金十数据6月11日讯，2025年6月10日至11日，东盟与中日韩（10+3）、东亚峰会、东盟地区论坛高官会 在马来西亚槟城举行。外交部副部长孙卫东率团出席。孙卫东在会上表示，面对变乱交织国际局势，要 开放、不要封闭，要合作、不要对抗，要公道、不要霸道，要共赢、不要零和，是地区国家的共同选 择。孙卫东严正驳斥美国在南海、台湾等问题上对中国的污蔑抹黑，强调美推进所谓"印太战略"，兜售 冷战思维和阵营对抗，拼凑排他性"小圈子"，在南海地区挑起纷争，挑拨离间地区国家关系，是破坏本 地区和平稳定的最大乱源。中方对此坚决反对。孙并就朝鲜半岛、缅甸问题、乌克兰危机、巴以冲突等 阐述中方原则立场。 （外交部） 外交部副部长孙卫东出席东亚合作系列高官会 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent demands made by the U.S. to India during trade negotiations, highlighting the implications of these demands on India's international relations and strategic positioning in the Indo-Pacific region [1][3][9]. Group 1: U.S. Demands - The U.S. has made three key demands to India: opening its domestic market, reducing purchases of Russian weapons, and decreasing alliances with BRICS nations [3][5]. - U.S. Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, expressed optimism about reaching a trade agreement with India, emphasizing the importance of early participation for better terms [1][3]. Group 2: Market Access - The first demand focuses on urging India to open its domestic market, as the U.S. views India's high protectionist tariff policies as a barrier to healthy trade relations [3][4]. - The U.S. has proposed a 26% tariff increase on Indian goods but has allowed a 90-day delay for negotiations, with a deadline set for July 8 [3][4]. Group 3: Defense Procurement - The second demand is for India to reduce its procurement of Russian military equipment, which the U.S. sees as a challenge to its strategic interests in South Asia and the Indian Ocean [4][5]. - The U.S. aims to shift India's military procurement towards American-made weapons, which could generate significant military sales revenue for the U.S. [4]. Group 4: BRICS Alliance - The third demand involves India reducing its alliances with BRICS nations, which the U.S. perceives as a threat to its financial dominance [5][7]. - The BRICS platform is crucial for India to maintain its international standing and economic cooperation, and distancing itself from BRICS could diminish India's influence in global governance [7][9]. Group 5: Diplomatic Implications - India's exclusion from the upcoming G7 summit highlights its diplomatic challenges, as it must balance relations with the U.S. while maintaining ties with Russia, China, and other BRICS countries [9]. - The ongoing negotiations and India's responses to U.S. demands will significantly impact its position in the global landscape and the political and economic dynamics of the Indo-Pacific region [9].

Core Points - The U.S. is pressuring India to distance itself from BRICS in exchange for a trade agreement, highlighting a shift in diplomatic tactics [1][3] - The U.S. sees India as a crucial player in its Indo-Pacific strategy, aiming to weaken China's influence by leveraging India's position [3][5] - India's reliance on Chinese manufacturing is significant, with a projected 37% increase in imports of Chinese machinery and electrical products in 2024 [5] - The U.S. demands include opening India's agricultural market to American soybeans and threatening military supply chains, particularly for F-21 fighter jet parts [7] - India is strategically delaying its response to U.S. demands while strengthening ties with Russia and exploring alternative currency agreements with the Middle East [9] - China's response to the situation has been measured, with support for India through infrastructure loans, contrasting with U.S. tactics [10] - Internal divisions in India are evident, with public sentiment largely against U.S. economic pressure and protests against American agricultural imports [12] - Global reactions to U.S. pressure include support for BRICS from other nations, indicating a broader resistance to U.S. hegemony [14] Summary by Sections U.S.-India Relations - The U.S. Commerce Secretary's visit to India was marked by a stark warning to sever ties with BRICS for a trade deal [1] - The U.S. initially expected compliance from 75 countries regarding tariffs but faced resistance, particularly from India [3] Economic Implications - The U.S. is pushing for India to open its agricultural market, which could significantly impact local farmers [7] - India's imports from China are expected to rise sharply, indicating a complex economic interdependence [5] Strategic Maneuvering - India is employing a strategy of delay while seeking to strengthen its energy ties with Russia and explore alternative economic frameworks [9] - China's support for India through financial means contrasts with U.S. pressure tactics, showcasing a different diplomatic approach [10] Domestic Sentiment - There is significant public backlash in India against U.S. economic policies, with protests emerging against American agricultural imports [12] - The internal political landscape in India is divided, with strong opposition to U.S. influence and calls for maintaining BRICS membership [12] Global Context - Other BRICS nations are rallying against U.S. pressure, indicating a potential shift in global power dynamics [14]

