Core Viewpoint - Bill Gross, co-founder of PIMCO, suggests that the actual federal funds rate may bottom out around mid-2027, indicating a moderate bearish outlook on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds following the Jackson Hole meeting [1] Interest Rate Outlook - The interest rate market trends post-Jackson Hole suggest that the federal funds rate could decline to 3% in approximately two years [1] - Gross anticipates that the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds could reach 4%, although he finds this difficult to imagine given the future supply of trillions of dollars [1] Yield Predictions - Investors are advised to maintain a moderately bearish stance, with expectations that the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds will fluctuate between 4.15% and 4.45% in the coming months [1] - The current yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds is approximately 4.3%, which Gross notes is "not cheap, especially after taxes" [1] Year-to-Date Performance - Year-to-date, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds has decreased by 6.3%, but it has increased by 13.1% compared to one year ago [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve is expected to implement six rate cuts of 25 basis points each over the next 18 months, potentially lowering the federal funds rate to 3.0% by the end of 2026 [1] Group 1: Economic Indicators - The U.S. labor market has shown significant signs of slowing down [1] - Inflation conditions have improved markedly compared to three years ago [1] Group 2: Federal Reserve Leadership - Stephen Milan's upcoming addition to the Federal Reserve Board and the anticipated new chair replacing Jerome Powell by May suggest a downward trend in interest rates over the next 18 months [1]

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve decided to maintain the federal funds rate target range at 4.25%-4.5%, marking the fifth consecutive pause in rate hikes since March 2023 [1] - The FOMC members unanimously acknowledged a slowdown in economic activity growth in the first half of the year, despite fluctuations in net exports affecting data [1] - The decision to keep the benchmark interest rate unchanged was supported by a 9-2 vote, with two members advocating for a 25 basis point cut to prevent further weakening of the labor market [1] Group 2 - Recent labor market data showed that July's non-farm payroll additions were significantly below expectations, with an increase in the unemployment rate and a drop in labor force participation to its lowest level since the end of 2022 [1] - Historical revisions to employment data for May and June erased over 250,000 job additions, undermining the perception of a strong labor market [1] - The mixed inflation data in July has caused discomfort within the Federal Reserve, with ongoing tariff effects expected to continue pushing inflation higher in the coming months [2]

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve decided to maintain the federal funds rate target range at 4.25%-4.5% during the FOMC meeting held from July 29 to 30 [1][3] - Committee members acknowledged that economic activity growth has slowed in the first half of the year, despite fluctuations in net exports affecting data [1] - Inflation remains slightly elevated, and there is a high level of uncertainty regarding the economic outlook [1] Group 2 - Almost all committee members agreed to keep the federal funds rate unchanged, with some dissenting votes advocating for a 25 basis point cut to prevent further weakening in the labor market [3]

Financial Market Dynamics and Open Market Operations - The current target range for the federal funds rate is approaching a neutral level, with GDP forecasts for 2025 to 2027 similar to those prepared for the June meeting [1] - Almost all participants at the Federal Reserve's July meeting agreed that maintaining the benchmark interest rate in the range of 4.25% to 4.50% is appropriate [1] - The impact of tariffs is becoming more evident in commodity prices, but the overall effect on the economy and inflation remains to be seen [1] - The market perceives the overall U.S. economy as resilient, but financial markets are beginning to differentiate between individual companies based on earnings scale and quality [1] - Existing data shows that foreign holdings of U.S. assets remain relatively stable [1] - Reserves remain in a state of abundance [1] Economic Situation Assessment - Actual GDP growth in the first half of the year has been moderate, with the unemployment rate remaining low and consumer price inflation still slightly elevated [1] - Inflation appears to have stagnated, with tariffs exerting upward pressure on commodity price inflation [1] - The labor market remains robust [1] Financial Situation Assessment - The U.S. financial system is still described as "significantly" fragile, with asset valuation pressures remaining high [1] - Vulnerabilities related to non-financial corporate and household debt are characterized as "moderate," with household debt to GDP ratio at its lowest level in the past 20 years and household balance sheets remaining strong [1] - The debt repayment capacity of listed companies remains strong [1] Economic Outlook - Commodity price increases are expected to be smaller and occur later than previously anticipated, with financial conditions expected to provide slightly stronger support for output growth [1] - The labor market is anticipated to weaken, with the unemployment rate expected to rise above the estimated natural rate by the end of this year and remain above it until 2027 [1] - Tariffs are expected to push inflation higher this year and provide further upward pressure on inflation in 2026, with inflation projected to decline to 2% by 2027 [1] - High uncertainty remains, primarily reflecting changes in economic policy and their related economic impacts [1] Current Economic Conditions and Outlook - Overall inflation remains slightly above the long-term target of 2%, but excluding tariff effects, inflation is close to the target [1] - Short-term inflation is expected to rise, with significant uncertainty regarding the impact of tariffs, which will take time to manifest in prices [1] - Current demand conditions limit companies' ability to pass tariff costs onto prices [1] - Long-term inflation expectations remain stable [1] - The unemployment rate remains low, with employment at or near maximum estimated levels [1] - Economic activity growth is expected to remain low in the second half of the year, with weakened housing demand, increased unsold homes, and declining home prices [1] - Uncertainty regarding the economic outlook remains high, emphasizing upward inflation risks and downward employment risks [1] - Concerns about the fragility of the U.S. Treasury market may increase demand for U.S. government bonds [1]

