Group 1 - Real World Assets (RWA) are becoming a significant trend in the blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors, representing a shift towards tokenizing tangible and intangible assets for digital trading [1][2] - RWA encompasses a broader range of assets compared to previous concepts like ICOs and NFTs, including commodities, invoices, and carbon credits, thus facilitating liquidity and lowering investment barriers [2][3] - The regulatory framework in Hong Kong has been evolving to support RWA, with initiatives like the Ensemble tokenization sandbox launched by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission [3][4] Group 2 - RWA is distinguished from NFTs and ICOs by its focus on real asset value, where tokens represent actual asset rights, unlike NFTs which symbolize digital assets and ICOs which lack underlying asset support [5][6] - The current challenges in RWA include asset verification, cross-border structuring, and governance, with many projects still in early stages and facing regulatory hurdles [6][9] - For mainland Chinese enterprises, issuing RWA in Hong Kong involves navigating complex regulatory requirements and establishing special purpose vehicles to comply with local laws [8][9]

Group 1 - The core concept of Real World Assets (RWA) involves tokenizing tangible and intangible assets through blockchain technology, allowing for digital representation and trading on blockchain networks [1][3] - RWA is seen as a significant trend in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space, evolving from earlier concepts like ICOs and STOs, and is viewed as a bridge between traditional finance and decentralized finance (DeFi) [3][4] - The tokenizable assets under RWA include real estate, intellectual property, receivables, commodities, and even cultural relics, enabling fractional ownership and liquidity for traditionally illiquid assets [4][10] Group 2 - Hong Kong has established a regulatory framework to support RWA, with significant milestones including the policy declaration in October 2022 and the launch of the Ensemble tokenization sandbox in August 2024 [4][10] - RWA is believed to enhance liquidity, lower investment thresholds, and improve transparency and security, attracting various market participants and traditional financial institutions [4][10] - The differences between RWA, NFTs, and ICOs are highlighted, with RWA being anchored in real asset value, while NFTs focus on digital asset uniqueness and ICOs are based on project expectations without underlying asset support [5][6] Group 3 - Current challenges in RWA tokenization include asset rights confirmation, cross-border structural design, and on-chain governance, with many projects facing difficulties due to regulatory and operational complexities [7][11] - The participation of ordinary investors in RWA is heavily dependent on regional regulations, with clear legal frameworks in places like Hong Kong, while mainland investors face restrictions [8][11] - For mainland enterprises, issuing RWA in Hong Kong involves establishing a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) and ensuring compliance with both local and international regulations [10][11]

Group 1: Development of Stablecoins - The development of stablecoins has evolved from a response to the vulnerabilities of traditional financial systems during the 2008 financial crisis to a recognized regulatory framework in the U.S. with the signing of the "Genius Act" [2][3] - Stablecoins emerged to address the structural contradictions between cryptocurrencies and traditional finance, with Tether launching USDT in 2014 as the first stablecoin backed by fiat currency [4][7] - As of June 2025, the total market value of stablecoins surpassed $250 billion, accounting for 8% of the cryptocurrency market, with a trading volume exceeding $37 trillion in 2024 [7] Group 2: Strategic Significance of Stablecoins - Stablecoins are seen as potentially reshaping global payment systems, offering advantages such as lower costs and faster transaction times compared to traditional SWIFT systems [10] - The legislative competition surrounding stablecoins reflects a broader struggle for monetary sovereignty in the digital age, with the U.S. reinforcing the dollar's dominance through stablecoin regulation [11] - Stablecoins serve as a digital financial entry point for the unbanked population, providing access to financial services without the need for traditional banking infrastructure [12] Group 3: Role of Trust Companies in Stablecoin Mechanisms - Trust companies can act as custodians for stablecoin reserve assets, ensuring that these assets are independent and protected from the issuer's bankruptcy [20] - The trust mechanism can facilitate compliance with regulatory policies, allowing for flexible responses to changes in regulations and enhancing the governance of stablecoin operations [21] - Trust companies can support the development of Real World Assets (RWA) by providing legal risk isolation and ensuring compliance in the tokenization process [23]

