Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. for its unilateral actions and emphasizes that dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solutions to the Ukraine crisis [1] Group 1: China's Position on the Ukraine Crisis - China maintains a consistent and clear stance on the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the sole feasible path to resolution [1] - Since the onset of the crisis, China has upheld an objective and impartial position, promoting peace and talks [1] Group 2: Response to U.S. Actions - The Chinese government condemns the U.S. for what it describes as typical unilateral bullying, particularly regarding the imposition of tariffs on China due to its imports of Russian oil [1] - China firmly opposes the illegal unilateral sanctions and extraterritorial jurisdiction imposed by the U.S. [1] - Should China's legitimate rights and interests be harmed, the government asserts it will take resolute countermeasures to protect its sovereignty, security, and development interests [1]

Core Points - The 2025 Tianjin Summit marked a significant shift in India's foreign policy, with Prime Minister Modi fully endorsing the "Tianjin Declaration," indicating a major diplomatic adjustment driven by complex international dynamics and economic interests [3][4] - The backdrop of this shift includes India's previous reluctance to engage with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and recent tensions with Pakistan, which were exacerbated by the U.S. imposing high tariffs on Indian goods [4][6] Group 1: Diplomatic Shift - Modi's government underwent a 180-degree turn in its diplomatic stance, moving from a position of isolation to active engagement with the SCO [3][4] - The U.S. imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, leading to a significant economic downturn for India, with GDP growth plummeting to 4.8% [6] - India's perception of U.S. tariffs as "unilateral bullying" prompted a strong internal response, including Modi's refusal to engage with Trump [6] Group 2: Economic Opportunities - The Tianjin Summit resulted in the signing of 10 cooperation agreements between China and India, including the establishment of a military communication channel to address border issues [8] - The reopening of previously closed border markets led to a trading volume exceeding 3.8 million RMB on the first day [8] - The inclusion of Indian companies in China's rare earth export list is crucial for India's defense and industrial sectors, given its 70% reliance on Chinese imports for rare earth materials [8] Group 3: The Tianjin Declaration - The "Tianjin Declaration" opposes Western unilateralism and condemns military actions against Iran, aligning with India's international stance [9][11] - The declaration proposes the establishment of the SCO Development Bank and emphasizes military cooperation and digital economic innovation, providing India with a platform to reduce dependence on Western financial institutions [11] - The declaration's historical references are seen as a diplomatic blow to Japan, highlighting India's stance on World War II narratives [14] Group 4: Media Interpretation - Indian media displayed a tendency for self-interpretation regarding the declaration's commitment to combating terrorism, despite the absence of specific references to recent attacks [15] - The portrayal of interactions between Modi and Pakistani Prime Minister Sharif was exaggerated by Indian media to emphasize regional tensions [16]

