Group 1 - The article highlights the increasing political violence in the U.S., with recent incidents raising concerns about a disturbing "new normal" [1][2] - Political polarization between the Democratic and Republican parties is intensifying, eroding the foundations of American democracy [1][2] - Key areas of contention include immigration policy, energy policy, and social welfare, with significant differences in approaches between the two parties [1][2][3] Group 2 - The article discusses the impact of Trump's policies, which have exacerbated class divisions and led to a decline in social mobility and trust in government [2][3] - A significant increase in threats against members of Congress has been reported, with over 9,400 threats in 2024, more than double the number from a decade ago [2][3] - The federal government has increased the budget for the Capitol Police to $833 million in response to rising violence, nearly double the $464 million budget from 2020 [2][3] Group 3 - The rise of generative artificial intelligence is noted as a factor that could further polarize society and influence election outcomes [3][4] - The spread of misinformation and the creation of "information silos" are contributing to the escalation of violence and political extremism [3][4] - A survey of political scientists indicates a belief that the U.S. is moving towards a form of authoritarianism, with concerns about the erosion of democratic norms [4][5] Group 4 - The article emphasizes the need for bipartisan cooperation to address economic inequality and political violence, which are seen as root causes of societal division [5][6] - Restoring public trust in institutions and bridging social divides are identified as critical challenges for the U.S. government [6]

特朗普再次当政后，在百日内急风暴雨般出台了多项内政和外交政策。不仅美国的政界和商界震荡不 已，一向被视为"象牙塔"的学术界也受到巨大冲击。很多学者将特朗普的新政批评为"政治干预学术"， 还有人认为这是一个"草台班子"的疯狂行动。然而，从围绕"美国例外论"的长期视角来看，美国当前的 乱局却有着久远的历史根源，不能仅仅解读为特朗普内阁的肆意妄为之举。 "美国例外论"的威权式回归 已故的美国政治学家西蒙·李普塞特曾对"美国例外论"进行了深刻而详尽的对比分析。在他看来，相比 于世界上其他国家（特别是欧洲国家），美国建立在一套独特的价值观念之上，可称为"美国信 条"（the American Creed）。美国信条包括五大要素：自由、平等、个人主义、民粹主义与自由放任的 经济模式。信条中的"自由"是指那种不受政府干预的消极自由；"平等"并不是指当代左翼主张的结果平 等，而是强调个人机会与尊严的平等。 进入现代社会后，欧洲的封建体制虽然分崩离析，但重视社会等级的文化特征仍然留存下来，欧洲人因 而具有鲜明的阶级意识。李普塞特指出，欧洲各国的左右翼政党为了解决中下阶层的社会问题，都乐于 采取福利制度、公共住房和医疗保障等国家 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the election of Lee Jae-myung as the new President of South Korea, highlighting his political journey and contrasting him with previous leaders [2][3] - Lee Jae-myung is referred to as the "Korean Trump" due to his populist approach, although he is positioned on the left side of the political spectrum, unlike many other figures labeled similarly [3][4] - The term "public recommendation massacre" is introduced, describing a political tactic where dominant factions within a party eliminate dissenting candidates during the nomination process [4][5] Group 2 - The article outlines the internal conflicts within the Democratic Party, particularly between Lee Jae-myung and former allies, leading to significant political shifts and departures from the party [6][7] - Lee Jae-myung's controversial actions, including attempts to suppress opposition within his party and aggressive legislative maneuvers, are highlighted, showcasing his assertive political style [8][9] - The article notes Lee's shifting political stance, including his outreach to conservative factions and business leaders, indicating a potential realignment of his party's identity [10][11] Group 3 - The implications of Lee Jae-myung's presidency for former President Moon Jae-in are discussed, suggesting that Moon may find relief from political scrutiny, while Lee faces high expectations and challenges [12]

