王毅说，中意是支持自由贸易的两大经济体、维护多边主义的两大力量、倡导交流互鉴的两大文明古 国。在国际形势变乱交织背景下，中意应展现责任担当，顺应时代潮流，始终相互信赖、共同成就，秉 持开放精神做大做优务实合作，以丰富的合作成果为各自经济发展和两国人民福祉作出更大贡献。 塔亚尼积极评价中意关系良好发展和取得的丰硕成果，表示意中友谊源远流长，马可·波罗、利玛窦是 两国传统友好的使者和象征。在双方共同努力下，意中建立全面战略伙伴关系，双边合作成果丰硕，为 两国人民带来切实利益，意中政府委员会为此发挥了重要作用，本次会议达成的纪要具体翔实，体现双 方积极意愿。中国是意优先合作伙伴，意方高度重视中国市场蕴含的巨大机遇，期待双方进一步加强经 贸、投资、科技、文化和体育等各领域交流合作，增进人民之间相互了解。意方愿同中方携手支持自由 贸易，维护全球供应链畅通，为通过对话和平解决国际争端做出共同努力。 （文章来源：央视新闻客户端） 一是强化战略属性，让机制更"新"。始终锚定两国领导人对双边关系达成的重要共识和作出的战略引 领，创新工作方式，加紧推动三年行动计划落地。 二是加强平台建设，让机制更"活"。加强议程议题设计，积极推 ...

在全球化日益加深的今天，贸易和经济政策的变化往往成为国际博弈的风向标。特朗普政府宣布自8月1 日起对部分商品加征高额关税的决定，毫无疑问引发了全球市场的震荡。这一举措不仅对美国本土经济 构成压力，更令与中国有着深厚经贸关系的东盟国家陷入了进退两难的境地。中美博弈的加剧，不仅使 全球经济形势更加复杂化，也将国际力量对比推向了一个关键节点。在此背景下，中国外交团队，尤其 是中国外交部长，凭借坚定而智慧的应对方式，成功化解了来自美国方面的压力，展现了中国在全球经 济治理中的领导力。 今年7月，在马来西亚吉隆坡举行的东盟外长会议上，美国国务卿鲁比奥的"印太经济框架"倡议，企图 通过拉拢东盟国家，共同对抗中国。然而，特朗普政府的高额关税政策却暴露了这一倡议的内在矛盾。 美国单方面加税的行为不仅损害了美国本土企业的利益，更令东盟国家陷入了贸易成本上升的困境。尤 其是对于东盟这些依赖对华贸易的国家来说，美国的政策几乎成了"口惠而实不至"的空头支票。相比之 下，中国凭借稳定的经济合作关系，展现了更多的诚意和行动，这使得东盟各国对于鲁比奥的倡议反应 冷淡，选择站在中国一边。 与美国的单边主义形成鲜明对比，中国则秉持平等互利的原 ...

10月1日，汉堡港举行新闻发布会，介绍未来发展计划。国际港口协会主席、汉堡港董事会主席兼港口 首席执行官延斯·迈尔表示，今年以来，汉堡港整体运营实现增长；但与去年同期相比，对美国的进出 口业务下降约24%，这主要是由于美国加征关税政策导致的。 延斯·迈尔指出，汉堡港作为连接欧洲和亚洲的枢纽，将会在全球贸易中发挥着越来越重要的作用，未 来也将继续积极参与中国提出的共建"一带一路"倡议。 国际港口协会主席汉堡港董事会主席兼港口首席执行官延斯·迈尔：众所周知，汉堡与中国关系密切， 我们与天津、深圳、上海以及青岛等港口都签署了姊妹港协议，因此我们与中国的关系非常密切。我们 也在海铁联运上，积极参与共建"一带一路"倡议，"一带一路"不仅仅是货物的运输，也是文化交流，是 互联互通的信息技术交流。我们将继续参与这一倡议。 汉堡港位于德国北部城市汉堡，是德国最大综合性港口、欧洲第三大通用港口，也是全球重要海铁联运 枢纽之一。 国际港口协会主席汉堡港董事会主席兼港口首席执行官延斯·迈尔：我认为美国关税政策在汉堡，更多 的是被视为一种不确定性，你永远不知道接下来会发生什么，这会破坏美国、欧洲和德国之间的货物流 通。今年以来我们的 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the necessity of understanding China for making accurate judgments, as articulated by Lee Hee-yul, the honorary director of the Sungkyun Institute of Chinese Studies in South Korea [2] - Lee Hee-yul founded the Sungkyun Institute of Chinese Studies in 2012 to broaden the understanding of China among the South Korean public, with publications like "Sungkyun China Observation" serving as important resources [2] - Over the past 30 years, Lee has visited China hundreds of times and believes that China can achieve development results in 2-3 years that other countries may take around 10 years to accomplish, attributing this to China's "condensed growth" [2] Group 2 - Lee has published numerous works on China, including the "China Handbook," which is used as a textbook in several prestigious South Korean universities for Chinese regional studies, earning him the 15th Special Contribution Award from the Chinese Book Awards [3] - The latest revision of the "China Handbook" systematically outlines China's developments in political, economic, diplomatic, and social fields [3] - Lee noted that China has become one of the largest consumer markets globally, with robots gradually replacing human labor in many factories, indicating a significant shift from the past "world factory" image [3] Group 3 - The South Korean government aims to rank among the top three AI powerhouses globally by 2030, highlighting the importance of future-oriented cooperation between South Korea and China [4] - Lee emphasizes the growing importance of free trade, multilateralism, and regional cooperation, advocating for an updated understanding of China among South Korean policymakers [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the necessity of understanding China for making accurate judgments, as stated by Lee Hee-yul, honorary director of the Sungkyun Institute of Chinese Studies in South Korea [1] - Lee Hee-yul founded the Sungkyun Institute of Chinese Studies in 2012 to broaden the understanding of China among the South Korean public, publishing materials like "Sungkyun China Observations" [1][2] - Over the past 30 years, Lee has visited China hundreds of times and believes that China can achieve development results in 2-3 years that other countries may take around 10 years to accomplish, attributing this to China's unique development path [1] Group 2 - Lee has published numerous works on China, including the "China Handbook," which is used as a textbook in several prestigious South Korean universities, and recently released its third revised edition, detailing China's political, economic, diplomatic, and social developments [2] - Lee noted that China has become one of the largest consumer markets globally and highlighted the rapid advancements in high-tech industries such as communication, big data, and artificial intelligence, driven by the Chinese government's long-term strategic planning [2] - The South Korean government aims to rank among the top three AI powerhouses by 2030, and Lee advocates for future-oriented cooperation between South Korea and China, emphasizing the importance of updating perceptions of China [3]

