值得注意的是，这一现象并非银行独有，消费金融公司、汽车金融公司等非银机构也在加大个贷不良资 产出清力度，共同印证了行业处置模式的转型。 银行下场卖房这一处置方式的利弊呈现多面性。对银行而言，直接卖房能显著提升资产处置效率，加速 资金回笼。同时通过自主把控交易流程，减少信息不对称带来的法律纠纷，最大限度保全资产价值。对 购房者来说，"直供房"成交价普遍低于市场价16%—31%，且交易流程规范透明，还能享受按揭贷款等 配套金融服务，有效解决了法拍房需全款支付的痛点，降低了"踩坑"风险。对市场而言，不良资产的有 序消化避免了恐慌性抛售对房价的冲击，为房地产市场健康发展筑牢缓冲垫。 "银行也在卖房了，比市场价低不少。"近期，兰州、广东等地银行通过线上平台直接挂牌"直供房"的消 息引发市场热议。这些房源凭借显著的价格优势和清晰的产权属性，成为刚需购房者的"捡漏"新选择。 而这背后，是金融机构不良资产处置从"被动清收"向"主动管理"转型的深刻变革。 银行"下场卖房"是特定经济环境下的选择。近年来，受经济下行压力与房地产市场深度调整影响，个人 按揭贷款断供、房地产开发贷款违约现象增多，银行持有的"法拍房""抵债资产"规模持 ...

Core Viewpoint - Banks are actively selling properties at prices significantly lower than market rates, driven by the need to manage non-performing assets and respond to economic pressures in the real estate market [1][2]. Group 1: Market Context - Recent economic downturns and deep adjustments in the real estate market have led to increased defaults on personal mortgage loans and real estate development loans, resulting in a growing scale of "foreclosure properties" and "debt settlement assets" held by banks [1]. - Traditional disposal channels for these assets have faced bottlenecks, with high rates of unsold foreclosure properties due to issues like unclear tax obligations and difficulties in clearing properties [1][3]. Group 2: Benefits of Direct Property Sales - Direct property sales by banks can significantly enhance asset disposal efficiency and accelerate capital recovery, while also reducing legal disputes through better control of the transaction process [2]. - Buyers benefit from "direct supply properties" that are generally priced 16% to 31% lower than market rates, with transparent transaction processes and access to mortgage services, addressing the challenges of full cash payments for foreclosure properties [2]. Group 3: Challenges and Risks - Banks may face challenges due to a lack of professional sales teams and market promotion experience, which could lead to inefficiencies and imbalances in cost and revenue [3]. - Potential issues with property rights and payment of property fees could result in disputes that harm the bank's reputation [3]. - The influx of low-priced properties into the market could temporarily suppress surrounding property prices, as seen in certain areas where average transaction prices have dropped [3]. Group 4: Alternative Asset Disposal Strategies - Besides direct sales, banks can utilize more mature and innovative methods for disposing of non-performing assets, such as packaging them for asset management companies (AMCs) that specialize in efficient asset disposal [4]. - Establishing "special asset divisions" or using asset securitization to attract capital market investors are also viable strategies for risk sharing and maximizing returns [4]. - For properties that are difficult to sell, converting them into long-term rental apartments or affordable rental housing aligns with policy directions and helps activate assets [4]. Group 5: Long-term Strategy - The decision for banks to sell properties directly is a tactical choice aimed at quickly mitigating risks and recovering funds, but it is essential to focus on preventing transaction disputes and reputation risks [4]. - A long-term solution involves building a multi-layered, professional, and market-oriented system for disposing of non-performing assets, with banks acting as financial providers and coordinators through collaboration with AMCs, technology companies, and local governments [4].

"比市场价低25%，产权直接跟银行签"——最近不少人刷到银行卖房子的消息，心里犯嘀咕：银行啥时候改行当房产中介了？这种"银行直供房"到底靠不靠 谱，能不能放心买？今天就用大白话跟你说透，想买低价房的千万别错过。 跟法拍房、中介二手房比，它的身份很特殊——产权在银行手里，没有个人房东的那些弯弯绕，这也是它最大的优势之一。 最近楼市里的 "银行直供房" 火得不行。农业银行、建设银行这些大银行，都在网上挂着房子卖，从一线城市的小两居到三四线的大房子，啥户型都有。 对想买房的刚需来说，这听着就像 "捡便宜" 的好机会，但不少人心里犯嘀咕：这银行直供房到底是啥？跟法拍房有啥不一样？这么便宜，会不会有坑？ 首先，得搞懂"银行直供房"到底是啥，其实大多是银行收来的法拍房、抵押房，不是开发商新盖的商品房。银行的目的很明确：把手里的"不良资产"变现， 不是来当"慈善卖房"的。所以别觉得银行卖的就没猫腻，反而因为房子来源特殊，问题可能更多。 比如产权问题，有些房子可能存在产权不清晰、有抵押没解完，甚至还有租约没到期的情况。你要是没查清楚就买，入住后可能被原房主、租客找上门，到 时候银行拍屁股不管，吃亏的还是你。 你以为银行降价是 ...