Core Points - The eighth round of China-Germany diplomatic and security strategic dialogue was held in Berlin, emphasizing the importance of the relationship between the two countries as they enter a new decade of partnership [1][2] - Both sides acknowledged the need for enhanced strategic communication and cooperation to address global challenges such as protectionism and unilateralism, aiming to provide more certainty to the world [1][2] Group 1 - Wang Yi highlighted that 2025 marks the 50th anniversary of China-Europe diplomatic relations, indicating a critical juncture for China-Germany relations [1] - The dialogue reaffirmed the commitment to mutual respect, seeking common ground while reserving differences, and the principle of win-win cooperation as the foundation for sustained development [2] - Both parties agreed to continue close communication and coordination on various international issues, including the Ukraine crisis and the Iran nuclear issue, to contribute to peace and conflict resolution [2] Group 2 - Wang Yi expressed appreciation for Germany's positive and rational approach towards developing relations with China, urging Germany to support China's efforts for national reunification [2] - The German Foreign Minister, Baerbock, reiterated Germany's commitment to the One China policy and the importance of maintaining a reliable and predictable partnership with China [2] - The dialogue underscored the historical and cultural ties between China and Germany, emphasizing the need for constructive engagement to manage differences [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China, particularly focusing on the impending expiration of a 90-day tariff suspension and the potential for increased tariffs from the U.S. on various countries, including China [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Strategy - The U.S. government has initiated a policy of imposing high tariffs globally under the guise of "reciprocity," with a 90-day negotiation window that is nearing its end [1][3]. - President Trump has indicated that he does not plan to extend the 90-day suspension and will soon communicate new tariff rates, which could range from 10% to 50% [3]. - The U.S. aims to leverage high tariffs to address its long-standing trade deficit and is pressuring other countries to reduce trade with China as a condition for tariff exemptions [3]. Group 2: China's Response - China has firmly opposed the U.S. unilateral actions, labeling them as bullying tactics that undermine the multilateral trade system [3][8]. - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has stated that any country attempting to sacrifice China's interests for U.S. tariff relief will face strong countermeasures from China [3][8]. - China has demonstrated its resolve in past trade negotiations, achieving certain agreements through strategic positioning and firm stances [3]. Group 3: Other Countries' Positions - Japan is struggling to reach a consensus with the U.S. on auto tariffs, with some factions suggesting sacrificing Chinese interests to gain leverage in negotiations [6][7]. - The EU has temporarily suspended high-level economic dialogues with China to focus on U.S. negotiations, with some politicians advocating for a united front against China [7]. - India has taken steps that appear to align with U.S. interests, such as imposing tariffs on Chinese steel, raising questions about its commitment to its strategic partnership with China [8]. Group 4: Potential Consequences - The article highlights the risks for countries that align with U.S. interests at the expense of China, particularly in sectors like rare earths, where China holds significant leverage [8][10]. - The U.S. faces challenges in managing simultaneous trade negotiations with multiple countries, raising doubts about the effectiveness of its tariff strategy [10]. - The article concludes that the ongoing trade tensions could lead to broader instability in the global economy, emphasizing the interconnectedness of nations in a globalized world [10].

Group 1 - The Chinese government firmly opposes sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff reductions and will retaliate if such situations arise [1] - The U.S. has been pressuring other countries to agree to its terms in trade negotiations, with a deadline approaching on July 9 [1] - Countries like India and Japan are hesitant to make concessions, particularly regarding tariffs, as these issues are critical to their economies [1] Group 2 - Canada has implemented a digital services tax targeting U.S. tech companies, which has led to a breakdown in trade negotiations with the U.S. [3] - The Canadian government is also seeking to diversify trade relationships, evidenced by its new strategic partnership agreement with the EU [3] - The EU is preparing substantial countermeasures to protect its interests amid ongoing trade tensions with the U.S. [3] Group 3 - The U.S. is considering extending the tariff exemption period due to difficulties in reaching agreements with multiple countries before the deadline [5] - There is a temporary compromise among G7 countries regarding tariffs, which reflects a mutual exchange of interests rather than a resolution of underlying conflicts [5] - The U.S. aims to repair relationships with allies to coordinate pressure on China, but this may not be sustainable in the long term [8] Group 4 - China has made it clear that it will not accept any agreements that compromise its interests and will respond firmly to any such actions [10] - The international trade landscape is shifting, with an emphasis on equal negotiations and adherence to multilateral trade rules for mutual benefit [10] - Countries considering sacrificing their interests for U.S. tariff reductions should weigh the potential consequences of China's retaliation [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of a healthy and stable China-Europe relationship, highlighting the need for multilateralism and cooperation to address global challenges [1] Group 1: China-Europe Relations - Xi Jinping expresses a strong commitment to the development of China-Europe relations, viewing the 50th anniversary of diplomatic ties as an opportunity to deepen strategic communication and mutual understanding [1] - The article mentions the need to consolidate partnership positioning and expand mutual openness while managing differences and conflicts [1] Group 2: Global Challenges and Multilateralism - The article calls for both sides to uphold multilateralism, defend fairness and justice, and oppose unilateral bullying [1] - It stresses the importance of jointly promoting a multipolar world and inclusive economic globalization to contribute to global peace, stability, development, and prosperity [1]

