Group 1 - Iran's Foreign Minister, Amir-Abdollahian, expressed the country's readiness to engage in fair and respectful negotiations if all parties are prepared to do so [1] - The Iranian government emphasizes that negotiations must be based on mutual respect and common interests, rather than threats and pressure [1] - Since April, indirect negotiations mediated by Oman have taken place, but significant disagreements remain on key issues such as uranium enrichment [1] Group 2 - The deadline for the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the corresponding UN Security Council Resolution 2231 has expired, leading to the termination of restrictions and mechanisms related to Iran's peaceful nuclear program [2]

Core Points - Iran's Foreign Minister, Zarif, stated that Iran will not resume negotiations with the U.S. as long as the U.S. makes "unreasonable demands" [1] - Iran has been in indirect negotiations with the U.S. since April, facilitated by Oman, but significant disagreements remain on key issues such as uranium enrichment [1] - The sixth round of negotiations, originally scheduled for June 15, was canceled due to an Israeli attack on Iran [1] - The U.S. and European powers announced on September 27 that the mechanism to quickly restore sanctions on Iran has been completed, leading to the reimposition of relevant UN sanctions [1] Summary by Sections Negotiation Status - Iran's negotiations with the U.S. are currently paused due to U.S. demands deemed excessive by Iran [1] - Iran has attempted to communicate with the U.S. through intermediaries but has received no response [1] Diplomatic Efforts - Iran emphasizes its commitment to diplomatic and peaceful solutions despite the stalled negotiations [1] - Zarif insists that negotiations can only continue on the basis of equality and respect, rejecting any unreasonable preconditions [1] Recent Developments - The indirect talks have seen five rounds since April, with major disagreements persisting on critical issues [1] - The reimposition of sanctions by the UN on Iran was announced following a statement from the U.S. and European allies [1]

Core Points - The Iranian Foreign Ministry announced that the 10-year deadline for the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and UN Security Council Resolution 2231 has expired, leading to the termination of restrictions and mechanisms related to Iran's peaceful nuclear program [1] - The resolution, passed in July 2015, aimed to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear activities while gradually lifting sanctions as Iran complied with nuclear limitations [1] - Iran emphasized that with the expiration of the deadline, the original mechanisms should naturally cease to exist, and the nuclear issue should be removed from the Security Council's agenda [1] Summary by Sections - **JCPOA and Resolution 2231**: The Iranian Foreign Ministry stated that the JCPOA and the corresponding UN Security Council Resolution 2231's 10-year period has ended, implying that all related restrictions are now void [1] - **Background of Resolution 2231**: The resolution was established to address Iran's nuclear issue within the non-proliferation agenda, allowing for the gradual lifting of sanctions as Iran adhered to nuclear restrictions [1] - **Iran's Position**: Iran claims that the main goal of the Security Council regarding its nuclear program has been achieved, as no reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have indicated violations by Iran [1] - **Future of Iran's Nuclear Program**: Iran intends for its nuclear program to be treated equally to that of other non-nuclear weapon states under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, subject only to regular IAEA oversight without additional restrictions [1] - **Diplomatic Approach**: Iran will continue to seek diplomatic solutions to disputes while asserting its sovereignty and the legitimacy of its peaceful nuclear program [1]

Core Points - Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif stated that Iran is open to negotiations with the U.S. only if they are based on equality, mutual respect, and common interests [1][2] - Zarif emphasized that the only negotiation topic is the nuclear issue, reiterating Iran's long-standing position [1] - Zarif expressed that there is currently no basis for reopening negotiations due to recent events during the UN General Assembly [1] Summary by Sections Negotiation Conditions - Iran is willing to negotiate if the U.S. is prepared to engage on an equal basis without imposing demands [1] - Zarif highlighted that any reasonable proposal that protects Iranian interests would be considered [2] Recent Developments - During the UN General Assembly, there were contacts between the two sides, but the U.S. position was deemed unreasonable by Iran [1] - The U.S. suggested delaying the "snapback" sanctions mechanism for six months in exchange for Iran surrendering all 60% enriched uranium, which Iran rejected as unacceptable [1] Multilateral Negotiation Framework - Zarif indicated that Iran prefers negotiations to occur within a multilateral framework, involving the UK, France, Germany, and the IAEA [1] - The U.S. envoy's refusal to accept this proposal led to a deadlock in discussions [1] Historical Context - Zarif pointed out that the U.S. unilaterally withdrew from the 2015 nuclear agreement and reinstated sanctions, complicating the negotiation landscape [1]

Core Points - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei stated that there are currently no new negotiation plans regarding the Iranian nuclear issue [1] - The focus of Iran is on assessing the impacts and consequences of recent actions by the UK, France, Germany, and the US [1] - Diplomatic activities continue in the form of ongoing contacts and consultations [1] Summary by Sections Iran's Position - Baghaei criticized the UK, France, and Germany for their "irresponsible and destructive" actions over the past three months [1] - He accused these countries of abusing the dispute resolution mechanism of the nuclear agreement to impose US demands on the UN Security Council [1] - Despite the conditions proposed by these countries being illogical, Iran has decided to maintain dialogue with the International Atomic Energy Agency [1] Diplomatic Actions - Iran will utilize all necessary diplomatic and other means to assert the legitimacy of its position [1] - The international community is urged not to accept or recognize the impacts and consequences of what Iran deems illegal actions [1] UN Security Council Developments - On August 28, the UK, France, and Germany notified the UN Security Council to initiate the "snapback sanctions" mechanism due to Iran's violations of the nuclear agreement [1] - A draft resolution aimed at extending the 2015 comprehensive agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue was voted on by the Security Council on September 26 but did not pass [1] - The UN Secretary-General's spokesperson confirmed that six previously passed sanctions resolutions against Iran were reactivated as of September 27 [1]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei stated that there are currently no new negotiation plans regarding the Iranian nuclear issue, emphasizing the evaluation of the recent actions and consequences of the UK, France, Germany, and the US [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Relations - Iran is continuing diplomatic activities through ongoing contacts and consultations despite the lack of new negotiation plans [1] - Baghaei criticized the UK, France, and Germany for their "irresponsible and destructive" actions over the past three months, accusing them of misusing the dispute resolution mechanism of the nuclear agreement [1] Group 2: Nuclear Agreement and Sanctions - The three European countries notified the UN Security Council on August 28 about Iran's violations of the nuclear agreement, initiating the "snapback sanctions" mechanism [1] - On September 26, the Security Council voted on a draft resolution aimed at extending the 2015 comprehensive agreement on Iran's nuclear issue, which was not passed [1] - The UN Secretary-General's spokesperson confirmed on September 28 that six previously passed sanctions resolutions against Iran were reactivated as of September 27 [1]

