Core Points - The core viewpoint of the articles is the implementation and impact of the nationwide special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, which aims to improve the business environment and reduce unnecessary inspections [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement Actions - The special action to standardize administrative law enforcement was fully launched nationwide in March this year, with a reported problematic case amounting to 335 million yuan, recovering losses of 98.81 million yuan for enterprises by May 21 [1]. - The implementation of the "Opinions on Strictly Standardizing Inspections Related to Enterprises" has led to the development of inspection standards and frequency limits by relevant departments, significantly reducing unnecessary inspections [1]. - In Shenzhen, the establishment of the administrative law enforcement supervision code system has shown effectiveness, with the number of enterprise inspections in Guangming District decreasing from 3,323 to 1,135 since 2025, a reduction of 65.84% [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Improvements and Innovations - The comprehensive cleanup of existing enterprise-related charging policies and the timely update of the charging directory have been emphasized, along with strict compliance reviews of new policies to prevent the introduction of non-compliant charging policies [1]. - The Ministry of Justice is developing management measures for administrative law enforcement personnel to ensure that only qualified individuals perform enforcement duties, with 1,140 leads sent to disciplinary inspection agencies and 1,068 personnel dealt with since the start of the special action [2]. - The exploration of flexible enforcement methods, such as the "flexible enforcement" mechanism in Shenzhen's Longhua District, aims to create a better business environment by providing green channels for enterprises that voluntarily self-check and correct minor violations [2].

Core Viewpoint - The government is actively addressing prominent issues reported by enterprises through a special action aimed at regulating administrative law enforcement related to businesses, resulting in a general decline in administrative fines and a reduction in arbitrary inspections [1][2]. Group 1: Objectives and Focus Areas - The special action targets four major issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and closures; illegal cross-regional law enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by law enforcement officials [2][3]. - Key focus areas for the action include food and drug safety, natural resources, ecological environment, safety production, urban management, and transportation, which are closely related to enterprises and the public [3]. Group 2: Progress and Impact - As of May 21, a total of 6,232 problem leads have been collected, with 5,246 cases addressed, recovering 98.81 million yuan for enterprises from a total of 335 million yuan in involved amounts [3]. - The action aims to optimize the business environment and stimulate market vitality by addressing issues such as unauthorized fees and excessive charges in various sectors, including logistics and utilities [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Measures and Future Directions - The action emphasizes strict adherence to laws and regulations, particularly in sectors affecting public health, with a focus on rigorous standards and accountability [6]. - Future efforts will include increased supervision of problem rectification, targeted handling of prominent issues, and measures to ensure compliance and accountability among local authorities [7].

Core Points - The article discusses the implementation and progress of a nationwide special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, aiming to protect their legal rights and improve the business environment [2][4][6] Group 1: Special Action Overview - The special action was launched in March this year, focusing on addressing issues such as arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures [2][4] - As of May 21, the action has gathered 6,232 problem clues and urged the handling of 5,246 cases, involving a total amount of 335 million yuan, recovering losses of approximately 98.81 million yuan for enterprises [6] Group 2: Key Issues Addressed - The action targets four main issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures; illegal cross-regional enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by enforcement personnel [4][6] - These issues are widespread and have significant negative impacts, with strong feedback from enterprises [4] Group 3: Implementation and Results - The Ministry of Justice has established a working platform to streamline the collection and processing of problem clues, enhancing efficiency and reducing the burden on local authorities [5] - Initial results show a downward trend in administrative fines and effective curtailment of arbitrary inspections, although there is still a gap between outcomes and enterprise expectations [6] Group 4: Future Plans and Mechanisms - Future efforts will focus on strengthening supervision of problem rectification, addressing prominent enforcement issues, and conducting research to evaluate the effectiveness of the action [6][9] - The establishment of a long-term mechanism for standardized enforcement is emphasized to prevent issues from recurring and to foster a conducive business environment [7][9]

行政执法是行政机关履行政府职能、管理经济社会事务的重要方式。在行政执法当中，要体现对各类主 体的平等保护，严格依法平等适用，不能违背"法律面前人人平等"的原则，不能仅仅为了让执法有温度 而突破法律底线，所以要坚持辩证地看这个问题。 规范执法不是执法越宽越好，更不是不执法，而是依法该严则严、当宽则宽，特别是对食品药品安全等 涉及群众切身利益的领域，要坚决落实"四个最严"的要求，以"最严谨的标准、最严格的监管、最严厉 的处罚、最严肃的问责"，切实保护人民群众的生命健康安全。要让行政执法"既有力度又有温度"，做 到既不缺位也不越位。 据中国网，5月22日，国新办就规范涉企行政执法专项行动开展情况举行新闻发布会，司法部行政执法 协调监督局局长刘波在国新办发布会上表示，目前很多地方在积极探索柔性的执法方式，优化执法理 念，坚持执法和服务相结合。实践中我们也看到，一些地方出台了免罚或者不罚的清单，比如上海出台 了《市场监管领域不予行政处罚和减轻行政处罚实施办法》，细化了轻微违法不予立案的程序。深圳龙 华区建立了"柔性执法"机制，对主动自查自纠的轻微违法企业，开通了免罚清单绿色通道。实践中的这 些探索，为企业营造了良好的营 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the implementation of a two-month "Spring Thunder Action" by the Zhenyuan County Market Supervision Administration to enhance market safety and protect public interests [1] - The action focuses on six key areas related to people's livelihoods, including food, pharmaceuticals, and special equipment, aiming to create a safe and orderly market consumption environment [1] - The "1+19" smart supervision system has been fully implemented in 235 school canteens, with 211 food quick tests conducted and six illegal cases addressed [1] Group 2 - A "Protect Farmers and Ensure Cultivation" special action has been launched during the critical spring farming period, focusing on major agricultural products like fertilizers and agricultural films [2] - A comprehensive regulatory model has been established, including source control, circulation traceability, and terminal sampling, resulting in 40 batches of inspections and the seizure of 1,973 bags of substandard fertilizers [2] - A knowledge property protection initiative has led to the investigation of two trademark infringement cases and the establishment of a 24-hour complaint handling network, recovering economic losses of 72,800 yuan [2] Group 3 - The county's market supervision authority emphasizes that the action is both a defense of safety and an upgrade of the business environment, with plans to establish a task list of 55 key issues for rectification [3] - Training for all enforcement personnel will be conducted to shift the regulatory model towards a preventive approach, fostering a standardized market environment for county economic development [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement inspections is crucial for optimizing the business environment and stimulating market vitality [1] - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment has introduced the "law enforcement + service" concept, highlighting the need for innovative regulatory methods to achieve a balance between strictness and leniency [1][2] - The transition from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to "precision enforcement" requires law enforcement personnel to possess stronger legal knowledge and technical skills [1][2] Group 2 - The distinction between "minor violations" and "malicious violations" is critical in flexible law enforcement, necessitating a deep understanding of legal boundaries by enforcement personnel [2] - The implementation of a "comprehensive inspection once" mechanism aims to break down departmental barriers and enhance the effectiveness of cross-sector collaboration [2] - Law enforcement personnel are expected to evolve from mere executors to "guardians of the rule of law" and "service providers for development," ensuring ecological protection while facilitating green enterprise growth [3]