Core Viewpoint - The article discusses regulatory actions taken against D Fund Company for alleged violations in fund sales practices, particularly involving collaborations with unqualified internet influencers to promote fund products, leading to significant investor risks and regulatory scrutiny [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Regulatory authorities issued a notice indicating that D Fund Company's fund product experienced over 10 billion in single-day subscriptions, raising concerns about potential violations in sales practices [1]. - Following an investigation, it was found that D Fund Company collaborated with unqualified internet influencers, paying substantial advertising fees to promote their fund products, which misled investors regarding risk levels [1][2]. - The regulatory response included orders for D Fund Company to rectify its practices and a suspension of public fund product registrations, holding responsible parties accountable [2]. Group 2: Industry Concerns - The notice highlighted that the violations reflect a broader issue within the industry, where institutions prioritize short-term growth over compliance and professional standards, indicating weaknesses in internal control mechanisms [2]. - Regulatory authorities are also monitoring other fund sales issues, including the reintroduction of "real-time fund valuation" features by some sales institutions and unlicensed third-party platforms, which could mislead investors and dilute fund returns [2][3]. - Emphasis was placed on the need for fund companies and sales institutions to enhance investor suitability management, ensuring that appropriate products are sold to suitable investors to prevent risk mismatches [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - A recent incident involving a fund company that experienced over 10 billion in net subscriptions in a single day has led to regulatory actions due to suspected violations in sales practices [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The regulatory authorities have mandated the fund company to rectify its practices and have suspended the acceptance of public fund product registrations [2][5]. - The company’s general manager, compliance officer, and head of the internet business department are being held accountable for the violations [2][5]. Group 2: Violations and Marketing Practices - The fund company was found to have collaborated with unqualified internet influencers ("大V") for marketing, paying substantial advertising fees to promote its products, which misled investors [2][3]. - The marketing tactics included using the influencers' platforms to create hype around significant purchases of the fund's products, enticing investors with inadequate risk disclosures [2][3]. Group 3: Industry Concerns - The industry has been criticized for the prevalence of marketing irregularities such as "real-time fund valuation," "increased purchase rankings," and "actual performance rankings," which have now been prohibited by regulators [3][4]. - The use of these marketing strategies has contributed to a short-term trading mentality among investors and has been deemed a form of disguised fund sales [3][4]. Group 4: Regulatory Requirements - Fund companies and sales institutions are required to enhance investor suitability management to ensure appropriate products are sold to suitable investors, preventing risk mismatches [5]. - Strict prohibitions have been placed on collaborations with unqualified internet influencers for any form of fund sales activities [5]. - Fund sales institutions and third-party platforms must conduct self-inspections and remove misleading features such as "real-time fund valuation" and "performance rankings" [5].

1月30日，记者从业内获悉，基金销售和宣传推介行为迎来新规范。 记者获悉，有关部门关注到部分基金销售机构和非持牌的第三方平台重新上架"基金实时估值"功能，直 接提供或通过"净值参考""板块涨跌"等形式变相提供"基金实时估值"功能，还衍生出按平台当日申购金 额排序的"加仓榜"、展示用户持仓收益和明细的"实盘榜"等。上述功能可能误导投资者，摊薄基金产品 收益，引发投诉纠纷，应当予以规制。 1月30日，记者从业内获悉，基金销售和宣传推介行为迎来新规范。 记者获悉，有关部门关注到部分基金销售机构和非持牌的第三方平台重新上架"基金实时估值"功能，直 接提供或通过"净值参考""板块涨跌"等形式变相提供"基金实时估值"功能，还衍生出按平台当日申购金 额排序的"加仓榜"、展示用户持仓收益和明细的"实盘榜"等。上述功能可能误导投资者，摊薄基金产品 收益，引发投诉纠纷，应当予以规制。 此外，相关要求强调，基金宣传推介与销售活动直接面向广大投资者，事关投资者合法权益保护与行业 声誉。 针对各类基金销售和宣传推介行为，相关要求提出，一是基金公司及基金销售机构要切实加强投资者适 当性管理，把合适的产品卖给合适的投资者，防止风险错配。 ...

