blocking" and "unblocking" risks, which includes both direct interventions and the development of safety infrastructure [3]. - The article advocates for the legal framework to adapt to modern technologies such as IoT, big data, and AI to enhance risk monitoring and assessment [4]. - It highlights the necessity of establishing clear legal responsibilities for various stakeholders, including enterprises and civil organizations, to ensure a collaborative approach to public safety [7]. Group 3: Legal Adaptability and Responsiveness - The adaptability of laws is crucial for effective risk warning and pre-event prevention, necessitating differentiated legal designs based on risk levels and regional characteristics [6]. - The article stresses the need for laws to evolve dynamically in response to changing risk landscapes, moving from static rules to dynamic responses [6]. - It calls for a comprehensive responsibility system that clearly defines the roles of multiple stakeholders in public safety governance, ensuring accountability even in the absence of incidents [7].
11月份,法律行业沉寂了!市场瞬间哑火。
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-27 09:43
Group 1 - The legal consulting industry is facing significant challenges, with many firms shutting down and lawyers canceling their licenses due to regulatory crackdowns and market pressures [4][25][27] - Recent regulations from the Guangdong Bar Association have led to a sudden halt in market activities, prompting law firms to sever ties with legal consulting companies [3][4] - The crackdown includes the revocation of licenses for some law firms in major cities like Beijing, Shanghai, and Foshan, as authorities encourage reporting of illegal activities [4][5] Group 2 - The cost of acquiring legal clients is rising, with some firms reporting costs exceeding 800 yuan per lead, indicating a competitive and challenging environment [10][19][43] - Many law firms are adapting by focusing on maintaining relationships with existing clients through innovative methods, such as providing gifts to encourage referrals [31][33] - The legal industry is experiencing a shift towards localized services, with various platforms like Douyin and Xiaohongshu enforcing stricter regulations on legal content, impacting unqualified individuals [36][38][22] Group 3 - The overall number of lawyers in major cities has decreased significantly, with over 6,000 lawyers in cities like Beijing and Shanghai canceling their licenses, reflecting a broader industry contraction [25][27] - The legal market is expected to continue its contraction into lower-tier cities, prompting firms to seek transformation and adaptability to survive [29] - The integration of AI in the judicial process is anticipated to improve efficiency, potentially alleviating some pressures faced by lawyers and courts [45]
【人民日报】查处“蝇贪蚁腐”不能止于个案
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-25 05:02
Group 1 - The article discusses the collaborative efforts of judicial and educational institutions to enhance the safety and legal awareness of minors in schools, emphasizing the importance of family education and community involvement [2][3][4] - It highlights specific cases where judicial recommendations have led to improved safety measures in schools, such as the prohibition of dangerous stationery items and the establishment of a management mechanism for hazardous materials [2][4] - The article also mentions the increase in cases where minors are involved in legal issues, and the proactive measures taken by the judicial system to prevent juvenile delinquency through education and community support [3][4] Group 2 - The article outlines the rise in juvenile crime and the corresponding response from the judicial system, which includes the establishment of social rehabilitation programs and partnerships with educational institutions to guide minors back to lawful behavior [3][4][5] - It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach to prevent juvenile crime, combining legal action with educational initiatives to foster a better understanding of laws among young people [4][5] - The article also notes the importance of addressing online safety for minors, as they are increasingly exposed to risks such as online scams and harassment [5][9] Group 3 - The article discusses the ongoing efforts to combat corruption at the grassroots level, particularly focusing on "micro-corruption" that affects public resources and services [15][16] - It highlights the judicial system's commitment to not only prosecute individual cases of corruption but also to implement systemic reforms to prevent such issues from arising in the future [15][16] - The article stresses the importance of transparency and accountability in public service, advocating for the use of technology to enhance oversight and reduce opportunities for corruption [16][17]
本领论丨尊法 学法 守法 用法
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-12-16 00:49
Core Viewpoint - The importance of strengthening the rule of law in governance and enhancing the ability to use legal thinking and methods to deepen reforms, promote development, resolve conflicts, maintain stability, and respond to risks is emphasized by Xi Jinping's recent directives on comprehensive rule of law [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Thinking and Methods - Legal thinking is defined as a decision-making and problem-solving approach based on legal awareness and principles, while legal methods are the actions guided by legal thinking [2][3]. - The emphasis on legal thinking and methods is crucial for leaders to effectively address issues, coordinate relationships, and resolve conflicts [2][3]. Group 2: Role of Leadership - Leaders are identified as the "key minority" in the comprehensive rule of law initiative, and they are expected to model respect for, understanding of, and adherence to the law [3][4]. - Xi Jinping calls for leaders to embody four models: respecting the law, learning the law, abiding by the law, and applying the law [3][4]. Group 3: Learning and Application - A deep understanding of Xi Jinping's legal thought is essential for enhancing the ability to apply legal thinking and methods, addressing significant questions about the implementation of comprehensive rule of law [4][5]. - Learning constitutional and legal knowledge is the first step in cultivating legal thinking, which is necessary for effective law application [5][6]. Group 4: Practical Implementation - Continuous improvement in the application of legal thinking and methods should occur through practical engagement in the comprehensive rule of law initiative [6]. - The goal is to ensure that every legal system, enforcement decision, and judicial case reflects fairness and justice, thereby meeting the growing needs of the people [6].
