2月26日，中国国家电脑病毒应急处理中心等发表《头号玩家——美国技术霸权下的全球虚拟货币资产 收割行动深层解析》报告，据不完全统计指，2022-2025年，美国通过各类案件累计全球没收虚拟货币 资产价值超过300亿美元。 涉及柬埔寨跨国犯罪太子集团创办人陈志案没收规模达150亿美元，涉约12.7万枚比特币，占没收资产 比重50%。针对加密货币交易所币安(Binance)及其创办人赵长鹏发起"民事+刑事"案，最终币安须支付 合共43亿美元罚款，赵长鹏签署认罪协议后被特赦。没收两人资产合共193亿美元，占整体比重达逾 64%。 报告还指，美国通过技术霸权收割全球虚拟资产，本质为维护其经济霸权及美元地位，一方面通过没 收、罚款方式直接掠夺，另一方面通过掌控虚拟资产监管规则及交易流动，将数码金融体系纳入美元主 导的全球金融框架。美国通过公开拍卖变现资产而获利巨大。单是2013年美国联邦调查局关闭暗网交易 平台"丝绸之路"所获比特币，于2014至2025年1月透过拍卖，收益超过100亿美元。 美股频道更多独家策划、专家专栏，免费查阅>> 责任编辑：山上 报告指，去年10月，美国纽约东区联邦检察官办公室宣布对陈志发起刑事 ...

这数字什么概念？相当于某些小国几十年都挣不回来的家底。而美国，只是动动手指，敲敲键盘，钱就 进了自己的腰包。 更扎心的是，这还不是全部。 两个案子就占了近200亿——一个叫陈志，一个叫赵长鹏。一个被没收150亿美元，一个被罚了43亿美 元。一前一后，一黑一白，愣是把全球虚拟货币市场割得鲜血淋漓。 ——镰刀挥向全球，却打着法律的旗号，这才是最高级的收割 说实话，看完这份最新报告，脑子里蹦出一句话： "你以为你在炒币，其实你在给美国交税。" 2月26日，国内几个权威部门联合甩出一份报告，揭开了一个让人目瞪口呆的事实——过去三年，美国 通过各类案件，累计从全球没收了超过300亿美元的虚拟货币资产。 300亿美元。 这哪是什么"打击犯罪"？这分明是一场精心设计的"数字围猎"。 ...

源：界面图库 跨境赌诈犯罪集团头目陈志今年初已被从柬埔寨押解回国。2026年2月26日，国家计算病毒应急处理中 心微信公众号发布《"头号玩家"——美国技术霸权下的全球虚拟货币资产收割行动深层解析》一文披 露，美国通过陈志案单案没收约12.7万枚比特币，获利150亿美元。 该文作者显示有4家单位，分别是为国家计算机病毒应急处理中心 、计算机病毒防治技术国家工程实验 室、360数字安全集团和安天科技集团股份有限公司。 据著名虚拟货币跟踪调查机构CoinGecko的统计数据，截至2026年1月底，全球虚拟货币资产总市值约 为2.73万亿美元，其中比特币总市值达到约1.57万亿美元。而同期，各国央行的黄金储备价值约为5.83 万亿美元，这意味着虚拟货币资产市值已达到全球官方黄金储备总市值的47%左右，已经接近一半，成 为不可忽视的新型金融资产，甚至已有少数国家将比特币列为法定货币。 文章指出，虚拟货币资产作为数字时代的新型财富载体，已成为美国经济收割的重要目标。美国利用技 术优势与规则制定权，并在盟友国家的配合下，将全球虚拟货币资产交易纳入自身监管与基于长臂管辖 的跨境执法体系，通过民事没收、刑事追责、罚款追缴等方式 ...

报告披露，美国是国际虚拟货币这场大型"赌局"的"头号玩家"，并且长期霸占"庄家"席位。在虚拟货币资产领域，美国掌控着全球主流区块链协议的核心 研发权、关键节点控制权及链上数据分析技术优势，头部区块链企业（如Chainalysis、Elliptic）均由美国主导，占据全球链上溯源市场90%以上的份额。 美国利用技术优势与规则制定权，并在盟友国家的配合下，将全球虚拟货币资产交易纳入自身监管与基于长臂管辖的跨境执法体系，通过民事没收、刑事 追责、罚款追缴等方式，大规模侵占境外虚拟货币资产。 陈志案与赵长鹏案：美国从两大案件中共获利近200亿美元 陈志案与赵长鹏案是美国运用技术霸权收割全球虚拟资产的两大典型样本。报告表示，两起案件完整呈现了美国"技术优势—法规绑定—机构执行"的收割 闭环，其过程逻辑与技术细节具有鲜明的霸权主义特征。 1月7日，公安部将重大跨境赌诈犯罪集团头目陈志（中国籍）从柬埔寨金边押解回国。陈志犯罪集团涉嫌开设赌场、诈骗、非法经营、掩饰隐瞒犯罪所得 等多项犯罪。目前，陈志已被依法采取强制措施，相关案件正在进一步侦办中。 报告内容显示，2025年10月，美国纽约东区联邦检察官办公室宣布对柬埔寨太子集 ...

