厄瓜多尔学者 伊斯梅尔·维拉克雷斯：在我看来，日本新任首相的言论对地区和平构成威胁，煽动不稳定。这种不稳定可能在多个方面显现。 针对日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论，国际人士表示，此举对地区和平构成威胁，加剧地区紧张局势。 德国《青年世界报》主编 尼克·布劳恩斯：我认为这样的言论在当前局势下极其危险，日本首相不但没有运用外交手段解决或遏制冲突，反而用她的言论进 一步加剧了潜在的冲突风险。日本对历史完全缺乏批判态度，当年作为一个残暴的军国主义国家，侵略并企图征服其他国家和民族，而如今的日本竟然毫无 批判地继承了这一传统。 德国智库席勒研究所主席兼创始人 拉鲁什：（高市早苗的）做法显示出日本企图重回军国主义之路，我认为日本正在出现一种趋势，而这种趋势确实根植 于之前的侵略，我对此感到非常担忧。 ...

Core Points - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan suggest a potential military intervention, which has been met with stern objections from China [1][2] - The comments are seen as a serious challenge to China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, violating international principles and agreements [1][2] - The remarks have sparked widespread criticism within Japan, indicating a disconnect between the government and public sentiment [3][4] Group 1: Provocation and Sovereignty - Kishi Nobuo's statements represent the first time a Japanese leader has linked Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense, signaling a dangerous ambition for military involvement [1] - The remarks challenge China's sovereignty as established by historical documents and international resolutions, emphasizing that Taiwan is a core interest of China [1][2] Group 2: Historical Context and Public Reaction - The year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's liberation, highlighting the historical grievances against Japan's past actions [2] - There is significant domestic backlash in Japan, with public protests against Kishi Nobuo's comments, reflecting a strong sentiment against militaristic rhetoric [3][4] Group 3: International Relations and Stability - Kishi Nobuo's comments threaten regional peace and stability, drawing condemnation from various international figures and organizations [4] - The remarks undermine Japan's post-war international standing and could lead to Japan's isolation on the global stage due to perceived unreliability in foreign policy [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The recent provocative remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have escalated tensions, suggesting potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which has been met with strong opposition from China [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Provocation and Sovereignty - Takaichi's statements are seen as a serious provocation against China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, marking the first time a Japanese leader has linked Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense [1]. - The remarks contradict established international agreements that affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and National Sentiment - This year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the recovery of Taiwan, highlighting the historical grievances stemming from Japan's colonial rule over Taiwan [2]. - Takaichi's comments are viewed as an affront to the collective memory of the suffering caused by Japan's wartime actions, which included significant atrocities against Chinese and Asian peoples [2]. Group 3: Military Expansion and International Relations - Takaichi's linkage of Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense is perceived as a pretext for military expansion, raising concerns about a resurgence of militarism in Japan [2][3]. - The remarks have drawn widespread criticism within Japan, with public protests indicating a significant portion of the population opposes Takaichi's stance [3]. Group 4: International Order and Legal Principles - Takaichi's statements challenge the post-World War II international order and Japan's pacifist constitution, which restricts military actions [3][4]. - The inconsistency in Japan's foreign policy regarding Taiwan undermines its credibility on the international stage, potentially isolating Japan diplomatically [3][4]. Group 5: Regional Stability and Global Reactions - The assertion that "Taiwan's issues are Japan's issues" poses a threat to regional peace and stability, with international figures expressing concern over the implications of Takaichi's remarks [4]. - The potential for Japan to become a destabilizing factor in the region is highlighted by reactions from other countries, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its historical actions [4].

