Core Viewpoint - The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) has played an irreplaceable role in deepening economic cooperation among member countries, providing mechanisms for economic security and platforms for innovation cooperation amidst a backdrop of global economic challenges [2][3]. Group 1: Economic Cooperation and Market Potential - RCEP member countries account for approximately one-third of the global population, and the diverse and complementary market structures can significantly enhance resilience against external risks by fully unleashing market potential [2]. - China expresses willingness to strengthen market connectivity and promote regional economic integration while supporting the accession of new members like Hong Kong to RCEP [2]. Group 2: Upgrading and Enhancing RCEP - There is a call for accelerating the review and upgrade process of RCEP to align with high international standards in trade rules, focusing on areas such as market access, government procurement, digital economy, green initiatives, and supply chain collaboration [3]. - The goal is to transition RCEP from being the "largest free trade area" to a "high-level free trade area" through comprehensive and high-quality implementation of commitments [3]. Group 3: Commitment to Multilateral Trade - The current international trade order faces significant challenges, and RCEP is encouraged to navigate these turbulent waters by upholding true multilateralism and supporting the central role of ASEAN [3]. - There is an emphasis on fostering dialogue between RCEP and other trade agreements like the EU and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) to create more mutually beneficial development opportunities [3].

Core Viewpoint - The speech emphasizes the importance of open cooperation among East Asian countries to overcome economic challenges and sustain growth, highlighting the region's historical economic achievements and the need for strategic collaboration moving forward [2][4][5]. Group 1: Economic Cooperation - The ASEAN and China-Japan-South Korea cooperation has shown resilience and vitality despite facing increased challenges and uncertainties in the global economic landscape [2][5]. - Open cooperation has been a key factor in East Asia's economic miracles, allowing countries to complement each other's strengths and avoid politicizing trade issues [4][5]. Group 2: Regional Stability - The current international situation is marked by conflicts and instability, which threaten global development; thus, maintaining peace and stability in East Asia is crucial [5][6]. - There is a strong call to uphold free trade and multilateral trade systems while opposing protectionism to advance regional economic integration [5][6]. Group 3: Supply Chain Collaboration - East Asia possesses a comprehensive industrial chain with strong complementary advantages, and there is a need to enhance collaboration across different segments of the supply chain [5][6]. - The region should focus on improving cooperation in finance, trade, and food security to create new growth points and enhance internal development momentum [5][6]. Group 4: Innovation and New Growth Drivers - The region is encouraged to support technological innovation, particularly in fields like artificial intelligence, robotics, and biomedicine, to enhance innovation capabilities [6][7]. - Continued collaboration in digital economy, electric vehicles, and clean energy is essential to seize development opportunities [6][7].

Core Points - The 47th ASEAN Summit emphasizes "inclusiveness and sustainability," with a focus on strengthening regional economic integration and strategic cooperation amid a complex global environment [1][3] - Chinese Premier Li Qiang's participation in multiple key meetings signals China's commitment to regional cooperation and multilateralism, which is crucial for Asia's role as a global economic growth center [1][4] Group 1: Regional Cooperation - The ASEAN leaders and dialogue partners are concentrating on enhancing regional economic integration and strategic collaboration, aiming to provide new directions for trade and investment [1] - Li Qiang highlighted the ongoing economic transformation in East Asia, asserting that the "East Asian miracle" is still in progress, and warned of rising uncertainties in the international economic landscape [3][4] - The RCEP leaders' meeting is significant as it marks the first gathering of leaders since the agreement was signed during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the strategic importance of this partnership [6][7] Group 2: Economic Integration - The RCEP is recognized as the world's largest free trade agreement, with its members, including ASEAN countries, China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, aiming for deeper economic integration [6][7] - Li Qiang called for closer cooperation among RCEP members to address challenges and promote development, emphasizing the need for an open regional market and adherence to multilateral trade systems [6][8] - The upcoming signing of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area 3.0 upgrade is expected to modernize trade frameworks and enhance regional economic cooperation, focusing on digital trade and sustainability [8][9] Group 3: Future Outlook - The series of summits aims not only to address current challenges but also to shape the future regional economic architecture, with a focus on mutual promotion rather than mere interdependence [8][9] - The role of China is evolving from an adapter of international rules to a leader in new globalization efforts, positioning itself as a reliable source of economic growth and stability for Asia and beyond [9]