Group 1: Core Views on UK-China Relations - The UK-China relationship is evolving towards a deeper level, characterized by pragmatism and mutual respect, with three key descriptors: "long-term," "consistent," and "strategic" [3][4][6] - Upcoming high-level interactions, including a phone call between President Xi Jinping and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, are expected to foster a positive atmosphere for bilateral cooperation [4][6] Group 2: Key Areas of Cooperation - Security cooperation is a priority, with both nations sharing responsibilities as permanent members of the UN Security Council, and a commitment to dialogue on differing views, such as the Ukraine conflict [5][6] - Environmental issues are highlighted as a global concern, with the UK being the first major economy to legally commit to net-zero emissions by 2050, and a call for collaborative efforts to meet climate goals [5][6] - Economic cooperation is emphasized, with the UK advocating for a healthy trade relationship with China, leveraging strengths in education and technology to explore new areas of collaboration [6][10] Group 3: Education and Youth Exchange - The number of Chinese students in the UK exceeds 155,000, while British students in China are fewer than 3,000, indicating a need to balance educational exchanges [6][8] - The UK government aims to enhance educational cooperation, ensuring that Chinese students receive valuable education and that UK degrees are recognized in China [9][10] Group 4: Electric Vehicle Market Dynamics - The UK welcomes investment from Chinese electric vehicle companies, noting a gradual increase in the market presence of Chinese EVs, despite slower growth [15][16] - The UK has not implemented restrictive policies specifically targeting Chinese EVs, promoting a collaborative approach to enhance mutual benefits in the electric vehicle sector [15][16] Group 5: Future of UK-China Relations - The relationship is complex and cannot be simply labeled as a "golden era," with an emphasis on consistency, long-term stability, and mutual respect as foundational elements [16][18] - The UK seeks to deepen cooperation in various fields, including climate, technology, and security, while addressing potential risks in emerging areas like artificial intelligence [11][17][18]