【环球时报-环球网报道 特约记者 袁宏】2月26日，中国国家计算机病毒应急处理中心等部门联合发布 的最新报告展示了美国利用技术霸权收割全球虚拟货币资产的过程。据不完全统计，2022—2025年，美 国通过各类案件累计没收全球虚拟货币资产价值超300亿美元，其中仅陈志案单案没收资产规模就达150 亿美元，占比达50%。 26日，中国国家计算机病毒应急处理中心、计算机病毒防治技术国家工程实验室以及360数字安全集 团、安天科技集团股份有限公司联合发布《"头号玩家"——美国技术霸权下的全球虚拟货币资产收割行 动深层解析》，报告结合陈志案、赵长鹏案等典型案例，从区块链技术背景与安全风险切入，系统剖析 美国利用技术霸权收割全球虚拟货币资产的过程逻辑、技术细节，深入解构其国家级网络攻击手段与深 层政治动机，为全球各国应对数字霸权威胁提供参考。 国家计算机病毒应急处理中心高级工程师杜振华在接受《环球时报》采访时介绍了报告出台的背景：国 际机构公开数据显示，截至2026年1月底，全球虚拟货币资产总市值约2.73万亿美元，其中比特币总市 值达到1.57万亿美元。同期，各国央行的黄金储备价值约为5.83万亿美元。"虚拟货币资产市 ...

Core Viewpoint - The third "Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Military" summit held in Spain saw 85 countries participating, but neither the US nor China signed the joint declaration, reflecting underlying strategic concerns from both nations [1][2][6]. Group 1: US Concerns - The US is wary that binding international rules could limit its technological flexibility and competitive edge in military AI, as it seeks to accelerate development through a "rapid iteration" model similar to SpaceX [1][2]. - The US aims to maintain a technological gap and a "technological crushing" advantage by combining rapid iteration with measures to contain competitors, particularly China, through export controls and investment reviews [2][4]. - The US prefers to establish a "Western-centric" governance system by creating standards with allies outside of multilateral frameworks, thereby excluding countries like China and reinforcing its own technological and regulatory dominance [2][4]. Group 2: China's Position - China refrained from signing the declaration due to concerns over vague principles regarding "responsible use" and the lack of mechanisms to balance the technological advantages of leading nations, fearing it could entrench Western dominance [6][8]. - China advocates for multilateral governance and emphasizes that international rules should consider both security and development, opposing the politicization of technology issues [6][8]. - The Chinese delegation highlighted the importance of risk prevention in military AI applications and reiterated its commitment to a human-centered approach to military AI, aiming to ensure national sovereignty and security [6][8]. Group 3: Structural Challenges - The sensitivity of military AI, involving national defense secrets, presents verification and enforcement challenges for any international rules, leading to a "prisoner's dilemma" where countries are hesitant to commit [8]. - The rapid pace of AI technological advancement outstrips the rule-making process, rendering the principles in the declaration inadequate to address specific risks associated with autonomous weapons and algorithmic biases [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada regarding the certification of Gulfstream jets, highlighting the complexities of international aviation regulations and the implications for the business jet market [3]. Group 1: Certification Issues - The Canadian Transport Department is collaborating with the FAA to address delays in the approval of certain Gulfstream jet models [4]. - President Trump accused Canada of illegally refusing to certify Gulfstream models 500, 600, 700, and 800, threatening a 50% tariff on Canadian aircraft sold in the U.S. [4][5]. - Without Canadian recognition of FAA certifications, Gulfstream jets cannot be delivered to Canadian buyers or operate in Canadian airspace [4]. Group 2: Regulatory Landscape - Following the Boeing 737 MAX crashes, Canada and the EU have become more cautious and are focusing on their own certification processes rather than relying solely on FAA approvals [7]. - The FAA has granted exemptions for certain Gulfstream models to begin phased deliveries, but Canada has withheld certification due to incomplete fuel system testing [7]. - The article notes that the FAA's approach may be influenced by competitive market dynamics, particularly concerning Bombardier's aircraft [7]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The business jet market is experiencing a resurgence, with a forecast of 8,500 new jets to be delivered over the next decade, valued at approximately $283 billion [10]. - North America currently holds over 60% of the global business jet fleet and is expected to receive about 70% of new deliveries in the next three years [10]. - Trump's threats have introduced uncertainty into the growing market, affecting ongoing transactions, as noted by industry executives [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The growing business jet market is facing uncertainty due to threats from former President Trump regarding aircraft certification and potential tariffs on Canadian-made planes [1][4]. Group 1: Aircraft Certification Issues - The Canadian Transport Department is collaborating with the FAA to address delays in the certification of certain Gulfstream jet models [1]. - Trump accused Canada of "wrongfully, illegally, and stubbornly refusing" to certify Gulfstream models 500, 600, 700, and 800, threatening a 50% tariff on Canadian aircraft sold in the U.S. [1]. - Experts indicate that without Canadian recognition of FAA certifications, Gulfstream aircraft cannot be delivered to Canadian buyers or operate in Canadian airspace [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Landscape - Following the Boeing 737 MAX crashes, countries like Canada and the EU are increasingly focusing on their own airworthiness certification capabilities rather than relying solely on FAA approvals [2]. - The FAA has granted exemptions for the G700 and G800 models, allowing phased deliveries until the end of 2026, but Canada has refused certification due to incomplete fuel system testing [2]. - The Chicago Convention mandates that safety is the priority, and the fuel icing tests are critical for engine fuel supply [2]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The business jet market is recovering, with a forecast of 8,500 new business jets to be delivered over the next decade, valued at approximately $283 billion [3]. - North America currently holds over 60% of the global business jet fleet and is expected to receive about 70% of new deliveries in the next three years [3]. - The demand for orders is stimulated by the U.S. "Big and Beautiful" Act's 100% bonus depreciation policy and the popularity of fractional ownership models [3]. Group 4: Competitive Landscape - Bombardier is a strong competitor to Gulfstream, with its latest ultra-long-range business jets priced around $80 million, often adjusted based on customer specifications [4]. - Trump's threats have created uncertainty in the market, affecting ongoing transactions, such as a deal to sell Bombardier jets to the U.S. [4]. - Legal experts have noted the unprecedented nature of Trump's actions, which could impact the rights of private jet owners protected by the constitution [4].

