Group 1 - The article discusses the significant geopolitical changes over the past two decades, particularly focusing on the Ukraine conflict and the evolution of the Iran nuclear issue, highlighting the unexpected escalation of violence and international tensions [1][2]. - The expansion of NATO, contrary to earlier promises made to Russia, is identified as a key factor that has contributed to the current instability in Ukraine, which is described as a "powder keg" situation [2]. - The U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal is noted as a pivotal moment that led to increased tensions, with subsequent military actions by Israel against Iranian targets further complicating the situation [2][3]. Group 2 - The article emphasizes the perception that the U.S. government relies on military force as a primary means of achieving its objectives, as evidenced by recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities [3]. - The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is highlighted, with criticism directed at U.S. policies that appear to disregard civilian casualties in favor of military objectives [2][3]. - The narrative suggests a regression in political civilization, where deceit and the violation of international norms have become commonplace, reflecting a troubling trend in global governance [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration's foreign policy is characterized as "predatory diplomacy," revealing a strong inclination towards territorial expansion and resource appropriation, reminiscent of colonial practices [2][3][4][5]. Group 1: U.S. Foreign Policy Actions - The Trump administration has openly expressed intentions to "take over" the Gaza Strip, suggesting that it is a target for U.S. acquisition [3]. - The administration has made claims about Canada becoming the "51st state," indicating a broader ambition to expand U.S. territory [3]. - There are reports of the U.S. pressuring Ukraine to relinquish mineral rights, showcasing a pattern of coercive diplomacy [3][13]. Group 2: International Reactions and Implications - Global reactions to U.S. actions have included significant market volatility, with investors beginning to divest from U.S. assets, indicating a shift towards "de-risking" from the U.S. economy [12]. - The European Central Bank's president has noted that the U.S.-led economic order is "collapsing," suggesting a potential decline in the dollar's dominance [12]. - Analysts have warned that the Trump administration's approach could lead to the fragmentation of the international order, with severe consequences for global trade and alliances [14]. Group 3: Historical Context and Ideological Underpinnings - The current U.S. foreign policy is compared to historical imperialistic actions, with references to the McKinley era and the Spanish-American War, highlighting a long-standing pattern of expansionism [7][9]. - The ideology of "Manifest Destiny" is invoked to explain the administration's belief in a natural right to expand U.S. influence globally [9][10]. - The Trump administration's approach is seen as a departure from traditional U.S. diplomacy, which has historically been more subtle in its imperialistic tendencies [11][14].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the dangers of unilateral trade practices by the United States, warning that such actions could lead the world back to a "law of the jungle" scenario, where all nations become victims of hegemonic behavior [1][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Trade Practices - The U.S. is accused of imposing tariffs on all trade partners and coercing them into making significant concessions under the guise of "reciprocal tariffs," which undermines existing international rules [1][3]. - The article highlights that if the international community allows the U.S. to act unchecked, it will result in a return to a predatory international environment, affecting all countries, especially the weaker ones [3][4]. Group 2: China's Position - China advocates for resolving disputes through negotiation and opposes unilateralism and protectionism, asserting that it is committed to defending its rights and preventing a regression to a "jungle world" [4][5]. - The article underscores China's significant market potential, being the second-largest consumer market globally, and its commitment to high-quality development, which includes green, digital, and intelligent transformations [5]. Group 3: Multilateralism and International Order - Both China and Australia are portrayed as beneficiaries and supporters of a multilateral system and free trade, emphasizing the importance of collective action to maintain international stability [1][5]. - The article calls for a united effort from the international community to uphold the UN-centered international system and the international order based on law, contributing to regional and global prosperity [4][5].