2023年4月，中美大豆产品应用价值链创新中心在河南省郑州市落地。苏健认为，在基于40多年来中美 大豆产业合作的经验和成功基础之上建立的创新中心，为中美两国大豆产业的深化合作创造了更好的平 台和机会。 大豆对于美国农业及农产品出口至关重要。根据美国农业部的数据，2024年大豆以245.8亿美元的出口 额位居美国农产品出口首位，占农产品出口总额的14%。2024年，中国购买了价值126.4亿美元的大 豆，占美国大豆出口总额一半以上。 苏健说："美国的农民非常沮丧、非常失望、非常不满，一直在鼓励联邦政府和特朗普总统采取措施重 新恢复与中国的大豆贸易。" "其实我们早些时候计划参加进博会时，我还在思索届时能和大家交流些什么。"美国大豆出口协会 （USSEC）首席执行官（CEO）苏健（Jim Sutter）近日对第一财经记者谈及第八届中国国际进口博览 会（下称"进博会"）时表示，他在进博会上的所见所闻，以及与中国合作伙伴的交流让他松了口气。 "我始终觉得中美两国人民之间有一种天然的好感。中国的市场极其庞大，而且发展非常迅速，需要进 口农产品的原材料。在美国，我们产量远大于国内的消耗，所以中美之间存在一种非常自然的协同 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent trade tensions between China and the U.S. illustrate a complex relationship where initial goodwill is quickly undermined by subsequent actions, highlighting a lack of genuine cooperation and trust [1][3][15]. Group 1: Trade Dynamics - China recently placed a significant order for 180,000 tons of soybeans from the U.S., signaling a desire for improved economic relations [3]. - Following this order, the U.S. announced a reduction in tariffs on certain Chinese goods, including a drop from high tariffs to 10% on fentanyl-related products, while also suspending a 24% tariff for a year [5][6]. - Despite these gestures, U.S. officials expressed skepticism about China's compliance with previous trade agreements, indicating a lack of trust [5][6]. Group 2: U.S. Actions Against Chinese Companies - Concurrently with tariff adjustments, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission initiated new restrictions targeting Chinese companies, citing national security concerns [8]. - New regulations could lead to the rejection of new applications and the removal of existing products from the market if they contain specific Chinese components, despite a lack of substantial evidence for these claims [8][9]. - This move resulted in a significant number of Chinese electronic products being removed from major U.S. e-commerce platforms, impacting availability and pricing for American consumers [9]. Group 3: Implications for Consumers and Market Dynamics - The actions taken by the U.S. are seen as detrimental not only to Chinese companies but also to American consumers, who may face higher prices and reduced product availability [9][11]. - China's response emphasizes that the U.S. is politicizing trade issues under the guise of national security, which undermines fair market competition and international norms [11][13]. - The ongoing trade relationship is characterized as interdependent, with both nations benefiting from mutual trade, suggesting that unilateral actions could lead to negative outcomes for both sides [15][17].

Core Points - Mexico's plan to impose high tariffs on imports from China has been postponed due to rising opposition from the private sector and members of the ruling party [1][3] - Mexican manufacturers have warned that the proposed tariffs would significantly increase production costs, impacting their competitiveness [1] - There are divisions within the ruling coalition regarding the tariffs, with some lawmakers supporting the president's efforts to protect domestic industries while others emphasize the importance of trade relations with China [3] Group 1 - The proposed tariffs could reach as high as 50% on products from China and other Asian countries, raising concerns about inflation and the overall economic impact [3] - The Mexican government is facing technical challenges in determining which products to tax, complicating negotiations with the private sector [3] - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to Mexico's unilateral tariff measures, emphasizing the need for inclusive economic globalization and cooperation [4] Group 2 - The Mexican government is evaluating the potential inflationary effects of the proposed tariffs, indicating a cautious approach to the implementation of such measures [3] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has announced plans to investigate Mexico's trade barriers against Chinese products, highlighting the potential for escalating trade tensions [4] - The situation reflects broader concerns about unilateralism and protectionism in international trade, particularly in the context of rising tariffs from the United States [4]