近日，国内头部信托机构中信信托将宝能系旗下宝能城有限公司一笔14.081亿元的不良债权公开挂牌处 置，引发业内广泛关注。 此次处置的债权包含借款本金10亿元、剩余利息2.265亿元及其他费用1.816亿元，抵押物为深圳市南山 区留仙大道北侧宝能城花园（东区）三期工程中的160套房产，房产产权属性为"商住混合用地/商业"。 《每日经济新闻》记者（以下简称每经记者）注意到，上述位于深圳核心区域的房产已存在二押、三 押、四押及司法查封等多重权利限制。 据披露，中信信托已就该笔债权向深圳市中级人民法院提起诉讼，诉求包括判令债务人支付回购价款、 特定资产收益款及违约金等相关费用，并主张对抵押物拍卖变卖价款享有优先受偿权，同时要求宝能地 产和宝能控股承担连带清偿责任。目前，该案已进入一审程序，预计2025年四季度开庭审理。 每经记者注意到，此次中信信托处置的宝能系资产，在竞价规则上，采用的是"不预设转让底价但设置 保留底价"的模式，打破了传统不良资产处置的定价惯例。 "过往比较传统的法拍方式是起拍价即保留价，起拍价差不多是参考价的70%。而不预设底价意味着潜 在投资者无需面对固定的门槛价格，保留底价估计主要是为了防止资产 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transfer of a non-performing debt associated with 160 properties in Shenzhen's Baoneng City, highlighting the complexities of the collateral and the implications for potential investors [2][4]. Group 1: Debt and Collateral Details - The total amount of the non-performing debt is approximately 1.408 billion yuan, consisting of a principal balance of 1 billion yuan, remaining interest of about 226 million yuan, and other fees totaling 182 million yuan [2]. - The collateral for the debt includes 160 properties located in the Baoneng City project, with individual property sizes ranging from 28 square meters to 123 square meters, designated for commercial and mixed-use purposes [2]. - There are concerns regarding the collateral being subject to multiple pledges and potential seizures, which could complicate the debt transaction [2][3]. Group 2: Legal and Market Context - The transfer of the debt is currently under litigation, with the transferor seeking various payments from the debtor, including penalties and legal fees, and asserting priority claims on the collateral's sale proceeds [4][5]. - The case is in the first-instance trial stage, with hearings expected in the fourth quarter of 2025, indicating a lengthy legal process ahead [5]. - Regulatory encouragement for financial institutions to adopt market-oriented methods for disposing of non-performing assets is noted, reflecting a broader strategy to mitigate financial risks [5]. Group 3: Market Implications - The properties involved are considered traditional quality projects, particularly given their location in Shenzhen, which may influence market perceptions [5]. - The potential for these properties to enter the auction market raises concerns about the impact on surrounding property prices, especially if a significant number of units are released simultaneously [5].

11月14日，国内头部信托机构中信信托将姚振华旗下宝能城有限公司一笔14.08亿元的不良债权公开挂牌处置，引发业内广泛关注。 此次处置的债权包含借款本金10亿元、剩余利息2.265亿元及其他费用1.816亿元，抵押物为深圳市南山区留仙大道北侧宝能城花园（东区）三期工程中的 160套房产，房产产权属性为"商住混合用地/商业"。 | | | | 公示附件 2: 债权明细表 | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 借款人 | 本金余额 | 剩余利息 | 其他费用 | 债权合计 | 抵押物 | 抵押 | 保证人 | | | (万元) | | (万元) | (万元) | | 人 | | | 宝能域有限 公司 | 100.000.000000 | 22,646.794521 | 18, 162, 584932 | 140,809.379453 | 深圳市南山区留仙 | | 宝能地产股份有 | | | | | | | 大道北侧宝能城花 | 宝能城 | 限公司、宝能控 | | | | | | | 园(东区)三期工程 | 有限公 | 股(中国) ...

Core Viewpoint - The disposal of a 1.408 billion yuan non-performing debt by CITIC Trust related to Baoneng City Limited has attracted significant industry attention, highlighting the ongoing financial struggles of the Baoneng Group and its assets in the real estate market [1][7]. Group 1: Debt Disposal Details - CITIC Trust is publicly auctioning a non-performing debt that includes a principal of 1 billion yuan, remaining interest of 226.5 million yuan, and other fees totaling 181.6 million yuan, secured by 160 residential-commercial mixed-use properties in Shenzhen [1][2]. - The auctioned properties are located in a core area of Shenzhen and are subject to multiple rights restrictions, including second, third, and fourth mortgages, as well as judicial seizures [2][4]. - The auction employs a "no preset transfer bottom price but with a reserved bottom price" bidding rule, which deviates from traditional practices in the disposal of non-performing assets [4][5]. Group 2: Market Context and Implications - The properties involved in the auction are part of the Baoneng City Garden project, which has seen active transactions in the Shenzhen real estate market, with current listings averaging 105,800 yuan per square meter [4]. - Baoneng Group has faced significant financial challenges, with over 50 billion yuan in total execution amounts reported as of November 2023, indicating a deepening debt crisis [7][8]. - The outcome of this debt disposal is expected to influence Baoneng's future debt restructuring efforts, potentially setting a precedent for other creditors regarding asset recovery strategies [8][9].