Core Viewpoint - Coolpad Group has announced the establishment of the "Real World Asset Tokenization Division" (RWA Division) to advance the tokenization of real-world assets in response to the Web3.0 technological transformation and the Hong Kong government's digital asset development policy [1][2] Group 1 - The RWA Division will be directly led by the company's Chairman and CEO, Chen Jiajun [1] - As of December 31, 2024, the group's investment properties are valued at approximately HKD 3,151 million [1] - The board has noted that the group's market value has long been below its net asset book value, indicating that asset values are not fully reflected in the capital market [1] Group 2 - The company is conducting preliminary feasibility studies on the tokenization of real-world assets to explore innovative ways to unlock their value and promote circulation [2] - Current discussions focus on effectively converting core asset values, assessing the technical adaptability to support this goal, and establishing relevant ownership and legal compliance frameworks [2] - If pilot projects prove commercially viable, the group plans to leverage the extensive industry resources and experience of major shareholder Chen in the real estate sector to assist more corporate clients in exploring and achieving asset tokenization [2]

Group 1 - The company has established a Real World Asset Tokenization Division to advance property asset tokenization efforts [1] - As of December 31, 2024, the company's investment property value is approximately HKD 31.51 billion [1] - Initial feasibility studies are being conducted on the Coolpad Building in Nanshan, Shenzhen, and the Coolpad Technology Ecological Park in Dongguan [1] Group 2 - If the pilot projects are successful, the company plans to expand its service model to assist more enterprises in exploring asset tokenization [1] - The company aims to promote the large-scale application of RWA technology in related industries [1]

Core Viewpoint - The tokenization of carbon credits is expected to enhance market liquidity and provide low-cost, divisible carbon neutrality tools for enterprises, while potential risks should not be overlooked [1][3]. Group 1: Industry Developments - Northern Trust announced a collaboration with SWIFT to explore trading tokenized assets like carbon credits through commercial bank accounts in Australia [1]. - JPMorgan's blockchain division, Kinexys, is developing a new blockchain application aimed at tokenizing global carbon credits to address standardization and transparency issues in the voluntary carbon market (VCM) [1]. Group 2: Tokenization Projects - Flowcarbon (GNT): An open-source protocol based on Celo that promotes institutional capital into climate change mitigation through tokenization [2]. - Klima DAO (KLIMA): Encourages emission reductions by raising carbon asset prices, with each token backed by real-world carbon assets [2]. - Nori (NRT): A blockchain-based carbon offset platform that addresses issues of double counting and fraud in existing markets [2]. - JustCarbon (JCR, JCG): Connects project developers and buyers through a symbiotic token system, supporting high-quality carbon removal projects [2]. - Toucan Protocol (TC02, BCT): Converts carbon credits into tokens, enhancing market transparency and liquidity through carbon bridges and pools [2]. - Coorest ($CC02): Generates tokens equivalent to the carbon absorbed by trees, linking them to real-world forestry [2]. - Moss Earth (MC02): Simplifies the offset process through blockchain technology, focusing on protecting native forests, reforestation, and carbon sequestration [2]. Group 3: Significance of Tokenization - Carbon credit tokenization creates a new category of digital assets, attracting more investors and increasing funding and liquidity in the carbon market [2]. - The decentralized architecture of blockchain allows carbon credits, which are typically fragmented and hard to price, to become standardized tokens that can be traded freely and priced in real-time [2]. - On-chain data is immutable and fully auditable, preventing double counting and enhancing market credibility [2]. Group 4: Challenges and Risks - The complexity of technology introduces risks of financial fraud, as the tokenization process involves intricate blockchain technology and smart contracts [3]. - Global liquidity may exacerbate regional imbalances, as the tokenization of carbon credits could amplify disparities between developed and developing nations [3]. - The certification of underlying assets remains centralized, despite blockchain's improvements in transparency and traceability [3].