Core Points - The UN has reinstated sanctions on Iran due to the "snapback" mechanism pushed by the UK, France, and Germany, which Russia does not recognize and will not enforce [1][2] - Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov has advised the UN against hastily implementing sanctions and re-establishing a sanctions committee [4] - Iran's Foreign Minister has criticized the European countries' actions as legally and procedurally flawed, asserting Iran's willingness to resolve issues through diplomacy [4] - Iranian President Pezeshkian stated that Iran has made necessary arrangements to overcome the reinstated sanctions, emphasizing that the situation is manageable [5] - The backdrop includes the 2015 nuclear agreement, the U.S. withdrawal in 2018, and subsequent tensions leading to the current sanctions [7] Group 1 - The UN has completed the process to reinstate sanctions on Iran, which Russia does not acknowledge [1][2] - Russia's stance is that the "snapback" mechanism is not valid for them, creating a divide in international response [2] - Lavrov's communication with the UN Secretary-General indicates Russia's opposition to the sanctions [4] Group 2 - Iran's leadership has expressed confidence in managing the consequences of the reinstated sanctions [5] - Diplomatic efforts by Iran with European nations during the UN General Assembly have yielded some results, despite U.S. demands being unacceptable [5] - The historical context of the nuclear agreement and subsequent U.S. actions has led to the current geopolitical tensions [7]

巴加埃表示，美国在2018年单方面退出伊核协议，并持续违反国际法、破坏协议执行，是导致当前局势 的根源。七国集团声称"美欧多次善意提出外交解决方案，以防局势倒退并寻求全面、持久解决"纯属说 谎与颠倒黑白。他还强调，欧洲三国因追随美国而未能履行自身义务，甚至支持以色列与美国对伊朗和 平核设施进行军事打击，严重违背了伊核协议承诺，也无视伊朗在外交道路上作出的努力。 （文章来源：央视新闻客户端） 当地时间10月2日，伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃谴责七国集团(G7)就伊朗核问题发表的声明，称其"虚伪并 歪曲事实"。 巴加埃称，欧洲三国和美国恢复已废止的安理会涉伊制裁决议，这一非法、不合理的做法是对伊核协议 争端解决机制的滥用，毫无法律或逻辑依据。七国集团对此表示欢迎，实际上是在为违反国际法的行为 背书。他强调，这一立场丝毫不能掩盖相关国家行径的非法和不正当本质。 巴加埃同时谴责七国集团在核不扩散问题上的双重标准，称其对以色列核武器库保持沉默，凸显其立场 的虚伪和不负责任。他强调，七国集团因其在国际法、和平与安全问题上的失责，已不具备向他国说教 的任何道义资格。(总台记者王寅) ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Union has reinstated a series of sanctions against Iran that were previously suspended due to the 2015 nuclear agreement [2] Group 1: Sanction Measures - The sanctions include travel bans, asset freezes, and economic and financial restrictions [2] - Specific measures prohibit the export of weapons and equipment related to nuclear activities to Iran [2] - Restrictions are placed on the import and transportation of oil, natural gas, and petrochemical products from Iran [2] Group 2: Financial and Trade Implications - The sanctions involve freezing assets of the Central Bank of Iran and major commercial banks [2] - Iranian cargo flights are banned from entering EU airports, impacting trade logistics [2]

面对压力，伊朗亮出了自己的两手策略。首先是"盾牌"：强调美国才是2018年首先毁约的一方，因此伊朗后续的浓缩铀提升等行为，完全是对不公的回应； 其次是军事防御——今年夏天，以色列在美方配合下，对伊朗纳坦兹等设施发动空袭。此后，伊朗以"安全风险"为由拒绝国际核查人员进入，这既是现实考 量，也是防御手段。 欧洲和伊朗的核争端，早已不只是"口水战"。一边是英国、法国、德国启动了30天内可恢复制裁的快速机制，另一边则是伊朗高层警告"所有选项都摆在桌 面上"。这种对峙的紧张气氛，已经不容忽视。 欧洲的态度很明确：如果德黑兰继续强硬，之前好不容易解除的国际制裁，将会加倍回归。原本为了限制核武发展、换取和平的国际协议，如今却成了引爆 新一轮危机的导火索。讽刺的是，这份寄予厚望的文件，已彻底失去了稳定局势的作用。 2015年签署的伊核协议，如今被欧洲、伊朗和美国各自当作工具：欧洲拿它当"法律武器"，伊朗把它当成"攻防筹码"，美国则利用"退场"的空缺左右局势。 结果，这场围绕规则的较量，已变成真正的角力。 英、法、德三国这次撕下调解者的面具，向伊朗发出了最后警告：要么配合，要么接受联合国层面的严厉制裁。法国总统马克龙甚至暗示， ...