Core Viewpoint - President Trump criticizes Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for maintaining high interest rates, claiming it severely harms the U.S. housing industry and makes it difficult for citizens to obtain mortgages [2][2][2] Summary by Relevant Sections Federal Reserve Policy - The Federal Reserve decided to keep the federal funds rate target range unchanged at 4.25% to 4.50% during its monetary policy meeting on July 30, marking the fifth consecutive meeting with no change in rates [2][2][2] Trump's Statements - Trump asserts that there are "no signs of inflation" and that "all signals point to a significant rate cut" [2][2][2] - He labels Powell as "a disaster" and has repeatedly called for substantial rate cuts [2][2][2] - Trump has indicated plans to appoint a new Federal Reserve chairman ahead of schedule [2][2][2] Legal Considerations - The White House confirmed that Trump is considering legal action against Powell regarding the rising costs of renovations at the Federal Reserve headquarters [2][2][2]

Core Viewpoint - President Trump criticizes Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for maintaining high interest rates, claiming it severely harms the U.S. housing industry and makes it difficult for many Americans to obtain mortgages [2] Group 1: Federal Reserve Policy - The Federal Reserve announced on July 30 that it would keep the federal funds rate target range unchanged at 4.25% to 4.50%, marking the fifth consecutive meeting with no change in rates [2] - Trump has repeatedly called for significant interest rate cuts and has suggested that Powell should resign [2] Group 2: Trump's Actions and Statements - Trump stated that there are "no signs of inflation" and that "all signals point to a significant rate cut" [2] - On August 13, Trump mentioned he would appoint a new Federal Reserve chairman ahead of schedule [2] - The White House confirmed that Trump is considering suing Powell over the rising costs of renovations at the Federal Reserve headquarters [2]

Group 1 - The total amount of gold futures at the Shanghai Futures Exchange is 36,345 kilograms, with no change from the previous day [1] - The main gold futures contract opened at 775.92 yuan per gram, with a high of 777.84 yuan and a low of 774.52 yuan, currently at 777.66 yuan, reflecting a 0.32% increase [1] - Trading volume for the day is 129,189 contracts, with open interest decreasing by 3,651 contracts to 194,004 contracts [1] Group 2 - Economic advisor Mark Summers from the Bush administration stated that a 4.3% federal funds rate is too high, indicating a potential for a 50 basis point rate cut [1] - Federal Reserve member Goolsbee expressed concerns over the latest PPI and CPI inflation data, suggesting that if signs of avoiding an inflation spiral appear in September or later, a rate cut could be possible [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve decided to maintain the federal funds rate target range at 4.25% to 4.5% during the July meeting, despite President Trump's calls for a rate cut [1]. Group 1: Federal Reserve's Decision - The Federal Reserve's decision disregarded President Trump's request for a rate cut, indicating significant internal divisions among its members [3]. - The members of the Federal Reserve generally fall into three camps regarding monetary policy: doves advocating for rate cuts and hawks opposing them [3]. Group 2: Internal Disagreements - It is not uncommon for different members to express varying opinions; however, statistical results show that it has been a long time since two or more members voted against each other in the same meeting [5][10]. - The occurrence of two members voting against each other in the same meeting is rare, with the last instance dating back to 1993 [14]. Group 3: Implications of the Vote - The two members who voted against the decision were both appointed by President Trump, highlighting potential political influences within the Federal Reserve [16]. - Following the meeting, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's tone shifted towards a more hawkish stance, leading to a decrease in market expectations for a rate cut in September from 65% to 40% [18]. - The internal complexities and uncertainties within the Federal Reserve have emerged as significant challenges [20].

当地时间7月30日，美联储结束为期两天的货币政策会议后，宣布将联邦基金利率目标区间维持在。这虽然和美国总统特朗普长期以来的降息要求背道而 驰，但符合市场的基本预期。 然而值得注意的是，在本次美联储会议上，首次有2名理事在利率决议中投反对票，这是1993年以来首次有两名美联储理事在会议中投下反对票。 对此，美国彭博社在8月4日发布了一篇纽约联邦储备银行前行长（美联储三号人物）、现任瑞士银行非执行董事、比尔·达德利的文章称：两位理事的反对 不会影响到美联储的政策和履职；而这两位理事之所以投下反对票，是因为一位"要报恩"，一位"想上位"。 比尔·达德利彭博社 达德利认为，尽管特朗普在过去的很长一段时间中都不断通过媒体等方式向美联储主席鲍威尔施加压力，要求美联储降息，但"特朗普对鲍威尔几乎没有影 响力"。根据美国最高法院的规定，除非"有正当理由"，否则美联储主席不能被直接解职，而特朗普提不出这样的理由，并且鲍威尔卸任后也可能继续担任 美联储理事。因此，美联储的控制权被牢牢地控制在鲍威尔手中。 此前包括彭博社在内的多家媒体都在报道中强调，这是"1993年以来首次有两名美联储理事在会议中投下反对票"。达德利也同意，一般在 ...