来源：天天基金网 中国经济网北京7月17日讯 今日，浙商基金发布浙商惠丰定期开放债券型证券投资基金清算报告。 报告称，浙商惠丰定期开放债券型证券投资基金（以下简称"本基金"）于2016年8月1日起基金合同生效， 浙商惠丰定期开放债券型证券投资基金基金份额持有人大会于2025年6月16日表决通过了《关于终止浙商惠丰 定期开放债券型证券投资基金基金合同有关事项的议案》。 牛冠群在管基金一览 （责任编辑：康博） 来源：天天基金网 对于清算原因，报告称："因为市场环境变化，本基金规模存量较小，为保护基金份额持有人的利益，根 据《中华人民共和国证券投资基金法》、《公开募集证券投资基金运作管理办法》、本基金基金合同等有关规 定，并经与本基金托管人协商一致，公司提议召开基金份额持有人大会对终止《基金合同》并进行基金财产清 算事宜进行审议。并于2025年6月16日表决通过了《关于终止浙商惠丰定期开放债券型证券投资基金基金合同 有关事项的议案》，本基金自2025年6月18日起进入基金财产清算程序。" 根据中国经济网记者了解，浙商惠丰定开债在2016年8月1日成立时的规模为5亿元，截至2025年6月17日 （基金最后运作日），基 ...

东方基金权益研究部总经理王然管理的多只产品长期业绩不佳，引发持有人强烈不满。部分投资者损失惨重，有人15万本金仅剩4万多元。东方基金作为老 牌公募机构，用时20年才突破千亿规模，但旗下"迷你基"扎堆现象严重，多只权益产品面临清盘风险。 基金经理业绩持续低迷 具体来看，东方民丰回报赢安混合规模不足300万元，东方创新医疗股票、东方匠心优选混合等5只产品规模不足3000万元。发起式基金中，东方专精特新混 合发起式规模不足1800万元，该产品将在今年底迎来"三年大考"。东方养老目标2050五年持有混合发起规模不足1.1亿元，该产品将在明年11月面临考验。 王然目前管理3只产品，现任基金资产管理总规模为2.05亿元。其在管基金最佳任期回报为-10.19%，创下其公募职业生涯的最差表现。东方新兴成长混合基 金今年以来收益微涨0.06%，在同类近2300只产品中排名2133位。东方品质消费一年持有期混合A在同类4500余只产品中排名4154位。 王然在2020年至2021年期间陆续卸任了多只产品，任职回报在4%至68%不等。从持仓情况看，她在2020年押中白酒股，东方新兴成长混合基金当年收益率 超过90%。2021年二三 ...

6只发起式基金相继退场 这家公募同日发布2只产品清盘公告。8月4日，申万菱信基金宣布旗下申万菱信碳中和智选混合发起式、申万菱信养老目标日期2040三年持有期混合 发起式（FOF）合同终止并进行财产清算。至此，年内该公募已有6只基金相继清盘，且全部为发起式基金。有业内人士指出，多只基金相继清盘或 将给公司带来一定的负面影响，市场可能对该公司投研管理能力产生质疑。对于规模相对偏小的存量产品，公司可以通过强化渠道营销，投入更多资 源来减少基金清盘情形。同时也应该进一步提升公司投研品牌的影响力。 整体来看，申万菱信基金旗下仍有不少"迷你"产品。Wind数据显示，截至2025年二季度末，申万菱信基金旗下数据可取得的81只产品中（份额合并 计算，下同），17只产品规模不足5000万元，其中包括11只发起式基金。具体到产品类型来看，申万菱信竞争优势混合、申万菱信价值精选混合等4 只主动权益类基金已规模迷你。债基方面，申万菱信稳鑫90天滚动持有中短债规模甚至已不足1000万元。 需多角度着手减少基金清盘情形 公开信息显示，"老牌"公募申万菱信基金成立于2004年1月，距今已有21年。股东方面，中央汇金公司控股的申万宏源证券持 ...