网言网语 | 善于用法治思维和法治方式正风肃纪反腐
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-12-15 09:30
中央纪委国家监委网站 杨文佳 新时代以来,以习近平同志为核心的党中央从坚持和发展中国特色社会主义的全局和战略高度定位法治、布局法 治、厉行法治,推动我国社会主义法治建设发生历史性变革、取得历史性成就。网友在中央纪委国家监委网站积 极留言,结合工作实际,分享纪检监察机关如何善用法治思维和法治方式正风肃纪反腐,加强纪检监察工作规范 化、法治化、正规化建设,以高质量监督执纪执法为推进全面依法治国、建设更高水平的社会主义法治国家提供 有力保障。 泗水长流:纪检监察机关自觉运用法治思维和法治方式履行职责,一要强化法治思维,做到依法履职。牢固树立 职权法定、程序正当理念,严格依照党章党规党纪和宪法法律法规行使监督执纪执法权,确保每一项措施、每一 个环节都于法有据、合规合纪。二要规范工作流程,提升法治化水平。健全完善监督检查、审查调查、案件审理 等各环节的内控机制和工作规程,严把事实关、程序关、法律适用关,确保案件处理经得起历史和法律的检验。 三要坚持标本兼治,在严惩腐败的同时,注重运用法治方式加强源头治理,做实以案促改、警示教育,推动形成 靠制度管权、管事、管人的长效机制,提升治理效能。 定南清风:纪检监察机关要强化法治 ...
厚植为民情怀解决急难愁盼 切实维护社会大局和谐稳定
Zheng Zhou Ri Bao· 2025-12-05 00:41
12月3日,市长庄建球到市信访局接待来访群众,面对面听取意见诉求,研究推进接访事项办理, 强调要深入学习贯彻党的二十届四中全会精神,认真贯彻落实习近平总书记关于加强和改进人民信访工 作的重要思想,厚植为民情怀,解决好群众急难愁盼问题,将心比心、依法依规做好信访工作,切实维 护群众合法权益,确保社会大局和谐稳定,为推动高质量发展高效能治理提供有力保障。 石秀田参加。 庄建球强调,信访工作是党和政府联系群众的"连心桥",要深入践行以人民为中心的发展思想,把 解决信访问题与推进城市更新、民生改善、基层治理等重点工作结合起来,以实际行动顺民意、得民 心、促发展。要进一步涵养"有解思维",以群众反映的问题为切入点,举一反三,找准根源,对症施 策,推动形成从"解决一件事"到"解决一类事"的制度机制。要扎实推进信访工作法治化,把法治思维和 法治方式贯穿信访工作全过程各环节,学习好、落实好《信访工作条例》,完善依法解决群众诉求的闭 环体系,确保信访工作在法治轨道上运行。要注重以信访工作提升社会治理效能,把信访诉求、群众智 慧同有效破解制约高质量发展的中长期问题结合起来,在谋划"十五五"发展中优化完善政策供给,更好 赋能经济社 ...
扬州市人大常委会部署“十五五”规划纲要编制专题调研工作
Yang Zi Wan Bao Wang· 2025-11-10 06:32
Core Points - The meeting focused on the preparation of the "15th Five-Year Plan" for Yangzhou, emphasizing the importance of high-quality development and the implementation of the spirit of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China [1][3] Group 1 - The Yangzhou Development and Reform Commission reported on the progress of the "15th Five-Year Plan" preparation, covering planning ideas, basic guidelines, overall framework, and key tasks [3] - The meeting highlighted the necessity of conducting specialized research to align with the city's development goals, particularly the "trillion-yuan city" initiative [3] - Emphasis was placed on ensuring the research is people-centered, adheres to new development concepts, and follows a systematic approach [3] Group 2 - Responsibilities for the research were clearly defined, with a focus on selecting appropriate research methods and scheduling [3] - The goal is to produce high-quality research outcomes that will inform the Yangzhou Municipal Committee's recommendations and assist in the preparation of the "15th Five-Year Plan" [3] - The meeting was attended by key officials from the Yangzhou People's Congress and the Development and Reform Commission, indicating a collaborative approach to the planning process [3]
以法治思维应对网络安全新问题
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-09-25 03:11
Core Viewpoint - Cybersecurity has become a crucial foundation for national security in the digital age, with significant achievements in the field but also new challenges arising from advancements like artificial intelligence and cloud computing [1][2]. Group 1: Achievements and Challenges - China has made substantial progress in cybersecurity, yet faces new issues such as deep fakes from AI, potential data leaks from large model training, and data security concerns from widespread cloud computing [1]. - The need for updated law enforcement and regulatory measures is emphasized to address the evolving nature of cybersecurity threats [1]. Group 2: Legislative and Governance Measures - The "AI Security Governance Framework" 2.0, released during the 2025 National Cybersecurity Awareness Week, categorizes AI security risks and proposes 30 technical and 14 comprehensive governance measures [2]. - A draft amendment to the cybersecurity law has been submitted for review, aiming to clarify legal responsibilities for failing to address illegal information and for providing substandard network equipment [2]. Group 3: Public Involvement and Reporting Mechanisms - The importance of public participation in cybersecurity is highlighted, with new regulations established to guide individuals and organizations on reporting cybersecurity incidents [3]. - The release of the "National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting Management Measures" outlines procedures and timelines for reporting incidents, along with the establishment of a dedicated reporting hotline [3]. - Enhanced technical capabilities, such as big data and AI, are recommended to improve threat detection and emergency response in cybersecurity [3].