以下文章来源于文化纵横 ，作者牛可 文化纵横 . 倡导文化重建，共同思想未来，发掘不一样的深度阅读。 当地时间6日、7日，美国移民与海关执法局等联邦机构在加州洛杉矶、纽约曼哈顿等地针对非法移 民展开执法行动，引发了大量街头对峙和冲突。面对骚乱，特朗普7日下令向洛杉矶部署国民警卫 队，称要"解放洛杉矶"。有分析指出，近日美国在移民问题上的高压政策并非偶然，而是特朗普稳住 选民基本盘、兑现竞选承诺的必然结果。那么，特朗普的核心支持者MAGA群体对移民问题存在何 种倾向？ 本文指出，这类由工人、农民和小城镇居民构成的群体，因经济竞争和文化焦虑孕育出对移民和外来 影响的持久敌意。在对外政策上，MAGA群体往往基于朴素的现实主义思维，奉行孤立主义。二战 后，这种草根美国人脑中根深蒂固的、直觉式的、情感性的孤立主义被自由国际主义议程所掩盖。然 而孤立主义没有消失，在产业-社会结构不可逆的历史变迁之下，它随特朗普的出现重新抬头。与此 同时，在对外政策上曾排斥基层民众的精英政治已演变为党派化的民粹政治，白人孤立主义的基因得 以从历史深处走向政治前台。 作者指出，特朗普的上台不是对历史常态的一次偏离，支持特朗普上台的MAGA群 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the contrasting narratives that arise during economic crises in capitalist countries, highlighting the tendency to attribute crises to class oppression or to blame foreign entities and specific domestic groups [1][2] - Trump's narrative aligns with the latter, attributing job losses and income declines to trade surplus countries and immigrants, which has resonated with voters in the Rust Belt [3][4][6] - The article notes that Trump's economic nationalism has led to significant political support from traditionally Democratic voters in struggling industrial regions [6][7] Group 2 - The U.S. is the largest steel importer, relying on imports for about 30% of its steel needs, primarily from Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and South Korea [8] - During his first term, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff on aluminum, which had limited effects due to exemptions for certain "friendly countries" [9][10] - In a recent announcement, Trump stated that tariffs on steel and aluminum would be doubled to 50%, claiming it would force American companies to buy from domestic suppliers [11] Group 3 - As of May 26, the average price of steel in the U.S. reached $901 per ton, double the global average, indicating that increased tariffs will further elevate domestic steel prices [12] - While higher steel prices may benefit the U.S. steel industry, they will impose cost pressures on sectors like automotive and construction, with Ford estimating a $1.5 billion profit reduction due to tariff impacts [13] - Economic analyses from Trump's first term suggest that while tariffs created thousands of steel jobs, they also resulted in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs in manufacturing and construction [14] Group 4 - The unprecedented 50% tariff will likely lead to continued reliance on imports in the short term, as equipment investments in the steel industry typically take years to materialize [15] - Rising prices for steel and aluminum could diminish the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing [16] - The article suggests that Trump's focus on economic nationalism may prioritize populist sentiments over actual manufacturing recovery [17] Group 5 - Canada and Mexico, as primary suppliers of steel and aluminum to the U.S., face severe industry impacts from the 50% tariffs, with suppliers indicating that such tariffs could devastate their sectors [18] - The article highlights the deep economic integration between Canada and the U.S., which has been beneficial for both nations, but notes that Trump's policies have prompted Canada to consider trade diversification [20][21] - The trade dependency is heavily skewed, with 78% of Canada's exports and 80% of Mexico's exports going to the U.S., while the U.S. imports only 14% and 15% from these countries, respectively [25][26] Group 6 - Trump's trade policies extend beyond economic issues, affecting immigration, drug cooperation, and water rights disputes [22][23] - The article emphasizes that the tariffs serve as a political tool, effectively a consumption tax that shifts costs and responsibilities while aiming to secure votes [34] - The potential for more radical populist leaders to emerge in the future is noted, suggesting that the current political climate may lead to even more extreme measures [36][37]

Group 1 - Harvard University has become a focal point of global public opinion due to a series of controversial events reflecting deep societal contradictions in the U.S. [1] - The conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard is fundamentally about the boundaries of educational autonomy and government regulation, originating from protests supporting Palestine that sparked anti-Semitic controversies [3] - Harvard's response to the government's pressure included a public rebuttal, emphasizing academic freedom and institutional autonomy, contrasting sharply with the Trump administration's hardline stance [5] Group 2 - The Trump administration's measures, while causing widespread public uproar, face significant implementation challenges, such as vague standards for reporting international students' activities [5] - The financial implications of these policies could severely impact Harvard's revenue from international students, which amounts to hundreds of millions annually, and could hinder its STEM research projects due to talent loss [5] - The ongoing debate over educational equity in the U.S. highlights accusations against Harvard for implementing de facto discrimination through racial quotas in admissions, particularly against Asian students [11] Group 3 - The rise of nativist sentiments in the U.S. is reflected in the Trump administration's policies towards international students, which could undermine America's global innovation leadership [9] - The events at Harvard and other universities illustrate the tension between maintaining free speech and ensuring personal safety amid rising identity politics [13] - Overall, the controversies surrounding Harvard represent a microcosm of the broader challenges facing American society in balancing multicultural coexistence with national interests [15]

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced the suspension of Harvard University's eligibility to enroll new international students, revoking its SEVP certification, which directly impacts the university's ability to provide I-20 forms and F-1 visa applications [1] - Harvard will not accept any foreign students holding F/J visas for the 2025-2026 academic year, and current international students must transfer to other certified institutions to maintain their legal status in the U.S. [1] - Harvard has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration regarding the international student ban, and a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order to maintain the status quo until a hearing [1][2] Group 2 - The incident reflects a broader struggle between populism and elitism in American society, highlighting deep-rooted issues such as political interference, structural conflicts among elites, and the politicization of higher education [2] - Trump's administration's actions against Harvard are seen as a political maneuver to appeal to his base, which is characterized by populist sentiments and anti-elitism [9][15] - The event underscores the tension between the elite institutions of higher education and the working-class sentiments, as many feel marginalized by the prevailing meritocratic system [6][8] Group 3 - The concept of meritocracy in the U.S. has been criticized for perpetuating inequality, as it often favors affluent families over middle-class children, leading to a perception that the system is rigged against the latter [7][11] - Trump's rise to power is attributed to his ability to channel public discontent with the meritocratic system, positioning himself as a voice for those who feel left behind [8][10] - The ongoing conflict between populism and elitism raises questions about the future of education as a tool for social mobility and its role in political power dynamics [16]