Group 1 - The overall A-share market is experiencing a fluctuating upward trend, yet some public equity funds are facing continuous shrinkage in scale, triggering liquidation conditions [1] - As of July 16, 50 active equity funds have entered liquidation procedures this year, with initiated funds being particularly affected [1][3] - The case of Zhongyin Securities Huize Jinqi 3-Month Holding Fund highlights the challenges faced by small and medium-sized fund companies in the FOF product layout, as its net asset value was only 0.28 billion yuan, significantly below the 2 billion yuan safety line [3][4] Group 2 - The "three-year test" for initiated funds has become a primary reason for liquidation, as funds must maintain a net asset value of at least 2 billion yuan after three years to avoid termination [4] - The increase in the number of liquidated equity funds is attributed to structural market conditions, where capital is concentrated in top funds and track-type products, diminishing the appeal of smaller funds [4] - Analysts suggest that the liquidation of initiated funds should not be viewed merely as failure but as a reflection of market competition, urging fund companies to carefully assess product strategies and resource alignment [4]

Group 1 - The core issue in the industry is the ongoing rumors of mergers, particularly involving Hai Futong and Hua An Fund, which are facing significant challenges such as frequent fund liquidations and poor performance [2][15] - Hai Futong has seen a wave of fund liquidations, with seven funds being liquidated in 2025 alone, and 19 funds currently below the 50 million threshold for liquidation [5][9] - The product structure of Hai Futong is heavily skewed towards bond and money market funds, which account for 84% of its total fund size, while equity funds only total 7.891 billion [11][12] Group 2 - Hua An Fund is also struggling, with 5 funds liquidated this year and 17% of its funds below the 50 million threshold, indicating a similar trend to Hai Futong [19][16] - The performance of equity products at Hua An Fund is weak, with many fund managers reporting negative returns, raising concerns about the overall management and strategy [20][22] - The management turmoil at Hai Futong, including the recent appointment of a new chairman without prior fund industry experience, complicates the resolution of its performance issues [14][30] Group 3 - The merger rumors between Hai Futong and Hua An Fund are driven by regulatory compliance issues following the merger of their parent companies, which necessitates the integration of their fund management operations [15][19] - Both companies have similar product structures, with a significant portion of their assets in bond and money market funds, limiting their growth potential in equity markets [16][18] - The historical performance of both funds has been marred by scandals, including a recent case of insider trading involving a former Hua An Fund manager, which has further damaged investor trust [24][34]

Core Viewpoint - The report from Furong Fund indicates that the Furong Medical Health Mixed Fund will enter liquidation due to its total fund size falling below 200 million RMB by June 28, 2025, which triggers the termination clause in the fund contract [1] Fund Performance Summary - The fund was established on June 28, 2022, and will cease operations on June 28, 2025, with a total fund size of 12,369,681.57 shares at the end of its operation [1] - The net asset value for Class A shares is 0.7920 RMB, with a total of 11,555,608.85 shares, while Class C shares have a net asset value of 0.7825 RMB and a total of 814,072.72 shares [1] - The fund has experienced cumulative losses of 20.8% for Class A and 21.75% for Class C over its three-year lifespan [1] Management Background - The fund has been managed by Li Huanghai since its inception, who has extensive experience in various investment roles across multiple firms [2] - Currently, Li Huanghai also manages three other funds, with only one, Furong Fuyue Mixed Fund, slightly outperforming its peers, while the other two, including Furong Value Selection Mixed Fund, have seen significant declines, with the latter down over 38% in nearly two years [2]

Group 1 - The number of fund liquidations in the year has reached 136, indicating a normalization of fund closures due to scale pressure or a decrease in the number of holders [1] - The number of liquidated funds has decreased by 50% year-on-year, despite a recovery in A-shares and Hong Kong stocks [1] - Equity funds remain the dominant type of liquidated funds, with a total of 88 funds, accounting for 65% of the closures [1] Group 2 - 33 bond funds have been liquidated, along with 14 FOF funds and 1 QDII fund [1] - Not all liquidated funds are from unpopular sectors; several popular themes such as dividends, pharmaceuticals, and Hong Kong-related funds have also been closed [1]