以法治思维应对网络安全新问题(金台锐评)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-09-24 22:59
Core Viewpoint - Cybersecurity has become a crucial foundation for national security in the digital age, with significant achievements in China but also new challenges arising from advancements in technology such as artificial intelligence and cloud computing [1][2]. Group 1: Achievements and Challenges in Cybersecurity - China has made substantial progress in the field of cybersecurity, but faces new issues such as deep fakes from AI, potential data leaks from large model training, and data security concerns from widespread cloud computing [1]. - The need for legal frameworks like the Cybersecurity Law and Personal Information Protection Law has been established, but ongoing advancements in technology necessitate an evolution in law enforcement and regulatory measures [1]. Group 2: Governance and Legislative Measures - Recent initiatives include the release of the "AI Security Governance Framework" 2.0, which categorizes AI security risks and proposes 30 technical and 14 comprehensive governance measures [2]. - A draft amendment to the Cybersecurity Law has been submitted for review, aiming to clarify legal responsibilities for failing to address illegal information and for providing substandard network equipment [2]. Group 3: Public Involvement and Reporting Mechanisms - The importance of public participation in cybersecurity is emphasized, with new regulations established to guide individuals and organizations on reporting cybersecurity incidents [3]. - The introduction of the "National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting Management Measures" outlines procedures for reporting incidents and establishes a hotline for public use [3]. Group 4: Technological Empowerment and Future Directions - Regulatory bodies are encouraged to enhance their capabilities through technology, utilizing big data and AI to improve threat perception and emergency response [3]. - The ongoing evolution of cybersecurity requires a commitment to legal thinking and methods to create a safe and clear online environment, transforming the scale of China's internet into economic growth [3].
“庭审现场就是最好的法治课堂”
Ren Min Wang· 2025-09-16 01:21
Core Points - The article highlights the importance of standardized and rigorous law enforcement procedures, emphasizing that they directly impact the outcomes of legal penalties and justice [1] - The collaborative efforts between the courts and administrative agencies in Quzhou have led to enhanced legal awareness and effective resolution of administrative disputes [1][6] Group 1: Administrative Court Innovations - Quzhou's courts have implemented a "court classroom" initiative, allowing administrative law enforcement personnel to observe trials, thereby improving their legal awareness and thinking [1] - The "cloud observation + in-depth explanation" teaching model has been established in collaboration with the Quzhou Party School, enhancing the legal education of key personnel [2] - A dual-track teaching model combining "cloud classrooms + practical experience" has been developed with several law schools, resulting in the training of over 120 legal talents [3] Group 2: Practical Engagement and Learning - Regular attendance of government leaders at court hearings has been institutionalized, promoting self-correction and accountability within administrative agencies [4] - A "three precision" observation mechanism has been established to enhance the effectiveness of court hearings, focusing on high-loss areas such as compensation and administrative penalties [5] - In 2024, Quzhou courts resolved 220 administrative disputes, achieving a withdrawal rate of 51.28%, the highest in the province [5] Group 3: Legal Education and Community Engagement - Quzhou courts have expanded their educational outreach, conducting over 20 administrative law lectures annually to cover all levels of government [6] - Judicial white papers and recommendations have been utilized to guide administrative practices, with 62 judicial suggestions provided to various departments over the past three years [6] - The "court classroom" concept has been broadened to include various community engagement activities, significantly enhancing public legal awareness and the overall level of legal governance [7] Group 4: Future Directions - The Quzhou courts aim to deepen the interaction between judicial and administrative bodies, further advancing the construction of a law-based government [7]