此前，有消息披露，美国在其"和平计划"未公开的附录中列举了多项经济相关的计划，这让欧洲多国官员感到担忧。 围绕俄乌"和平计划"各方分歧加剧 目前，围绕美国提出的乌克兰问题"和平计划"，俄、乌、欧、美多方正在进行博弈。美国白宫新闻秘书莱维特11日证实，美方已经收悉乌方提交的更新 版"和平计划"。欧洲方面希望本周末与美方在法国巴黎就"和平计划"举行会谈，但美方尚未确认参会。 当地时间12月11日，德国总理默茨表示，他与欧洲多国领导人共同向美国总统特朗普发出一份有关俄乌"和平计划"的提议，并邀请美方13日参加相关会议。 默茨说，他与其他欧洲国家领导人已经阐明，有关领土让步的这一问题必须由乌克兰总统和乌克兰人民来回答。 美国总统特朗普同一天却没有明确表示，美方是否将派代表参会。 美国总统：不想浪费太多时间 特朗普表示，"如果我们认为达成协议的概率大，就会出席13日在欧洲举行的会议，我们不想浪费太多时间。" 特朗普还表示，美国此前与俄罗斯及乌克兰"已非常接近达成协议"，由于方案涉及以特定方式划分领土，"这可不是简单的事情"。 特朗普说，除了乌克兰总统泽连斯基，乌克兰民众都很喜欢这一协议。他还警告称，当前冲突若持续，"最 ...

Group 1 - The latest U.S. National Security Strategy report reflects a significant shift in the U.S. foreign policy perspective, moving from a post-World War II worldview to a focus on "core national interests" rather than maintaining the "post-war international order" [1][2] - The report indicates a trend of "tooling" allies, criticizing European partners' domestic and foreign policies, and opposing NATO's continued expansion [2] - The emphasis on military strength remains consistent across all three reports, with a focus on rebuilding military capabilities and modernizing nuclear deterrence systems [3] Group 2 - The approach to global challenges has evolved, with the latest report viewing global issues like climate change as burdens to be avoided, contrasting with previous reports that sought leadership in these areas [2] - The strategic priority regions have shifted, with the latest report elevating issues like drug trafficking and illegal immigration in the Western Hemisphere, indicating a more assertive U.S. stance in Latin America [2] - Economic security remains a key theme, with a focus on re-industrialization and supply chain risk mitigation, highlighting the importance of maintaining dominance in high-tech, manufacturing, and critical minerals sectors [3]

据环球时报报道，12月11日，在被问及日本首相高市早苗涉台错误言论导致中日关系恶化时，白宫新闻 秘书莱维特回应："日本是美国的重要盟友，这体现在美日领导人之间的私人关系，以及我们与日本持 续发展的贸易关系。特朗普认为，我们应该在与中国建立良好合作关系的同时，维持与日本的牢固同盟 关系。"报道认为，莱维特这番表态表明未在中日之间选边站。有日本网民说："'美国优先'和'日本优 先'不可能一致，可怜的日本人。" ...

Core Viewpoint - The latest U.S. National Security Strategy report represents a significant shift in American foreign policy, aiming to redefine the U.S. global role and the concept of "America First" under President Trump's second term [1] Strategic Shift: "Limited Core American Interests" - The 2017 report maintained the framework of "U.S. leadership of the free world" but introduced "America First" and "great power competition," linking economic and security issues [2] - The 2022 Biden administration report emphasized great power competition and global challenges, returning to "liberal internationalism" principles while supporting democratic values and the importance of alliances [2] - The Trump 2.0 report moves further by stating that maintaining "core national interests" is the fundamental purpose of U.S. foreign policy, focusing on enhancing American strength and prosperity [2] Regional Priorities - The new report reorders U.S. strategic priorities, emphasizing "Western Hemisphere first," with a focus on border security, drug trafficking, and preventing foreign intervention [3] - It continues to view the Asia-Pacific as the main area for great power competition while reducing the importance of the Middle East and defining Africa primarily in terms of mineral supply and terrorism risks [3] Policy Fluctuations - Over eight years and three reports, U.S. foreign policy has shown inconsistency, particularly in its approach to global challenges like climate change, where the latest report views it as a "burden to avoid" [4] - The positioning of allies has also shifted, with the new report showing a trend of "tooling" allies and criticizing European domestic and foreign policies [4] - The stance on U.S.-Russia relations has softened in the latest report compared to previous assessments, indicating a desire to rebuild strategic stability with Russia [4] Changes in Strategic Regions - The 2017 report paid little attention to the Western Hemisphere, while the 2022 report highlighted its direct impact on the U.S. The new report elevates issues like drug trafficking and illegal immigration to a more significant level [5] Overall Trends - The new report is characterized as having a narrower vision, stronger partisanship, and a more inward-looking policy approach [6] - It contains contradictions, promoting non-interventionism while asserting intervention rights in the Western Hemisphere and attempting to influence European development [7] - Despite the changes, a consistent theme across all three reports is the maintenance of U.S. dominance in the international system, particularly in military competition and domestic economic security [7]

