Core Points - The China-ASEAN Free Trade Area 3.0 negotiations have been fully completed, marking a significant milestone in regional economic integration [1][2] - The 3.0 version includes nine new chapters focusing on digital economy, green economy, supply chain connectivity, and more, enhancing cooperation in emerging fields [1][2] - The completion of the negotiations is seen as a response to global economic challenges and a demonstration of the vitality of free trade and open cooperation [2][3] Group 1 - The China-ASEAN Free Trade Area 3.0 negotiations were initiated in November 2022 and concluded after nearly two years and nine rounds of formal talks, with a substantial end expected in October 2024 [2] - The 3.0 version is a priority for both parties, symbolizing a significant achievement in maintaining and deepening free trade [2][3] - The agreement aims to provide institutional guarantees for the construction of a large China-ASEAN market and promote mutual prosperity and development [3] Group 2 - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce emphasizes the importance of maintaining global supply chain stability and opposes unilateralism and protectionism [1][2] - The agreement is expected to inject greater certainty into regional and global trade, promoting an open and cooperative international economic order [2] - Both parties will actively advance their domestic signing and approval processes, aiming for the formal signing of the upgraded agreement by the end of the year [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China, particularly focusing on the impending expiration of a 90-day tariff suspension and the potential for increased tariffs from the U.S. on various countries, including China [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Strategy - The U.S. government has initiated a policy of imposing high tariffs globally under the guise of "reciprocity," with a 90-day negotiation window that is nearing its end [1][3]. - President Trump has indicated that he does not plan to extend the 90-day suspension and will soon communicate new tariff rates, which could range from 10% to 50% [3]. - The U.S. aims to leverage high tariffs to address its long-standing trade deficit and is pressuring other countries to reduce trade with China as a condition for tariff exemptions [3]. Group 2: China's Response - China has firmly opposed the U.S. unilateral actions, labeling them as bullying tactics that undermine the multilateral trade system [3][8]. - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has stated that any country attempting to sacrifice China's interests for U.S. tariff relief will face strong countermeasures from China [3][8]. - China has demonstrated its resolve in past trade negotiations, achieving certain agreements through strategic positioning and firm stances [3]. Group 3: Other Countries' Positions - Japan is struggling to reach a consensus with the U.S. on auto tariffs, with some factions suggesting sacrificing Chinese interests to gain leverage in negotiations [6][7]. - The EU has temporarily suspended high-level economic dialogues with China to focus on U.S. negotiations, with some politicians advocating for a united front against China [7]. - India has taken steps that appear to align with U.S. interests, such as imposing tariffs on Chinese steel, raising questions about its commitment to its strategic partnership with China [8]. Group 4: Potential Consequences - The article highlights the risks for countries that align with U.S. interests at the expense of China, particularly in sectors like rare earths, where China holds significant leverage [8][10]. - The U.S. faces challenges in managing simultaneous trade negotiations with multiple countries, raising doubts about the effectiveness of its tariff strategy [10]. - The article concludes that the ongoing trade tensions could lead to broader instability in the global economy, emphasizing the interconnectedness of nations in a globalized world [10].

Group 1 - The trade war between the US and the EU has intensified, with French President Macron criticizing certain countries' tariff policies as tools of coercion, specifically targeting the US [1][3] - Macron's proposal for a "zero tariffs for zero tariffs" strategy has become a central countermeasure for Europe, warning that if the US maintains a 10% baseline tariff, Europe will implement equivalent retaliatory measures [3][4] - The EU's trade deficit with the US has expanded to $158 billion in 2024, with significant imbalances in aerospace and digital services [3] Group 2 - The European Commission is preparing to impose tariffs on $95 billion worth of US goods, while also implementing restrictions in digital tax and public procurement [3][4] - The actual impact of tariffs is evident in Europe, with a report indicating an 18% decrease in EU steel capacity utilization and a €2.3 billion reduction in automotive exports [4] - If the trade war escalates, GDP growth in the US and EU could decline by 0.8% and 1.2%, respectively, prompting European companies to make defensive adjustments [4] Group 3 - China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi's visit to Europe is significant, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of China-EU diplomatic relations and the first strategic communication after the EU Commission's reshuffle [6][9] - The visit aims to provide a platform for direct communication and lay the political groundwork for the upcoming China-EU leaders' meeting [6] - The EU is experiencing a strategic dilemma, trying to maintain economic sovereignty while not fully aligning with either the US or China [6][9] Group 4 - The trade war's ripple effects are impacting global supply chains, with the UN warning that the most vulnerable economies are suffering the most from US tariff policies [7] - Wang Yi's visit offers Europe a strategic opportunity, aligning China's open and cooperative approach with the EU's goal of strategic autonomy [7][9] - Despite existing tensions, both sides have reached a consensus to restart negotiations on price commitments, indicating a potential for cooperation [7][9]

