日本与美国围绕关税问题进行了七轮谈判，但始终未能达成一致，反而激怒了美国，导致美国加大了对日本的制裁力度。这使得日本感到多年对美的妥协与 付出全都付诸东流，情绪激烈反弹。 石破茂亲自登上电视节目，公开表达了强硬立场，誓言将继续与美国抗争，坚决不允许日本被无端欺压。尽管他言辞坚定并付诸行动，但日本当前的国力尚 不足以正面硬碰美国，若继续拖延，恐怕只会被美国更严厉地压制。 面对困境，石破茂转而把目光投向中国，并作出关键承诺，急切定调中日关系。问题是，石破茂真的愿意放下针对中方的立场吗？他对美日关系态度的转变 透露了怎样的深层信号？ 7月10日，在马来西亚吉隆坡，中国外长王毅与日本外相岩屋毅进行了会晤。王毅强调："要稳定中日关系，日本必须树立客观公正的中国观，并采取积极理 性的对华政策。"岩屋毅对此态度诚恳，主动提及历史问题，承诺认真面对。 这场会谈虽未引起广泛关注，但对日本来说却是被逼无奈的选择。一个月前，特朗普突然宣布自8月1日起，对所有日韩商品征收25%的关税，直接撕裂了长 期以来美日同盟的表面和谐。 其实美国频繁运用关税作为贸易武器，从中美贸易战到对欧盟钢铝征税，如今又针对日本。美方惯用策略是先施压再谈判， ...

Group 1 - The Chinese government firmly opposes sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff reductions and will retaliate if such situations arise [1] - The U.S. has been pressuring other countries to agree to its terms in trade negotiations, with a deadline approaching on July 9 [1] - Countries like India and Japan are hesitant to make concessions, particularly regarding tariffs, as these issues are critical to their economies [1] Group 2 - Canada has implemented a digital services tax targeting U.S. tech companies, which has led to a breakdown in trade negotiations with the U.S. [3] - The Canadian government is also seeking to diversify trade relationships, evidenced by its new strategic partnership agreement with the EU [3] - The EU is preparing substantial countermeasures to protect its interests amid ongoing trade tensions with the U.S. [3] Group 3 - The U.S. is considering extending the tariff exemption period due to difficulties in reaching agreements with multiple countries before the deadline [5] - There is a temporary compromise among G7 countries regarding tariffs, which reflects a mutual exchange of interests rather than a resolution of underlying conflicts [5] - The U.S. aims to repair relationships with allies to coordinate pressure on China, but this may not be sustainable in the long term [8] Group 4 - China has made it clear that it will not accept any agreements that compromise its interests and will respond firmly to any such actions [10] - The international trade landscape is shifting, with an emphasis on equal negotiations and adherence to multilateral trade rules for mutual benefit [10] - Countries considering sacrificing their interests for U.S. tariff reductions should weigh the potential consequences of China's retaliation [10]

Group 1 - The second China-Central Asia Summit was held in Astana, Kazakhstan from June 16 to 18, 2025, resulting in a series of cooperation agreements aimed at enhancing economic and trade collaboration between China and the five Central Asian countries [2][3] - Trade and investment were highlighted as key areas of focus, with a commitment to diversify trade structures, simplify trade procedures, and upgrade investment agreements, leading to a historical high of 286.42 billion RMB in trade volume in the first five months of the year, a 10.4% year-on-year increase [3] - The summit's outcomes are expected to deepen economic cooperation, particularly in emerging sectors such as renewable energy and digital economy, enhancing the quality of collaboration [3][4] Group 2 - The cooperation framework emphasizes complementary development, particularly in green minerals, new energy, and agriculture, aligning with mutual interests and enhancing the quality of partnerships [4] - The energy sector is transitioning from a traditional one-way export model to a comprehensive cooperation model, focusing on the entire energy supply chain and promoting sustainable development through collaboration in wind and hydropower [4] - The summit also reinforced the commitment to a multilateral trade system based on WTO rules, advocating for the liberalization and facilitation of trade and investment, which is timely given the current global trade challenges [5]

