Summary of Key Points from Conference Call Records Industry Overview - The recent market uptrend has been significantly driven by high-risk preference funds such as leveraged funds and private equity funds, while low-risk preference funds are focusing on structural opportunities [1][2][6]. Core Insights and Arguments - **Active Equity Funds**: There has been a marginal improvement in the issuance and redemption of active equity funds, with July's new issuance reaching 9.7 billion yuan, indicating a recovery from a previous low cycle [3][4]. - **ETF Performance**: Broad-based ETFs faced redemption pressure with a net outflow of 76.7 billion yuan in July, while industry-themed ETFs saw a net inflow of 31.7 billion yuan, particularly in sectors like cyclical, manufacturing, and finance [5]. - **Leverage Funds**: The inflow of leveraged funds has been rapid and significant since July, contributing to the bullish market sentiment [6]. - **Insurance Capital**: Insurance holdings increased significantly, reaching approximately 400 billion yuan in Q1, with the proportion of insurance capital in equity assets rising to 8.4%, the highest since 2022 [8][9]. - **Foreign Investment**: Foreign capital participation in A-shares has been increasing, with net inflows of nearly 20 billion yuan in July, indicating a recovery in market confidence [10]. - **Private Equity Funds**: The management scale and positions of private equity funds have increased significantly, marking them as a crucial source of incremental capital in the current market [11]. - **Retail Investor Participation**: Although the number of new accounts has risen, retail investor confidence remains slow to recover, with institutional investors primarily driving the current market uptrend [12]. - **IPO and Refinance Activity**: There has been a notable increase in IPO and refinancing activities among listed companies, but the pressure on market liquidity remains low compared to previous years [13]. Additional Important Insights - The issuance of floating management fee products has significantly contributed to the recovery of active equity fund issuance, with 22.7 billion yuan from these products in June [4]. - The market has seen three phases of industry-themed ETF growth in 2023, each associated with the TMT technology growth backdrop [5]. - The recent policies have facilitated insurance capital's entry into the market, with a notable increase in the number of stakes taken by insurance funds in listed companies [9].

Core Viewpoint - The approval of the second batch of 12 new model floating rate funds marks a significant step towards high-quality development in the public fund industry, with a focus on aligning the interests of fund managers and investors through a performance-based fee structure [1]. Group 1: Fund Approval and Management - On July 24, 2023, the second batch of 12 new model floating rate funds was approved [1]. - The funds were submitted by 12 fund management companies including E Fund, Southern, Huatai-PineBridge, and others, and were accepted by the China Securities Regulatory Commission on July 4 [1]. - Morgan Asset Management highlighted that the approval of the Morgan Huiqi Growth Mixed Fund represents an important step in responding to the high-quality development of the public fund industry [1]. Group 2: Fee Structure and Investor Benefits - The new fee structure ties management fees to fund performance and the investor's holding period, aiming to enhance the shared interests and risk-sharing between fund managers and investors [1]. - This approach is expected to improve the investment experience for holders [1]. - Morgan Asset Management emphasized its commitment to the development of actively managed equity funds, recognizing that investment performance is fundamental to the public fund's success [1].