Core Viewpoint - Mexico has postponed its plan to impose tariffs on Chinese goods, with China firmly opposing any restrictions imposed under external pressure [1] Group 1: Economic Relations - China advocates for inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism, protectionism, and discriminatory measures [1] - The essence of China-Mexico economic cooperation is mutual benefit and win-win outcomes [1] Group 2: Trade Cooperation - In the context of certain countries imposing tariffs, China and Mexico should enhance communication and coordination to jointly uphold free trade and multilateralism [1] - Both countries are important members of the Global South, emphasizing the need for collaboration to promote global economic recovery and trade development [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the postponement of Mexico's plan to increase tariffs on imports from China due to opposition from private enterprises and members of the ruling party, highlighting the importance of mutual cooperation and free trade between China and Mexico [1] Group 1: Economic Globalization - China advocates for inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism, protectionism, and discriminatory measures [1] - The Chinese government emphasizes the need to protect its legitimate interests against external pressures [1] Group 2: China-Mexico Relations - China and Mexico are both significant members of the Global South, with mutual benefit being the essence of their economic cooperation [1] - The Chinese side values the development of China-Mexico relations and aims to strengthen communication and coordination in the context of rising tariffs from certain countries [1] Group 3: Trade and Economic Recovery - Both countries are committed to maintaining free trade and multilateralism to promote global economic recovery and trade development [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Mexican government's plan to impose high tariffs on Chinese imports has been postponed until at least December due to increasing opposition from the private sector and members of the ruling party [1] Group 1 - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasizes the importance of inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism and protectionism [1] - China and Mexico are both significant members of the "Global South," and their economic cooperation is characterized by mutual benefit [1] - In the context of rising tariffs from certain countries, China and Mexico should enhance communication and coordination to uphold free trade and multilateralism [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Mexican government's plan to impose high tariffs on Chinese imports has been postponed until at least December due to increasing opposition from the private sector and members of the ruling party in Mexico [1]. Group 1: Economic Relations - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasized the importance of mutual benefit and win-win cooperation in China-Mexico economic relations, highlighting that both countries are significant members of the "Global South" [1]. - The Ministry advocates for inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism, protectionism, and discriminatory measures against China [1]. Group 2: Trade and Tariffs - The postponement of the tariff plan comes amid a backdrop of rising tensions regarding tariffs imposed by certain countries, indicating a need for enhanced communication and coordination between China and Mexico to safeguard free trade and multilateralism [1].

Core Viewpoint - The plan by Mexican President López Obrador to impose high tariffs on Chinese imports has been postponed until at least December, according to reports from Mexican lawmakers and business leaders [1] Group 1: Economic Policy - The postponement of tariffs indicates a shift in Mexico's trade policy, potentially affecting trade relations with China and the broader economic landscape [1] - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasizes its commitment to inclusive economic globalization and opposes unilateralism and protectionism [1] Group 2: Diplomatic Relations - The Chinese government firmly opposes any measures that harm its legitimate interests and will take necessary actions to protect its rights based on actual circumstances [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that openness is a distinctive feature and a necessary requirement of Chinese-style modernization, highlighting the importance of expanding high-level openness to promote reform and development [1] Group 1: Economic Performance - Since the 14th Five-Year Plan, China has implemented a more proactive opening strategy, leading to a new pattern of high-level openness, evidenced by the total goods trade remaining the world's largest for several consecutive years and service trade exceeding $1 trillion for the first time, ranking second globally [1] - China's export share in the world has stabilized at over 14%, while the import share has increased from 9.7% in 2012 to 10.5% in 2024 [1] Group 2: Institutional Opening - The quality of bilateral investment has steadily improved, with a continuous reduction in the negative list for foreign investment access, and the removal of restrictions in the manufacturing sector [1] - The first batch of pilot measures for free trade zones has been fully implemented, showcasing China's commitment to embracing the world with an open stance [1] Group 3: Challenges and Opportunities - The article acknowledges the challenges posed by rising anti-globalization sentiments and increasing instability in global economic growth, emphasizing the need to expand high-level openness to counter these uncertainties [1][2] - It highlights the importance of actively engaging with international high-standard economic and trade rules, particularly in the service sector, and participating in the formulation of rules in emerging fields like digital trade and artificial intelligence [2] Group 4: Reform and Mechanism Improvement - There is a need to eliminate systemic barriers and promote mutual reinforcement between reform and opening, as deep reforms in domestic service industries and cross-regional openings face bottlenecks [3] - Issues such as "invisible barriers" faced by private and foreign enterprises, inadequate regulatory frameworks for new business models, and low standards for intellectual property protection need to be addressed to create a favorable market environment for innovation and investment [3] Group 5: Confidence in Openness - The confidence in advancing high-level openness stems from China's strong economic foundation, resilient potential, and advantages such as a complete industrial system, a vast market, and abundant talent resources [3] - The goal is to establish a new pattern of openness that is broader, deeper, and more extensive, injecting "open momentum" into Chinese-style modernization [3]

Core Viewpoint - Recent investigations by Norway, Denmark, and the UK into Chinese-made buses, citing potential "remote control" risks, reflect underlying political biases rather than actual safety concerns [2][3][4] Group 1: Safety Investigations - The investigations claim that Chinese electric buses may pose national security risks, with UK officials suggesting they could "paralyze London" [2] - No evidence has been presented to support claims of remote control incidents involving Chinese electric buses in Europe [2] - The investigations are characterized as a presumption of guilt, lacking substantial evidence [2] Group 2: European Perception and Bias - The negative labeling of Chinese electric buses as "remote shutdown" vehicles indicates a deep-seated bias among some European individuals against Chinese enterprises [3] - The spread of such absurd claims highlights a distorted public opinion environment regarding China in Europe [3] - The tendency to overgeneralize "national security" concerns has led to a detrimental impact on Sino-European relations, hindering potential win-win cooperation in various sectors [3][4] Group 3: Impact on Trade and Reputation - The actions of certain European countries are seen as damaging to the reputation of Chinese companies and violating principles of market fairness [4] - These actions could disrupt global supply chains and negatively affect the global energy transition and emission reduction efforts [4] - The narrative surrounding Chinese electric buses reflects broader anxieties about development and protectionism in Europe, which could ultimately harm European competitiveness in the face of technological advancements [4]