Group 1 - The article highlights India's precarious position as it faces potential 100% tariffs from the Trump administration, prompting a shift in its foreign policy towards China and Russia for support [1][3][6] - India's Foreign Minister's statement about not supporting de-dollarization reveals the country's anxiety under U.S. pressure, as it seeks to maintain its trade relationship with the U.S. while navigating the challenges posed by tariffs [1][5] - The economic implications of U.S. tariffs are significant, with India having a trade surplus of $36.7 billion with the U.S. in 2023, accounting for over 80% of its global surplus, indicating a heavy reliance on this relationship [5][6] Group 2 - Modi's government is facing severe challenges in its automotive sector due to a shortage of rare earth materials, which has led to production halts, highlighting India's technological vulnerabilities [6][8] - The article discusses the geopolitical dynamics within the BRICS nations, emphasizing the internal conflicts and differing strategies among member countries, particularly in light of U.S. sanctions and pressures [9][11] - The potential for a renewed trilateral dialogue between China, Russia, and India is seen as a strategic move by Modi to counterbalance U.S. influence and address regional security concerns, particularly regarding Pakistan [3][11]

报道称，诺实际上一直在国防部履行负责印太安全事务的助理国防部长的职责，曾两次陪同国防部长皮 特·赫格塞思出访亚洲。赫格塞思3月宣布对密克罗尼西亚联邦一些地区投资20亿美元，以加强基础设施 建设，就有诺从旁协助。他2024年10月曾率领美国国会代表团前往密克罗尼西亚联邦访问，讨论"第二 岛链"问题。 【文/观察者网 王一】本周早些时候，美国国防部提名曾在众议院"中国问题特别委员会"担任法律顾 问、炒作过"中国威胁论"的美籍韩裔官员约翰·诺（John Noh）担任负责印太安全事务的助理国防部长。 韩国《朝鲜日报》6月4日指出，该职务是五角大楼在亚洲地区的关键职位，负责监督美国在东亚、东南 亚的军事战略和联盟。在美国与中国关系紧张、盟友们正寻求美国明确其在该地区的长期立场的当下， 极具挑战性。 根据美国国防部网站披露的信息，诺毕业于斯坦福大学和布朗大学法学院，曾是一名美国驻阿富汗的陆 军军官。后来，他开始从事法律工作，在得克萨斯州出任助理检察官，负责贩毒案件。 在"中国问题特别委员会"期间，诺主要负责美国及其盟友在印太地区的战略，并在该地区开展以国防为 重心的合作。后来在特朗普宣誓就职当天，诺开始担任国防部负责东亚 ...

Group 1: U.S. Measures Against China - The U.S. has intensified its crackdown on China despite a temporary truce in the trade war, indicating a long-term strategy to view China as a primary strategic competitor [1] - The U.S. has implemented a comprehensive ban on AI chip exports to China, which includes a policy effective from May 15, 2025, prohibiting global companies from using Huawei's Ascend series chips [2] - The U.S. has pressured major EDA companies like Synopsys, Cadence, and Siemens to stop providing chip design software to certain Chinese clients, initially targeting military-related enterprises [2] Group 2: Aerospace Technology Restrictions - The U.S. has suspended the sale of critical technologies, including jet engine technology, to China, specifically targeting the COMAC C919 project to hinder China's progress in large aircraft manufacturing [7] - Despite these restrictions, China has made significant advancements in aerospace technology, with the CJ1000A engine, which has been in development since 2011, nearing mass production [7] Group 3: Visa Restrictions for Chinese Students - The U.S. announced an increase in visa revocations for Chinese students, particularly in STEM fields, aiming to prevent the influx of high-end talent into the U.S. [8] - This move may inadvertently encourage more Chinese students to pursue education domestically, fostering innovation and development within China [10] Group 4: Geopolitical Strategy - The U.S. is leveraging its "Indo-Pacific Strategy" to disrupt China's regional influence, attempting to use Southeast Asian nations to contain China and provoke regional conflicts [12] - Despite U.S. military deployments in the Indo-Pacific, China's influence in the region continues to grow, as evidenced by its active participation in ASEAN and other diplomatic engagements [12]