Core Viewpoint - The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) has played an irreplaceable role in deepening economic cooperation among member countries, providing mechanisms for economic security and platforms for innovation cooperation amidst a backdrop of global economic challenges [2][3]. Group 1: Economic Cooperation and Growth - Since the implementation of RCEP over three years ago, regional economic growth has remained robust despite global economic sluggishness [2]. - The agreement has facilitated trade and investment liberalization, enhancing the resilience of regional economic growth and maintaining supply chain stability [4]. Group 2: Challenges and Responses - The current international economic landscape is marked by rising unilateralism and protectionism, posing significant risks to the region [3]. - Member countries are urged to strengthen collaboration to address these challenges and promote development through a more open regional market [3]. Group 3: Future Directions - There is a call for the RCEP to undergo quality upgrades, aligning with international high-standard economic and trade rules, and exploring cooperation in areas such as market access, government procurement, and digital economy [3]. - The importance of maintaining a multilateral trade system is emphasized, with a commitment to supporting ASEAN's central role and promoting a stable regional multilateral trade framework [3][4].

Core Viewpoint - China emphasizes its role in sharing development opportunities with the world, contributing significantly to enhancing global economic resilience and maintaining international trade rules [1] Economic Contributions - China is recognized as a country with the most complete industrial categories and comprehensive supply chains, providing high-quality manufacturing and stable supply to support global economic circulation [1] - The country is committed to deepening reforms and expanding openness, ensuring stability on the supply side while offering a vast market on the consumption side [1] Technological and Industrial Development - China is accelerating the development of new productive forces and promoting industrial transformation, with a focus on international cooperation in digital economy, artificial intelligence, and new energy sectors [1] Global Governance Initiatives - China has proposed global governance initiatives, firmly supporting a multilateral trade system centered around the World Trade Organization (WTO) and advocating for inclusive economic globalization [1] - The country aims to provide strong support for developing countries to better participate in global division of labor and integrate into the global trade system through high-quality co-construction of the Belt and Road Initiative [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent round of economic and trade consultations between China and the U.S. in Kuala Lumpur signifies a constructive dialogue aimed at resolving mutual concerns, highlighting the importance of communication in addressing differences and fostering cooperation [1][2]. Group 1: Economic and Trade Issues - The discussions covered a wide range of topics, including U.S. maritime logistics and shipbuilding industry measures, extension of tariff suspension, fentanyl tariffs and enforcement cooperation, agricultural trade, and export controls, all of which are critical to both parties and impact global supply chain stability [1]. - Both sides agreed to further clarify specific details and adhere to their domestic approval processes, indicating a commitment to resolving longstanding interests while maintaining a focus on problem-solving [1][2]. Group 2: Strategic Leadership and Cooperation - The importance of adhering to the consensus reached by the leaders of both nations is emphasized, with multiple rounds of consultations reflecting a commitment to mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation [2]. - The essence of U.S.-China economic relations is framed as mutually beneficial, with a historical context underscoring that cooperation leads to shared benefits while conflict results in mutual harm [2]. Group 3: China's Development Strategy - China's commitment to high-level openness is expected to provide more opportunities for countries, including the U.S., as outlined in the recently approved "14th Five-Year Plan" which aims to expand institutional openness and maintain a multilateral trade system [3]. - The strategic foresight demonstrated by China in implementing long-term plans is viewed as a stabilizing factor in a world filled with uncertainties, contributing positively to global development [3].

Core Viewpoint - The unilateral actions of the United States are severely undermining the global trade system, particularly affecting developing countries, which face significant economic challenges due to high tariffs and trade uncertainties [1][2] Group 1: Impact on Global Trade - The U.S. has imposed tariffs that exceed the World Trade Organization (WTO) limits on several countries, including China, Switzerland, and Indonesia, disregarding WTO rules and disrupting the global trade system [1] - Developing countries are experiencing a loss of export income, decreased product competitiveness, and job losses due to U.S. trade policies [1] - High tariffs are leading to reduced export competitiveness, decreased foreign investment, and currency depreciation in developing countries [1] Group 2: Structural Issues in the U.S. Economy - The root causes of the U.S. trade deficit are structural issues such as declining manufacturing competitiveness, imbalances in savings and investment, and corporate tax avoidance, rather than unfair trade practices [2] - It is estimated that up to 30% of the U.S. trade deficit may stem from corporate tax avoidance behaviors [2] Group 3: Call for Multilateral Cooperation - Developing countries are urged to actively participate in the multilateral system and advocate for WTO reforms that better serve their development interests [2] - There is a need for a fair and predictable multilateral trade system to prevent any country from unilaterally imposing trade measures [2]

