Core Points - The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement emphasizes that the actions of European signatories to the Iran nuclear deal to restore sanctions are provocative and illegal, potentially escalating tensions around the Iran nuclear issue [1][2] - The statement highlights that the UN Security Council's vote on September 19 to continue lifting sanctions against Iran saw Russia, China, Algeria, and Pakistan voting in favor, while the European countries and the US voted against [1] - The Russian Foreign Ministry asserts that the vote does not allow other countries to restore sanctions against Iran, and it condemns the Western countries' disregard for international law [1][2] Summary by Sections - **Russia's Position on Sanctions** The Russian Foreign Ministry criticizes the push by European countries and the US to restore sanctions on Iran, labeling it as a violation of international law and a source of increased tension [1][2] - **UN Security Council Vote** The UN Security Council's recent vote resulted in a failure to pass a resolution to continue lifting sanctions against Iran, with Russia and its allies supporting the resolution while Western nations opposed it [1][2] - **Future Diplomatic Efforts** Russia, alongside China, has proposed a technical extension of the UN Security Council Resolution 2231 to create conditions for negotiations and to address concerns regarding Iran's peaceful use of nuclear energy [2]

Group 1 - The Russian Foreign Ministry condemned the attempts by the UK, France, and Germany to forcefully push for the restoration of sanctions against Iran in the UN Security Council [1] - The Russian side has repeatedly pointed out that the actions of the European countries involved in the Iran nuclear deal are provocative and illegal [1] - These actions will further escalate tensions surrounding Iran's nuclear program [1] Group 2 - The UN Security Council failed to pass a draft resolution to continue lifting sanctions on Iran on the 19th [1]

Group 1 - The UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution to extend the sanctions waiver on Iran, with the proposal not receiving the required nine votes for approval [2] - The resolution was proposed by South Korea, the rotating president of the Security Council in September, and was opposed by the US, UK, and France among others [2] - If the resolution had passed, it would have continued to lift UN sanctions on Iran based on the 2015 nuclear deal and Security Council Resolution 2231 [2] Group 2 - The UK, France, and Germany triggered the "snapback" sanctions mechanism on August 28, citing Iran's "serious non-compliance" with the nuclear deal [2][3] - The "snapback" mechanism allows for the restoration of sanctions if the Security Council does not pass a resolution to continue the sanctions waiver within 30 days [2] - There are concerns regarding the legality of the "snapback" mechanism activation by the UK, France, and Germany, as it bypassed the required "dispute resolution mechanism" [3] Group 3 - Iran has expressed opposition to the activation of the "snapback" mechanism and reached an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency regarding the resumption of verification activities in Iran [3] - Despite the failure to pass the sanctions waiver resolution, negotiations on the issue may continue during the upcoming General Assembly debate [3]

Core Viewpoint - The UN Security Council voted on a proposal to reinstate sanctions against Iran, resulting in 4 votes in favor, 9 against, and 2 abstentions, leading to the restoration of sanctions by the end of the month due to insufficient support for exemption [1] Group 1: Sanctions and Agreements - The sanctions that were previously exempted under the Iran nuclear deal will be reinstated on the 28th of this month [1] - China and Russia voted in favor of continuing the exemption from sanctions [1] - The Iran nuclear deal, established in 2015, involved Iran agreeing to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions [1] Group 2: Political Reactions - Iran criticized the European nations for threatening to reinstate international sanctions, labeling their actions as politically motivated [1] - Iran warned that if diplomatic efforts fail, it would consider all options available [1] Group 3: Historical Context - The nuclear agreement has been in a state of suspension since the U.S. unilaterally withdrew during Trump's presidency, leading Iran to retract some of its commitments a year later [1] - The UK, France, and Germany have proposed to the Security Council that Iran has violated the 2015 agreement by not adhering to its commitments to limit nuclear weapons development [1]