Core Viewpoint - After three years of underperformance, active equity funds have rebounded significantly in 2024, with a notable performance divergence among top fund managers [1][3]. Performance Overview - The "Wande Mixed Equity Fund Index," representing active equity funds, showed a performance of -21.03% in 2022, -13.52% in 2023, and a positive 3.45% in 2024, compared to the Shanghai Composite Index's performance of -15.13%, -3.70%, and 12.67% respectively [3]. - As of August 6, 2024, the Wande Mixed Equity Fund Index has increased by 16.67%, outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index by over 8 percentage points and the CSI 300 Index by over 12 percentage points [3]. Star Fund Managers' Performance - Among 242 active equity funds managed by star fund managers with over 10 billion in assets, only 35% outperformed the Wande Mixed Equity Fund Index, while 68% outperformed the Shanghai Composite Index, and 85% outperformed the CSI 300 Index [4][5]. - Notably, over 60% of these funds underperformed the average of active equity funds, with 30% lagging behind the Shanghai Composite Index [5]. Sector Analysis - The underperformance of some star fund managers is attributed to their heavy investments in core stocks, particularly in the food and beverage sector, which has seen declines this year [5][11]. - The food and beverage sector index dropped by 6.06%, with the liquor index down by 8.41% as of August 7, 2024 [5]. Top Performers - Fund managers like Ge Lan and Zhao Bei have excelled, with Ge Lan's funds showing returns of 68.97% and 25.36% respectively, primarily due to heavy investments in innovative drugs, especially in Hong Kong stocks [7]. - Zhao Bei's funds have also performed well, with returns of 89.92% and 63.59%, benefiting from significant allocations to innovative drugs [7][8]. Growth Style Managers - A number of growth-oriented fund managers have also shown strong performance, with returns exceeding 30% for several funds managed by Du Meng and Li Xiaoxing [9]. - These managers have successfully navigated structural market changes by investing in emerging sectors such as AI, innovative drugs, and new consumption [9]. Underperformers - Some previously top-performing fund managers, such as Zheng Chengran and Liu Yanchun, have struggled, with several funds showing negative returns due to heavy exposure to underperforming sectors like liquor and renewable energy [11]. - The rapid market style shifts and the inability to adapt investment strategies have contributed to their underperformance [11]. Future Outlook - The public fund industry is expected to evolve towards a more team-oriented and systematic approach, with a shift away from reliance on star fund managers [12].

Core Insights - The article highlights the increasing role of Fund of Funds (FOF) and investment advisory services in identifying specialized and differentiated investment products in the current structural market environment [1][6] - There is a notable shift in the investment strategy from selecting "star fund managers" to choosing more transparent and practical quantitative or thematic products [6] FOF and Investment Strategies - FOFs have been actively increasing their allocations to various specialized products, particularly in active equity funds, amidst a backdrop of improved liquidity in the domestic market [1][2] - Notable quantitative products such as Nuon Multi-Strategy C and CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy C have seen significant interest from FOFs, with over 10 FOFs heavily investing in these funds by the end of Q2 [2][3] - The performance of these funds has been impressive, with Nuon Multi-Strategy C achieving a return rate exceeding 40% since Q2, while others like CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy C and Guojin Quantitative Multi-Factor C have returns around 20% [2][3] Thematic and Specialized Products - FOFs are also exploring other distinct active stock-picking products across various themes such as Hong Kong stocks, technology, dividends, gold stocks, finance, and real estate [2][3] - The demand for active equity funds is driven by the need for stable excess returns and clear investment logic, with a focus on products that can provide certainty in returns during structural market conditions [3][5] Risk Management and Investment Framework - The investment community is increasingly recognizing the importance of a comprehensive risk-return evaluation system, moving beyond traditional performance metrics to include strategy clarity and market adaptability [5][6] - Multi-asset strategies are seen as advantageous in capturing structural opportunities, allowing for diversified investments across low-correlated assets to optimize risk-return profiles [3][6] Evolution of Investment Preferences - There has been a significant evolution in the preferences of investment advisory services towards active equity funds, emphasizing the selection of strategies over individual fund managers [6] - The focus has shifted from short-term timing and stock selection capabilities of fund managers to utilizing tool-based products for long-term asset allocation [6]

Market Overview - Recent market performance has been strong, with US stocks experiencing a significant drop last Friday due to "data revision," yet continuing to rise this week, reaching new highs for the year [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index also hit a new closing high for the year, indicating a vibrant market environment [1] - Key indicators of market activity include a trading volume of 1.73 trillion and margin financing data surpassing 2 trillion for the first time in ten years [1] Investment Trends - The market is currently favoring sectors such as technology (AI, robotics, innovative pharmaceuticals) and banking, leading to profitable opportunities [1] - There is a notable structural market trend this year, with actively managed equity funds outperforming passive funds [2][3] - The average return of equity mixed funds has increased by 15.81%, while the CSI 300 Index has only risen by 4.28% [1] Fund Performance - A review of actively managed equity funds shows that only 16 funds met the criteria of having over 500 million in size, a three-year return exceeding 30%, and a maximum drawdown within 20% [6] - The selected funds are primarily managed by experienced fund managers, most of whom have over ten years of experience [7] Notable Fund Managers - Yang Chonghan from Huatai-PB focuses on financial sectors, achieving a return of 20.93% this year, outperforming the banking index which rose by 13.59% [8] - Jiang Cheng, known for value investing, has two funds that focus on dividend stocks, particularly in the banking sector, showing strong performance in both volatile and rising markets [8] - Xu Yan from Dacheng has three funds listed, maintaining a consistent performance with a stock holding ratio around 60% [9] Fund Selection Criteria - The selection criteria for the funds included a minimum size of 500 million, a three-year return of over 30%, and a maximum drawdown of 20% [5] - The analysis suggests that the defensive capabilities of these funds are strong, with a focus on minimizing drawdowns while still achieving reasonable returns [13]