报道多元世界 解读复杂中国 白宫的回应让日本舆论失望了。 据日本时事通讯社当地时间12月12日报道，当地时间12月11日，在被问及日本首相高市早苗就台湾问题发表讲话后引发的中日冲突 时，白宫新闻秘书莱维特回应说："日本是美国的重要盟友，这体现在美日领导人之间的私人关系，以及我们与日本持续发展的贸易关 系。 特朗普总统认为，我们应该在与中国建立良好合作关系的同时，维持与日本的牢固同盟关系。 " 以下文章来源于环球时报 ，作者辛斌 ▲ 白宫新闻秘书莱维特 （资料图） 环球时报 . 在日本媒体相关报道的留言区，有日本网民留言说：" '美国优先'和'日本优先'不可能一致，可怜的日本人。"还有人对高市早苗提出批 评说："高市的涉台表态和特朗普的G2讲话几乎同时出现，显然她对国际形势缺乏了解，真让人气愤，别因一时冲动就将国民置于险 境。" 来源：环球时报新媒体 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c ne ne rgy） 编辑丨赵方婷 2 人民日系社 主管主办 能 源 领 域 最 大 的 原 创 内 容 基 地 发行热线 010-6536 9497 中国的语报 010-6536 9481 真 传 @ 人民 ...

Group 1 - The Trump administration's "reciprocal tariff" policy, which imposes tariffs up to 145% on Chinese goods, is seen as a gamble that disrupts global trade dynamics [1][4][9] - The policy is rooted in Trump's belief that China is the main cause of the U.S. trade deficit, aiming to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. by blocking Chinese imports [7][11] - The tariffs are expected to generate $100 billion annually for the U.S. treasury, but the actual burden falls on American consumers and businesses [11][20] Group 2 - The tariffs have led to increased costs for U.S. manufacturers reliant on Chinese intermediate goods, forcing retailers to pass on these costs to consumers [13][14] - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) reports that the costs of tariffs are primarily borne by the U.S., with households losing approximately $1,300 in 2020 and over $1,200 annually after the new tariffs in 2025 [18][20] - The tariffs are projected to decrease U.S. GDP by 5.1% and reduce imports by 21%, while employment in both skilled and unskilled labor sectors is expected to decline by over 6% [22] Group 3 - Despite the tariffs, U.S. companies have not relocated production back to the U.S.; instead, they are sourcing from other low-cost countries, leading to an increase in the trade deficit from $420 billion in 2017 to $823 billion in 2023 [24][26] - The trade deficit reflects deeper structural issues in the U.S. economy, such as insufficient domestic savings, rather than just tariff impacts [26][28] - The agricultural and manufacturing sectors in the U.S. are facing significant challenges, with products like soybeans and cotton losing access to the Chinese market due to retaliatory measures [26][28] Group 4 - In response to U.S. tariffs, China has diversified its markets and accelerated industrial upgrades, achieving a total trade value of 37.31 trillion yuan in the first ten months of 2025 [33][35] - Although exports to the U.S. decreased by 17%, exports to ASEAN and EU countries have significantly increased, reducing the U.S. share in China's foreign trade to 9% [35] - China's automotive exports are projected to exceed 6 million units in 2025, marking a shift away from reliance on labor-intensive products [36] Group 5 - China's advancements in semiconductor technology, particularly in mature process chips, demonstrate resilience against U.S. restrictions, with a significant portion of global chip consumption being mature process products [36][38] - The Chinese economy's actual GDP decline due to tariffs is only 1.62%, significantly lower than the U.S. impact, indicating a more controlled economic response [39] - The intended goal of making China regress economically has instead catalyzed its growth and transformation, revealing the limitations of using tariffs as a means of economic pressure [41]