【文/观察者网 熊超然】根据波兰国家选举委员会网站当地时间6月2日公布的统计结果，独立候选人卡 罗尔·纳夫罗茨基（Karol Nawrocki）赢得波兰总统选举，他赢得了50.89%的选票，与得票率为49.11%的 公民联盟候选人、华沙市长拉法尔·恰斯科夫斯基（Rafal Trzaskowski）展开了激烈竞争。 美联社当天报道指出，自两周前的首轮投票后，波兰国内的选情持续胶着，折射出这个北约与欧盟东翼 国家的深刻社会分裂。当地时间6月1日晚间公布的一项早期出口民调显示，恰斯科夫斯基一度即将胜 选，但几小时后更新的民调数据却逆转了局势。这一结果表明，在美国总统特朗普支持的纳夫罗茨基的 领导下，波兰有可能将转向更具民粹主义和民族主义色彩的发展道路。 现年42岁的纳夫罗茨基，既是一名历史学家，也是一名业余拳击手，此次选举作为独立候选人，却得到 了右翼反对党法律与正义党的支持。此外，纳夫罗茨基身上有"反俄"、"亲美"等印记，既表态将继续支 持乌克兰，但也毫不留情地批评乌克兰。分析人士认为，纳夫罗茨基担任总统后，波兰总理图斯克也将 在执政中遭遇挫折。 当地时间6月1日，波兰华沙，波兰总统候选人纳夫罗茨基对着支持者做出 ...

特朗普政府和右派政治团体指责学生运动为"反犹主义"，因此要"整顿"相关大学，要求这些学校打击 反犹主义、限制国际学生、取消DEI政策。 特朗普最有威力的武器就是取消联邦政府提供给大学的科研拨款。哥伦比亚大学是第一个投降的，但 声望最高的哈佛大学选择了强硬对抗。 本文来自微信公众号： 秦朔朋友圈 （ID：qspyq2015） ，作者：岳富涛，题图来自：AI生成 近期，特朗普政府与哈佛大学的冲突持续升级，宣布取消哈佛招收国际生的资格，要求6800名国际 生72小时内立即转学。哈佛就此向联邦法院起诉美国政府。 5月29日，联邦法院召开听证会。但戏剧性的是，就在听证会召开之前，美国移民和海关执法局代理 局长发布了一封信，给了哈佛30天的宽限期，哈佛可以在一个月内对政府撤销该认证的决定提出质 疑。特朗普本人也改口说，哈佛可以保留15%的国际学生比例。 在当天的听证会上，联邦法官艾莉森·伯罗斯 （Allison Burroughs） 表示计划发布初步禁令，禁止特 朗普政府在未遵循法定程序的情况下撤销哈佛大学的学生和交流访问者项目 （SEVP） 认证。她强 调："我确实认为需要发布命令。它不需要过于严厉，但我希望确保现状不 ...

每经编辑｜毕陆名 据央视新闻26日消息，当地时间25日，美国总统特朗普威胁称，联邦政府将可能不再继续向哈佛大学提供新的拨款，并要求校方提供所有国际学生的姓名及 国籍信息，以便进一步审查。 《日本经济新闻》网站文章认为，来自全球的优秀人才曾支撑起美国的繁荣，而特朗普政府正试图切断这一循环。 近期在英国伦敦发布的《2025年全球软实力指数》显示，美国在国际社会的"声誉"指标明显下滑。软实力概念的提出者、哈佛大学肯尼迪政府学院前院长约 瑟夫·奈在去世前曾撰文说，美国吸引其他国家的能力已日渐衰落，特朗普政府的种种做法正严重损害美国的"软实力"。 斯普雷策表示，美国教育委员会在4月就给美国国务院和国土安全部致信，要求他们如果要撤销学生签证，终止学生及交流访问学者项目，就需要提供更多 信息，但并没有收到回应。 斯普雷策说，她担心准入学的国际学生觉得来美国风险太大，从而导致学生数量开始下降，而国际学生去年一年就给美国带来了430亿美元的经济收益。 另据新华社报道，针对特朗普政府对哈佛大学的"国际禁招令"，哈佛大学教授瑞安·伊诺斯称，美国政府正试图对一个美国机构施加惩罚，原因仅仅是这个 机构没有屈服于美国政府的政治意愿。 美 ...