新华财经圣保罗9月28日电 巴西副总统费尔南多·阿尔克明26日表示，巴西应在今年年底前与欧盟签署南 方共同市场（南共市）自由贸易协定。 阿尔克明在接受巴西媒体采访时说，"我们已与新加坡、欧洲自由贸易联盟（EFTA）达成协议，应在未 来两个月内与欧盟签署南共市自由贸易协定。" 他同时透露，巴西还在与阿联酋就建立经贸伙伴关系进行谈判，并称这些举措体现了巴西对多边主义和 自由贸易的承诺。 谈及本周在联合国大会期间举行的巴美总统会晤，阿尔克明表示，这是推动双边经贸对话的重要一步。 巴方希望通过谈判降低美国对巴西产品征收的关税比例，并扩大免税商品范围。他强调，矿产资源、数 据中心等议题也可能纳入未来的巴美经贸磋商。 美国对巴西加征高额关税后，巴西政府积极通过国内外措施帮助企业减轻冲击。一方面，启动"巴西主 权计划"，缓解出口企业所受的不利影响；另一方面，巴西正加快推进对外经贸协议，拓展更大市场。 （文章来源：新华财经） ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions in the global energy market, particularly focusing on the firm stance of China and India in defending their energy autonomy against U.S. pressure to cease purchasing Russian oil [1][3][5]. Group 1: U.S. Pressure and Response - The U.S. has issued strong warnings to China and India, demanding an immediate halt to their purchases of Russian oil, framing it as a violation of international interests [5][9]. - Despite U.S. pressure, both China and India have responded with a resolute commitment to their energy security, highlighting their independence in energy policy decisions [7][10]. - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized that their energy cooperation with Russia is in line with international trade rules, rejecting U.S. accusations as baseless [5][12]. Group 2: International Reactions and Implications - The reactions from the Western bloc have been mixed, with some questioning the U.S.'s unilateral approach and its implications for global energy stability [9][10]. - The situation has prompted a reevaluation of energy strategies among various countries, including traditional U.S. allies in Europe, indicating a shift away from U.S. dominance in energy governance [10][14]. - The article suggests that the ongoing energy dynamics signify a profound transformation in the global energy landscape, with China and India asserting their roles as independent players [12][14]. Group 3: Strategic Considerations - China views energy security as a vital component of its national development, and its partnership with Russia is seen as a pragmatic choice amidst geopolitical shifts [12][14]. - India, as the third-largest oil consumer, has made it clear that its energy choices are sovereign and not subject to external dictation, reinforcing its strategic autonomy [12][14]. - The article concludes that the current energy standoff reflects a broader trend towards a more diversified and balanced international energy order, challenging the previous Western-centric model [14].

Core Viewpoint - The effectiveness of trade policies, particularly tariffs, is being questioned even among Trump's supporters, who are beginning to recognize that job losses are more attributable to automation than to trade policies. The logic of free trade remains relevant despite the challenges it faces [1][10]. Tariff Measures - Trump's administration has raised the average tariff level in the U.S. from less than 2% to 17.7%, with specific tariffs on steel, aluminum, and copper reaching 50%, and most auto imports facing a 25% tariff. New investigations targeting robots, industrial machinery, and medical supplies may lead to further tariffs [2][3]. - Starting October 1, new tariffs will be imposed on various imported products, including 50% on kitchen cabinets and bathroom sinks, 30% on imported furniture, and 100% on patented and branded drugs [2]. Trade Agreements and Reactions - The U.S. has reached trade agreements with several major partners, including the EU, Japan, and South Korea, but skepticism about Trump's trade logic persists. Countries like South Korea are experiencing significant export declines due to high tariffs [4][5]. - Japan's former central bank governor criticized Trump's high tariff policies as misaligned with U.S. economic realities, while the EU has faced criticism for perceived concessions under U.S. pressure [5]. Geopolitical Implications - Trump's tariffs have led to geopolitical shifts, with Canada experiencing a 1.6% economic contraction due to export declines and a rising unemployment rate. Canada is now seeking to reduce its dependency on the U.S. [6]. - The EU is accelerating trade diversification efforts and increasing defense investments to reduce reliance on the U.S. for security commitments [6]. - Australia and New Zealand are also reassessing their diplomatic ties with the U.S. due to trade tensions, which could impact intelligence cooperation [7]. Global Trade Dynamics - Despite the challenges posed by Trump's protectionism, countries are recognizing the benefits of reducing tariffs. Indonesia has reached a free trade agreement with the EU, and other nations are pursuing similar agreements to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs [9]. - The WTO's multilateral trade system is under threat, with a decline in global trade share and increased unilateral measures by major economies, leading to fragmentation of the trade system [11]. Future Trade Frameworks - There are calls for the WTO to reform and better facilitate global cooperation amid the current trade turmoil. China has expressed its commitment to not seeking special treatment in future negotiations [12]. - Analysts suggest forming multiple alliances among like-minded countries to create a flexible network that can promote trade integration while ensuring supply chain security [13].

Core Viewpoint - China expresses willingness to collaborate with the United Nations and relevant parties to implement President Xi Jinping's global governance initiative, aiming to establish a more just and reasonable global governance system [1] Group 1: China's Commitment - China will firmly uphold the position and authority of the United Nations, promoting dialogue and cooperation among countries to coordinate effective actions [1] - The country emphasizes the importance of maintaining free trade and economic globalization, while continuing to share development opportunities with other nations [1] Group 2: Global Governance Initiative - The core concept of the global governance initiative aligns closely with the principles upheld by the United Nations [1] - The UN Secretary-General expresses a strong interest in enhancing cooperation with China to defend multilateralism and promote global development [1] - There is a call for reform in the global governance system to better safeguard the common interests of the international community [1]