积存金不再是"低门槛"业务。 黄金价格在持续创造历史，银行在紧急出手控制风险。本周，国际金价连破四个关口，现货黄金在1月 28日首次站上5300美元/盎司，多家银行则在近期密集上调了积存金业务准入门槛。 继去年多家银行动态调整积存金业务起购金额后，进入2026年，已有工商银行、农业银行等国有大行进 一步收紧积存金业务准入条件，主要方式是对个人客户风险承受能力提出更高要求。同时，还有多家银 行继续提示风险或上调起购金额。 过去，黄金积存业务因为投资门槛低、交易灵活性强等特点，被视为普通投资者参与黄金投资的重要渠 道，不同银行对积存金业务的准入要求也存在较大差异。在业内人士看来，随着金价波动加剧、监管新 规落地，将会有更多银行强化适当性管理，积存金业务的定位也将较过去发生变化。 1月5日，工商银行也发布了《关于个人客户积存金业务调整风险测评等级准入要求的公告》。记者结合 公告内容和客服人员介绍了解到，自2026年1月12日起，个人客户在该行办理积存金业务的开户、主动 积存或新增定投计划（即"定期积存计划"）的，需要取得C3-平衡型及以上的评估结果。此前，该业务 对个人客户的风险承受能力要求是C1-保守型及以上。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent adjustments by major state-owned banks in China, including Agricultural Bank of China and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, to increase the risk assessment requirements for gold accumulation business reflect a proactive approach to risk management in response to rising gold prices and market volatility [1][2]. Group 1: Changes in Risk Assessment Requirements - Agricultural Bank of China announced that starting January 30, 2026, personal clients must undergo a risk assessment to participate in its gold accumulation business, requiring a cautious rating or higher [1]. - Industrial and Commercial Bank of China previously set a requirement for clients to achieve a balanced rating or higher for opening accounts and initiating gold accumulation plans [1]. Group 2: Rationale Behind the Changes - The increase in risk assessment requirements aims to protect investors from irrational investment risks and to comply with regulatory demands for investor suitability management [2]. - The adjustments are seen as a rational risk control measure by financial institutions, reinforcing investor protection and reducing potential complaints related to price volatility [2]. Group 3: Market Positioning of Gold Accumulation Products - Some banks, like China Merchants Bank, are positioning their gold accumulation products as medium-risk investments, indicating a shift from low-threshold financial products to those requiring appropriate risk tolerance [3]. - The industry is moving towards enhancing the quality of gold accumulation business rather than merely expanding its scale, emphasizing the need for risk matching and compliance management [3].

Group 1 - The international gold price has shown a slow upward trend, reaching 1130.86 yuan per gram, an increase of 9.87 yuan or 0.88% from the previous trading day [1] - The opening price for the day was 1121.15 yuan per gram, with a daily high of 1135.62 yuan per gram and a low of 1120.87 yuan per gram [1] Group 2 - Agricultural Bank of China has adjusted the investment threshold for its gold accumulation business, allowing existing clients to execute transactions without new restrictions [2] - This adjustment follows a similar move by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which raised the risk assessment level for personal clients from "C1-Conservative" to "C3-Balanced" [2] - The increase in investment thresholds by state-owned banks is attributed to the high volatility of gold prices, which recently surpassed 5100 USD per ounce [2][3] Group 3 - Experts indicate that as gold prices reach historical highs, the nature of gold accumulation is shifting from a "stable savings alternative" to a "highly volatile risk asset," amplifying volatility risks [3] - The banking sector faces increased business risks and compliance pressures due to potential complaints from clients who entered the market at high prices and may face losses [3] - Since 2025, several commercial banks have raised the entry level for gold-related businesses to C3 or equivalent standards, reflecting a trend towards stricter risk management in the banking industry [3] Group 4 - Some investors are attempting to bypass the new investment thresholds by providing misleading information during risk assessments, which could lead to significant risk mismatches [4] - This behavior undermines the core purpose of risk assessments, which is to evaluate investors' true financial and psychological capacities [4] Group 5 - The gold and silver markets experienced a spike followed by a pullback, with gold reaching a high of 5113 before falling to 4990, while silver dropped from 117 to 101 [5] - The market is currently testing the effectiveness of a specific candlestick pattern, with potential strategies for short positions being discussed based on Fibonacci retracement levels [5]

【导读】农业银行对个人积存金业务增加风险承受能力测评准入 中国基金报记者 忆山 继工行之后，又一家国有大行调整个人积存金业务准入门槛。 1月26日，农业银行发布《关于存金通黄金积存业务增加风险承受能力测评要求的公告》，宣布自1月30 日起，取得谨慎型及以上评估结果的个人投资者方可办理积存金业务。 二、已签约客户的卖出、提货，有效期内定投计划的执行和终止，以及解约等操作，不受上述条件的限 制。 三、建议客户提高风险防范意识，基于自身财务状况和风险承受能力理性办理存金通黄金积存业务。 此前，个人客户在农业银行办理存金通黄金积存业务时，并无强制风险评估的要求。最新公告的落地， 意味着该行积极响应监管要求，强化投资者适当性管理。 多家上调准入门槛 目前来看，国有大行对个人客户积存金业务普遍设置了风险承受能力准入等级门槛。 其中，工商银行自2026年1月12日起，要求C3（平衡型）及以上的个人客户方可办理积存金业务，成为 开年以来首家提高个人积存金业务准入门槛的国有大行。 增加风险承受能力测评准入 农业银行表示，为落实监管要求，进一步保护金融消费者权益，该行将对个人客户参与存金通黄金积存 交易增加风险承受能力测评准入。 ...