25日，日本政府内阁决议通过答辩书，称高市关于"台湾有事"可能构成"存亡危机事态"的国会答辩"不 改变日本政府的一贯立场"。日方所谓"一贯立场"的具体内容到底是什么？日方能不能完整公开地表述 这个"一贯立场"？日方一再重复所谓"立场未变"的概念，却始终没有触及问题实质。答辩书老调重弹， 看似在"找补"高市言论的恶劣影响，实则仍在为错误观点遮掩、背书，反复变奏"台湾有事就是日本有 事"等谬论。这种只提概念回避实质的政治伎俩，对中方关于收回错误言论的正当要求刻意闪躲、企图 蒙混过关，让人不得不质疑，日方到底包藏着什么样的心思？ 日本常驻联合国代表还致函联合国，称"日本政府防卫的基本方针是专守防卫这一被动防卫战略"。这不 过是日方欲盖弥彰的谎言。事实胜于雄辩。日本政府近年来在军事安全领域的一系列动作，早已将"专 守防卫"原则这一"和平宪法"的核心要义架空虚化。近期日方一系列危险举动，包括对武器出口"松 绑"后首次出口杀伤性武器、自民党启动讨论修订"安保三文件"、将在与中国台湾邻近的西南诸岛部署 进攻性武器等，更进一步暴露其突破"和平宪法"束缚、挑战战后国际秩序的政治图谋，让所谓"被动防 卫战略"的说辞显得苍白无力， ...

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan have drawn significant criticism from various sectors, highlighting the potential dangers of Japan's right-wing movements and their implications for regional stability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's comments in the Diet signal a dangerous shift in Japan's political stance, suggesting a willingness to intervene militarily in Taiwan issues, which China has condemned as crossing a red line [1]. - The remarks are seen as part of a broader trend among Japanese right-wing factions aiming to break free from Japan's pacifist constitution and revive militaristic sentiments [1][3]. Group 2: Historical Background - Takaichi has a history of extreme right-wing actions, including questioning Japan's acknowledgment of its wartime actions and advocating for a revisionist narrative regarding Japan's colonial past [2]. - Her political career is marked by controversial actions, such as visiting the Yasukuni Shrine and denying historical atrocities like the Nanjing Massacre [2][3]. Group 3: Military Developments - Japan's Defense Minister recently announced plans to deploy medium-range air defense missiles in the Ryukyu Islands, which are strategically close to Taiwan, indicating a military buildup in the region [4]. - The Japanese Self-Defense Forces have developed operational plans for potential conflicts in the Taiwan Strait, revealing a clear military strategy that aligns with Takaichi's rhetoric [4][5]. Group 4: Regional Implications - The rhetoric surrounding "Taiwan's situation" is viewed as a pretext for Japan's right-wing factions to expand military capabilities and move away from post-war defense principles [5]. - Japan's increasing military budget and discussions around revising its nuclear policies have raised alarms both domestically and internationally, suggesting a shift towards more aggressive military posturing [5].

Core Viewpoint - Japan is attempting to break free from the constraints of international law as a defeated nation in World War II, leading to a potential resurgence of militarism, which poses a serious threat to peace and stability in Asia and the world [1][3][4] Summary by Sections Japan's Recent Actions - Japan has made several provocative moves, including the first export of lethal weapons since easing restrictions in 2023, discussions within the ruling party to revise security documents, and plans to deploy offensive weapons on islands near Taiwan [1][3] International Legal Obligations - International documents such as the UN Charter, the Potsdam Declaration, and Japan's surrender documents clearly outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, including disarmament and restrictions on military capabilities [2][3] Domestic and International Reactions - There is growing concern from both domestic and international communities regarding Japan's shift away from its post-war pacifism, with criticism from scholars, media, and public protests against the government's militaristic rhetoric [3][4] Historical Context and Responsibilities - The historical context emphasizes the importance of acknowledging past mistakes to prevent future conflicts, urging Japan to adhere to international law and its own pacifist constitution to build trust with neighboring countries and the international community [4]

这绝非一时失言，而是其极右面目的彻底暴露。高市从政以来，极右争议就从未断绝。她与宣传纳粹思想的人合影，为美化希 特勒的书籍作序，种种行径，罔顾历史事实与人类良知，是对二战受害者的公然亵渎。高市之流表面高喊"存亡危机"，暗地里 早已把军国主义的獠牙，磨得锃亮。 高市早苗的政治思想与行为轨迹，既深扎日本极右土壤，又不断延伸向周边海域，如同毒章鱼触须，四处横生。对于这般肆意 污染地区安全环境的行径，国际社会必须保持高度警惕并予以坚决反制，共同维护得来不易的和平局面。 近日，日本首相高市早苗公开宣称"台湾有事"可能构成日本的"存亡危机事态"，并提及拟修改"无核三原则"。其狼子野心，昭然 若揭。 责编：张靖雯、陈亚楠 ...