Group 1 - The Trump administration is reportedly pressuring other countries to limit trade with China in exchange for tariff exemptions, showcasing a unilateral approach to trade negotiations [1] - The U.S. has imposed tariffs under the guise of "reciprocity," which has been criticized as a form of economic coercion and unilateral bullying [1][4] - The U.S. military is heavily reliant on Chinese exports for critical materials, such as gallium and germanium, which are essential for advanced military technology like the F-35 fighter jet [3] Group 2 - China's response to U.S. tariffs has included significant retaliatory measures, impacting U.S. agricultural markets, particularly with a 25% tariff on soybeans leading to an 18% drop in prices [3] - The Chinese government has issued strong statements regarding the need for equal dialogue with the U.S. and has set clear conditions for negotiations, including respect for China's sovereignty [6] - There is a growing sentiment within the U.S. political landscape questioning the importance of Taiwan, indicating a potential shift in U.S. foreign policy towards the region [8]

Core Viewpoint - The international situation is complex and volatile, with heightened geopolitical tensions and ongoing unilateral bullying, leading to severe challenges in the global refugee crisis [1] Group 1 - The global refugee situation is becoming increasingly severe and challenging [1] - Countries should abandon practices that create divisions and provoke conflicts on the international stage [1] - There is a call for nations to reject unilateralism and bullying behavior [1]

215 | 国务院常务会议: 漫定股市 Financial Weekly 母周金融评论 . . 重大事件 EVENTS ◎ 特朗普称可立即让美联储主席走人 Financial Weekly 每周金融评论 | 目录 CONTENTS 热点聚焦 OCUS ◎ 国务院常务会议·要持续稳定股市、持续推动房地产市场 平稳健康发展 ◎ 商务部:坚决反对任何一方以牺牲中方利益为代价达成交易, 将坚决对等反制 MEETINGS ◎ 国家发改委主任郑栅洁主持召开推动低空经济发展工作会议 重大政策 POLICES ◎ 欧洲央行下调三大关键利率25个基点 重要数字 DATA ◎ 美国股汇双杀，美元指数暴跌1％，美国股指期货走低 © 现货黄金史上首次站上3300美元/盎司 JP/UI 1-12 热点聚 焦 国务院常务会议：要持续稳定股市，持续推动房地产市场平稳健康发展 4月18日，国务院总理李强主持召开国务院常务会议。会议指出，面对复杂严峻的外部环境，要深入贯彻中央经济工作会议部 署，加力落实《政府工作报告》明确的政策措施，锚定经济社会发展目标，加大逆周期调节力度，着力稳就业稳外贸，着力促消 费扩内需，着力优结构提质量，做强国内大循 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the U.S. government's decision to impose "reciprocal tariffs" on Chinese goods, which is viewed as a unilateral and bullying action that violates international trade rules and harms China's legitimate rights and interests [1][3]. Summary by Sections Tariff Imposition - Starting from April 10, 2025, a 34% additional tariff will be imposed on all imported goods from the U.S. on top of the existing tariff rates [1]. - The current policies regarding bonded and tax exemption remain unchanged, and the additional tariffs will not be exempted [2]. Legal Actions and Responses - China has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. in the World Trade Organization (WTO) regarding the imposition of these "reciprocal tariffs," claiming it violates WTO rules and undermines the multilateral trade system [3][4]. - The Chinese government emphasizes its role as a defender of international trade order and urges the U.S. to correct its actions and remove the unilateral tariff measures [4]. Unreliable Entity List - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has added Skydio Inc. and 10 other U.S. companies to an unreliable entity list, prohibiting them from engaging in import and export activities related to China and from making new investments in China [5]. - The announcement is based on various Chinese laws aimed at protecting national sovereignty and security [5][6]. Suspension of Import Qualifications - The General Administration of Customs has suspended the import qualifications of six U.S. companies due to inspection and quarantine issues, affecting products such as sorghum and poultry [10].