The provided content does not contain any specific quantitative models or factors, nor does it include detailed construction processes, formulas, or backtesting results for such models or factors. The report primarily focuses on the performance, allocation, and trends of active equity funds in various industries during Q2 2025. Below is a summary of the key points: - Active equity funds' net asset value weighted average return in Q2 2025 was 2.14%, with a median return of 1.85%[6][15][115] - The top 10 funds by return in Q2 2025 achieved approximately 30% growth, with a total net subscription of 9.02 billion yuan[8][39][41] - The top 10 funds by net subscription in Q2 2025 collectively reached 217.30 billion yuan, with a median return of 12.55%[39][40] - Active equity funds' overall stock positions increased slightly to 85.97% in Q2 2025, up 0.50 percentage points from Q1 2025[7][28][115] - The top four industries with the highest active equity fund allocations in Q2 2025 were electronics, healthcare, electric power and new energy equipment, and food and beverages[9][43][46] - The top four industries with the highest active equity fund overweighting in Q2 2025 were telecommunications (2.08 percentage points), banking (0.71 percentage points), defense and military (0.61 percentage points), and electronics (0.45 percentage points)[9][43][46] - The top four industries with the highest absolute returns in Q2 2025 were telecommunications (21.77%), commercial trade (21.55%), agriculture (19.03%), and insurance (12.51%)[108][116] - Non-sector-themed funds showed the highest active overweighting in telecommunications (2.09 percentage points), banking (0.92 percentage points), insurance (0.58 percentage points), and defense and military (0.46 percentage points)[9][111][116] No quantitative models or factors were explicitly mentioned in the report. The focus was on fund performance, industry allocation, and market trends.

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant performance disparity between actively managed equity funds and thematic ETFs, particularly in the booming sectors of humanoid robots and innovative pharmaceuticals, with ETFs gaining substantial scale due to their advantages in capturing market trends [1][2]. Group 1: Performance of Funds - The innovative pharmaceutical sector has seen a strong market performance, leading to a total of 17 "doubling funds" in 2023, all of which are related to this theme, with 10 being actively managed equity funds and 7 being thematic ETFs [1]. - The top-performing innovative pharmaceutical funds include several actively managed funds and ETFs, with notable mentions such as Huatai-PB Hang Seng Innovative Pharmaceutical ETF and others [1]. - Despite the strong performance of actively managed funds, their scale growth has lagged behind that of ETFs, with the top 10 innovative pharmaceutical active funds having a total scale of only 9.4 billion yuan at the end of Q2, while the 7 ETFs increased their scale by 12.9 billion yuan to reach 28.4 billion yuan [2]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The rapid growth of ETFs is attributed to their passive tracking mechanism, which allows them to effectively capture beta returns from high-growth sectors, making them more appealing to investors compared to actively managed funds [3]. - The expansion of ETFs has put pressure on actively managed equity funds, which are struggling to attract new investments despite their strong performance, as investors prefer the transparency and lower costs associated with ETFs [4]. - The management fees for ETFs are generally lower than those for actively managed funds, further enhancing their attractiveness to investors [4]. Group 3: Future Trends - The emergence of new ETFs focused on themes such as artificial intelligence and cloud computing indicates a shift in investor preference towards passive investment strategies, while the success of actively managed funds will increasingly depend on the historical performance of fund managers [5]. - The coexistence of passive and active investment strategies is essential, as both serve different investor needs and risk profiles, with active funds playing a crucial role in value discovery [5][6].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the significant performance disparity between actively managed equity funds and thematic ETFs, particularly in the context of the booming human-robot and innovative drug sectors [1][2][4] - The number of "doubling funds" in the innovative drug sector reached 17 by July 29, with 10 being actively managed equity funds and 7 being thematic ETFs, showcasing the strong performance of these funds [2][3] - Actively managed equity funds have achieved substantial excess returns due to stock-picking abilities, but their scale expansion has lagged behind that of ETFs, which have benefited from the strong market performance of specific sectors [2][3] Group 2 - Data shows that the 10 actively managed innovative drug funds had a total scale of 9.4 billion yuan at the end of Q2, with an increase of 5.8 billion yuan during the quarter, while the 7 ETFs saw an increase of 12.9 billion yuan, reaching 28.4 billion yuan [3] - The rapid growth of ETFs is attributed to their passive tracking mechanism, which allows them to capture industry beta returns effectively, leading investors to prefer ETFs for quick exposure to high-growth sectors [4][5] - The rise of ETFs has created competitive pressure on actively managed equity funds, which are struggling to attract new investments despite their strong performance [5][6] Group 3 - The article notes that the existence of actively managed equity funds remains valuable, as they can smooth out volatility through strategic stock selection, contrasting with the automatic rebalancing of ETFs [6][7] - The current trend indicates that passive products like ETFs are more attractive to investors, prompting actively managed funds to seek differentiated strategies for survival [7] - The article warns that while ETFs offer convenience, investors should be cautious of their short-term speculative nature, which can exacerbate market volatility [8]