警惕高市复刻危险的历史剧本 新华社记者叶书宏 回首过去，日本走向战争的一个显著特征，便是当权政客对危机的"刻意制造"与"扩大利用"。无论是 1931年的九一八事变，还是1937年的卢沟桥事变，日本军部与激进政客都是一个套路：人为制造外部紧 张局势，从而压制国内反战声音。今天日本右翼正在复制这一剧本。高市早苗等人不断渲染夸大"中国 威胁"，高调宣称介入台海局势，本质上是一种"为了修宪而制造危机"的政治纵火，推动"预言的自我实 现"：通过露骨挑衅恶化周边环境，反过来宣称"和平宪法已失效"，从而为扩军修宪铺平道路。 军国主义的老剧本反复搬演。1941年，日本偷袭珍珠港，发动太平洋战争，也是强调面临美国经济封 锁，国家面临"生存危机"。这种将侵略包装成"打破绝境"的叙事，成为其发动战争的一贯伎俩。而今， 高市早苗等人的政治话术正在复刻这一话术。 历史告诉我们，战争不是一夜之间爆发的，而往往始于对"危机"的刻意制造和对"生存空间"的无限夸 大。昔日，"满蒙生命线"的谎言将日本拖入了罪恶的深渊；今日，"台湾有事"的叫嚣正试图拆除日本战 后和平繁荣的防波堤。 这是历史幽灵的重现。当一些势力开始用外部威胁掩盖内部矛盾，当"先 ...

出格言论背后的危险触手｜新漫评 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：徐世明 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 近日，日本首相高市早苗公开宣称"台湾有事"可能构成日本的"存亡危机事态"，并提及拟修改"无核三原则"。其狼子野心，昭然 若揭。 这绝非一时失言，而是其极右面目的彻底暴露。高市从政以来，极右争议就从未断绝。她与宣传纳粹思想的人合影，为美化希 特勒的书籍作序，种种行径，罔顾历史事实与人类良知，是对二战受害者的公然亵渎。高市之流表面高喊"存亡危机"，暗地里 早已把军国主义的獠牙，磨得锃亮。 高市早苗的政治思想与行为轨迹，既深扎日本极右土壤，又不断延伸向周边海域，如同毒章鱼触须，四处横生。对于这般肆意 污染地区安全环境的行径，国际社会必须保持高度警惕并予以坚决反制，共同维护得来不易的和平局面。 ...

来源：中国军网-解放军报 撰文： 宝川 原文： 军国主义余毒未除才是"日本有事" 如何解决台湾问题，完全是中国人自己的事，不关日本的事。台湾光复是二战胜利成果，是战后国际秩 序的重要组成部分。《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》等国际法律文件，都明确了中国对台湾的主权。台湾 问题纯属中国内政，一个中国原则是国际社会普遍共识。采取何种方式解决台湾问题、实现中国完全统 一，完全是中国人自己的事。任何人都没有资格说三道四，负有历史罪责的日本更应谨言慎行。 历史与现实充分证明，军国主义余毒未除才是真正的"日本有事"。从发动侵华战争造成超3500万中国军 民伤亡，到袭击珍珠港引发太平洋战争，日本军国主义不仅给世界人民造成深重灾难，也把本国拖入战 争泥潭，使日本成为唯一遭受原子弹轰炸的国家。日本军国主义军事扩张史，也是回旋镖不断刺向自身 的毁灭史。如今，日本右翼政客逆国际大势而动，不仅在历史问题上大开倒车，还冒天下之大不韪借台 湾生事，更大幅提升防卫预算、发展远程攻击能力、试图修改"无核三原则"，大有复军国主义亡魂之 势。对于这一动向，国际社会必须始终保持高度警惕。 中国人民和人民军队不信邪也不怕邪，不惹事也不怕事。如果高市早苗等 ...