Group 1 - The core issue of individuals struggling to maintain psychological boundaries often leads to sacrificing their own needs to please others, which is rooted in complex psychological mechanisms [1] - The "people-pleasing" addiction mechanism activates a reward circuit in the brain, resulting in a dopamine release that creates a temporary sense of pleasure, forming a dependency on this behavior [2] - Low self-worth leads individuals to overly rely on external validation, making them sensitive to rejection and prompting them to compromise their boundaries to avoid criticism [2][3] Group 2 - Negative feedback from the family of origin can create deep psychological scars, making individuals overly sensitive to similar negative evaluations in adulthood [3] - Cultural expectations often pressure individuals to conform to societal norms, leading them to abandon their own needs to meet the expectations of family or social groups [3] Group 3 - Continuous breaches of psychological boundaries can result in "psychological entropy," leading to decision paralysis and emotional overload, with individuals at higher risk of depression [4] - Relationships lacking boundary awareness can fall into a "power imbalance trap," where one party may manipulate the other, leading to feelings of exploitation and dissatisfaction [4] Group 4 - When psychological boundaries collapse, individuals may experience "existential anxiety," struggling to distinguish between their true selves and societal expectations [5] - Neuroimaging studies indicate that such individuals have abnormal activity in the default mode network, which is closely related to self-awareness [5] Group 5 - A three-step strategy for rebuilding psychological boundaries includes categorizing relationships into three circles: the core circle for close family, the collaborative circle for colleagues and friends, and the stranger circle for unfamiliar individuals [6][7] - Gradual behavioral training can help individuals practice saying no in low-risk scenarios, enhancing their ability to maintain boundaries [7] - Mindfulness meditation can strengthen the brain's ability to regulate emotional responses, helping individuals remain calm when faced with boundary violations [8]

6月6日，在北京智源大会现场，宇树科技创始人王兴兴表示，未来机器人格斗会成为全球大家比较受欢 迎的体育赛事。在大会现场，宇树科技机器人G1展示了格斗的动作，"参加格斗比赛是为了给大家展示 一下当前机器人技术的发展情况，从而带动整个行业的发展，未来我们也希望做更多的商业化拓展和尝 试。"(贝壳财经) ...

"拧巴的人需要一个引导型恋人。" "引导型恋人没惹任何人。" 在拧巴的人的呼唤下，"引导型恋人"亮了。 引导的一方被奉为活菩萨、智性恋天菜、最伟大的存在，戏称是血包、小狗，也被批评为自以为是的懂 哥，在变相PUA。 渴望被引导的那一方，在呼唤爱的同时，也被指责为不过是巨婴、娇妻，是只会吸噬他人能量的伥鬼。 矛盾的激发，有关于爱的方式的争议，有由原生家庭与成长环境所塑造的人格差异的冲突，有当代年轻 人群体焦虑与茫然的体现，有主体性和性别意识的碰撞。这里不探讨更多结构性的问题。 在关于"引导型恋人"的呼唤与吵闹中，其实大多数只是"好好说话"的问题。 到底在拧巴什么？ 拧巴的人到底在拧巴什么？ TA们常常内心充满矛盾，自我对抗强烈，习惯自我压抑，难以直接表达需求，总是用反向行为来掩盖 真实感受，同时对变化敏感，但又惧怕不确定性。纠结、压抑、内耗是TA们再典型不过的特征，"没 事"、"不用"、"随便"是TA们惯用的口头禅。 TA们对亲密感既渴望又排斥，自卑，对被否定这件事过度敏感。对方未秒回信息，TA们会反复回想"是 不是我哪里说错话了"；对方说"最近有点忙"，TA们可能会解读为"是不想理我了"；甚至在这场关于"引 ...