Group 1 - The current global economic situation is characterized by chaos, particularly since the Trump administration's policies, including high tariffs and significant government spending cuts [1][2][4] - Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods have reached as high as 145%, which contradicts his stated goal of increasing fiscal revenue, as such high rates deter American consumers from purchasing these goods [2][4] - The preference for bilateral trade negotiations over multilateral agreements under Trump's administration is seen as less efficient and more destabilizing, leading to increased uncertainty in international relations [4][8] Group 2 - Elon Musk's approach to reducing government spending overlooks the essential public functions that government agencies serve, particularly in funding basic research, which is crucial for long-term economic growth [5][6] - The U.S. government invests approximately $70 billion annually in basic research, which is vital for technological advancements and overall economic progress [5][6] - The misconception that private funding can fully support basic research fails to account for the public good aspect of such research, which often benefits society as a whole [6][8] Group 3 - The independence of central banks from political influence is crucial for effective monetary policy, as political leaders may prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term stability [9][10] - The long tenure of Federal Reserve Board members (14 years) allows for a focus on long-term monetary policy rather than short-term political pressures [10] - Local government revenue generation methods differ significantly between the U.S. and China, impacting their ability to incentivize businesses effectively [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The Cambodian Prime Minister, Hun Manet, emphasizes that the current crisis due to the U.S. government's plan to impose a 49% reciprocal tariff presents an opportunity to enhance industrial capabilities and promote diversification [1][2]. Group 1: Economic Strategy - The Cambodian government plans to attract high value-added industries, such as the automotive and electronics sectors, to reduce dependency on the U.S. market [2]. - There will be support for initiatives aimed at increasing the value added in competitive agricultural sectors [2]. Group 2: Trade Relations - Hun Manet advocates for the promotion of free trade and the deepening of bilateral and multilateral trade relationships [2]. - He believes that under pressure, countries will unite more to address the impacts of tariffs [2]. Group 3: Regional Challenges - The Prime Minister highlights the need for regional policies to focus on the happiness of the people, addressing issues such as conflict risks, climate change, and demographic shifts [2]. - He warns against extreme rhetoric and radical nationalism, calling for an emphasis on peaceful international cooperation [2].

今年2月莫迪去美国谈贸易翻倍，特朗普还答应卖F-35战机给印度，这种装备连美国盟友都未必能轻易拿到。印度是金砖国家成员，但这次行为明 显跟中国提议的"共同对抗美国霸凌"对着干。中国外长在巴西开会时还强调要维护多边贸易，结果印度直接单干。之前金砖要扩员，印度就怕自 己话语权被稀释，偷偷反对拖慢进度，现在又跟美国跑这么快。印度人自己好像也闹矛盾。印度去年军费全球前三，买的都是美国和法国装备。 美国副总统万斯前段时间，访问印度希望能尽快达成关税协议。 据环球网报道，金砖国家外长会晤近日在巴西里约热内卢结束。巴西外长维埃拉在会后举行的记者会上说，与会外长们就反对全球"关税战"达成 共识，坚决反对贸易保护主义维埃拉说："我们坚决反对贸易保护主义死灰复燃以及以环境为借口采取的一些非关税措施。我们认为世界贸易组织 改革对解决贸易争端至关重要。"会晤发表主席声明说，外长们严重关切违反世贸组织规则的、不公正的单边保护主义行径，包括滥施对等关税。 莫迪与普京（资料图） 巴西作为轮值主席国发布声明，未直接点名美国。但在座的基本都是这次特朗普关税战的见证者，到底说谁，大家也一清二楚。然而，俄罗斯当 年的短视，为了阻碍中国掌控金砖组织 ...

中美关税战打得火热，中国沉得住气，接连迎来援手，美国却被特朗普折腾得够呛，第一季度GDP直接萎缩0.3%，特朗普却说"衰退也能接受"，反观中国， 沉得住气，还接连得到外部助力。 OPEC+突然增产石油，金砖国家也发声批单边主义，美国却在盟友圈里越混越孤立，美媒直言，特朗普百天就把美国百年攒下的优势败光了，这场博弈， 到底谁占了上风？ 与此同时，金砖国家也在巴西开了外长会，给了中国另一记助力，会议结束时，主席声明直接开火，猛批单边贸易保护主义，呼吁全球一起维护多边贸易和 自由贸易体系，虽然印度从中作梗，没让会议出联合声明，也没点名美国，但明眼人都看得出来，这声明句句针对特朗普的高关税政策。 金砖国家这几年影响力越来越大，代表了新兴经济体的声音，他们集体发声，不光是在给中国撑腰，更是在向全球传递信号：单边主义不得人心，贸易战没 前途。这对美国来说，是个不小的外交打击，毕竟贸易规则这东西，美国过去一直是制定者，现在却被新兴国家反过来批评，脸面往哪儿搁？ 更让特朗普头疼的，是美国在盟友圈里也混不下去了，加拿大和澳大利亚最近刚结束选举，结果都差不多：想跟特朗普套近乎的势力，全都摔了个大跟头。 澳大利亚联盟党党魁达顿，公 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary is engaging with other countries to form agreements aimed at countering China, requiring them to reject the possibility of re-exporting Chinese products and to scrutinize Chinese investments [1] - The Trump administration is reportedly pressuring other nations to limit trade with China in exchange for U.S. tariff exemptions, which has been met with strong opposition from China [3][5] - China has publicly warned that any country sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff exemptions will face reciprocal measures, emphasizing its determination to protect its rights [5][7] Group 2 - India has recently announced a temporary 12% tariff on certain imported steel products, marking a significant shift in its trade policy amid the ongoing trade tensions initiated by the Trump administration [7] - Historical evidence suggests that countries compromising long-term cooperation for short-term gains will ultimately face backlash, reinforcing the need for fair principles and international coordination [7]