【导读】农业银行对个人积存金业务增加风险承受能力测评准入 继工行之后，又一家国有大行调整个人积存金业务准入门槛。 1月26日，农业银行（601288）发布《关于存金通黄金积存业务增加风险承受能力测评要求的公告》，宣布自1月30日起，取得谨慎型及以上评估结果的个 人投资者方可办理积存金业务。 增加风险承受能力测评准入 农业银行表示，为落实监管要求，进一步保护金融消费者权益，该行将对个人客户参与存金通黄金积存交易增加风险承受能力测评准入。具体如下： 此外，还有多家股份行、城商行对准入等级进行了上调。如中信银行宣布，自2025年6月28日起，客户参与积存金业务需满足C3（平衡型）及以上；中原 银行宣布，积存金产品的风险等级于2025年9月20日调整为R3中等风险，该产品仅适用于平衡型（R3）及以上风险承受能力的客户。 业内人士表示，近年来金价波动加剧，银行相继上调积存金业务的风险承受能力准入等级，除了响应监管对投资者适当性管理的要求外，也是为了保护投 资者利益，抑制黄金短期暴涨引起的投机情绪。 三、建议客户提高风险防范意识，基于自身财务状况和风险承受能力理性办理存金通黄金积存业务。 此前，个人客户在农业银行办理存金 ...

央行官网发布公告，《中国人民银行残缺污损人民币兑换办法》已于2025年12月12日经央行2025年第18 次行务会议审议通过。该办法明确金融机构需无偿为公众办理残缺污损人民币兑换业务，不得拒绝。特 殊原因形成的残缺污损人民币兑换，由央行分支机构指定金融机构办理。办法还划定了兑换标准与不予 兑换的情形，进一步完善兑换流程。旧版办法及相关通知将随新办法施行同步废止。 2、多省份官宣调降商业用房购房贷款最低首付比例 1、新版残缺污损人民币兑换办法3月31日起正式施行 中国人民银行陕西省分行发布通知，自2026年1月23日起，当地商用房房贷最低首付比例调至不低于 30%。此次政策并非陕西独有，广东（不含深圳）、湖南、湖北等四省份也已同步发布调降通知。该政 策覆盖商业用房及商住两用房，是各地落实房地产金融调控的具体举措。目前相关政策已在上述地区正 式落地，助力商业地产市场平稳发展。此次调降进一步优化了商用房信贷政策，降低了相关购房资金门 槛。 3、马年贺岁纪念币钞兑换火爆，二手市场溢价超80% 1月26日，欢迎关注《银行今十条》，今日银行重要信息一览： 6、董方获批担任招银理财董事、总裁 国家金融监督管理总局发布正式批 ...

（原标题：高估值赛道产品审批收紧，考验公募产品布局能力） 市场持续上涨、热点轮动，监管正逐步收紧对高估值赛道权益基金的审批。业内人士认为，此举将降低 同质化竞争以及单一赛道过度拥挤的风险，保护投资者利益。基金公司应顺应监管逆周期调节的导向， 提升产品布局能力。 "监管层通过动态调整产品注册节奏，从供给端实施逆周期调节，抑制非理性跟风投资，是为了更好保 护投资者的利益，构建更有利于长期投资的市场环境。"王铁牛称。 在南开大学金融学教授田利辉看来，热门赛道基金审批节奏调整，其核心逻辑是"逆周期调节"与"投资 者适当性管理"的深度融合。 "当前，部分科技创新赛道估值已处于历史较高分位，资金若在情绪高点通过新发基金集中涌入，极易 催生局部泡沫，加剧市场波动。"田利辉指出，监管此举的目的是主动平抑这种"顺周期"募资冲动，防 止行业"产品供给"与"价值发现"基本功能的错位。从更深层看，这也是从源头治理"风格漂移"等顽疾， 引导行业从追逐短期热点的"题材驱动"，回归遵循契约精神的"策略驱动"。 公募应提升逆周期产品布局能力 受访人士认为，监管从产品供给端着手进行逆周期调节，有利于抑制同质化竞争，降低单一赛道过度拥 挤的风险 ...