Core Points - The UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution to continue lifting sanctions on Iran, with the proposal not receiving the required nine votes for approval [1] - The resolution was proposed by South Korea, the rotating president of the Security Council for September, and received support from China, Russia, Pakistan, and Algeria, while the US, UK, and France opposed it [1] - If passed, the resolution would have continued to lift sanctions based on the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and relevant Security Council Resolution 2231 [1] - The UK, France, and Germany initiated a "snapback" mechanism on August 28, citing Iran's violations of the nuclear deal, which would restore sanctions if no resolution is passed within 30 days [1] - The legality of the "snapback" mechanism is questioned, as it bypassed the required "dispute resolution mechanism" outlined in the nuclear deal and Resolution 2231 [1] - Iran has expressed opposition to the "snapback" mechanism and reached an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency on September 9 regarding the restoration of verification activities in Iran [1] Diplomatic Developments - Iran, along with the UK, France, Germany, and other relevant countries, has approximately one week to engage in diplomatic discussions to prevent the restoration of sanctions [2]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei stated that Iran will not yield to what it considers "illegal" demands from the West, which aim to strip Iran of its "inalienable" nuclear rights [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Relations - Baghaei accused the three European countries of acting under U.S. directives, which he claims severely undermines the diplomatic process and lacks goodwill [1] - He emphasized that these countries have neither legal authority nor moral legitimacy to restore sanctions against Iran, arguing that such actions violate both the text and spirit of the Iran nuclear agreement and UN Security Council resolutions [1] Group 2: Recent Developments - Over the past three to four months, Iran engaged in diplomatic efforts with the U.S., demonstrating goodwill and adhering to diplomatic commitments [1] - However, just two days before the sixth round of negotiations, Israel launched attacks on Iran, followed by coordinated strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities by the U.S. and Israel, which Baghaei labeled as acts of aggression aimed at sabotaging negotiations [1] Group 3: Sanctions and Responses - On August 28, the foreign ministers of the UK, France, and Germany issued a joint statement regarding the Iran nuclear issue, notifying the UN Security Council of their intention to activate a "rapid re-imposition of sanctions" mechanism [1] - If the Security Council does not pass a resolution to extend the sanctions waiver against Iran within 30 days, the related sanctions will be restored [1] - Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif condemned this move as lacking justification and indicated that Iran would respond appropriately [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the UK, France, and Germany have initiated the "snapback sanctions" mechanism regarding Iran's nuclear issue, warning that if the UN Security Council does not extend the sanctions waiver within 30 days, previous sanctions will be reinstated [1][2] - The three countries have expressed their intention to continue diplomatic engagement with Iran during the 30-day countdown [2][6] - Iran's Foreign Minister has condemned the actions of the UK, France, and Germany as unjustified and illegal, indicating that Iran will respond appropriately [3][7] Group 2 - Since 2019, Iran has failed to comply with the nuclear agreement, prompting the UK, France, and Germany to take this action [2] - The "snapback sanctions" mechanism allows the signatories of the nuclear agreement to respond to Iran's violations, with the mechanism's validity set to expire on October 18 of this year [2] - Iran has gradually ceased compliance with parts of the nuclear agreement since May 2019, but maintains that its actions are reversible [2]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Ministry strongly opposes and condemns the European countries' submission of a notification to the UN Security Council regarding Resolution 2231, claiming it violates the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the resolution itself [1][2]. Group 1: Iran's Position - Iran asserts that the European countries lack legal or moral authority to invoke the "snapback" mechanism of Resolution 2231, deeming their notification invalid and without legal effect [1]. - The JCPOA's dispute resolution mechanism is highlighted as an essential part of the agreement, designed to prevent any party from abusing their rights, particularly by countries like Germany, France, and the UK that have not fulfilled their commitments [1]. - Iran emphasizes that the misuse of the mechanism, especially following the illegal attack on its nuclear facilities by the US, reflects malicious intent [1]. Group 2: Criticism of European Countries - Iran accuses the European countries of ignoring the broader context and distorting the sequence of events, claiming they are rewarding violators while punishing victims [2]. - The unilateral withdrawal of the US from the JCPOA in 2018 and the subsequent re-imposition of sanctions are attributed to the US, not Iran, while the failure of European countries to mitigate the economic impacts of this withdrawal is also criticized [2]. - The decision by the European countries is said to severely undermine the ongoing interactions and cooperation between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), with Iran indicating it will respond appropriately to this provocation [2].

Core Points - Iran and the three European countries (UK, France, Germany) held a new round of nuclear negotiations in Geneva on August 26, focusing on the views regarding UN Security Council Resolution 2231 [1] - Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, Karimi, emphasized the country's commitment to seeking a mutually beneficial diplomatic solution and urged the European nations and the UN Security Council to provide diplomatic time and space [1] - The 2015 nuclear agreement required Iran to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions, with Resolution 2231 endorsing the agreement and including a "snapback" mechanism for sanctions in case of violations, which is effective until October 18 of this year [1] Summary by Sections Negotiation Context - The recent negotiations followed a previous round on July 25 in Geneva, indicating ongoing diplomatic efforts between Iran and European powers [1] Diplomatic Stance - Iran's position remains focused on diplomacy, with calls for the European nations to make the right choices regarding the nuclear agreement [1] Sanctions Mechanism - The "snapback" mechanism allows signatories to respond to Iran's violations, highlighting the pressure on Iran to comply with the nuclear agreement and cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency [1]

伊朗国家电视台报道称，本周二，伊朗将与2015年伊核协议的三个欧洲缔约方（英、法、德）以及欧 盟，在日内瓦举行副外长级别的新一轮谈判。在与以色列的12天军事冲突结束后，伊朗暂停了与联合国 核监督机构的合作。德黑兰方面认为，国际原子能机构（IAEA）未能谴责以色列和美国对其核设施的 打击行为。欧洲三国威胁称，将根据2015年核协议启动"回弹机制"——该机制将重新实施协议框架下已 取消的联合国制裁，除非伊朗同意限制其铀浓缩活动，并恢复与国际原子能机构核查人员的合作。伊朗 对启动该条款的合法性提出异议，指责欧洲国家未履行协议中的承诺。 2015年，伊朗与美国、英国、法国、俄罗斯、中国和德国达成伊核问题全面协议。2018年，美国单方面 退出该协议，随后恢复并不断升级对伊单边制裁。在阿曼斡旋下，美国和伊朗自今年4月以来举行五轮 由斡旋方居中传话的间接谈判，双方在若干核心议题上分歧巨大。第六轮谈判原定于6月15日举行，因 以色列突袭伊朗而取消。 在此前的冲突中，美国对伊朗的核设施实施了打击。卡塔尔半岛电视台25日称，伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊 24日表示，美国企图通过对抗迫使伊朗服从，那些主张通过与美直接谈判解决问题的人是"浅 ...