特朗普的关税大战，坚持到现在依旧没有见到太多的收效，眼瞅着中国啃不动，特朗普又开始迫其他国 家交作业。 6月3日，美国总统特朗普在社交媒体发文，再次推销自己的对等关税政策，并且做出了解释，把自己伪 装成一个受害者称，其他国家对美国征收高额关税，却不允许美国反击，这么下来，美国的经济就没有 生存的机会了。与此同时，路透社公布了一则致美国谈判伙伴的信函，告诫这些国家目前美国政府已经 没有耐心了，要求各国代表在6月4日本周三之前必须给出最好的谈判报价。 为了配合特朗普的威胁，美国商务部长将第一刀砍向了印度，指出印度的做法激怒了美国，指责印度经 常从俄罗斯出购买军事武器，还指责印度加入了金砖国家，更是跟着金砖国家一起转向摆脱美元霸权 尤其是在美国的对等关税搬出之前，印度就率先赶往美国愿意妥协，虽然印度方面做出了极大的让步， 但是美国还是一步不让，这也导致谈判被搁置了下去，如今美国旧事重提逼迫印度妥协，按照印度以往 的操作手段，在美国的胡萝卜加大棒的威胁下，用不了多久就软了会向美国妥协。继续做他的骑墙派。 美商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克表示，这些问题特朗普已经给摆在了桌前要求印度政府解决，还特地强调 预计在不久的将来，印度 ...

第22届香格里拉对话会5月30日至6月1日在新加坡举行。中方在对话会上强调中国将践行包括全球安全 倡议在内的三大全球倡议，与地区国家团结合作，携手打造亚太命运共同体，同时坚决反对个别国家抹 黑污蔑他国、制造分裂对抗的相关言论。 与会嘉宾及国际问题专家表示，中方倡导的国际安全观顺应历史发展规律，契合亚太国家维护自主发展 与和平环境愿望；部分国家企图制造分裂、鼓动对抗的言行违背潮流、不得人心，注定难以得逞。 中国安全主张广获认同 "中国的发展起步于亚太，得益于亚太，也贡献于亚太。"中国人民解放军国防大学副校长兼教育长胡钢 锋5月31日在对话会第三场专题会议上说，中方始终以实际行动推进区域安全，妥善处置解决矛盾纠 纷，积极推动本地区热点问题降温稳局，携手域内国家持续维护安全稳定。 近年来，中方积极参与具有建设性的各类对话平台，在多个国际场合阐述中方安全倡议与主张，与各方 广泛沟通、增信释疑、加深合作。中国提出的全球安全倡议已得到100多个国家、国际和地区组织的支 持和赞赏，成为具有全球影响力的国际共识。 马来西亚新亚洲战略研究中心理事长许庆琦表示，中国始终秉持合作共赢与开放包容理念，同区域国家 携手维护和平稳定、推 ...

Core Viewpoint - The 22nd Shangri-La Dialogue held in Singapore focused on regional security issues, with significant discussions surrounding the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy and China's responses to criticisms from Western nations [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy - The U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy has been criticized for failing to achieve positive outcomes for regional countries, instead exacerbating tensions and conflicts [4]. - The Chinese representatives emphasized that the dialogue should aim to reduce differences and foster honest communication rather than create problems [2][8]. Group 2: Regional Cooperation and Stability - China has established cooperative agreements with 17 neighboring countries to build a community of shared destiny, highlighting a contrasting approach to regional development compared to the U.S. [4]. - The dialogue underscored the importance of maintaining peace and stability in Asia, which has been achieved through mutual understanding and cooperation among regional nations [7][8]. Group 3: Trade and Economic Relations - The dialogue also addressed concerns regarding U.S. tariffs and trade wars, which are seen as detrimental to global multilateralism and economic globalization [7]. - Malaysia's Prime Minister emphasized that ASEAN countries value their trade relationships and will not compromise them for unilateral agreements [5].

5月31日，在新加坡出席香格里拉对话会的中国国防大学教授孟祥青在接受总台记者采访时表示，美国 在对话会中制造地区分裂，但是东盟国家更关注合作和发展，这才是地区国家的共同心声。孟祥青说， 美国在香格里拉对话会期间再次抛出了所谓的"印太战略"，这一战略已经出台多年，除了挑起事端、制 造危机、搞乱亚太之外，可以说是毫无建树。(央视新闻) ...