Core Insights - The rise of "initiated funds" has led to a significant number of funds facing liquidation due to not meeting the 200 million yuan threshold after three years [1][2] - Despite the high rate of liquidation, initiated funds remain a key strategy for fund companies, raising questions about their sustainability and operational costs [4][5] Group 1: Fund Liquidation Trends - As of July 15, 2023, 43 initiated funds have been liquidated this year due to failing to reach the required 200 million yuan, marking a historical high [1][2] - The average decline in value for these funds over three years is 18.65%, with nearly half experiencing a drop of over 20% [3][4] - Specific sectors like renewable energy and healthcare have seen significant performance issues, with some funds reporting cumulative returns as low as -53.43% [2][3] Group 2: Fund Company Strategies - Fund companies continue to launch initiated funds despite the risks, with over 404 such funds issued in 2023 alone [4][5] - The relatively relaxed establishment conditions for initiated funds allow companies to quickly enter niche markets and develop new fund managers [6][7] - Initiated funds serve as a "incubation" platform for new strategies and managers, providing opportunities in less recognized sectors [6][7] Group 3: Future Outlook - As of mid-July 2023, 183 initiated funds are approaching their three-year mark, with 98 of them still below the 200 million yuan threshold, indicating potential future liquidations [7] - Some initiated funds have successfully surpassed the threshold, such as the Yongying Advanced Manufacturing Fund, which has achieved a cumulative return of 82.35% [7]

Core Viewpoint - The recent wave of fund liquidations is seen as a necessary process of market self-purification, reflecting a survival of the fittest mechanism in the investment landscape [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Liquidation Trends - In 2024, over 300 funds have been liquidated, marking a record high, with 129 funds announcing liquidation in the first half of the year, an increase compared to the same period last year [1]. - Many of the liquidated funds failed to meet the minimum scale requirement, indicating rational choices made by investors as they shift funds towards products that can generate long-term returns [1]. - The average scale of the bottom 20% of actively managed equity funds has significantly shrunk, while the top 20% of products have seen substantial growth in their share [1]. Group 2: Market Mechanism and Fund Structure - The liquidation process serves as a necessary pain for market self-correction, with the total number of public funds nearing 13,000, including over 1,600 "mini funds" with scales below 50 million [1]. - The excess of products has led to resource allocation imbalances, and liquidation is a form of automatic correction for ineffective supply [1]. - Regulatory bodies have been optimizing the fund exit mechanism, encouraging the liquidation of "zombie products," which has prompted fund companies to abandon the "shell protection" strategy [1]. Group 3: Implications for Investors - Investors are encouraged to focus on the underlying logic of products, such as the stability of fund managers, the adaptability of strategies, and the company's resource investment, to avoid "high-risk liquidation" products [2]. - When encountering liquidated funds, investors should seize the opportunity to adjust their portfolios and utilize conversion functions to seamlessly transition to quality funds, preventing cash from being idle [2]. - The process of fund liquidation is compared to the elimination of outdated capacities in the solar industry, suggesting that it is a transformative change that expands effective supply and is a necessary step towards market maturity [2].

Core Viewpoint - The recent wave of fund liquidations is a natural outcome of market mechanisms, reflecting a process of self-purification and the survival of the fittest in the investment landscape [1][2] Group 1: Fund Liquidation Trends - In 2024, over 300 funds have been liquidated, marking a record high, with 129 funds announcing liquidation in the first half of the year, an increase compared to the same period last year [1] - Many of the liquidated funds failed to meet the minimum scale threshold, indicating rational choices by investors as they shift funds towards products that can generate long-term returns [1] Group 2: Market Mechanism and Fund Structure - The liquidation process serves as a necessary pain for market self-correction, with the total number of public funds nearing 13,000, yet over 1,600 funds classified as "mini funds" with assets below 50 million yuan [1] - The regulatory body has been optimizing the fund exit mechanism, encouraging the liquidation of "zombie products," which has led fund companies to abandon the "shell protection" strategy and focus on competitive products [1][2] Group 3: Impact on Investment Strategies - The reduction of low-efficiency supply through liquidation promotes the optimization of fund structures and directs capital towards new productive themes [2] - Investors are advised to focus on core indicators such as the stability of fund managers, the adaptability of strategies, and resource allocation to avoid "high-risk liquidation" products [2]