第一财经此前曾报道，据不完全梳理，包括农业银行、建设银行、交通银行等多家银行，近期均通过线 上平台大量直接销售房产。在京东资产拍卖平台或阿里资产拍卖平台上，部分银行在售房产标的已超千 套，处置速度明显加快。（详见 《低价"银行直供房"激增,有房产价格低于市价25%》 ）。这一现象 已在业内引发广泛关注。 银行为何加速推出直供房源？背后是多重因素的叠加推动。一方面，随着部分经营性贷款陆续到期，抵 押房产因当前房地产市场下行而面临价值重估，出现评估价低于原贷款金额的"价值倒挂"现象，导致部 分企业与个人面临续贷困难，违约房产随之进入处置流程；另一方面，银行自身也面临资本消耗、盈利 补充与房价预期下行的压力，加速处置抵债资产成为其优化资产负债表、释放资本空间的重要选择。 展望未来，业内普遍认为，目前一、二线城市涉房风险整体可控，但部分区域仍面临风险出清压力。在 此背景下，银行正积极拓展资产证券化等多元化处置渠道，探索存量房产的有效盘活路径，力求在稳步 化解金融风险的同时，实现资产价值的最大化回收。 本文字数：3236，阅读时长大约5分钟 作者 | 第一财经 王方然 2025.11. 16 有何原因？ 多位房地产业内 ...

展望未来，业内普遍认为，目前一、二线城市涉房风险整体可控，但部分区域仍面临风险出清压力。在此背景下，银 行正积极拓展资产证券化等多元化处置渠道，探索存量房产的有效盘活路径，力求在稳步化解金融风险的同时，实现 资产价值的最大化回收。 有何原因？ 多位房地产业内人士向第一财经表示，银行通过线上平台直接出售房产的"直供"模式近期显著增加，尤其是在部分区 域性银行中更为普遍，其标的物多为"抵债房产"，且这些地区的房价下行压力更为明显。有银行人士也证实了直供房 挂网数量逐年走高的趋势。需要说明的是，由于资产交易平台的统计口径往往包含了已结束、已撤销的场次以及同一 资产的重复挂牌，导致表面数据被高估。业内人士指出，若剔除这些因素，当前银行直供房在整体二手房市场规模中 的占比仍然有限。 那么，为何银行直供房数量短期内出现较快增长？ 部分业内人士认为，这与续贷风险有关。一位券商房地产首席分析师对第一财经表示，此前银行为支持实体经济，向 部分中小企业发放了以房产为抵押的经营贷款。如今三年周期陆续到期，抵押房产面临重新评估。受当前房地产市场 下行影响，这些房产估值普遍低于贷款发放时的估值，导致部分借款人出现资金缺口、难以按期还款 ...

Core Viewpoint - The auction of 160 residential and commercial properties owned by Baoneng City Limited, a subsidiary of Baoneng Group, has drawn significant attention due to the ongoing debt crisis faced by the Baoneng Group, with a total of 14.08 billion yuan in non-performing debt being publicly disposed of [1][5]. Group 1: Debt and Asset Disposal - The disposed debt includes a principal of 10 billion yuan, remaining interest of 2.265 billion yuan, and other fees totaling 1.816 billion yuan, secured by properties in a prime area of Shenzhen [1][2]. - Baoneng Group's overall executed amount has exceeded 50 billion yuan, with Baoneng Real Estate and Baoneng Automotive accounting for over 32 billion yuan and 12 billion yuan, respectively [6][7]. - The auction of the properties is part of a broader trend where Baoneng has been disposing of assets to alleviate its debt burden, with multiple assets already sold this year [5][7]. Group 2: Auction Mechanism - The auction employs a "no preset transfer price but with a reserved price" model, which deviates from traditional asset disposal practices, allowing for more flexible bidding without a fixed starting price [3][4]. - This new auction model is expected to challenge trust companies' asset management capabilities and may influence future debt restructuring processes for Baoneng [4][7]. Group 3: Market Implications - The outcome of this auction could set a precedent for other creditors regarding asset disposal and debt recovery strategies, potentially impacting Baoneng's future debt restructuring efforts [7]. - The properties in question are located in a highly active real estate market, with current listings showing an average price of 10.58 million yuan per square meter, indicating the potential value of the assets being auctioned [3][2].