Group 1 - The Canadian government announced the cancellation of the digital services tax, originally set to impose a 3% tax on U.S. tech companies, in response to pressure from President Trump [1] - The cancellation is part of a broader negotiation strategy, with Canada and the U.S. aiming to reach a "mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement" by July 21 [1] - Trump's administration is using tariffs as a tool to reshape global trade dynamics, pressuring countries to distance themselves from China [2][3] Group 2 - The trade negotiations are facing significant challenges, with key differences in sectors like automotive and steel making progress difficult [2] - China has firmly stated that it will not accept any deals that sacrifice its interests for tariff exemptions, indicating a strong stance against unilateral trade actions [5] - The situation highlights the tension between unilateralism and multilateral trade systems, with the need for equitable and reciprocal trade relationships emphasized [5][7]

Group 1 - The U.S. government has set July 9 as a critical date for implementing "baseline tariffs" on EU goods, which will disrupt the long-standing trade understanding between the U.S. and Europe [3] - The European Commission has prepared a countermeasure list of tariffs totaling €116 billion, which will impact key industries such as automotive and agriculture, marking the most severe test of U.S.-EU economic relations since the establishment of the WTO [3] - Germany, as the largest economy in Europe, is inclined to seek tariff exemptions for its automotive industry to protect companies like Volkswagen and BMW from the trade war's impact, while France adopts a tougher stance, emphasizing the need for strategic autonomy [3][5] Group 2 - French President Macron aims to reshape the EU's voice on the international stage by reducing dependence on the U.S. and establishing an independent trade and security system [5] - The upcoming visit of Wang Yi coincides with a tense moment in U.S.-EU relations, as the EU's strategic direction will significantly influence global dynamics [5] - The bilateral trade between China and the EU is projected to exceed €900 billion by 2024, with ongoing cooperation in emerging sectors like renewable energy and digital economy [5]

欧盟（资料图） 值得玩味的是，欧盟的态度曾出现微妙摇摆。6月中旬，为配合与美谈判，欧盟一度取消中欧高层经济对话。但美国在七国集团峰会上的背弃 （特朗普提前离场并再度发出关税威胁），彻底浇灭了欧盟的幻想。塞伯特透露，欧盟甚至准备了针对美国服务业的反制"组合拳"——从数字 服务税到限制公共采购合同，直击美国科技巨头的核心利益。 据国际在线消息，7月9日的钟声正滴答作响——美国"对等关税"90天暂停期的最后期限步步紧逼，一场牵动全球贸易神经的摊牌时刻即将来 临。在这场由美国单方面掀起的贸易风暴中，中国商务部于6月底向世界发出清晰信号：任何国家若以牺牲中国利益为代价换取美国关税豁免， 必将面临中方的坚决反制。这不是空洞威胁，而是对公平贸易规则的捍卫宣言。 美国的关税大棒挥舞得毫无章法，其"对等关税"政策被中方斥为赤裸裸的单边霸凌，严重冲击多边贸易体制根基。更令人警觉的是，美方在谈 判中竟要求贸易伙伴主动限制对华贸易，以此作为豁免关税的筹码。这种试图分裂全球产业链的霸道行径，让国际社会看清了华盛顿的算盘： 既想遏制中国，又想独吞中国市场红利。 贸易（资料图） 硝烟味最浓烈的战线横跨大西洋。面对美国反复无常的极限施压—— ...