主动权益基金情绪偏乐观， 证券研究报告 银行行业配置达到历史高位 —— 量化市场追踪周报（2025W30） 请阅读最后一页免责声明及信息披露 http://www.cindasc.com 1 [Table_ReportTime] 2025 年 4 月 27 日 金工研究 [Table_ReportType] 金工定期报告 [Table_Author] 于明明 金融工程与金融产品 首席分析师 执业编号：S1500521070001 联系电话：+86 18616021459 邮 箱：yumingming@cindasc.com 吴彦锦 金融工程与金融产品 分析师 执业编号：S1500523090002 联系电话：+86 18616819227 邮 箱：wuyanjin@cindasc.com 周君睿 金融工程与金融产品 分析师 执业编号：S1500523110005 联系电话：+86 19821223545 邮 箱：zhoujunrui@cindasc.com [Table_Title] 量化市场追踪周报(2025W30)：主动权益基金情绪 偏乐观，银行行业配置达到历史高位 [Table_ReportDate] ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of sustained outperformance by fund managers in the A-share market, highlighting the need for true alpha rather than high volatility smart beta. It identifies the "Guangfa Multi-Factor" fund as a standout performer, having outperformed major indices for seven consecutive years, a rarity in the market [1][6]. Fund Performance and Management - Guangfa Multi-Factor, managed by Yang Dong and Tang Xiaobin, has shown a diversified portfolio with a balanced style. Other funds managed by Yang Dong, such as Guangfa Value Navigator and Guangfa Balanced Growth, also reached new net value highs in July [2]. - As of June 30, 2025, Guangfa Multi-Factor achieved an absolute return of 11% in the first half of the year, with a cumulative return of 345.84% since inception and an annualized return of 19.21%. In comparison, the CSI 300 and CSI 800 indices rose by 19.36% and 11.76%, respectively [7]. Investment Strategy - Yang Dong employs a team-based, multi-strategy approach to achieve stable and sustainable excess returns, contrasting with single-manager fund management [3][4]. - The article discusses the significance of "continuity" in investment performance, noting that Guangfa Multi-Factor is one of only two active equity funds that have outperformed major indices consistently over the past seven years [6]. Fund Characteristics - The funds managed by Yang Dong are categorized into two types: core funds aimed at outperforming major indices and style-enhanced funds for more sophisticated investors [9]. - The article outlines the distinct characteristics of the funds, including their investment scope and holding patterns, with Guangfa Multi-Factor focusing on a broad market allocation while other funds target specific sectors [8][9]. Team and Strategy Integration - Yang Dong's team combines subjective and quantitative strategies to enhance investment performance, leveraging both macroeconomic insights and data-driven analysis [21][22]. - The article highlights the unique aspects of Yang Dong's team, including the management of diverse products, the collaborative effort in generating excess returns, and the specialized roles within the team [33]. Market Adaptation - The article notes that Yang Dong's team has demonstrated strong industry allocation capabilities, adjusting their strategies based on market conditions and sector performance [15]. - The funds have shown adaptability in their holdings, with significant changes in top positions reflecting market trends and opportunities [27][29].