当具身智能具有一定的身体和智力之后，从经济和社会治理角 度看，它是否构成自身人格，又能否承担自我责任？ 作者：刘诚 封图：图虫创意 近期，具身智能产业发展迅猛，其关注的是如何将感知、行动和环境交互融入机器学习和人工智能 的发展中，从而打造更加灵活和自主的智能体。 那么， 当具身智能 具有 一定的身体和智力之后，从经济和社会治理角度看，它是否构成自身人 格，又能否承担自我责任？ 具身的双重含义 具身智能指智能体（机器人或程序）通过与物理世界或模拟环境的交互来学习和应用知识的能力。 相较于一般的人工智能，具身智能最显著的区别便在于"具身"。"具身"有两层含义。第一层含义是 具有"身体"，用身体感知环境。这种智能不仅仅依赖于传统的计算资源，还强调了身体性体验的重 要性，即智能体的身体与其所处环境之间的互动对于学习和发展复杂行为至关重要，为人工智能的 未来描绘出一幅更加真实、动态且复杂的图景。 以往，人工智能强调的数据输入、运算过程、结果输出。具身智能不再被动地等待数据投喂，而是 凭借其身体主动感知周遭环境，自主收集数据，并借助身体的不同部位灵活作出反应。 工具与人格争议 具身智能是一种比较高级的智能体，既能用身体感 ...

2025.05. 30 本文字数：1624，阅读时长大约3分钟 导读 ：天下之事，不难于立法，而难于法之必行。 民法典明确：自然人的人身自由、人格尊严受法律保护；法人、非法人组织享有名称权、名誉权和荣 誉权受法律保护，侵权方要受到追究并承担侵权赔偿等责任。根据最高法近日公布的数据，从民法典 施行到今年4月30日，全国各级人民法院共审结人格权纠纷案件80.41万件。其中既有公民个人也有 一些市场主体人格权受到侵害的案例。 中国法学会民法学研究会会长、中国人民大学一级教授王利明日前在接受检察日报记者专访时表示， 民法典通过人格权独立成编，全面维护人民群众进入新时代后不断提升的精神层面的需求，全面强化 了对人格尊严的维护，使人民群众不仅吃得饱、穿得暖，而且活得更体面、更有尊严。 作者 | 一财评论员 5月28日是新中国第一部以法典命名的法律《中华人民共和国民法典》（下称"民法典"）的五岁生 日。 2020年5月28日，十三届全国人大三次会议表决通过了这部法典，于次年1月1日施行。在随后的几 年间，包括公民个人在内的各类民事主体的合法权益得到了更为充分的保护，成效斐然。 民法典被称为"社会生活的百科全书"，也是民事主 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, celebrated its fifth anniversary, has significantly enhanced the protection of civil rights and interests, establishing itself as a comprehensive legal framework for social life [2][6]. Group 1: Characteristics of the Civil Code - The Civil Code exhibits three main characteristics: targeting, seriousness, and extensibility [3]. - Targeting: It provides detailed regulations on personal rights, property rights, and personality rights, establishing a clear framework for rights protection from birth to death [3]. - Seriousness: The Civil Code has shown rigidity in judicial processes, exemplified by a landmark case where a party was ordered to pay 640 million yuan for intellectual property infringement, marking the highest compensation in this field [4]. - Extensibility: The Civil Code serves as a foundational law that promotes the completeness of the legal system, with new laws like the Private Economy Promotion Law enhancing its principles [4][5]. Group 2: Legal Protections and Developments - The Private Economy Promotion Law protects the personal and property rights of private economic organizations and their operators, ensuring that their rights cannot be infringed upon [5]. - The ongoing development of specific laws, despite the clarity of the Civil Code, indicates the evolving nature of legal challenges and the need for continuous legal advancements [5]. - The emphasis on private rights protection, equality, and good faith reflects the Civil Code's role as a fundamental law in the market economy, providing essential guidelines for law enforcement [6].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court continues to implement typical cases of the Civil Code, focusing on protecting intellectual property rights and supporting the development of new productive forces, which aims to enhance the quality of economic and social development [1] - The case involving the unauthorized use of a person's voice highlights the legal recognition of voice as a personal right, establishing boundaries for new business models and technologies [2] - A case regarding malicious defamation by a customer against a business demonstrates the legal recourse available for businesses to protect their reputation and seek damages for harm caused by false statements [3] Group 2 - Additional typical cases include those related to the infringement of trade secrets in the electric vehicle chassis technology and civil public interest litigation concerning ecological damage, indicating a broader application of the Civil Code in various sectors [4]