Core Viewpoint - The future of global trade order is precarious as the deadline for the suspension of "reciprocal tariffs" by the Trump administration approaches, with China firmly opposing any compromises that sacrifice its interests for U.S. tariff reductions [1][3]. Group 1: China's Stance - China’s Ministry of Commerce has issued a strong statement against unilateral U.S. tariffs, labeling them as "naked unilateral bullying" that undermines multilateral trade systems and international order [1][3]. - China has drawn a clear red line, stating it will not accept any deals that sacrifice its interests for U.S. concessions, warning countries against using Chinese interests as bargaining chips in negotiations with the U.S. [3][9]. - The Chinese government has recognized attempts by other nations to align with U.S. interests at the expense of China, indicating that any such actions will face strong countermeasures from China [3][10]. Group 2: International Reactions - Japan is reportedly considering accepting some U.S. conditions to break trade deadlocks, which could lead to a deeper binding of the rare earth supply chain with the U.S., potentially targeting China [3][5]. - The European Union is experiencing similar pressures, with some countries willing to compromise to avoid escalating trade conflicts with the U.S., while others remain resistant [5]. - Germany's recent actions against the Chinese tech company DeepSeek, framed as data protection measures, are viewed as a strategic move to align with U.S. interests, highlighting the complexities of international trade dynamics [5][9]. Group 3: U.S. Position - Despite some softening in Trump's stance towards China, this may not indicate a genuine desire for de-escalation but rather a tactical move to facilitate negotiations [7]. - The core of trade negotiations remains centered on actual interests, with China emphasizing the importance of maintaining a multilateral trade system and warning against opportunistic behaviors from other nations [9][10].

【环球时报驻美国特约记者 冯亚仁 环球时报记者 熊昕仪 环球时报特约记者 文远】商务部新闻发言人28日晚就美与有关国家关税谈判情况答记者问时表 示，中方乐见各方通过平等磋商解决与美方经贸分歧，但坚决反对任何一方以牺牲中方利益为代价达成交易，换取所谓关税减免。如果出现这种情况，中方 绝不接受，将坚决予以反制，维护自身正当权益。马来西亚《今日商业》杂志评论称，这是中国商务部对任何与美国达成损害中国利益贸易协议的国家发出 的严厉警告。与此同时，美国与贸易伙伴的谈判进展并不顺利。在美国政府"对等关税"90天暂停期即将于7月9日结束的背景下，美国总统特朗普仍然保留了 对许多贸易伙伴重新征收高额关税的可能性，美国财长贝森特也暗示，政府可能会给予各国更多时间进行谈判。美国《纽约时报》称，美方表态凸显了与美 国谈判时所面临的不确定性。 商务部研究院研究员周密29日对《环球时报》记者表示，中国一直坚持原则，即在多边框架下处理国与国之间的经贸问题，这就包括对所有国家都采取平等 互惠的方式。因此，如果个别国家在经贸谈判中不遵守多边原则，对中国造成损失，中方肯定不会认可这样的做法。商务部28日的表态也再一次明确释放了 信号：对于想跟 ...

Core Viewpoint - The event "Building Dreams Together for Development" highlighted the importance of Macau's role in economic diversification and integration into the national development framework, emphasizing its historical significance as a cultural exchange hub [1][2]. Group 1: Economic Development - Macau aims to enhance its economic diversification while improving governance efficiency to support national high-level openness and maintain social stability [1]. - The government plans to assist mainland enterprises and advanced technologies in expanding into Portuguese-speaking, Spanish-speaking, and Latin American countries, while also attracting foreign enterprises and business models to the Greater Bay Area market [1]. Group 2: International Cooperation - The China-Portuguese-speaking Countries Economic and Trade Cooperation Forum is seen as a stabilizing force amid recent international trade uncertainties, promoting predictability in economic relations [1]. - Key areas of focus include strengthening economic ties, maintaining a multilateral trade system, expanding cooperation in emerging fields, and deepening cultural exchanges to solidify mutual understanding [2]. Group 3: Cultural and Tourism Engagement - The media delegation engaged with various local organizations and visited significant cultural sites, reflecting Macau's appeal as a world tourism and leisure center [2]. - The event was part of a series of joint interviews aimed at covering all cities in the Greater Bay Area, showcasing the region's collaborative spirit [2].

Group 1 - The "2025 China Enterprises Going Global Summit" was held in Shenzhen, focusing on providing a high-end platform for Chinese companies to tackle challenges in globalization and explore win-win transformation paths [1] - The summit was co-hosted by the Global Council for Chinese Enterprises Going Global, emphasizing the need for dialogue on rules and resource connections amid deep restructuring of global industrial chains [1] Group 2 - Long Yongtu, former Vice Minister of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation, commented on the US's tariff plan, stating it has pushed globalization to the brink of collapse and will face strong resistance globally [3] - The results of the China-US Geneva talks in May indicated a return to pre-tariff levels, showcasing China's significant contribution to stabilizing global trade and maintaining multilateral trade systems [3] - The recent China-US economic consultations have elevated bilateral relations to a higher level, suggesting a positive outlook for the future of China-US economic relations [3]