Group 1 - The U.S. is pressuring the Netherlands to expand semiconductor equipment export controls, aiming to prohibit ASML from providing installation and after-sales services for existing lithography machines in mainland China, which could paralyze thousands of precision lithography machines in Chinese factories [1][3] - ASML's CEO has publicly opposed U.S. pressure, stating that pushing China to become fully self-reliant could lead to stronger competition, suggesting that maintaining some dependency might be more beneficial [1][3] - ASML's financial report reveals that orders from China amount to approximately €10.2 billion, accounting for nearly 40% of its total revenue, highlighting the significance of the Chinese market [3] Group 2 - Despite increasing U.S. restrictions since 2019 targeting advanced lithography machines, ASML's sales to China have not decreased, indicating the immense value of the Chinese market for global companies [3][5] - ASML has indicated that if the Dutch government cannot ensure its commercial autonomy, it may consider relocating its core business to another country, prompting the Netherlands to initiate a substantial subsidy plan to retain ASML [5] - The ongoing "lithography machine game" underscores the importance of self-reliance in technology, as China has developed a robust industrial system and is making strides in producing its own EUV lithography machines, expected to achieve mass production by 2026 [5][9] Group 3 - China's technological advancements are rapidly progressing across various fields, including breakthroughs in precision steel and autonomous technologies, indicating a shift from following to leading in high-tech sectors [7][9] - The liver care market, previously dominated by Western brands, is now being disrupted by Chinese innovations, exemplified by the launch of a new liver care product that significantly undercuts the prices of similar imported products [7] - The perception of China's competitiveness in technology has shifted, with Western commentators recognizing that the global competitive landscape is undergoing fundamental changes due to China's advancements [9]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. aims to reduce its reliance on Chinese rare earth metals within two years, citing concerns over China's reliability as a supplier [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Strategy and Actions - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessenet stated that the U.S. will find alternative sources for rare earth metals within 12 to 24 months, with President Trump supporting this initiative [1][3]. - The U.S. is focusing on "supply chain security" and "technological hegemony," particularly in strategic sectors like semiconductors and defense, where rare earths are critical [3]. - A key initiative includes an $8.5 billion agreement with Australia to restructure the supply chain, aiming for a "Australia mining - U.S.-Australia processing - Western consumption" model [3]. Group 2: Challenges and Limitations - The U.S. faces significant technological barriers in rare earth separation, requiring advanced chemical extraction processes that are currently lacking domestically [4]. - MP Company, the only U.S. rare earth miner, can only process light rare earths and lacks the capability to handle heavy rare earths essential for high-end permanent magnets [4][6]. - Australia's Lynas Corporation, despite having rich reserves, also relies on China for refining, and its U.S. processing facility will take 3-5 years to become operational, exceeding the U.S. two-year timeline [4][6]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics and Global Implications - China's dominance in the rare earth sector is attributed to decades of technological accumulation and a complete industrial system, producing over 300,000 tons of neodymium-iron-boron magnets annually, compared to the U.S. target of only 1,000 tons [6]. - The U.S. Department of Defense's price floor for heavy rare earths is nearly double the market price, which could increase costs for defense and renewable energy sectors, undermining their international competitiveness [6]. - The U.S. strategy may lead to a fragmented global resource allocation, as it attempts to create an exclusive supply chain through alliances like AUKUS, countering China's market-driven approach [6][8]. Group 4: Future Outlook - While the U.S. aims to diversify its supply chain, the short-term advantages of China's rare earth industry remain irreplaceable, particularly in heavy rare earth separation technology [8]. - A more pragmatic approach for the U.S. would be to engage in global collaboration within the rare earth supply chain, rather than pursuing unrealistic decoupling goals [8].