Core Viewpoint - The unilateral actions of the United States are severely undermining the global trade system, particularly affecting developing countries, which face significant economic challenges due to high tariffs and trade uncertainties [1][2] Group 1: Impact on Global Trade - The U.S. has imposed tariffs that exceed the World Trade Organization (WTO) limits on several countries, including China, Switzerland, and Indonesia, disregarding WTO rules and disrupting the global trade system [1] - Developing countries are experiencing a loss of export income, decreased competitiveness of their products, and job losses due to U.S. trade policies [1] - High tariffs are leading to reduced foreign investment and currency depreciation in developing countries, creating an unstable economic environment [1] Group 2: Structural Issues in the U.S. Economy - The root causes of the U.S. trade deficit are structural issues such as declining manufacturing competitiveness, imbalances in savings and investment, and corporate tax avoidance, rather than unfair trade practices [2] - It is estimated that up to 30% of the U.S. trade deficit may be attributed to corporate tax avoidance behaviors [2] Group 3: Call for Multilateral Cooperation - Developing countries are urged to actively participate in the multilateral system and advocate for reforms in the WTO to better serve their development interests [2] - There is a need for a fair and predictable multilateral trade system to prevent any country from unilaterally imposing trade measures [2]

Core Viewpoint - The expansion of high-level opening-up is essential for economic development and a necessary choice for modernization in the new era [1][3] Group 1: Key Concepts from the Fourth Plenary Session - The session emphasizes four key concepts for the next five years: "high-level," "win-win," "innovation," and "persistence" [2][3] - "High-level" refers to the requirements for the breadth, depth, scope, and methods of opening-up despite complex external conditions [2] - "Win-win" highlights the importance of cooperation and shared opportunities, contrasting with unilateralism and protectionism [2] - "Innovation" focuses on adapting to new international rules and leveraging technological advancements for trade transformation [2] - "Persistence" underscores the significance of bilateral investment and the Belt and Road Initiative in fostering a new development pattern [2] Group 2: Significance of High-Level Opening-Up - High-level opening-up is crucial for stimulating new growth momentum by introducing advanced technologies and management practices [3] - It enhances risk resistance through diversified international market layouts, reducing external shocks [3] - It promotes high-quality economic development and regional coordination [3] - It increases international influence, showcasing China's responsible global role and contributing to global development [3] Group 3: Strategies for Expanding High-Level Opening-Up - Steadily expand institutional opening-up by reducing tariffs and aligning domestic regulations with international standards [6][7] - Maintain a multilateral trade system and expand international cooperation through platforms like the Belt and Road Initiative [6][7] - Actively promote self-initiated opening-up and encourage innovation in new trade models such as e-commerce and digital trade [6][7] Group 4: Future Directions and Initiatives - The focus will be on deepening reforms in areas like intellectual property protection and digital economy governance to enhance the business environment [7] - The dual circulation strategy will be promoted to integrate domestic and international markets [7] - High-quality Belt and Road cooperation will be prioritized, enhancing infrastructure connectivity and sustainable development [8]

构建开放型世界经济的中国担当 新华社记者樊宇 李蓉 珠江之畔，千年商都，第138届中国进出口商品交易会（广交会）场馆内外人头攒动。历经60多年岁月 而魅力不减，"中国第一展"的人气，折射中国迈向高质量发展的决心和持续推进高水平对外开放的诚 意。 在单边主义、保护主义逆流涌动的今天，全球经济增长依然低迷，经贸格局深刻重构。是促进开放合作 还是走向封闭对抗？是坚持互利共赢还是固守零和博弈？中国坚定不移推进高水平对外开放，推动构建 开放型世界经济。中国经济，这片历经无数次"狂风骤雨"依然"在那儿"的壮阔大海，正以其深刻的发展 逻辑和开放的博大胸怀，展现着作为世界经济"稳定锚"和"动力源"的时代担当。 习近平总书记指出："中国扩大高水平开放的决心不会变，同世界分享发展机遇的决心不会变，推动经 济全球化朝着更加开放、包容、普惠、平衡、共赢方向发展的决心不会变。"回望"十四五"，中国始终 以坚定的步伐践行这一承诺，将机遇的种子播撒全球，将融通的血脉连接世界，将开放的理念化为现 实。 （一）为全球增长蓄力 面对变乱交织的世界，构筑一个稳定增长且潜力巨大的市场，本身就是对世界经济最直接的贡献。"与 中国同行就是与机遇同行，相 ...