Core Viewpoint - The first human-shaped robot fighting competition, part of the CMG World Robot Competition series, took place in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, showcasing advanced robotic combat capabilities and technology [7][18]. Group 1: Competition Overview - The competition featured four UTree G1 robots controlled by operators from different fields, with one robot wearing black protective gear emerging as the champion [7]. - The event utilized a point system over three rounds, with effective strikes to the head and torso scoring points, and penalties for being knocked down [8]. Group 2: Technical Challenges - The competition tested robots' instantaneous explosive power, requiring strong power systems for quick action responses, and highlighted the importance of control algorithms for precise movement [9][10]. - Robots faced dynamic environments that challenged their stability and control, with many robots showing signs of wear and tear from the competition [11]. Group 3: Learning and Control - The G1 robot has eight basic fighting movements and various combinations, allowing it to perform punches and kicks [14]. - Operators used voice and remote control for real-time manipulation of the robots, emphasizing human-robot collaboration [15]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The extreme testing environment of the robot fighting competition promotes continuous algorithm optimization and performance enhancement, benefiting human production and daily life [17]. - The competition signifies a new phase in robotic demonstrations, pushing companies to improve algorithms and hardware, and increasing the demand for standardized testing protocols in the industry [18].

5月25日晚，全球首个以人形机器人为参赛主体的格斗竞技赛事在浙江展开，该场比赛中宇树G1人形机 器人作为唯一参赛机型亮相赛场，最后诞生了史上首个机器人格斗冠军。 当晚，四支宇树科技旗下机器人队同台竞技，与此前备受关注的机器人马拉松比赛中仅考验机器人的移 动性和稳定性不同，机器人在拳击场上互殴、被打倒后快速站起、被打歪后快速"回正"，不仅要求机器 人有稳定性和抗冲击性，也要求机体结构足够刚硬、有稳定的重心。 当晚的比赛整体分为表演赛和竞技赛两部分，前者主要秀动作，后者则是竞技赛和贴身肉搏，竞技赛采 用标准的三回合赛制、每回合两分钟。击中头部或躯干算有效击打，倒地要扣分，若倒地后无法在规定 时间内起身，则判负。黑、粉、绿、红四队在两两捉对厮杀后决出胜者，最终回合小黑对上了小绿，小 绿在最终回中三次倒地后，首个机器人拳王诞生了。 据悉，此次比赛的格斗动作设计都采集自外部专业人员，用来给AI模型提供学习参考，这意味着每一 个挥拳动作背后都有职业选手的经验和数据。 此次比赛采用的机器人是宇树G1人形机器人。据宇树官方介绍，G1人形机器人售价9.9万起，具有超大 关节运动角度空间、23~43个关节电机，具备AI模仿和强化 ...

Core Viewpoint - The robot fighting competitions are not merely technical showcases but represent a competition for attention within the industry [1][4][5]. Group 1: Industry Trends - The complexity of robotic demonstrations is increasing, moving from walking to running and now to fighting, as companies seek to capture attention [4][5]. - Companies like Yushun and Zhongqing are actively participating in robot fighting events, indicating a shift in focus towards more engaging applications [1][4]. - The industry is experiencing collective anxiety, as evidenced by the proliferation of fighting events, which serve as an extension of technology showcases [4][5]. Group 2: Technical Insights - Yushun's G1 robot demonstrated notable performance in a recent competition, showcasing its hardware and algorithm stability despite some operational challenges [5][6]. - The ability of G1 to maintain balance during high-intensity confrontations relies on AI reinforcement learning and joint perception [6]. - Fighting scenarios can comprehensively test a robot's mechanical structure, motion control, sensor fusion, and intelligent decision-making capabilities, which are crucial for real-world applications [6]. Group 3: Industry Concerns - There are concerns regarding whether these competitions are a natural evolution of technology or merely a marketing gimmick to attract attention [5][6]. - The focus on attention-grabbing events may overshadow significant engineering challenges, such as hardware-software integration, power consumption, and long-term stability [6].