德国总理默茨9日表示，近期发布的美国国家安全战略报告中的部分内容对欧洲而言"不可接受"， 德国及欧洲在安全政策方面必须高度独立于美国。"美国优先"没问题，但"美国孤立"不符合美方利益。 美国在世界上也需要伙伴，欧洲可以是其中之一。 ...

据新华社柏林12月9日电 （记者张毅荣、李超）德国总理默茨9日表示，近期发布的美国国家安全战略 报告中的部分内容对欧洲而言"不可接受"，德国及欧洲在安全政策方面必须高度独立于美国。"美国优 先"没问题，但"美国孤立"不符合美方利益。美国在世界上也需要伙伴，欧洲可以是其中之一。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年12月10日 13 版） (责编：赵欣悦、袁勃) ...

美国国债正以每秒10万美元的速度狂奔，直逼40万亿美元大关，这相当于每个美国公民背负着超过11万美元的债务。 2025年10月，美国政府陷入了史上最 长的停摆，持续36天，打破了历史纪录，这一切的根源，竟是一场关于医疗保险和福利支出的预算之争。 与此同时，特朗普政府公布的新版《国家安全战略》宣布将从"全球霸权"转向"半球主导"，表面上看美国似乎要"撂挑子"了。 但真相是，美国并非不想当老 大，而是想换个更省钱的方式继续当老大。 这场战略调整的核心被概括为"美国优先"，其本质是"战略止损"。 美国债务危机的严重程度远超一般人想象。 截至2025年10月，美国联邦政府债务总额已达到37.85万亿美元，占GDP比重高达126.79%，远超国际货币基金 组织设定的90%警戒线。 2024财年，美国国债的利息支出达到了惊人的1.1万亿美元，历史上首次超过军费开支。 这意味着美国政府每收取1美元税款，就 有19美分要用来支付国债利息。 在美国国内政治僵局的背后，是两党在医疗福利支出问题上的尖锐对立。 民主党人声称，"400万美国人将完全失去医疗保险"，而共和党人则坚持要削减不 必要的开支。 这种对立使得美国政府在2025 ...

今年的报告挺有意思，开篇就对民主党精英一通臭骂，称这帮家伙过去几十年很狂妄，想主导全球，到处铺摊子，都要把美国累死了；同时批评他们迷信 价值观外交、全球化及自由贸易，不仅损害了美国中产阶级和工人的利益，更掏空了美国国力。这份报告强调，要聚焦美国"核心国家利益"，坚持"美国 优先"原则，重新调整美国全球战略部署。笔者认为，这份国家安全战略报告有四大变化： 第一，自我认知发生了变化。特朗普出身商人，对高成本、低回报的事务能甩出去就甩出去。笔者认为，特朗普政府对美国实力的认知较往届政府更为清 醒，他实际上已经承认美国实力不如从前了，因此不再推行"大包大揽"的全球策略，转而将重心放在增强美国综合国力上，以实力维系霸权。报告特别强 调，要提升美国经济实力，增强产业链、供应链的韧性和安全水平，确保美国科技保持绝对领先地位。 （图源：路透社） 4日深夜，美国白宫发布了特朗普总统第二任期的美国国家安全战略报告，全面阐述美国的外交政策。 每一届美国政府都会发布一份国家安全战略报告。2017年12月18日，美国白宫发布了特朗普的第一任期的国家安全战略报告，那份报告首次将中国定义 为"战略竞争对手"。从那以后，中美关系便发生了天翻 ...