Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of flexible allocation funds, particularly highlighting the success of the Yimin Service Leading fund in navigating market volatility through strategic position management, which resulted in significant excess returns during turbulent market conditions [1][4][6]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Strategy - On April 7, during a significant market downturn where over 2900 stocks hit their daily limit down, many active equity products fell over 10%, but the Yimin Service Leading fund maintained a net value change of 0, successfully avoiding losses [4]. - The fund's stock position was only 0.89% at the end of the previous year, but it increased its position to nearly 20% during the first quarter as market conditions improved, demonstrating effective timing and position management [4][6]. - The fund's net value remained stable with minimal fluctuations from June 2023 to the end of the year, indicating a cautious approach to market conditions, with a focus on bank deposits and bond funds [4][7]. Group 2: Flexibility and Market Sensitivity - The flexible allocation nature of the Yimin Service Leading fund allows for significant adjustments in position, making it more responsive to short-term market fluctuations, which is particularly advantageous for smaller funds [6][7]. - Many flexible allocation funds typically adopt a neutral position strategy, maintaining stock positions between 40% to 60%, but in high-pressure performance situations, they may adjust positions to enhance net value elasticity [7]. Group 3: Timing Debate - The ongoing debate about market timing remains relevant, with some fund managers emphasizing the difficulty of timing and opting for a focus on stock selection instead [2][8]. - The performance of different funds can vary significantly based on timing decisions, as illustrated by the contrasting results of two funds managed by the same team due to differing timing strategies [8][10].

在连续二十几期的情绪观察之后，不知道读者是什么体会，我自己总结了一下主要是以下几点： 因此，比较稳妥的策略是： 关于情绪指标的延伸阅读： 关于动量指标的延伸阅读： 《 RSR（RSV、RPS）和趋势模板的背景含义 》 市场的日常是非理性的，因此会有波动起伏；市场又是很理性的，因为非理性终究要回归。 所谓循环和规律，只是对历史数据的统计归纳，如果生搬硬套必然犯刻舟求剑的毛病。总结用归纳法，实战用演绎法。交易演绎法，不是用归纳得到的经 验去求必然因果，而是不断评估大局和局部的胜率和赔率，更新自己的对策，西洋学说称之为贝叶斯主义。 择时的本质是情绪管理。 市场起伏在统计学上有迹可循，始终循环，但不简单重复； 方向可以预期，但无法准确预测，尤其无法预测涨跌幅度； 大多数周期，回撤比上涨要快，也即浮盈很容易变成浮亏； 胜率在情绪爬升期，赔率在情绪冰点，情绪高温区二率皆输； 动量背离是情绪反转前兆，动量的本源就是情绪; 情绪的最小张力单元就是TR，向上或者向下突破TR预示情绪反转； 1. 冰点抓胜率和赔率双赢，极端超卖区域的快速反弹； 2. 40周期情绪爬升过程中，抓更短周期的情绪回落点的胜率（埃尔德的三重滤网）； 3. ...

Core Viewpoint - The issuance of three-year holding period funds has significantly decreased, with only 14 products established in 2023 and 2024, contrasting sharply with previous years when many high-value funds were launched [1][3]. Group 1: Fund Issuance Trends - The number of three-year holding period funds has sharply declined, with only 11 products established in 2023 and 3 in 2024, indicating a cautious approach from public funds due to market volatility [2][3]. - In the years 2020 to 2022, the issuance of three-year funds peaked, with 21, 38, and 17 products launched respectively, including several large-scale funds exceeding 10 billion [3]. Group 2: Performance of Newly Established Funds - Most of the newly established three-year funds have achieved positive returns, with notable performances such as Dachen Zhi Xin's nearly 30% increase and Yinhua's over 23% rise since inception [4]. - The funds that were launched during market lows have benefited from better timing, contrasting with the poor performance of funds issued at market highs [4][6]. Group 3: Investment Strategies and Market Conditions - Fund managers emphasize the importance of timing in investment, suggesting that funds should be launched during market lows to capitalize on valuation advantages [4][6]. - Despite the overall positive performance of newly established funds, many have missed out on trending sectors like artificial intelligence, focusing instead on stable, long-term investments [5][6].

从本质上来说，任何投资决策都是预测未来。无论你决定购买股票，卖出债券，或者坐拥现金，其实都是基于你对未来做出的判断之上的决策。因此有很多 人认为，如果想要获得好的投资回报，投资者一定要有超凡的预测未来的能力。那么问题来了：事实确实是这样么？ 在分析这个问题之前，我们先来看张图。 图表 1 ：市场对美联储基准利率的预测总是错 数据来源：彭博社，Apollo Chief Economist 上图展示了自2008年以来美联储基准利率的历史（绿色实线）。站在现在回头看，我们可以看到一条非常清晰的历史路径：美联储在2008年金融危机后，立 刻大幅度降息至零，并将零利率水平一直保持到2016年。在2016到2020年间，美联储慢慢逐步升息。然后到了2020年，COVID疫情发生后，美联储再次将利 率降到零。从2022年开始，为了应对通胀压力，美联储又快速将基准利率提到5%左右。 很多人可能没有意识到的是，市场对于美联储未来利率的预测（上图中虚线）， 从来没有正确过 。举例来说，在2008到2016年间，美联储利率始终保持在 零，然而同期市场的共识是：美联储很快就会升息。很少有人会预料到，零利率会整整持续8年。 接下来，让 ...